Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.32s
Petitioners Reply Brief — Segura v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1984
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). … FABRICANT Dickstein & Fabricant 24 East 21st Street New York, New York 10010 Counsel for Petitioners
468 U.S. 796Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In Re James A. Wolfe, Petitioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 6, 2024
. $ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Civil No. 3:24-cv-21 JAMES A. WOLFE, ' (Judge Mariani) Plaintiff • FILED SCRANTON v. … Procedure 4(c)(3), the Clerk of Court is directed to SERVE a copy of the complaint (Doc. 1), notice of lawsuit and request to waive service of summons (form AO 398), waiver of the service of summons (form AO 399
Opposition Brief — United States Nat. Bank of Ore. v. Independent Ins. Agents of America, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Bank Act Section 92 passim 12 U.S.C. § 24 (Seventh) 2,11 N.M. Stat. … Agents, 399 F.2d 1010, 1016 (Sth Cir. 1968) ‘eMphasis in original).
508 U.S. 439Federal Register · Rule · Aug 5, 2022
If the annual limit is between 297-399 mt, the initial trip limit will 15 mt, and the trip limit will be reduced as follows: • January-June: If cumulative catch is within 220 mt of the annual limit, the … Under this final rule, e-tickets must be submitted within 24 hours if any Pacific bluefin tuna is included in a landing into California.
87 FR 47939Commerce DepartmentNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAgency decision · Agency decision
Memo. 2019-24 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KATHERINE DENISE HENRY, Petitioner, AND TIMMY H. BLACK, Intervenor v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20138-16. … On March 24, 2014, respondent sent petitioner and intervenor a "Notice CP2000" proposing a deficiency of $2,243 attributable to the unreported wage income from the church.
United States Tax CourtAmicus Curiae Brief — California v. Krivda
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
Moore, 35 Ml. 2d 399, 220 N.E. 2d 443 (1966) ii. Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)...........-.. li Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)... ...........- ee eee 7 Trask v. … Rev. 45 (1957)..............-05: 5 Plumb, ‘‘Illegal Enforcement of the Law,’’ 24 Cornell ee a | Ter!
409 U.S. 33Opposition — Griffith v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 243; United States v. Bristol, 473 F. 2d 439, 445 (C.A. 5). 4 3. … Ct. 754, 24 L. Ed. 2d 753 (1969) ; Bruce vs. U.S., 351 F. 2d 318, 5th Cir. (1965), Cert. den., 384 U.S. 921, 86 S. Ct. 1370, 16 L. Ed. 2d 441 (1966).
423 U.S. 926Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Sandberg v. New England Novelty Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1944
United States, 264 Fed. 399. In this connection the attention of the Court is directed to the principle that is established in the case of Erie Rail- road Co. v. … The petition for contempt was filed and an order of notice was issued thereon on October 24, 1941 (Record, page 34).
323 U.S. 740Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 11, 2019
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970). 5 Justices typically spoke unanimously.11 Only about 8% of cases included a dissenting opinion. … Id. at 534. 24 Republican Party of Minnesota, 536 U.S. at 777–78. 10 ought to be able to ensure that their cases are decided in an ideologically-balanced way.
Opposition Brief — New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department v. Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
After dismissing claims based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the District Court rendered summary judgment for Petitioner Taxation & Revenue Department on September 24, 1997. … These steps — from bid solicitation to delivery — were often accomplished the same day and almost always within 24 hours.
528 U.S. 928Brief for the United States in Opposition — Riggs v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1971
United States, 399 F. 24.93, certiorari . © denied, 393 U.S. 1025 __..... + Parker Vv. United States, 252 F. 2d 680, certiorari denied, 356 U.S. 964 - —_ “SEL ar 8 Remmer v. … Lennon, 246 F. 2d 24, — Gael, BT Te cp i es are. . United, States v. McGuire, 381 F. 2d OR re 8 United States v. Shavin, 287 F. 2d 647 _.- 8 ' United States v.
404 U.S. 823Appendix — Koran v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1971
United States, make a print of an obligation of the United States, to wit: a $5.00 Federal Reserve Note drawn on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Series 1950E, Check Letter “P,” Face Plate No. 399 … Whether the “Con- current sentence” doctrine enunciated in Hirabayashi has continiung validity in light of subsequent decisions will be argued before the Su- preme Court on March 24, 1969.
402 U.S. 948Motion to Dismiss Appeal — F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. Gerosa
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss Appeal · 1959
D. sales (fol. 323, Txp’s Exh. 24, p. 151). … (one document) showing, among other things, the number of units of each descrip- tion ordered by the distributer (fols. 101-104, 176, 186, Txp’s Exh. 24, p. 150).
358 U.S. 282Opposition Brief — Houston Byrd, Jr., Petitioner v. Christopher Cook, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jul 1, 2022
Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 90 S. Ct. 2117 (1970) ..................... 9 Warthman v. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, 297, 90 S. Ct. 2117 (1970).
Private Land Mobile Radio Services; 800 MHz Public Safety Interference Proceeding
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 28, 2005
.1625 13 .1750 14 .1875 15 .2000 16 .2125 17 .2250 18 .2375 19 .2500 20 .2625 21 .2750 22 .2875 23 .3000 24 … .1500 13 .1625 14 .1750 15 .1875 16 .2000 17 .2125 18 .2250 19 .2375 20 .2500 21 .2625 22 .2750 23 .2875 24
70 FR 56583Federal Communications CommissionBrief for the United States — Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1971
Martin, 375 U.S. 399 -......----.-----2 at Bowe Vv. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 416 F.2d 711 _..... ‘. Carrington Vv. … United States, 416 F.2d 980, 989 (C.A. 5), certiorari denied, February 24, 1970, No. 1015, this Term.
400 U.S. 542Motion to Dismiss — Holekamp v. Holekamp Lumber Co.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1961
. — pp. 364-399, elas one gt gt IER 2 Ae lS a ae a 4 (‘onstitution of Missouri, 1875 ......... ween neeneeone 9,-3- Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1899, Section 958 ....3, 10, 11 Revised Statutes of … W. 2d at §80-681, 683; Jurisdictional Statement, pp. 21-24, 28). ‘This finding of ee, power with respect to the charters of corpora- tions Sich as Holekamp is the very heart of the opinion.
366 U.S. 715Brief for the United States in Opposition — Riggs v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1971
United States, 399 F.2d 93, certiorari : denied, 393 U.S. 1025 : _* Parker v. United‘ States, 252 F. 2d 680, certiorari : denied, 356-U.S. 964 ___ ' Remmer v. United States, 347 U. … Lennon, 246 F. 2d 24, certiorari denied, 355 U.S. 886 * United States Vv. McGuire, 381 F. 2d 306 _ United States v. Shavin, 287 F. 2d 647 - United .States v.
404 U.S. 823Amicus Curiae Brief — Linda H. Lamone, et al., Appellants v. O. John Benisek, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 11, 2019
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970). 5 Justices typically spoke unanimously.11 Only about 8% of cases included a dissenting opinion. … Id. at 534. 24 Republican Party of Minnesota, 536 U.S. at 777–78. 10 ought to be able to ensure that their cases are decided in an ideologically-balanced way.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — David Allen Anderton, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 19, 2018
App. 28 Appendix D Order Denying Petition for Rehearing in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (September 24, 2018) . . . . . . . . . … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 402-403 (1966).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.