Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.65s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jonathan Dunn, Applicant v. Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 14, 2022
Klem, 497 F.3d 272 (3d Cir. 2007) 15 STATUTES Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-1 passim vi Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1 14 OTHER … damaged, as that would mean "aplaintiff can never suffer irreparable injury resulting from environmental harm in a sIt goes without saying that "[t]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lynk Labs, Inc., Petitioner v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 16, 2025
It was never promulgated through notice-and-comment rulemaking and appears only in informal guidance documents, the MPEP, and ad hoc Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions. A. … This case offers a clean, narrow, and recurring vehicle for the Court to reaffirm that Loper Bright’s holding applies universally: no form of interpretive deference survives under another name. V.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Air Line Pilots v. Miller
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
RRR Ra Se ea AIRS ATS 2 Oe eae a ee 17 Air Line Pilots Association v. Miller, U.S. ___, 118 EEE ee a ee eee 3 AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. … In a footnote, the Court commented that “(t]he parallel provision in s 14(b) of the Taft Hartley Act ... makes the union shop agreement give way : : if definitively ruled on.
523 U.S. 866Amicus Curiae Brief — Smith v. City of Jackson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Five months later, EEOC issued proposed interpretations of the ADEA for notice and comment. 44 Fed Reg. 68,858 (1979). … After careful review of the comments, EEOC made changes to the proposed regu'ations. 46 Fed. Reg. 47,724 (1981).
541 U.S. 958Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastern Airlines Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
re ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA a, BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE CHARLES FRIED Acting Solicitor General ALBERT G. LAUBER, JR. … Accord, United Air Lines, Inc. v.
474 U.S. 892Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Dep’t of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, 51 FLRA 1532, 1536 (1996). … Army and Air Force Exchange Service, 5 FLRC 167 (1977).
524 U.S. 903Amicus Curiae Brief — Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Air Force { 17. … Air Force J 32; Decl. of U.S. Navy 4.
547 U.S. 47Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Shoe Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. is a Delaware corporation. … (citing Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 299, 306 (1923)).
538 U.S. 1056Amicus Curiae Brief — Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
As Congress made clear when enacting the Reed-Bulwinkle Act, competitors have rights under the Sherman Act when railroads act outside the immunity granted by Reed- Bulwinkle. … Shippers and competitors received no opportunity to comment.
488 U.S. 880Amicus Curiae Brief — Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Association of Flight Attendants
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 480 U.S. 13801 (1987) oo... eeeeeeeee 5,9 STATUTES: Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. sections 151-188 a sccnisus passim MISCELLANEOUS: Air Transport 1988, The … The membership of AIRCON and ATA include every major air carrier in the United States.2 Because AIRCON and ATA air carrier mem- bers are covered by the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.
493 U.S. 962Amicus Curiae Brief — Janus v. Am. Fed'n, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1466)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
An auditor would not 3 issue a “clean” or unmodified opinion in this situa- tion.? … The peer reviewer analyzes the audit firm’s accounting and auditing process, and it may select for review any Hudson audit conducted in the time period subject to review.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. v. Pakoototas (No. 06-1188)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Wirth, Smelter Smoke in North America: The Politics of Transborder Pollution (2000) ..... 10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Env’t Can., Comments on the U.S. … See Env’t Can., Comments on the U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Isabel Rico, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 15, 2025
Parole Commission and Reorganization Act, Pub. L. No. 94233, § 2, 90 Stat. 219, 226 (1976), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 4210(c), repealed by Comprehensive Crime Control Act, Pub. L. No. 98-473, tit. … PROB. 75, 76 (1987): 4 The December 1979 Federal Probation “Looking at the Law” column … concluded that the probation period is tolled from the act which initiates the revocation proceeding (the issuance
Amicus Curiae Brief — North Dakota v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (No. 05-628)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
The Clean Water Act is comprehensive and applies to all “waters of the United States.” … States adopt water quality standards to protect public health or welfare, enhance the quality of water and serve the purposes of the Clean Water Act (the Act).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Food Mktg. Inst. v. Argus Leader Media, 139 S. Ct. 915 (2019) (No. 18-481)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Dep't of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976). … Joe Sharkey, Whole-Body Scans Pass First Air- port Tests, N.Y.
Amicus Curiae Brief — South Carolina v. Environmental Technology Council
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
These periodic submis- sions are referred to as “clusters.” See 51 Fed. Reg. 33,712, 33,714 (1986). … of the Act.
521 U.S. 1103Amicus Curiae Brief — Herman Avery Gundy, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 1, 2018
Trucking Ass’ns, 531 U.S. 457, 474 (2001) (“We agree with the Solicitor General that the text of § 109(b)(1) of the [Clean Air Act] at a minimum requires that [f]or a discrete set of pollutants and based … effects of the pollutant in the ambient air.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 17, 2026
(cleaned up). … Id. at 546 (cleaned up). B. Strict scrutiny is the appropriate test to assess the constitutionality of the Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 10, 2025
They are instead legally barred from doing so for a period. … Army or the Air Force.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
That court failed to note that the notice and delay provisions of the act do not explicitly limit the right of a citizen suing under the act the right to recover costs expended during that period, should … Comment b, Restatement of *When the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act was passed into law as an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act in 1976, the legislative history of the act contained “
515 U.S. 1192
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.