Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Phillips Manufacturing & Tower Company, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021

Even if the OSH Act permitted the agency to issue such an order, it must be done through normal notice-and-comment rulemaking—not an emergency temporary standard. … Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. DOT, 900 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1990), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 1077 (1991). The D.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021

Even if the OSH Act permitted the agency to issue such an order, it must be done through normal notice-and-comment rulemaking—not an emergency temporary standard. … Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. DOT, 900 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1990), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 1077 (1991). The D.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BST Holdings, LLC, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021

Even if the OSH Act permitted the agency to issue such an order, it must be done through normal notice-and-comment rulemaking—not an emergency temporary standard. … Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. DOT, 900 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1990), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 1077 (1991). The D.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rockstead v. City of Crystal Lake (No. 06-1716)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

NAHB appeared before the Court as a petitioner in a case decided earlier this term concerning the Clean Water and Endangered Species Acts, NAHB v. … The state-litigation rule has been thoroughly aired in the lower federal and state courts.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Comm'n

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

When WRTL’s proposed ads are viewed in the context of WRTL’s plan to air them right before Senator Feingold’s election, along with WRTL’s own press releases, website, and negative comments, and campaigning … Pre-BRCA, this pre-election period was consistently the time when most “issue ads” financed with soft money were aired in a thinly disguised attempt to influence the election.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Moreland Properties LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, Petitioner v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio Corporation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 28, 2026

Nor does a State need such delegation to act. … Contaminated properties “can pose environmental exposure risks to community members via access to the sites or contamination of soil, air, and/or water at the site.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

II, §3 22 HTT sc eciicrinicnaricaniiiiisigiatinaiasincinianiiniinmmnpmanncnnnts 21, 28 Clean Air Act § 304, 42 U.S.C. 7604 , 18 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. -................... 1 § 101 … The Clean Water Act Gives EPA And The Individual States Primary Responsibility For Ensuring Effective Enforcement Of The Act’s NPDES Permit Program The Clean Water Act establishes “ ‘an all-encompassing

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021

Even if the OSH Act permitted the agency to issue such an order, it must be done through normal notice-and-comment rulemaking—not an emergency temporary standard. … Air Transp. Ass’n of Am. v. DOT, 900 F.2d 369, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1990), vacated on other grounds, 498 U.S. 1077 (1991). The D.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Parker Drilling Mgmt. Servs., Ltd. v. Newton, 139 S. Ct. 914 (2019) (No. 18-389)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

Salazar, — fe fT Lae Re ) | ee 18 Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. v. Throop, 181 P.3d 1084 (Alaska 2008)..................000..00000. 12 Bonner v. … Christopher, The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, 6 STAN. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Constitution Art. 1, § 8 .........cccccececeeeeeeneneeeees - 17 Civil Rights Act of 1964, | 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ef SOG... .ccccccceceeeeeeeeeneneees passim Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. .. … Army Corps of Engineers in order to comply with the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seg.

Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 16, 2019

William Hines, History of the 1972 Clean Water Act: The Story Behind How the 1972 Act Became the Capstone on a Decade of Extraordinary Environmental Reforms, 4 Geo. Wash. J. Energy & Envtl. … Miars, The Clean Water Act of 1977: Great Expectations Unrealized, 47 U. Cin. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Defenders of Wildlife v. Chertoff (No. 07-1180)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

The Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. 8 The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. … The National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq. The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024

it submitted comments on the Council on Environmental Quality’s most recent proposed rules in respect of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). 3 CEA respectfully submits that its broad … Importantly, this Court has recognized that, when Congress acts, it necessarily acts with a purpose. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1998).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Alaska Conservation Council (No. 07-990)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387 ................... 1 Clean Water Act, Section 301 (33 U.S.C. … In Chevron, the statute at issue was the Clean Air Act, which regulated, but did not define, “stationary sources” of pollution, rather than the Clean Water Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd., Petitioner v. Brian Newton

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 26, 2018

Cir. 2011) ............................ 18 Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. v. Throop, 181 P.3d 1084 (Alaska 2008).............................. 12 Bonner v. … Christopher, The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, 6 STAN. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026

. § 5101 et seq.) .......................... 13 Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq. ................................................................................. 27 General Allotment Act … Id.; see generally Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq.; cf. Petitioners’ Br. 43–47 (explaining that the CAA preempts state-law climate suits).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Center for Biological Diversity, et al., Petitioners v. Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 5, 2020

air, clean water, endangered species, toxic waste, and archeological resources, among others. … a habitat conservation plan that addresses the impact of the take, as well as mitigation measures to avoid those impacts, and the Secretary of the Interior must find, after an opportunity for public comment

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. J.G.G., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2025

Id. at 169 (cleaned up). … Air Lines v. Waterman S.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Pork Producers Council, et al., Petitioners v. Karen Ross, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food & Agriculture, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 15, 2022

Earl, Cleaning Up After Federal and State Pollution Programs: Local Government Hazardous Waste Regulation, 17 Stetson L. … Gramling, III & William L. 7 Earl, Cleaning Up After Federal and State Pollution Programs: Local Government Hazardous Waste Regulation, 17 Stetson L. Rev. 639, 641 (1988).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hamdi A. Mohamud, Petitioner v. Heather Weyker, St. Paul Police Officer

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 28, 2026

Marshal” for a limited time period). … (cleaned up). The question always must be whether the individual is—to some extent—acting under color of state law or jointly with the state. See Burton v.