Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Stuart R. Harrow, Petitioner v. Department of Defense
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 19, 2024
See Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act, Pub. L. … If such a minimal link were sufficient to make filing time periods jurisdictional and immutable, then all of the time periods in sections cross-referenced in Section 1295(a) would be jurisdictional (and
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sierra Club v. Morton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958)... 18 97 National Automatic Laundry & Cleaning Council v. Schultz, D.C. … This reluctance is evidently grounded in several considerations, each of which we believe worthy of brief comment.
405 U.S. 727Amicus Curiae Brief — Karyn D. Stanley, Petitioner v. City of Sanford, Florida
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2024
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983)............................................ 18 Weyer v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983).
Amicus Curiae Brief — American Gas Association, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Energy, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 23, 2026
Replacing an old gas furnace with a new heat pump costs more than simply buying a new version of the same gas furnace and air conditioner. Id. … Council & Nat'l Apartment Ass'n, Comment on Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Water Heaters, at 5–6 (Sept. 24, 2023).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2025
This Court has found Article III injury when constitutional claims are alleged—period. It has not ignored them to wait for a court order. … New York Times, 376 U.S. at 271 (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2019
Civil Rights Act of 1871, ch. 22, § 1, 17 Stat. 13. … This task, 8 however, is an act “of statutory construction.” Wood v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
In the 1960s, over-the-air broadcasters vehemently attacked cable operators for “ pirating” their broadcast signals. The Court's decision in Fortnightly Corp. v. … Comments of RIAA, Digital Audio Broad. Sys. & Their Impact on the at tee , FCC MM Dkt.
545 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 475 (2014) (No. 14-114)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
“The 1987 amendments to Clean Water Act required states to establish quantitative Water Quality Criteria for several dozen toxic pollutants .... … Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 124 S.Ct. 2427, 2445 (2014). F.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2026
Webb served as a Marine infantryman from 2005 to 2010, completing a combat tour in Iraq, and now reports and comments on war and foreign policy. … Virginia’s post-Independence militia act of 1785 specified private ownership of “a good, clean musket carrying an ounce ball, and three feet eight inches long in the barrel, with a good bayonet and iron
Amicus Curiae Brief — McCaffrey v. Oona ex rel. Kate S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Further, Congress last year unanimously passed the Air Carrier Access Act, (P.L. 99-435) to expressly prohibit discrimination against handicapped individuals by airlines. … some commenters did provide these comments.
526 U.S. 1154Amicus Curiae Brief — Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
17 Clean Water Act of 1977 § 404, 33 U.S.C. 1344... 21 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of ls te es Ie Oe I ccieicreececcnscctrecrereeres 21 fe Rs fe. | eee 17 EI ES a a 28 a eecieadeiualicbld … The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq., and the wetlands and other activities of the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977, 33 U.S.C
473 U.S. 172Amicus Curiae Brief — Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board of California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
The cost to reconstruct the necessary information for past periods would be ‘prohibitive’; the cost to set up and maintain systems to obtain the information for future periods would be so “huge” that … The Federal Aviation Act, in a section entitled “State taxation of air commerce,” expressly prohibited certain forms of state taxation and expressly authorized others.
506 U.S. 870Amicus Curiae Brief — Lee v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 30 (2016) (No. 15-1293)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
The PTO acts as regulator in registering trademarks, just like the government acts as regula- tor when it issues patents or registers copyrights. … The Lanham Act, just like the Copyright Act and Pa- tent Act, is not a grant or funding statute.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali Rehaif, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2019
. § 5861(d) ......................................................15 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(2)(A) ................14 Firearms Owners’ Protection Act, Pub. L. … Wilson, 133 F.3d 251, 261 (4th Cir. 1997) (interpreting prohibition in Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(2)(A), against “knowingly violating” other sections to require knowledge of each element constituting
Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Contractors Association, (5) National Insulation Con- tractors Association, (6) National Roofing Contractors Associa- tion, (7) Painting and Decorating Contractors of America, and (8) Sheet Metal and Air … The .67% of city contracts awarded to minority construction contractors in the 1978-83 period reveals nothing about either ra- cial discrimination in the construction industry in the Richmond area or
484 U.S. 1058Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
The Montana adjudication thus 2Seven actions were initiated in the United States District Court for the District of Montana over a four-year period which led to the Court of Appeals’ decision, Northern … In later dicta the court commented that, while it was ‘not so much concerned with the Bureau’s ultimate specifie decisions pertaining to administration of the Flat- head Irrigation Project, as | am
486 U.S. 1007Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 6, 2022
Hyneman, after conducting a thorough search of the writings of leading American political figures for the period 1760-1805, found that 34% of all quotations in the Framers’ writings came from the Bible … (Cleaned up). This reasoning in Smith, the "jurisdictional" portion, is sound and should be preserved.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Co., ee 18 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS: | TT TD 9 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. ee 4 air reccnenenseencsnunsssnscsesces 4 Postal Reorganization Act, Pub. L. … In claiming exemption from the Administrative Procedures Act, USPS does not comply with the Paper- work Reduction Act or the Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Act.
540 U.S. 736Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucky Stores, Inc. v. Holihan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
EEAC also filed extensive comments in response to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s Notice of Pro- posed Rulemaking on its substantive regulations imple- menting the employment provisions … In the next three month period, thirteen employees filed 51 complaints with Lucky regarding Holihan’s abusive be- havior.
520 U.S. 1162Amicus Curiae Brief — Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
And in Lockridge, 403 U.S. at 299, the Court observed, “[A]n ac- tion seeking damages for injury inflicted by a breach of a union’s duty of .air representation [is] judicially cognizable in any event … Commentators have differed on the extent to which union actions reducing a member’s employment opportunities constitute discipline for purposes of the Act.
493 U.S. 67
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.