Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Delta Air Lines, Inc.. ne Sn ae wig 24 Wolff v. South Colonie Cent. School Dist., S55 FUR. Tae GURROL SN. BBEE) ow ce ewdeescwcs en 7 Statutes and Regulations Americans with Disabilities Act. … The _ccompanying * The proposed version of this Interpretive Guidance was itself published for public comment and revised in accordance with the comments re- ceived, just like the underlying regulations

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lease Lights, Inc. v. Public Service Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

From 1969 to 1983, PSO’s market share swelled from 24% to nearly 65%, while the plaintiffs’ shares declined from nearly 24% to 13%, froin 13% to 5%, from 23% to 6% and from 9% to 8% over the same period … Preferred Communications and Bates extended immunity to the sovereign acts of state governments, their political subdivisions, or their regulatory agencies.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Defense Center, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 27, 2023

Ninth Circuit posited will become a reality unless and until an 3 For instance, a final rule setting the procedural requirements for all applications to the agency, conducted pursuant to notice and comment … See National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations Revisions, 87 Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver Cnty. Emps. Ret. Fund, 138 S. Ct. 440 (2017) (No. 15-1439)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

of discovery pending a motion to dismiss, 15 U.S.C. § 77z-1(b)(1), and a requirement that plaintiffs file certifications setting forth their transactions in the security at issue during the class period … As one commentator recognized, ‘a dcftedant to a weak claim may stand a chance of disposing of the lawsuit with a motion to dismiss under the Twombly/Iqbal standard ... .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Innovation Law Lab, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2020

Plaintiffs challenge not only the substantive merits under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101-1537 (“INA”), but also the MPP’s promulgation without notice-and-comment rulemaking under … rulemaking and for suspending the 30day grace period for a rule’s taking effect. 5 U.S.C. § 553(a)(1), (b)(B), (d)(3).

Amicus Curiae Brief — David Carson, as Parent and Next Friend of O. C., et al., Petitioners v. A. Pender Makin

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 29, 2021

In Milwaukee, Wisconsin, over a ten-year period, more than $139 million in taxpayer funds went to voucher schools that were kicked out of the program for failing to meet basic requirements. … Sarah Carr, Who cleans up problem choice schools?, MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL (Sept. 15, 2003), https://goo.gl/zoCc45.

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

They all concerned a single, time-barred act, not as in this case, a lengthy series of related acts, many of which were within the limitations period. ARGUMENT I. … So long as the employee files his charge within the limitations period following the last illegal act, the charge is timely.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Johnson v. Mayor of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

The BFOQ Exception Should Continue To Be Scrutinized On a Case-By-Case Basis... . » TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Page Air Line Pilots Ass'n Intl 0. … Comment, The Cost of Growing Old: Business Necessity and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 88 Yale L.J. 565 (1979) .....

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cory Ratzloff, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 3, 2023

C., 503 U.S. 291, 305 (1992) (cleaned up). … And it can only constitutionally issue these Guidelines “because they must pass two checks: congressional review and the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kate Adams, Petitioner v. Sacramento County, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 9, 2026

Grp., Inc., 529 U.S. 803 (2000) (successful challenge to “signal bleed” portion of Telecommunications Act). … (emphasis added) (cleaned up). The court further found that the images themselves were not a “subject of legitimate news interest.” Pet. App. 12a.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Isolation is demanded, absolutely, and the only thing we can promise to put into their lives is hu- mane segregation in the open air.” Id. at 96. … Senator Ball commented, “/i/f you are going to seg- regate that class of people to make them more content, you want a farm entirely separate.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Porter v. Nussle

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

or not act, e.g., a policy providing that an em- ployee should perform some act if it is ‘reasonably’ warranted by the circumstances.” … Gear; a clean-up of a flooded cell that re- ‘sulted in pinochle cards getting wet; and a search of a cell in which clean and dirty clothes were mixed together. 141 Cong. Rec. at 14 579 (Sen.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Vernado Air Circulation Sys., Inc., 122 S. Ct. 1889 (2002)... 23 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES -— continued Page Huntington Branch, NAACP v. … Consideration Of Citizen Comments Does Not Threaten Any First Amendment Rights.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jones v. RR Donnelley & Sons Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Section 1658(a)’s four-year period is clearly “suitable to carry [the Civil Rights Acts] into effect.” 42 U.S.C. 1988(a). … Four years provides a uniform and fair limitations period for Section 1981 claims created by the 1991 Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Applicants v. Missouri, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 20, 2023

Reading’s case, the police chief who acted as the cat’s paw for the military officials demanding censorship of Mrs. … (cleaned up). As in this case, the government officials in Reading v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 9, 2024

Reading’s case, the police chief who acted as the agent for the military officials demanding censorship of Mrs. … (cleaned up). As in this case, the government officials in Reading v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

Consistent with its actual apparent nineteenth century origin, one commentator has asserted that: * “. . . … Some of the States did grant some patents during this period, primarily by special legislative act. Particularly 56 See generally, Schwartz, supra, note 40, which quotes the full text of each. 5?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Troxel v. Granville

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

This limitation decreases judicial usurpation of parental decision-making and the harmful airing of family disputes. … Additionally, third party visitation statutes that are broadly applied open the door to the harmful airing of family discord.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Burt W. Newsome, et al., Petitioners v. Clark A. Cooper, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2021

Much more important, these agreements suppress complaints against police misconduct which should be thoroughly aired in a free society. … In some cases litigation will extend over a period of years.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Montanile v. Bd. of Trs. of the Nat'l Elevator Indus. Health Benefit Plan, 135 S. Ct. 1700 (2015) (No. 14-723)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Neither Pe- titioner nor its amici dispute that for the period of time that Mr. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983); Hamilton v. Air Jam., Ltd., 945 F.2d 74, 78 (3d Cir. 1991).