Documents

Brief in Opposition — Silber v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition · 1962

. ---- 19, 20, 24 Tileston v. Ullman, 318 U.S. 44__._-.-.------ 16, 7 Ullmann v. United States, 350 U.S. 422____-- . Uphaus v. Wyman, 360 U.S. 72......------- 17 Wilkinson v. … United States, 365 U.S. 399, and Braden v. United States, 365 U.S. 431. 2.

Petition — Kutas v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

United States, 422 F.2d 374 (1970), cert.denied, 399 U.S. 915, 90 S.Ct. 2219, 26 L.Ed.2d 573. … Szukhert, 375 U.S. 3ll, 84 S.ct. 411, 11 L.Ed.2d 354, 367-8 -24- (1964).

Reply Brief — Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001

On Ethics and Profes- sional Responsibility, Formal Op. 96-399 (1996) (“ABA 9 Op.”). … Br. at 24-26; NYSBA Br. at 7-8.

Opinion — Bloom v. Illinois (No. 52)

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1967

Almon, 24 LQ. Rev. 184, 266 (1908) ; The Summary Process to Punish Contempt, 25 L: Q. ® 6 "_ BLOOM v. ILLINOIS. … United States, 350 U.S. 399 (1956). BLOOM v. ILLINOIS. = 9 Dunn, 6 Wheat. 204, 227-228 (1821).

Petitioners Brief — Green v. County School Board of New Kent County

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1968

Martin, 375 U. 8. 399 Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell, 372 F. 2d 158 (10th Cir 1967) ee v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 ieviles a 50 Borders v. … Fla. ), January 24, 1967 ....: . 49n Briggs v. Elliot, 132 F. Supp. 776 (E. D. SC. 1955) . .28, 33 Brown v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donte Booker, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 15, 2017

(See Case No. 1:13CR-00050, DN #: 51, at 310-,- ¶ 22-24);(DN #: 51, at 311, ¶ 14-24);(DN #: 51 at 312, ¶ 1-12);(see also Exhibit B). … (DN: 51,at 311, ¶ 22-24). TRIAL COUNSEL: "Why didn't you at that point in time just not go?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Owens v. Steele (No. 09-130)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Guida, 549 F3d 399 (6th Cir. 2008) ................ 8 State v. Kelly, ye Eee 9, 10 United States v. Bagley, Sie a oa eas swe cscs cecee 18 United States v. … App. 24. 18. The majority opinion also suggests that Ms.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Peterson v. Stafford

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

et Vv. , 490 N.W.2d at 423- 24 quoting Gustafson v. Holm, 232 Minn. at 1265-27, 44 N.W.2d at 447. … Anderson v Martin, 375 U.S. 399, 84 S.Ct. at 456 (1964).

Reply Brief — Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000

On Ethics and Profes- sional Responsibility, Formal Op. 96-399 (1996) (“ABA 9 Op.”). … Br. at 24-26; NYSBA Br. at 7-8.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Brenda Evers Andrew, Petitioner v. Tamika White, Warden

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 22, 2024

Rev. 399 (2019) ........... 5 Farr, Defeminizing and Dehumanizing Female Murderers: Depictions of Lesbians on Death Row, 11 Women & Crim. … Rev. 399, 405 (2019) (“gatekeepers unjustly discount women’s personal trustworthiness, based on inaccurate interpretations of survivors’ courtroom demeanor, as well as negative cultural stereotypes about

Opposition Brief — Kiernan Wholean, et al., Petitioners v. CSEA SEIU Local 2001, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Feb 22, 2021

Pet. at 24. … Ass’n, 399 F. Supp. 3d 361 (W.D. Pa. 2019), aff’d, 972 F.3d 262 (3d Cir. 2020); Ogle v. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Ass’n, 397 F. Supp. 3d 1076 (S.D.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Union Railroad v. Imm (No. 249)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1961

United States, 354 U.S. 394, 399 (1957) .. Commiasioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U.S. ee og Se dy a's dé wicea 8-6 » First Employer's Liability Case, 207 U.S. 463 (1908) Healy v. … S. 394, 399 '1957:; Commissioner of In- ternal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U. S. 87, 94 (1939).

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Petrelli v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1942

Proof failed to show possession in petitioner.. 24 V. No proper proof of market value of jewelry I Sea Shake saws a abee ted cay ade 23 VI. … S., 24 F. (2nd) 399......---..eee eee es 10, 18 D’Allessandro v. U. S., 90 F. (2nd) 640........... 6, 10, 138 Forte v. U. S., 94 F. (2nd) 286.............02eeee- 10, 16 Husten v. U.

Jurisdictional Statement — Roe v. Wade

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1973

at 28a), and on July 24, 1970, by Appellant Jane Roe (App. at 21a). … Supp. 1032 (D.D.C. 1969), ques. of juris. postponed to merits, 397 U.S. 1061, further juris. questions propounded, 399 U.S. 923 (1970) ; California v. Belous, 71 Cal. 24 ——, 458 P.2d 194, 80 Cal.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — California v. Foreman

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Louisiana (1970) 399 U.S. 30, 33 [26 L.Ed.2d 409, 413, 90 S.Ct. 1969). LE The People rely upon language in People v. … Maroney (1959) 399 U.S. 42 [26 L.Ed.2d 419, 90 S.Ct. 1975]; or involve the hot pursuit of a fleeing felon as in Warden v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wyoming v. Houghton

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

.-++++55 17 BG RR aan Seer ewok ee eo ew ee 21 Ee POPC OE CELE ETS ae Ree. 24 (iii) iV TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U. S. 753, 61 L. … Maroney, 399 U. S. 42, 44 (1970) (instruments and fruits of armed robbery, namely guns and money).

Brief for the Appellee — Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Beaver County

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Appellee · 1946

S. 399, M0 0, ULS. ex rel.T. V. A. v. Powelson, ‘319 U. … Pelzer, 312 U.S 399, 402-3. ° National ‘Labor Relations Boaz v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Adem Albra, Petitioner v. Board of Trustees of Miami Dade College, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2018

Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, 626, 67 L.Ed. 1042(1923) .............36 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 426,491; 86 S. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, 626, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923).

Opposition Brief — O'Brien v. O'Laughlin (No. 09-484)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009

Vol. 9:119). 24. … See Petition, page 24; O'Laughlin II/ at 302.

Motion to affirm — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion to affirm · Oct 20, 2025

Perry (“LULAC”), 548 U.S. 399, 433 (2006). The district court’s reasoning is fully consistent with Milligan. C. … Callais, Nos. 24-109 & 24-110 (Sept. 24, 2025) [hereinafter “U.S. Br.”]. The United States’s approach is wrong for three reasons.