Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2020

10,000+ results

0.13s

  • Opposition — Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1997

    JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was entered on February 24, 1997. … (A. la) Accordingly, the panel determined an opinion was not needed, and entered its per curiam order on February 24, 1997.

    522 U.S. 863
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Teague v. Lane

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

    Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) . iv Statutes: 14 Maine Rev. St. §§ 1211 et seq. (1971) “a a oe ee ae Colo. Rev. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970). (Emphasis added.)

    489 U.S. 288
  • Petitioners Reply Brief — Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1981

    Pet. at 22-24. 6 1978 amendments to pre-1978 retirements. … Pet. at 24-26.

    454 U.S. 825
  • Opposition Brief — Parks v. Mississippi

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

    State, 40 So.2d 160, 70 S.Ct. 77, 338 U.S. 805, 94 L.Ed. 487, 70 S.Ct. 977, 399 USS. 958, 94 L.Ed. 1369 4 Miller v. U. S., 287 Fed. 864, 43 S.Ct. 705, 262 U.S. 758, 67 L.Ed. 1219 4 Parks v. … Ed. 487, rehearing denied, 70 S.Ct. 977, 399 U.S. 958, 94 L.Ed. 1369; Golden v. State, 71 So.2d 476, 220 Miss. 465; Anderson v. State, 152 So.2d 702, 246 Miss. 821; Fed.

    411 U.S. 947
  • Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Younge v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970

    Mitchell, (1938) 303 U.S. 391, 399, 82 L.Ed. 917, 922, 58 S.Ct. 630. … At 303 US. 399-400, 82 L.Ed. 922, the Court said, “Remedial sanctions may be of varying types.

    397 U.S. 922
  • Opposition Brief — Susan Neese, et al., Petitioners v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jul 30, 2025

    No. 24-1221 In the Supreme Court of the United States SUSAN NEESE, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL. … Oral Arg. at 23:24-23:35, https://www.ca5.uscourts. gov/OralArgRecordings/23/23-10078_1-8-2024.mp3 (petitioners noting lack of any “past enforcement action”). 2.

  • Jurisdictional Statement — Marks v. Chief of Police of Los Angeles

    Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1970

    United States, 350 US. 399° 00. Connally v. General Constr. Co., 209 U.S. 385 "yd _) as St St my TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED Cases Dombrowski ¥. Ptister, SOUS AT eS Giaceto v. … The above-entitled action came on regularly for trial on the 22nd day of March, 1968, in Department 24, the - Honorable Arnold Praeger, Judge Presidi.iz, the Court sitting without a jury, neither party

    397 U.S. 316
  • Petition — Colorado v. Hendershott

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

    Texas, 388 U.S. at 24-25 (Harlan, J., concurring). … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). In Williams, this Court upheld, as legitimate, a reciproca!

    459 U.S. 1225
  • Application — Colby Todd Dubose, Applicant v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Application · Mar 16, 2023

    Ct. 399 (2019). … Spencer, 24 Or. App. 385, 545 P.2d 611 (1976).

  • Respondents Brief — Consumers' Research, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 3, 2024

    Petitioners contend (Pet. 24-25; 23-743 Pet. 28) that Section 254 violates the nondelegation doctrine because it im- 13 poses “vague” standards and lacks “objective” limits. … Sunshine Anthracite Coal, 310 U.S. at 399; cf. United States v.

  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Acker v. Commissioner

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1959

    (Pet. 24.) The taxpayer’ s petition _+ for amin was denied on September 3, 1958. ‘'(Pet. 24-27.) The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on December 1, 1958. … S. 391, 399, this Court said : ' As stated i in Oceanic Steam Mavigaiion Cov. § ‘Stranahan, ‘214 U.

    358 U.S. 940
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Washington v. Glucksberg

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    California, 403 U.S. 15, 24 (1971), for example, this Court held that the First Amendment guarantee of free speech and expression derives from “the belief that no other approach wou! … Brief for the United States at 23-24. The Dutch guidelines are more permissive than the and model American statutes, however.

    521 U.S. 702
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cynthia E. Collie, Petitioner v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 9, 2021

    (Order 5-24-19) In a one paragraph Order, the Court cites to the Doe v. … S. 747, 769, n. 24 (1982); Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U. S. 479, 491, and n. 7, 497 (1965).

  • Petition — Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Gibbons

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

    In December 1980, RLEA renewed its motion for a stay, but on December 24, 1980, the appellate court denied that request stating that petitioner’s motion of June 1980 ‘seeking a general stay pending … E.g., New Haven Inclusion Cases, supra, 399 U.S. at 431.

    454 U.S. 823
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 17, 2018

    August 24, 2017) .................. 9, 10, 11 Benisek v. Lamone, 266 F. Supp. 3d 799 (Md. August 24, 2017) ............................... 15 Brooks v. Kemp, 1:17-cv-3856-TCB (ND. Ga. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) (acknowledging that partisanship is a permissible factor to consider when redistricting).

  • Reply Brief for the Petitioner — Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for the Petitioner · 1942

    American Fur Ref. oy *-* ~~ 198 U.S, 399......: = Br cee ow atemtibe ables 26's 0% 6 Cuno Engineering Corp. Vv. Automatic Devices Corp., 62 Sup. Ct. 37, decided November 10, 1941. … ments of the ‘Home Run” game (Exs. 23 and 24) is dis- spelled in the light of the testimony (R. 159- 160): “XQ. 26. Mr.

    315 U.S. 126
  • Petition — Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

    Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) 24, 25 Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1970) ........ 27 Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956) ..............-. 7,12 Couch v. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970); People v. Elliot, 54 Cal. 2d 498, 354 P.2d 225, 6 Cal. Rptr. 753 (1960).

    454 U.S. 815
  • Respondent Brief in Opposition — Pfeiffer Electric Co. v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Respondent Brief in Opposition · 1963

    (R. 154-155; Pet. 24.) … Com- missioner, 248 F. 2d 399, 406-407, and 262 F. 2d 512, 513-514 (CLA. 2), certioran demed, 359 U.S. 1002; Gregg Uo. of Delaware v.

    372 U.S. 965
  • Animal Waste and Water Quality: EPA’s Response to the Waterkeeper Alliance Court Decision on Regulation of CAFOs

    Congressional research report · CRS Report · Jun 1, 2016

    The amount of precipitation that constitutes a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event varies by location. 6 Waterkeeper Alliance et al. vs. EPA, 399 F.3d 486 (2nd Cir. 2005). 7 U.S. … EPA, 399 F.3d at 507.

    RL33656Congressional Research Service
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Anthony E. Ntamere, Petitioner v. Amerihealth Administrators, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 2, 2025

    First State Bank, 399 F.3d 940 (8th Cir. 2005)............................................ 24 Educadores Puertorriquenos en Action v. Hernandez, 367 F.3d 61 (1st Cir. 2004).. 26 Ellis v. … First State Bank, 399 F.3d 940, 947 (8th Cir. 2005), instructing that joint action under § 1983 requires a “voluntary understanding*’ between the federal and state actors. 24 By contrast, Youngblood

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.