Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Treasury v. Fabe

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

The United States, however, grossly mischarac- terizes liquidation as a clean-up operation that occurs only after an insurer is no longer conducting the “business of insurance.” … Provided, That after June 30, 1948, the Act of July 2, 1890, as amended, known as the Sherman Act, and the Act of October 15, 1914, as amended, known as the Clay- ton Act, and the Act of September 26

Amicus Curiae Brief — Food and Drug Administration, et al., Petitioners v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 30, 2024

As Secretary of the Air Force, she led efforts to increase percentages of women and diverse candidates in applicant pools, to open more Air Force roles to women, and to extend the Post-Pregnancy Deployment … The morning of my appointment, I learned that Georgia had a three-day “cooling off” period, which meant that the first day was only to confirm the pregnancy.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) 6, 20 STATUTES: Hours of Service Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 61 ef seq. —...... 4 Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 151 ef seq. ......... 13 Federal Railroad Safety Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ … As is true of a handful of other industries (e.g., nuclear power, air traffic control, trucking, aviation), the threat to pub- lie safety posed by Hours of Service employees whose judgment or senses

Amicus Curiae Brief — Marek v. Chesny

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Employment —— om mission comes into play only when there is a plaintiff's verdict for less than the amount of the offer (see Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. … C., 81975 (Bank Holding Company Act); 15 U.S.C., 815 (Clayton Act); 18 U.S.C., §1964(c) (Organized Crime Control Act of 1970); 33 U.S.C., $1365(d) (Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act); 42 U.S.C

Amicus Curiae Brief — Patterson v. Shumate

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983); Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 (1983); Alessi v. … * Even Section 6(a) of the Uniform Exemptions Act does not permit levy on all assets of an ERISA-governed plan. See Comment 5 to § 6(a).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Reynaldo Gonzalez, et al., Petitioners v. Google LLC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2023

Section 230 like any other law should be periodically reexamined and updated when 24 circumstances change. … The Court is not made up of legislative draftsmen nor legislative custodians, cleaning up the messes and mistakes of legislators past. Any fixes to Section 230 must come from Congress.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Dba Cigna Corp. v. Calad

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

of 1947 FS en 16 Texas Health Care Liability Act (THCLA), Tex. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 90 (1983).

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Rifle Association of America, Petitioner v. Maria T. Vullo

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 11, 2024

The revolution against the Crown was not the only topic of controversy that generated pamphlets in this period. … EPA, 566 U.S. 120, 130-31 (2012) (“there is no reason to think that the Clean Water Act was uniquely designed to enable the strongarming of regulated entities into ‘voluntary compliance.’”); Am.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Nobelman v. American Savings Bank

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

Thus, when “Congress amends the bankruptcy laws, it does not write ‘on a clean slate,’ ” Dewsnup, 112 S. … As early as 1934, when Congress passed the National Housing Act, Pub. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

In both Claiborne Hardware and the instant case the only evidence of violence refers to a few isolated acts of violence during a limited period in the long years under review. … See also Comments of [then Circuit Judge] Ruth Bader Ginsburg, New York University Law School, 1992.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Binance, et al., Petitioners v. JD Anderson, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2024

THE SECOND CIRCUIT’S DECISION IS AT ODDS WITH MORRISON’’S TEACHINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND EXCHANGE ACT ...................................... 19 II. … THE SECOND CIRCUIT’S DECISION IS AT ODDS WITH MORRISON’S TEACHINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND EXCHANGE ACT The Second Circuit’s holding in this case implicates the Securities Act of 1933

Amicus Curiae Brief — Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 3, 2024

Although the reporting was accurate, CBS retracted both stories, apologized on air, fired the reporter (award-winning Howard Smith), and settled the case for an undisclosed amount. Id. 120–25. … According to the Times’ Managing Editor, the paper’s bank accounts “were coming out ‘cleaned.’ This is an expensive business.” Edmondson, at 2.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Am. Legion v. Am. Humanist Ass'n, 139 S. Ct. 451 (2018) (No. 17-1717)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

memorial crosses, and Gettysburg is home to two more; and military awards often use the image of a cross to recognize service, such 3 the Army’s Distinguished Service Cross, the Navy Cross, the Air … And just as courts should not act as “supervisors and censors of religious speech” in the context of religious invocations, 134 S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Adkins v. Children's Hospital of DC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1923

Day Period. For the 16 hour period, 6 A. M. to 10 P. … Night Rest Period. For the 8 hour period 10 P. M. of one day to 6 A.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Askew v. American Waterways Operators, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

*The Water Quality Improvement Act of 1970, 33 U.S.C. 1161-1175, creates an exception to the Limitation of Liability Act with respect to recovery by the federal government for the costs of cleaning … But there are numerous kinds of equipment systems in various stages of de- velopment for this purpose, including inter alia the “dynamic keel” oil containment system,“ pneumatic barriers using air

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

However, Section 7(a)(2) is clear on its face that it applies to any action “carried out” by a federal agency, even when that action is pursuant to a statute, like the Clean Water Act, that was enacted … Rather, “public comments ... prompt{[ed] EPA to adopt” it. /d. at 296.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Padot v. Padot (No. 05-1076)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Members of the military services who have served for the requisite period may retire from active duty and receive retirement pay. 10 U.S.C. 3911 et seg. (Army); 10 U.S.C. 6321 et seg. … (Air Force).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (No. 08-1314)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

App. 1-27, and the Supreme Court of Cali forma demed discretionary review, 1d at 3l 1 ‘The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (Safety Act), now codified at 49 US © 30101 et seg, … The agen cy stated that no commenters had “presented any new data that would cause the agency to change its tentative conclusion,” enunciated in the L988 NPRM, that requir- ing Type 2 seatbelts in

Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller-Wohl Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & Industry

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

Act), 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 95 (1983).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Zimmian Tabb, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2020

(“There is no compelling reason to defer to a Guidelines comment that is harsher than the text.”); Havis, 907 F.3d at 451 (Thapar, J.) … Army Corps of Eng’rs, 531 U.S. 159, 174 n.8 (2001) (declining to consider the rule of lenity’s application to the Clean Water Act because the regulation at issue exceeded the agency’s statutory authority