Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hines v. California

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

(Appendix A at 24-27; 15 Cal.4th at 1030- 1032.) me Vil. REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT 1. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 428, 91 L.Ed.2d 335, 358, 106 S.Ct. 2595 (1986) (conc. opinion of O'Connor, J.).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sandchase Cody, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 24, 2021

Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ............................... 5 Collins v. Miller, 252 U.S. 364 (1920) ............... 8 Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. … Ave., S.E. #560 Washington, D.C. 20005 Washington, D.C. 20003 Counsel for Amici Curiae November 24, 2021 * Counsel of Record

H.R. 4508, the PROSPER Act: Proposed Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act

Congressional research report · CRS Report · Feb 22, 2018

— — — — — §399 C D 9,942 9,942 9,942 9,942 9,942 9,942 9,942 §371 C M 13,965 15,000 — — — — — §399 C D 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 §371 C M 4,655 … (D/M)b Historically Black Graduate Institutions §399 C D FY2017 Approp.

Opposition Brief — Aero Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1966

Stat. 136, 73 Stat. 519, 29 USC. 151, et fh Re a eR TSE ye cep RG RS ih capa a aac 24 ~. … | 268-269, 24-25; R. 262, 141; 269, 98-99).

Opposition Brief — Town of Rye v. Skinner

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

Like petitioners here (Pet. 24-25), some of the respondents in that case relied on Bow- man Transp., Inc. v. … Campbell, 399 F. Supp. 208 (D. Mass. 1975), aff’d, 536 F.2d 956 (1st Cir. 1976).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Arthrex, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 2, 2020

Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012).................................................... 11 Eli Lilly & Co. v. … See Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 24-25, 25 n.2, United States v. Image Processing Techs.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Timothy Rosin, Petitioner v. Kimberly Hill

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 29, 2025

Supp. 2d 399, 435-36 (D. Md. 2006). … Supp. 2d 399, 435-36 (D. Md. 2006).

Outer Continental Shelf, Central Gulf of Mexico, Oil and Gas Lease Sale 152Final

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 7, 1995

337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 347, 348, 349, 350, 355, 357, 358, 359, 362, 363, 365, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 384, 385, 386, 389, 393, 394, 395, 397, 398, 399 … 300, 301, 302, 305, 311, 312, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 333, 335, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 348, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 363, 365, 378, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 392 397, 398, 399

Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

Jd. at 399. … Jd. at 399-400.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tanco v. Haslam, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-562)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

See id. at 399. … DeBoer, 772 F.3d at 399.

Asylum Law and Female Genital Mutilation: Recent Developments

Congressional research report · CRS Report · Feb 15, 2008

Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 745 (4th Cir. 2006). 16 In re A-T-, 24 I. & N. … . § 208.13(b)(1). 37 In re A-T-, 24 I. & N.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Delo v. Lashley

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

Jd. at 399. … Dugger, 481 U.S. at 398-399.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Davena v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1952

Tr. p. 81, line 24 to p. 82, line 3). … United States, 174 F. (2d) 397, 399 (C.A. 8th).”’

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eric Drake, Petitioner v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 10, 2025

Eric Von Drake, Cause Numbers: F-22-76307 & F-24- 76901, 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), this case holds that a court lacking authority cannot deprive liberty. Wengerd v. Rinehart, 114 Wis. 2d 575, 338N.W.2d861 (Wis. Ct.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Oct 11, 1994

RP94-401-000, RP94-399-000, 001 and 002, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America CAG-9. Docket No. RP85-202-014, Trunkline Gas Company CAG-10. Docket Nos. … Omitted CAG-24. Omitted CAG-25. Docket No. GP90-7-000, Barbara T. Fasken CAG-26. Docket Nos. CP94-114-001 and CP94-694-001, Distrigas of Massachusetts CAG-27. Omitted CAG-28.

Opposition Brief for the United States — Webster v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief for the United States · 1971

most of these cars, inserting prices in the applications and bills of sale based on the retail value, although the actual ‘prices were often several thousand dollars below re- tail (Tr. 220-255, 399 … This is the limit established by Rule 24(b),, F.R.Crim.P., and the exercise of the court’s ° discretion in refusing to grant additional peremptory challenges was proper. United States v.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pfeifer v. Bell & Howell Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974

(m September 24. 19TS. Pfeifer filed a notice of appeal of the District Judge's Getober 29, 1973 order [sice!] with the Tta Cireuit Court of Appeals (page following 399, Petition).

Opposition Brief — Naim v. Naim

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1955

(See Opinion below, Statement as to Jurisdiction, Page 24.) ca 4 trary or without a reasonable relation to the purpose of the statute. … Meyer y, Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399. The appellee’s reasoning pre- supposes the validity of the purpose of the statute. Oyama v. California, 332 U. S. 633, 646.

Opposition — Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v. Craft

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

City of Eureka, 399 F. Supp. 64, 67-68 (D.Kan. 1975); Limuvel v. Southern Union Gas Co., 378 F. Supp. 964, 966-67 (W.D.Tex. 1974); Bronson v. … City of Chattanooga, 192 Tenn. 267, 241 S.W.24 291 (1951), and Jones v.

Opposition — Gibson v. Davis

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

reinstated because the notice of proposed removal had been insufficiently specific and had not included one of the reasons cited in the final Bureau decision ordering that petitioner be discharged (App. 18-24 … Testan; 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976); United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 (1941).