Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Foreign Service Assn. v. Garfinkel

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Elimination of “Classifiable’’ From the Form Agree- ments Moots the Controversy About That Term During a fourteen-month period beginning in August, 1987, executive officials, litigants, the Congress … This would act to stop the whistleblower.’

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

United States, 487 U.S. 99, 110 (1988) (“Artificial entities such as corporations may act only through their agents”): CFTC v. … Yet allegations of discrimination in the air—like “Ipjroof of negligence in the air’”-——will not do” (Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R., 162 N.E. 99, 99 (N.Y. 1928) (Cardozo, J.)

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 13, 2024

Fairness in Women’s Sports Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 W. Va. … Johns Cnty., 57 F.4th 791, 814 7 (11th Cir. 2022) (cleaned up); see Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Hunt, 139 S. Ct. 1507, 1512 (2019); Reno v. Bossier Parish Sch.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Frank Thompson, Petitioner v. Carl Wilson, Commissioner, Maine Department of Marine Resources

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 16, 2026

These include, for example, Clean Water Act permitting requirements under which a farmer may face enormous penalties for normal farming activities,2 farm labor laws under which agencies seek to facilitate … Maine cannot escape Silverman’s rule by observing that its GPS device is small, or that it transmits only periodically. 13 Size and frequency do not matter; physical invasion does.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Devillier, et al., Petitioners v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 17, 2023

San Diego, 450 U.S. 621 (1981) ............................................... 8 Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. … Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 267 (1946); and Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitburn v. Addis

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

2 approaches, and the Secretary invited comments from all interested parties concerning how best to reconcile the Act’s requirements that States make eligibility determina- tions based on AFDC standards … Reg. at 39,428 (noting existence of alternatives and soliciting comments); 58 Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

During the same period, seven Assembly Democrats mailed out 208,000 pieces, including those sent out by Murray. … “One undercover project doesn’t eradicate a type of crime, but it acts as a deterrent.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — John Ream, Petitioner v. Department of the Treasury, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2026

Spirits were used as cleaning agents. Id. Candidates handed out liquor to their supporters at the polls. … The surplus product, high tax and decline in demand, “kept the distilling business in a comparatively depressed condition after the speculative period following the war.” Id.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tesla, Inc., Petitioner v. Granite Vehicle Ventures LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2026

Like the Copyright Act and other parts of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) sets an express statutory deadline for filing a review petition when there is copending litigation. … conditions may also be imposed on the right to appeal.50 Private landlords could find that they are never allowed to increase rents;51 candidates for office that they can never use campaign funds to travel by air

Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall v. Sorrell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

This is exactly what Act 64 accomplishes. … When should the legal system modify the rules creating the market system to price goods— such as security, social stability, or clean air—that other market-based legal rules might not?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

Table 1: Nationwide Examples of Operating Transfer of Development Rights Programs Location | Purpose Transfer Activity/ | Source Comments Belmont, | Reduce or Six transfers as of | note | California … legislature Jersey Pinelands, | Preserve envi- | Transfers involv- | note 31 New ronmentally | ing 12,318 acres Jersey sensitive land New Preserve open | Municipal Land note 32 Jersey space Use Act

Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

At Norton Air Force Base, which borders San Bernardino, California. … Legis Proceedings, supra, comments of Co-Chairman Richard Alatorre, page 120.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Food Mktg. Inst. v. Argus Leader Media, 139 S. Ct. 915 (2019) (No. 18-481)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

See, e.g., Stop Air France From Shipping Monkeys to Their Deaths! … , https://headlines.peta.org/air-france-stop- shipping-monkeys/ (“Air France even canceled an individual shipment of monkeys after a public outcry by PETA and its supporters.”). 15 (statement of Rae

Amicus Curiae Brief — Winston Tyler Hencely, Petitioner v. Fluor Corporation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2025

to troops was 1:100 – a dramatic change from previous wars.3 By 2003, the ratio of private contractors to U.S. military personnel in the Gulf had shrunk to roughly 1:10. 4 During the post-occupation periods … Midwest Air Traffic Control Serv., Inc., 8 F.4th 105, 129 (2d Cir. 2021). B. Reversal of the decision consistent with Boyle.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ivan Antonyuk, et al., Petitioners v. Steven G. James, In His Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of New York State Police, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 25, 2024

Whether the proper historical time period for ascertaining the Second Amendment’s original meaning is 1791, rather than 1868. 2. … One commentator even advocated that “state legislatures and state attorney generals should defy the Court’s decision in Bruen ….” David L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — All American Check Cashing, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 1, 2019

Ct. 2044, 2055 n. 5 (2018) (cleaned up) (explaining the considerations driving remedies in appointments-clause jurisprudence).7 II . … Second , any further delay in definitively resolving the issues presented in this case will prolong a period of regulatory confusion without appreciable benefit to this Court.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Andre Martello Barton, Petitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 3, 2019

And nothing in the history of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) or the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) indicates that Congress intended to discount the years … Presidential Statement on Signing the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act 1997, reprinted in 1 Legislative History of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997 P.L. 104-208, at 1937 (1997

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al., Petitioners v. Food and Drug Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 15, 2023

Ct. 2228, 2268 (2022) (cleaned up). … During the same period, chemical abortions “increased from 4.4% of total abortions in 2002 to 34.1% in 2015.” Id.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Connecticut, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 16, 2020

Dec. 6, 2019) ........................ 6 In re Air Cargo Shipping Servs. Antitrust Litig., 278 F.R.D. 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2010) ............................ 16 Burton Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. … California recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), a sweeping privacy law that echoes the EU’s GDPR and regulates companies’ use of personal data. CAL. CIV. CODE § 1798.175.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Illinois, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 10, 2025

Army, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the Air Force, or the Space Force . . . to execute the laws,” “except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.” … Second, the President’s determination that militia forces were necessary was not questioned by Congress, the courts, or contemporary commentators.