Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Friedrichs v. Cal. Teachers Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2933 (2015) (No. 14-915)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

He is a graduate of the Air Force Academy and has a Ph.D. from MIT. … PRI believes that free interaction among consumers, businesses, and voluntary associations is more effective than government action in providing good schools, quality health care, a clean environment

Amicus Curiae Brief — Goldstein v. California

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

The position of the De- partment of Justice on that issue was stated in its 18 comments on the recent sound recording amendment to the Copyright Act which provides statutory protection for sound recordings … of the Copyright Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Micrel, Inc. v. Linear Technology Corp

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

See, e.g., Patent Act of 1790, ch. 7, 1 Stat. 109; Patent Act of 1798, ch. 11, 1 Stat. 318; Patent Act of 1836, ch. 357, 5 Stat. 117; Patent Act of 1839, ch. 88, 5 Stat. 353; Patent Act of 1870, ch. … 230, 16 Stat. 198; Patent Act of 1939, ch. 451, 53 Stat. 1212; Patent Act of 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 792.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 21, 2023

And the former Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1994, 20 U.S.C. § 7114(d)(6) required schools receiving federal funds to have programs that “convey a clear and consistent message that … One email Flaherty sent to Facebook—containing government findings concerning COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on the site—includes his comment “Don’t read this as White House endorsement of these suggestions

Amicus Curiae Brief — Janus v. Am. Fed'n, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1466)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

Goer 'S CARE B Dia scx sccinecsvisccsicccévesdicacocobssoniinss 14 Every Student Succeeds Act, Pub. L. … These issues run the gamut from physical conditions that interfere with learning and compromise student safety (e.g., leaking roofs, heating and cooling issues, mold, asbestos, lead paint, indoor air

Amicus Curiae Brief — James LeBlanc, Petitioner v. Brian McNeal

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 8, 2024

Bormes, 568 U.S. 6, 14 (2012), the Court held that because the Fair Credit Reporting Act created a “detailed remedial scheme,” it precluded recourse to the Little Tucker Act. Id. at 15. … Texas, 601 U.S. 285, 292-93 (2024) (cleaned up). Yet how to calculate the correct detention period and ensure timely release are important questions of prison administration.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC, 136 S. Ct. 1824 (2016) (No. 15-927)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, BI Te Ge, Te GO once cnccscescccesesccscscececsececcecess 11 Whitman v. Am. Trucking Ass'ns, i Fk. | 12 1V Zenith Elecs. Corp. v. PDI Commun. … After-the-fact statements by commentators “are not a reliable indicator of what Congress intended when it passed the law, assuming extratextual sources are to any extent reliable for this purpose.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Yarnell v. Cuffley

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Keeping the roadsides clean is part of that function. … This case is about the right of the people—acting through their elected representatives-to engage in their own speech as a body politic.

Amicus Curiae Brief — D. A., a Minor, By and Through his Mother, B. A., et al., Petitioners v. Tri County Area Schools, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2026

Petitioners and politicians alike have used the phrase to express anger, dissatisfaction, or even humor—never a sexual act. … Every day, people choose to express themselves using clean(er) language in certain contexts instead of resorting to full swear words.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

For example, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.S.C. … Courts and commentators alike have advocated the use of periodic payment plans to secure the efficient, fair, and proper allocation of medical monitoring awards.” See, e.g., Herber v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Zubik v. Burwell, 136 S. Ct. 444 (2015) (No. 14-1418)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2444 (2014) (“UARG’”) (quoting FDA v. … Id. at 232-33. 6 The notice-and-comment period was deemed “impracticable, unnecessary, {and] contrary to the public interest” to ensure that college students could “benefit from the Conference of Bishops

Amicus Curiae Brief — The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC, Petitioner v. Michigan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2025

In 1988, South Carolina passed the Beachfront Management Act, which prohibited Lucas from building on his land. … (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Prevost

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 CRUE a uae oe ae ee ee eee a 5,6,7,8 R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Prevost, 915 F.26 767 Ge Ce. TD) . wc es 5 STATUTES Cal. Unemp. Ins. … SC el 10 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Pub. L. 98-369, § 4(b)(3), codified at 29 Ee pe lk 5,6 Haw. Rev. Stat. § 392-21 (1985)............ 7 N.J. Stat.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shawn Montgomery, Petitioner v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 21, 2026

While the FMCSA compiles data on carriers, Congress previously recognized, in the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (“FAST Act”), Pub. … Brokers merely act as intermediaries . . . .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

Perhaps the most notable are the automobile air pollu- _ | tion cases brought by. … In re Multi-— district Vehicle Air ee MDL, No. 31. |. Court is presently pending on interlocutory appeal be- ‘ fore the Ninth Circuit in the air pollution cases.

Amicus Curiae Brief — California Restaurant Association, Inc., Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 2, 2021

California Air Resources Board, 111 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1265 (2003). … Both of these statutes require that health officers act when “necessary.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gilbert P. Hyatt, Petitioner v. John A. Squires, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 3, 2026

(cleaned up). -8compliance with its regulations, including that any applicant submission is not “being presented … to cause unnecessary delay,” in contravention of 37 C.F.R. § 11.18(b)(2)(i). … Some rules employ words requiring applicants to act “promptly,”14 to be “diligent,”15 act in “good faith,”16 13 Br. of SBTC, Addendum 2. 14 See 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.6(f)(1)(i); 1.8(b)(1); 1.10(c)(1), (d)(1)

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Martin Jonathan Batalla Vidal, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2018

” requiring “notice and comment.” … Since the DAPA policy was not implemented in accordance with “notice and comment” requirements, Judge Hanen concluded that it was invalid.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gundy v. United States (No. 17-6086)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

Rev. 265, 307 (2001) (cleaned up). … When government acts in excess of lawful powers, that liberty is at stake.” Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211, 221—22 (2011) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pan Am Corp. v. Section 1110 Parties

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

A consensus has clearly developed contrary to the position we advocate on this appeal, including comprehensive opinions by district courts acting as appellate courts in the Sec- ond and Third Circuits … The delay arising out of carrying this case over the Court’s summer recess would inflict irreparable injury on lessors and would impose an ill-advised period of new uncertainties on airline financing