Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

7,792 results

0.20s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. New Jersey, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 29, 2025

    Bray, Multiple Chancellors, supra, at 423. … Hughes, 52 U.S. at 568.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

    It ignores the fact that the "well-founded fear" test of Section 101(a)(42) also applies to refugee admis- Sions under Section 207, see Stevic, 467 U.S. at 423 n.18, and adjustment of refugee status … The text of Section 208 could not be clearer, and this Court emphasized the point in Stevic. 467 U.S. at 423 n.18 ("Meeting the defini- tion of ‘refugee’ .. . does not entitle the alien to asylum

    480 U.S. 421
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Fred J. Eychaner, Petitioner v. City of Chicago, Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 13, 2021

    Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 119 (1940). … The court invoked “a strong theme of federalism, emphasizing the ‘great respect’ that we owe to state legislatures and state courts in discerning local public needs.” 545 U.S. at 482.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    United States, 423 U.S. 130 (1976) ............ 16 Brewer v. Ham, 876 F.2d 448 (5" Cir. 1989) .......... 1] Bea a. FE, SET CAR. … Ashcroft, 539 U.S. 461 (2003); Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996); Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 (1996); United States v. Hays, 515 U.S. 737 (1995); League of United Latin American Citizens v.

    546 U.S. 1074
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Jackson v. Perry (Nos. 05-276, 05-204, 05-254, 05-439)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    United States, 423 U.S. 130 (1976) ............ 16 Brewer v. Ham, 876 F.2d 448 (5" Cir. 1989) .......... 11 Bush v. … Ashcroft, 539 U.S. 461 (2003); Bush v. Vera, 517 U.S. 952 (1996); Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 (1996); United States v. Hays, 515 U.S. 737 (1995); League of United Latin American Citizens v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Quill Corp. v. North Dakota

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    Benjamin, 328 U.S. 408, 423 (1946) (Congressional au- thority over interstate commerce is “plenary” and “su- preme”’).*! … Benjamin, 328 U.S. 408, 423 (1946) (the power of Congress over interstate commerce is “plenary” and “supreme’’).

    504 U.S. 298
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gabriel Olivier, Petitioner v. City of Brandon, Mississippi

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 17, 2025

    Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 (1997) .... 8 Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) ...... 2, 10 Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (1973) ... 3 Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521 (2011) ...... 8 Smith v. … Heck’s rule reflects Congress’s determination “that habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy for 10 state prisoners attacking the validity of the fact or length of their confinement.” 512 U.S. at 482 (

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

    Cl. 472, 482 (1941); McShain Co. v. United States, . 83 Ct. Cl. 405, 409 (1936). These. decisions all have in. … Moorman, 338 U.S, - 457 (1950) and United States v.

    406 U.S. 1
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Endowment for Arts v. Finley

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Discovery Network, Inc., 507 U.S. 410, 423-24 n.19 (1993). … See generally Janson, supra note 6, at 482-496. 21 that lends itself naturally to embellishment and per- fection.*!

    524 U.S. 569
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Richards v. Terrazas

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    Tawes, BIT Ustdse BOS CAGE) oc ccccccesccccecrccecccesccsecesesececs 43, 46 rr ee oi, BO FASB) oc cccccvecesvccsvecseses 41 eee 0, mew LOER, 423 UU... 345, (1I9TS) ccccccccsevsccsece oeevece as Be … sec. 482(b) to set aside an election of officers of the United Mine Workers.

    502 U.S. 1084
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'n v. Byrd, 139 S. Ct. 52 (2018) (No. 18-96)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    Dias, 468 U.S. 263 (1984). ” North Dakota v. U.S. 495 U.S. 423 (1990). ™ Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460, 466 (2005). c %6 2. Bacchus, North Dakota, and Granholm. In Bacchus Imports, Lid. v. … U.S., 495 U.S. 423 (1990), the Court, in a plurality opinion, reaffirmed that states have “virtually complete control” over “the importation and sale of liquor and the structure of liquor distribution

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — North Carolina v. Jackson

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (1983) INS v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210 (1984) Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567 (1988) Miranda vy. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Mosely v. … In that case, a state highway patrolman forced the motorist to stop his vehicle upon observing it weave in and out of its lane of traffic. 468 U.S. at 423.

    525 U.S. 943
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Baker v. General Motors Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Estin, 334 U.S. 541, 546 (1948). … Corp., 456 U.S. 461, 482-83 (1982) Thus, the Full Faith and Credit obligation has always been understood to be “subject to the requirements of due process Marrese v.

    522 U.S. 222
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections v. Yeskey

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 482 (1995). … /d., at 482-483. The management of state prisons is a core function of state government.

    524 U.S. 206
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — E.M.D. Sales, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Faustino Sanchez Carrera, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 19, 2024

    Testifying before the U.S. … Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 423 (1979). In these cases, “[t]he litigants thus share the risk of error in roughly equal fashion.” Id.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

    Ch. 120, 482 et seq. (1971) .. … -Stat. ch. 120, §482 et seq.

    410 U.S. 356
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — NACCO Industries, Inc. v. Tracy

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Illinois Department of Revenue, 482 U.S. 182 (1987). … denied, 506 U.S. 1054 (1993).

    522 U.S. 1091
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Allender v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

    Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656 (1989) 11,13 New Jersey v. T.L.0., 469 U.S. 325 (1985) ......s.sssesessseseeees 8 New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987) 29 New York v. … Burger, 482 U.S. 691, 702-703 (1987) (ad- ministrative search must “further” a “‘substantial’ government in- terest” and must be “carefully limited in time, place, and scope”); Colorado v.

    528 U.S. 873
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — E. D., a Minor, By Her Parent and Next Friend, Lisa Duell, et al., Petitioners v. Noblesville School District, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2026

    Sayreville Bd. of Educ., 333 F.3d 417, 423 (3d Cir. 2003) (recognizing “that a school’s authority to control student speech in an elementary school setting is undoubtedly greater than in a high school … B.L., 594 U.S. at 190.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamling v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

    Richard D., —— U.S. ——, 35 L.Ed.2d 25 536 (1973) 25 Literature Inc. v. Quinn, 482 F.2d 372 (ist Cir. 1973) ..... 27 28 27 Long Island Vietnam Moratorium Committee v. … Quinn, 482 F.2d 372 (1st Cir. 1973); Hamar Theatres Inc, v. Cryan, 365 F. Supp. 1312 (D. N.J. 1973) (three-judge court), juris. statement filed, 42 U.S.

    414 U.S. 1143

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.