Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

4.88s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. City of Oakland, California, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 11, 2021

    Holding that the Clean Air Act displaces the federal common law that would otherwise govern respondents’ claims would only strengthen the case for federal jurisdiction. … In so holding, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the Clean Air Act displaced federal public nuisance claims based on emissions contributing to global warming. Pet. App. 13a.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

    GER Bees cccccocectecesosnennel 14 United States Constitution BUDE ccovcceceeseeesscssnnnne 7 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(d).............. a Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365.............. 9 — Page … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(d), and in the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365.

    497 U.S. 871
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    Although § 1988 authorizes fees in “any action or proceeding” - brought to enforce the Civil Rights Acts, and § 304(d) applies only to “any action” brought under the Clean Air Act, this distinction … This Court did not address, however, the | - propriety of a fee award under the Clean Air Act, or any other statute, for a prevailing defendant.

    532 U.S. 994
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

    States and local governments had strongly pro- tested against the congressional imposition upon them of rigorous air quality standards under the Clean Air Act and Amendments of 1970 because the federal … Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624, 637 (1973).

    420 U.S. 35
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

    CAMPAIGN CLEAN WATER, INC AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE STATES OF TEXAS. … But the true magnitude of the damage cannot be assessed until what has been withheld is contrasted with what the States really need to meet the clean water goals of the Act.

    420 U.S. 136
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. City of New York

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

    vs. “ CAMPAIGN CLEAN WATER, INC. … But the true magnitude of the damage cannot be assessed until what has been withheld is contrasted with what the States really need to meet the clean water goals of the Act.

    420 U.S. 35
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Bragdon v. Abbott

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

    Agency Comments GAO did not obtain official agency comments on this report. … ~ Lares handpieces were brush-scrubbed in running water, rinsed, dried, and cleaned and lubricated from the base with Lares Handpiece Conditioner. They were run 60 seconds with air and water.

    526 U.S. 1131
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 24, 2025

    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act. … See Administrative Conference of the United States, Recommendation 76-4: Judicial Review Under the Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1976), in Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977: Hr’

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026

    Agency, Clean Air Act Requirements and History, https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-actoverview/clean-air-act-requirements-and-history (last visited May 20, 2026) ..................................... 9 U.S. … Agency, Clean Air Act Requirements and History, https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/cleanair-act-requirements-and-history (last visited May 20, 2026). 10 II.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

    (Energy Policy and RR Oe ees x 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d) (Clean Air Act Amendments ere a ate eR ta. 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f) (Clean Air Act Amendments ae 4, eee baa S81 ee ee ee & 42 U.S.C. § 8435 (Powerplant … § 1988") (applying the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C.

    510 U.S. 517
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington v. Dague

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

    Case Co., 793 F.2d 909 oe | re 15 Statutes: Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VT ........... 18 Clean Air Act § 304(d), 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d) .. 2... 2... 7 - h. ££. wevrerecrr: 3 33 U.S.C. § 1365 … (RCRA) and the Clean Water Act, respec- tively.

    505 U.S. 557
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

    . § 1314 (D)(2) ooo. cece cceececcecescececceneceueeees ) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4332(B) ..000..00 00. cece. 10 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7411(a)Q1) ooo. iS) 1 A Legislative … American Trucking Ass’ns, 531 U.S. 457, 467 (2001) (Clean Air Act of 1970 prohibits weighing costs against benefits in promulgation of national ambient air quality standards): Tenn.

    556 U.S. 208
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Utility Water Water Act Group Group v. Riverkeeper, Inc. (Nos. 07-597, 07-588, 07-589)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

    UE aR, SE UIE... © GRBIED .nccc cscs ceneccccessccsscccecesce 10 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7411 (a)Q1) ooo. eee ) 1 A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of Re es … American Trucking Ass‘ns, 531 U.S. 457, 467 (2001) (Clean Air Act of 1970 prohibits weighing costs against benefits in promulgation of national ambient air quality standards); Tenn.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

    .-.n0reccerecessccvssssesorevccees 5 Clean Air Act § 109b), GE UE BEAS. … B FOR Cat AaD onevccnsscacsssccesscccscscoovesese 5, 6 Clean Air Act § 112(dX2), 42 U.S.C. § 7412(d 2) (2O1Z)............cccserreersrereeerreees 4 Clean Air Act § 112(n(1XA), 42 U.S.C. § 7412(nX 1A

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (2014) (No. 13-339)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

    EPA, Cleaning Up the Nation’s Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends 1-4 (2004)4 [hereinafter Cleaning Up the Nation’s Waste Sites]. … Thus, Sec- tion 9658 must preempt state limitations periods based on the date of a defendant’s last act or omis- sion.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    The EIS Would Assist States in Meeting Their Obligations Under the Clean Air ACt .........ecceeeeee 24 IV. … Environmental Defense has helped design such landmark clean air programs as the market-based pollution cap and allowance trading program adopted in the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments to abate acid deposition

    541 U.S. 752
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Utility Water Water Act Group Group v. Riverkeeper, Inc. (Nos. 07-597, 07-588, 07-589)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

    Alaska, 540 U.S. at 485 n.12 (discussing similar Clean Air Act provisions); David M. … This Court has implicitly held that Congress made such value choices in the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act. See TVA v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022

    Applying this standard, this Court has upheld challenged delegations made pursuant to the Clean Air Act, see Whitman v. Am. … Id. at 325. 11 Building on this reasoning in the context of the Clean Air Act, in American Electric Power Co. v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — ExxonMobil Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Incorporated, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 11, 2025

    The Clean Air Act thus contains several limitations on citizen suits. … FEDERALISM PRINCIPLES UNDERLIE ANY CLEAN AIR ACT INTERPRETATION.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

    States and local governments had strongly pro- tested against the congressional imposition upon them of rigorous air quality standards under the Clean Air Act and Amendments of 1970 because the federal … Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624, 637 (1973).

    420 U.S. 136

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.