Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

4.38s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Nance, Petitioner v. Timothy C. Ward, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2022

    Ct. 1080 (2018) ............................................ 2 Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr. Fund v. … Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 388 (2007) (quoting Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Tr. Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of Cal., 522 U.S. 192, 201 (1997)).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

    The Massachusetts Supreme Court has held that the maintenance of a person in a persistent vegetative state for a period of years is intrusive treatment as a matter of law. … , mucous membranes moist and lips from cracking or blistering; keeping the bed linen clean and dry and otherwise maintaining patient hygiene and comfort.

    497 U.S. 261
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016) (No. 15-674)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

    The recent DAPA and DACA program have no comparable paper trail because they were created without using notice-and-comment rulemaking. … public notice-and-comment?

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    Vernado Air Circulation Sys., Inc., 122 S. Ct. 1889 (2002)... 23 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES -— continued Page Huntington Branch, NAACP v. … Consideration Of Citizen Comments Does Not Threaten Any First Amendment Rights.

    538 U.S. 188
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

    United Air Lines, Inc., 130 F.3d 893 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. granted, No. 97-1943 (U.S. Jan. 8, 1999) ooo ccccecccossesseecee 22, 30 Sweet v. … For 80 percent of the mo- nocular individuals studied, their loss of an eye had “no effect” on their normal activities after the adjustment period had ended, and for approximately two-thirds of those

    527 U.S. 555
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984

    Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963) _. aire 7 Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., 445 U.S. 308 (1980) ... sonanusisninsensivsteaponstjelsniaialliaaaa vin, 2 Wisconsin v. … It is the trade association for the prin- cipal national periodical distribniors engaged in the busi- ness of distributing or arranging for the distribution of paperback books and periodicals to wholesalers

    469 U.S. 813
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Midland Central Appraisal District v. BP America Production Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

    Tex-Air Helicopters, Ine., 970 S.W.2d SSO CLOR. UFGB).0sccciccccrnscsessnsessenns 19 Carson Petroleum Co. v. Vial, 279 U.S. 95 (1929) Champlain Realty Co. v. … ” * Federal circuits generally do not hear challenges to state ad valorem taxes because of the Tax Injunction Act. 28 U.S.C. §1341.

    563 U.S. 936
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

    Consistent with its actual apparent nineteenth century origin, one commentator has asserted that: * “. . . … Some of the States did grant some patents during this period, primarily by special legislative act. Particularly 56 See generally, Schwartz, supra, note 40, which quotes the full text of each. 5?

    416 U.S. 470
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

    PROCEDURAL DUE PROC- ITER wisiscovcucsirsinctnienenseicsenenssbinnine eensnaicabiaibanbetenia 11 CORI annccsneececessecnccccnvsseeess ‘sccheiiemenneenemnninennnne 20 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page Air … E.g., Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. O'Neill, 111 S.

    508 U.S. 602
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    The court found it “fairly transparent” that the Chapter was drafted “to skirt judicial holdings that forbid states to delay tender offers beyond the period required by the Williams Act”’ ®In corporations … Some commentators still seek burden on interstate commerce that outweighed any local benefits. 457 U.S. at 648-646.

    479 U.S. 810
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

    The court found it “fairly transparent” that the Chapter was drafted “to skirt judicial holdings that forbid states to delay tender offers beyond the period required by the Williams Act” ®In corporations … Some commentators still seek burden on interstate commerce that outweighed any local benefits. 457 U.S. at 643-646.

    481 U.S. 69
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Stars Interactive Holdings (IOM) Ltd., fka Amaya Group Holdings (IOM) Ltd., et al., Petitioners v. Kentucky, ex rel. J. Michael Brown, Secretary of the Governor's Executive Cabinet

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2021

    See Acts of 1798, Vol. I, Digest Stat. Laws of Ky., Title 87 § 3. … Id. at 4, 7 (cleaned up). The Kentucky Supreme Court’s decision highlights those concerns.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Kendra Espinoza, et al., Petitioners v. Montana Department of Revenue, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 13, 2019

    When they do so, they are acting ultra vires. Alexander Hamilton explained this in The Federalist No. 69, when he wrote that the government “has no particle of spiritual jurisdiction.” … Over a 10-year period, more than $139 million in taxpayer funds went to Milwaukee voucher schools that were ejected from the program for failing to meet basic requirements.15 The abuse is startling.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    Van Dusen Air, Inc., 622 F. Supp. 1216 (D. … completed within the twenty (20) business day period.

    479 U.S. 810
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Transcontinental Pipe Line Corp. v. State Oil & Gas Bd.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624 CITT ccctanensecsiscctnsceneesassnconenanitansnninnnteinnenmnnmestitiiont Exxon Corp. v. … Lockheed Air Ter- minal, 411 U.S. 624, 639 (1973).

    474 U.S. 409
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    Co., ee 18 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS: | TT TD 9 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. ee 4 air reccnenenseencsnunsssnscsesces 4 Postal Reorganization Act, Pub. L. … In claiming exemption from the Administrative Procedures Act, USPS does not comply with the Paper- work Reduction Act or the Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    540 U.S. 736
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United Behavioral Health, et al., Petitioners v. D. K., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 2, 2024

    NFL Plan Comment, supra, at 5. … Cir. 1978) (cleaned up)). The “notice-andcomment procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act” similarly were “designed to assure due deliberation,” improving substantive outcomes. Smiley v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Arlington v. Federal Communications Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013

    To allow for clear signals over a broad coverage area, that equipment often must be placed high in the air. … It requested public comments in 2008 and received hundreds of them, with “lilndustry commenters generally supportling] the Petition in all respects.” Pet. App. 79a.

    568 U.S. 1080
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gumport v. Sterling Press, Inc., 116 S. Ct. 1016 (1996) (No. 95-945)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996

    Dimension Financial Group, 474 U.S. 361 bE SER ee Ee FOR 6 In re Government Securities Corp. 972 F.2d 328 (llth Cir. 1992), cert. denied 507 U.S. ——, 122 L.Ed.2d 744 (1993) . 11 In re Gull Air, Inc … The Eighth Circuit arrived at the opposite conclusion, focusing only on comments of legislators to include title 28 in sec- tion 9 of the Rates Act at a time in the legislative process when section

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Zagorski v. Bell

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

    Zagorski’s capacity to think and act. See id. at 614-17; 620-21; 636-37; 640-41." … Exposure to extreme temperatures for even short periods can cause long-lasting physiological and psy chological harm.

    559 U.S. 1068

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.