Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LLC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982), this Court reversed a First Circuit decision that entered an injunction after finding a violation of the Clean Water Act. … The Court ex- plained that “{a]n injunction [wa]s not the only means of en- suring compliance” with the Clean Water Act because the Act provided for fines and criminal penalties. /d. at 314.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gamble v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 582 (2018) (No. 17-646)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

This federal “back stop” policy is consistent with bedrock Federalism principles and sensibly provides local prosecutors “every opportunity to clean up their own shops.” Laurie L. … SHORT TITLE This Act may be cited as the “Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994 [18 U.S.C. § 248)”. SEC. 2.

Amicus Curiae Brief — John Sturgeon, Petitioner v. Bert Frost, in His Official Capacity as Alaska Regional Director of the National Park Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 14, 2018

Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. … Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2441-42 (2014).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations U. S. A., Ltd. v. Morts

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Stat. 666 ........ 13 Act of Feb. 26, 1845, ch. 20, 5 Stat. 726 7 Act of June 26, 1884, ch. 121, § 18, 23 Stat. 57-58 16 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1862(7) . * ce 18 Extension of Admiralty Act, 46 … Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121, 123 (1985) (holding that the Clean Water Act’s definition of “navigable waters,” 33 U.S.C. 1362(7)), includes not only those waters that are navigable in

Amicus Curiae Brief — Food Marketing Institute, Petitioner v. Argus Leader Media, dba Argus Leader

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 14, 2018

Circuit [in Public Citizen] refers two years later in what has become a widely-cited – if purely dicta – comment regarding reputational harm.” … Air France Cargo (Certificate 57-T0109) . . . .”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jiahao Kuang, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Defense, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 4, 2020

petitions on Air Force bases. … Department of the Air Force; former Governor of Wake Island

Amicus Curiae Brief — Monex Deposit Company, et al., Petitioners v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 19, 2020

In FCC, the FCC imposed a forfeiture order against 44 broadcast stations for airing an episode of television that purportedly violated the FCC’s indecency standards. … lengthy period” of “conspicuous inaction” against the conduct it now said was unlawful. 567 U.S. at 158–59.

Amicus Curiae Brief — South Carolina v. Katzenbach

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1965

‘I 1961 United States Commission on Civil Rights Report, 75. 16 Title III of the 1960 Act declared voting records public and required their preservation for a period of twenty. … Fair, supra, and comments in 73 Yale L.J. 90, 98.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

Garmon, 359 U.S. at 244-45. 8 limitations periods for violations of a contract are three or more years.” … ® This Court could. of course, adopt § 10(b) as the period of limitations for suits under ERISA.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Several years later, however, in Air Courier, the Court clarified that, in fact, a showing of intent to benefit the plaintiff is required. … There, the court held that §1981’s language “protects the right to enter into and preserve a contractual relationship, period.” Id. at 303.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Priscilla Villarreal, Petitioner v. Isidro R. Alaniz, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 5, 2025

The Fifth Circuit found qualified immunity because no case had “held that a time period so short [six days] violated the Constitution.” Taylor v. Stevens, 946 F.3d 211, 222 (5th Cir. 2019). … Maricopa Cnty., 693 F.3d 896, 917 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc) (cleaned up) (citations omitted); see also Pet.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969

;-Comment, 55 Colum. L. Rev. 907 (1955). … In the D’Aleman case the court, i in ruling that “the Death on the High Seas Act grants a right of action in admiralty for death caused by wrongful act, neglect or default occurring in the air space

Amicus Curiae Brief — McQueen v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Sometimes they will act almost immediately after the purchase. Bowles v. United States, 31 Fed. … Cl. 37 (1994)(purchase of a vacant lot for a retirement house and submission of an application for a § 404 permit under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344, in the same year).

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Whittier v. Walnut Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

It is ample to lay out zones where family values, youth values, and the biessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people.” Village of Belle Terre v. … And of course, the other side of the tence is that those that feel it’s all mght. or wish to particularly wish to view, or the act or an act Question.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 24, 2025

Bethune-Hill, 580 U.S. at 190 (cleaned up). … Id. at 181 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Linde Air Products Co., 336 US. 271, 275 (1949)). … of misconduct or acts targeted to financially vulnerable in- dividuals.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

The analogy to § 12 of the Nonintercourse Act drawn by Francis Wilson, who drafted the language, does not Suggest a waiver of restraints on alienation for post-enactment periods. … Had Congress understood § 17 to have that effect, it surely would have commented upon its relationship to the later statutes.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kathleen Uradnik, Petitioner v. Inter Faculty Organization, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2018

In addition, when an exclusive representative is certified, its status cannot be challenged “for a period of one year.” Id. at subd. 12. … The convention called upon the “Trump administration to drop its DACA [Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals] appeal in the courts” and resolved that Congress should pass a “clean DREAM Act” that creates

Amicus Curiae Brief — South Carolina State Ports Authority, et al., Petitioners v. National Labor Relations Board, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 30, 2023

Air Force, later joining the South Carolina Air National Guard and the U.S. Air Force Reserve. In 1992, Senator Graham won election as a member of the South Carolina State House. … In 2022, the annual wages in the state manufacturing sector were about 22.2% higher than the U.S. state average over the same period. See id. at 26 ($67,514 compared to $55,254).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

cases, come in many different forms, a case-by-case analysis is always necessary There can be no rigid requirement that plaintiffs introduce a separate ‘plus’ factor, such as a negative em- ployer comment … Air Line Pilots Ass’n Int'l v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 863 F.2d 891, 914 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (Mikva, J., dissent- ing from the denial of the suggestion to hear the case en banc).