Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.53s
Amicus Curiae Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968) ............ 28, 29 SEC v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co., eR re ee ee ee 9-10 SEC v. Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co. of Am., SED US. … Georgia Association of Independent Insurance Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968), rendered sixteen years before this Court’s decision in Chevron. (6a, 16a-17a).
511 U.S. 1141Memorandum — Ford v. United States (No. 74-838)
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1974
When Officer Shuck and petitioner came over to the truck, Terry asked Shuck if he knew the nature of the truck’s contents (Tr. 24-25). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, that, when a warrantless seizure of a motor vehicle is justified on the basis of probable cause, an immediate warrantless search of the vehicle is also justified (id. at 52):
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Troutman v. Rumsfeld
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
Georgia Asagciation Of Independent Insurance — Agents, 399 F. 24 1010 PS eer ' Tennessee Electric Powér co. Vv. T.V.A., 306 U.S. 118, 59, S..Ct. 366, 83 L.Ed. 543 Whitney National Bank v. … September 30, 1969 Issued as Mandate: Oct. 22, 1969 -45- 3 APPENDIX C - Congressional Record, House, May 24, 1946, pg 5654 (Report of Mr.
397 U.S. 923Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
Supp. 399 fe Per ee ee Burleson v. Burleson, 277 A.2d 647 (D.C. App. 1971) ............... Carna v. Bessemor Cement Co.., 558 F. … On June 24, 1996, the Plaintiff filed its complaint for declaratory judgment and interpleader (Doc. 1).
522 U.S. 863Brief for the United States — Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Nemitz
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1972
Corp. in Nebraska Trustee Operation, 247 I.C.C. 653-_.____________.- 28 Nap Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S: 392: _ __. 24 Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. Merger, Ete, Virginian Ry. … Compare New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 407-408.
404 U.S. 37Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Thus, it dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, id. at 399, in light of this Court’s requirement, in Davis v. … Perry, 549 U.S. 399, 410-11 (2006) (opinion of Kennedy, J.) (quoting M. Barone, R. Cohen, & C. Cook, Almanac of American Politics 2002, at 1448 (2001)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 17, 2018
August 24, 2017) .................. 9, 10, 11 Benisek v. Lamone, 266 F. Supp. 3d 799 (Md. August 24, 2017) ............................... 15 Brooks v. Kemp, 1:17-cv-3856-TCB (ND. Ga. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) (acknowledging that partisanship is a permissible factor to consider when redistricting).
Amicus Curiae Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968) ..... SEC v. Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co. of Am.., EE SS 5 ovcccssesccceces Securities Indus. Ass'n v. Federal Reserve Bd., 468 U.S. 207 (1984) ........ … Georgia Association of Independent Insurance Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968), sixteen years before this court’s decision in Chevron. By contrast, the D.C.
511 U.S. 1141Reply Brief for the Petitioner — Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for the Petitioner · 1942
American Fur Ref. oy *-* ~~ 198 U.S, 399......: = Br cee ow atemtibe ables 26's 0% 6 Cuno Engineering Corp. Vv. Automatic Devices Corp., 62 Sup. Ct. 37, decided November 10, 1941. … ments of the ‘Home Run” game (Exs. 23 and 24) is dis- spelled in the light of the testimony (R. 159- 160): “XQ. 26. Mr.
315 U.S. 126Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Griffing v. Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
.—, 107 S.Ct. 3034 (1987) . . . 24 Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) . 22, 23,25 Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545 (1965) ........ 21, 24 Chapman v. … Saba, 399 So.2d 456 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), review denied, 408 So.2d 1095 (1981) ........ 19 Skinner v. Oklahoma, 315 U.S. 535 (1942) .......... 24 Vv Stanley v.
495 U.S. 958Public Meeting for the Steens Mountain Advisory Council, Oregon
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 28, 2023
L. 106-399). … [FR Doc. 2023-26184 Filed 11-27-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4331-24-P
88 FR 83145Interior DepartmentLand Management BureauNotice of Subcommittee Meeting for the Steens Mountain Advisory Council, Oregon
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 10, 2019
The FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours. … L. 106-399).
84 FR 54634Interior DepartmentLand Management BureauSupplemental Brief — Natelli v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1977
Martin, Obermaier & Morvillo 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10019 Attorneys for Petitioner Wasrinqren OC © CLO PUBLIGHERD + LAW PRINETENG CO « (702) 399-0625 IN THE Supreme Court … UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Pursuant to Rule 24(5) of the Rules of this Court, petitioner submits this supplemental brief to bring to
434 U.S. 819Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arizona ex rel. Dean v. City Court of Tucson
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
Dec. 1., 1972 § 24. Rights of accused in criminal prosecutions Section 24. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 69, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 1888, 26 L.Ed.2d 437, 440 (1970) (footnote omitted).
493 U.S. 1080Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Weintraub v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976
at 399-400. … Subsequently, bloodstained 24.
424 U.S. 914Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donoho v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Barash, 365 F. 2d 395, 399, 403 (2nd ORE BE five. 14 United States v. Bottone, 365 PF. 2d 389, 394 (2nd Cir. . See Pe, Pe Te Pe: HRA NT aT 14 ‘United States v. … Barash, 365 F. 2d 395, 399, 403 (2nd Cir.’ 1966), states that ‘‘the doctrine of one good count is not a fetish’’: .
390 U.S. 1014Federal Register · Notice · Aug 22, 2024
entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Kangxi Communication Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., 5th Floor, Building 10, No. 399 … [FR Doc. 2024-18817 Filed 8-21-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
89 FR 67969International Trade CommissionCentennial Power, Inc. et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 10, 2006
ER06-398-000; ER06-399-000; ER04-268-003; ER98-4159-006; ER99-1293-005] Take notice that on December 27, 2005, Duquesne Keystone, LLC and Duquesne Conemaugh, LLC (collectively, Applicants) hereby submit … PH06-8-000] Take notice that on February 24, 2006, DTE Energy Company filed a Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Regulations pursuant to Requirements of The Public Utility Holding Company Act of
71 FR 12349Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionBrief for the Respondent in Opposition — O'Bryan v. Chandler
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969
It is reported in 399 F.2d 916 and is set out as Appendix B to the Pe- tition. The Petition is incorrectly entitled in this Court O’Bryan v. Chandler, Chief Judge. … C. 20004 Counsel for Respondent of Counsel: SHIPLEY, ACKERMAN & PICKETT February 24, 1969
394 U.S. 906Card — Berry v. State Tax Commission
Supreme Court brief · Card · 1965
.: Sh. 179, 399 P.2d 164 (1965) 207. 2, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20 Goodwin v. State Tax Commission,’ 286. App: Div. — 694, 146 N.Y.S.2d 172 (1955), 1. … Ed. 458 (1952) pecsnssecessezsenes hy 22, 13, 24, 16, 17 Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S..37, 40 S. Ct. 221, 64.L: Ed. 445° (1920) ........... ial edaiacwten eta 3, 18, 19, : State v.
382 U.S. 16
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.