Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

This certification includes periodic inspections of the laboratory and participation by the laboratory in a proficiency testing program. … See, [llinois Clinical Laboratory Act, sec 8-101.( Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 111 1/2, par. 628-101.). 8.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Goodman v. Georgia

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Supp. 2d 170, 180 (W.D.N.Y. 1999) (plaintiff “was regularly deprived use of his wheelchair for extended periods of time [and] . . . was unable to shower’); Candelaria v. Coughlin, 787 F. … No. 96-247, 94 Stat. 349) ..000000000.... 25 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 EES RL, 5 SSO aw Ow 25 Civil Rights Act of 1957, 42 U.

Amicus Curiae Brief — VBS Distribution, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Nutrivita Laboratories, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 24, 2020

In that same time period, district courts have cited the Federal Appendix in more than 10,000 decisions. … Rev. 1167, 1203 (1978) (explaining reasons why unpublished opinions evade review by courts and commentators alike).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Colorado Department of State, Petitioner v. Micheal Baca, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2019

took the opposite approach, forbidding Colorado from binding electors to their oath (or, it would seem, from imposing other sensible, non-textual qualifications such as residency, age, competency or a clean … criminal history) 28 Period dictionaries identify both broad and narrow accepted usages of the terms “elector,” “vote” and “ballot.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Defense v. American Civil Liberties Union, (2009) (No. 160)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Dep’t of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 360-61 (1976) (quoting S. Rep. No. 89- 813, at 3 (1965)). … “[T)]hese limited exemp- tions do not obscure the basic policy that disclo- sure, not secrecy, is the dominant objective of the Act,” Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Itel Containers Int'l Corp. v. Huddleston

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

.--00eeeeeeeee ee eeeeeees 28 CORICLRIBNOIE . ........o00svcceseccccnesenseeneneeee 30 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases Air France v. … Reg. 10242 (1990). —- 7 and imposed back taxes and penalties on Petitioner for failing to pay tax under Tennessee’s Retailers’ Sales Tax Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mobil Corp. v. Adkins

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Indeed, the West Virginia Supreme Court justified its action in promulgating and adopting Rule 26.01 by pointing to its perceived need to clean out the state courts’ dockets. See State ex rel. … Chief Justice Burger has also commented on the prejudicial effect of complex and lengthy jury presentations.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Burr

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Compagnie Nationale Air France, 78 F.3d 664, 667-668 (D.C. … carrier or foreign air carrier subject to that part, and (6) the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921 [7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.]

Amicus Curiae Brief — BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Jd. § 3, Comment 5. c. … Court, Congress does not write on a clean slate.

Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

The court found it “fairly transparent” that the Chapter was drafted “to skirt judicial holdings that forbid states to delay tender offers beyond the period required by the Williams Act” ®In corporations … Some commentators still seek burden on interstate commerce that outweighed any local benefits. 457 U.S. at 643-646.

Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

The court found it “fairly transparent” that the Chapter was drafted “to skirt judicial holdings that forbid states to delay tender offers beyond the period required by the Williams Act”’ ®In corporations … Some commentators still seek burden on interstate commerce that outweighed any local benefits. 457 U.S. at 648-646.

Amicus Curiae Brief — US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Air refused that request and placed Barnett in an extra short-term “limited duty” mailroom position. /d. at 50a-Sla. … All employee questions and comments are welcomed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sharp v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

Based on a variety of conditions, shoreline property can grow, shrink, or remain stable for periods of time. Borax Consolidated Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles, 296 U.S. 10, 11-18 (1935). … Water Act and Endangered Species Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Spire Missouri Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Defense Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 6, 2022

The American Gas Association (“AGA”) was founded in 1918 and represents more than 200 local energy companies that deliver clean natural gas throughout the United States. … FERC’s decisionmaking regarding such Certificates is subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 475 (2014) (No. 14-114)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

“The 1987 amendments to Clean Water Act required states to establish quantitative Water Quality Criteria for several dozen toxic pollutants .... … Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 124 S.Ct. 2427, 2445 (2014). F.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Accord (No. 07-806)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Polyacrylamide has numerous beneficial uses, including the cleaning of water used in coal processing operations. … Whether or not the Defendants, or any of them, acted in such a manner as to justify punitive damages. k.

Amicus Curiae Brief — US Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

Significantly, the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, as amended by the Chandler Act of 1938, under which Case v. … stated in Dewsnup that Congress does not “write ‘on a clean slate’ ” when it amends the bankruptcy laws, 112 S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Zenith Radio Corp., 618 F.2d 110, aff’g, GED FTI, TE aire sicicssintrceeecnctsiercerenerncn cneneoenstetee 10 Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330 -................... 16 Scott v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 105 & n.25 (1983); Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 451 U.S. 504, 522-523, (1981).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alabama v. Pope (No. 08-345)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Commentators estimate that thousands of or- ders in such cases remain enforceable and subject to ongoing jurisdiction. … If a city council, for example, considers seeking modification of a consent decree, those dis- cussions almost always will be aired at public meet- ings.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Nebraska, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022

The administration has relied on the HEROES Act to both execute the Debt Forgiveness Program—at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars—and to evade the normal notice-and-comment protections of the … Ct. at 2613 (cleaned up); see also Ala. Ass’n of Realtors v. HHS, 141 S.