Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.40s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 11, 2023
(quoting Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324). … Ct. at 2609-10 (quoting MCI, 512 U.S. at 229, and Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 22, 2022
(quoting Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324). … Ct. at 2609-10 (quoting MCI, 512 U.S. at 229, and Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Flowers Foods, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Angelo Brock
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2026
Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 344 (2011) (cleaned up). In other words, the FAA focuses on honoring the intent of private parties, and not the public implications of their agreements. … United Air Lines, Inc., 250 F.3d 237, 241-242 (4th Cir. 2001).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977) and _ Western Air Lines v. Criswell, 472 U.S. 400 (1982). … Some of them harassed me, making jokes and cruel comments.
499 U.S. 187Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 27, 2018
PETER O’ROURKE, ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent. … And Justice Scalia stated that he would “restore the balance originally struck by the [Administrative Procedure Act] . . . by abandoning Auer and applying the Act notice-and-comment process – precisely
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 24, 2025
“Some Likelihood” of Success Is Insufficient, Especially for Enjoining an Act of a State Legislature. 1. … King, 567 U.S. 1301, 1303 (2012) (Roberts, C.J., in chambers) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
in Mexico may be picked up in southern Texas through over-the-air signal spillover (and through cable carriers that, without the consent of the broadcasters, carry such over-the- air signals). … in Mexico may be picked up in southern Texas through over-the-air signal spillover (and by cable carriers that, without the consent of the broadcasters, carry such over-the-air signals).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 5, 2023
So, too, here the State has chosen one and only one issue to comment on the position of the candidates. … Cook, 531 U.S. at 530-532 (Rehnquist, J., concurring) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 13, 2023
The BWN Act did not override the scope of the Agent Orange Act. … It is clear from the legislative history that the Agent Orange Act was meant to (i) remedy a lengthy period of Congressional paralysis concerning ailing Vietnam veterans and (ii) provide a universal solution
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 28, 2021
s law—and appears to have been a pointed comment that the dissenters should have found D.C.' … Id. at 864–65 (quoting Act of June 2, 1927, No. 373, § 3, 1927 Mich. Public Acts 887, 888 (repealed 1959); Act of Apr. 22, 1927, ch. 1052, §§ 1, 4, 1927 R.I.
Amicus Curiae Brief — The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC, Petitioner v. Michigan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2025
In 1988, South Carolina passed the Beachfront Management Act, which prohibited Lucas from building on his land. … (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 29, 2024
Abortion purveyors – Danco, the FDA, et al. – rely on ER doctors being available to clean up the mess while being lied to about causation. F. … Comstock Act Violated There is a reason the Comstock Act was passed.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Election Com'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Before the ink was dry on Section 203, which bans corporate expenditures of more than $10,000 to fund “electioneering communications’—broadcast, cable, or satellite ads, aired within a fixed period … See William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar act III, sc. ii.
551 U.S. 449Amicus Curiae Brief — Rumsfeld v. Padilla
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
See General Comment No. 29 para. 1. The British government recently derogated from: the ICCPR to pass the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act of 2001. … General Comment No. 29 para. 16.
542 U.S. 426Amicus Curiae Brief — Pledger v. Medlock
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Cable operators also receive fees from those who purchase time to air particular programming on cable systems. … ® Section 622(b) of the Cable Act, 47 U.S.C. § 542(b), provides that: “For any twelve-month period, the franchise fees paid by a cable operator with respect to any cable syste™ should not exceed five
498 U.S. 809Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Western Air Lines, Inc., 42 Cal.2d 621, 268 P.2d 723, apeal dismissed, 348 U.S. 859 RN Ee a Cee ean oO Le OS Tae 25 Pruneyard Shopping Center v. … A statement that any customer comments con- cerning the rate increase should be addressed to the Commission Clerk.
475 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 3, 2026
(cleaned up). -8compliance with its regulations, including that any applicant submission is not “being presented … to cause unnecessary delay,” in contravention of 37 C.F.R. § 11.18(b)(2)(i). … Some rules employ words requiring applicants to act “promptly,”14 to be “diligent,”15 act in “good faith,”16 13 Br. of SBTC, Addendum 2. 14 See 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.6(f)(1)(i); 1.8(b)(1); 1.10(c)(1), (d)(1)
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gundy v. United States (No. 17-6086)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Rev. 265, 307 (2001) (cleaned up). … When government acts in excess of lawful powers, that liberty is at stake.” Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211, 221—22 (2011) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cross v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
This fact is important, because generally speaking, the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of “[a]ny part of the [federal] Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws. … For example, and as pointed out by Petitioners, in the post-9/11 period, Guardsmen were detailed as security at airports nationwide.
541 U.S. 935Amicus Curiae Brief — Maine Community Health Options, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 6, 2019
For example, in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Congress enacted the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act “to preserve the continued viability of the United … States air transportation system from potentially ruinous tort liability in the wake of the attacks.”
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.