Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
497 results
2.69s
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Description: Avista Corp submits a clean version and a blackline version of Substitute Original Sheet 1–21 of their FERC Electric Tariff, Seventh Revised Volume 9. Filed Date: 12/07/2007. … Description: Bicent (California) Malburg LLC submits an application for approval under section 204 of the Federal Power Act and request for expedited consideration. Filed Date: 12/07/2007.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 71, No. 227 / Monday, November 27, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., submits copies of a clean and redlined revisions to Sheet 966A and 966C of FERC Electric Rate Schedule 10–C, etc., under ER06–1308. … Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed Wholesale Market Participation Agreement with Great Bear Hydropower, Inc., et al., pusuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act etc., under
Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionwwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Agency decision · Agency decision
The proposal is designed to decrease the NOX emission rate of the Cypress Station and enable Trunkline to meet the required air emission limitations for this site. … Comment Date: January 11, 2006. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionerjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
Agency decision · Agency decision
Location: On Cooper Lake, approximately 4.8 river miles from the mouth of Cooper Creek in south central Alaska, 55 air miles south of Anchorage. g. … Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a–825r. g. Applicant Contacts: For the transferor: Clayton B.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 71, No. 193 / Thursday, October 5, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Moreover, Honeoye does not require any activities that involve ground disturbance or changes to operational air or noise requirements. … Instructions for Submitting Comments Submit your comments by one of the following methods: 1.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
compare each fuel type by quality determinants, in the study of developments in fuel supply which may affect the reliability of electric service, (2) in environmental improvement programs for the different air … SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(a) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 72, No. 148 / Thursday, August 2, 2007 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 9, 2007. … SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to submit a request VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:42 Aug 01, 2007 Jkt 211001
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791 (a) 825(r) and 799 and 801. … Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791 (a) 825(r) and 799 and 801. h. Applicant Contact: Ms.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 70, No. 214 / Monday, November 7, 2005 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Description: El Paso Electric Co submits a Notice of Cancellation and a cancellation tariff sheet for the purpose of canceling its Utility Service Contract with Holloman Air Force Base, Alamogordo, New … Description: United Power Inc advises that due to amendments to section 201(f) of the Federal Power Act, it is not a public utility. Filed Date: 10/26/2005. Accession Number: 20051028–0119.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFiling and Reporting Requirements for Interstate Natural Gas Company Rate Schedules and Tariffs
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 11, 1995
Then, a notice could issue establishing the 10-day comment period. … each proposed new rate the rate which represents the refund floor or ``last clean rate.''
60 FR 52960Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Energy Regulatory Commission (2006)
Agency decision · Agency decision
The Commission solicits comment on its prioritization proposal. 4. Trial Period 90. … Further, IEEE 516–2003 defines ‘‘standard atmospheric conditions’’ as temperatures above freezing, wind less than 24 kilometer per hour, unsaturated air, normal barometer, uncontaminated air, and clean
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 71, No. 97 / Friday, May 19, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 25, 2006. … Comment Filed EPA ICR No. 0940.19; Ambient Air Quality Surveillance (Proposed Rule); OMB Number 2060–0084; OMB filed comments on April 18, 2006.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
Agency decision · Agency decision
The Final Rule also benefits clean energy resources by reforming energy and generator imbalance charges. … The Commission proposed to change the period from three to five years. Comments 374.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Agency decision · Agency decision
35226 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Proposed Rules Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Issued June 9, 2006. … Regulatory Flexibility Act Statement 14.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 70, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Agency decision · Agency decision
We seek comments on what would constitute a reasonable length of time for such periodic certification to be effective. For example, is a five-year certification period appropriate? … We seek comments on what would constitute a reasonable length of time for such periodic re-approval to be effective. For example, is a five-year approval period appropriate?
Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionebenthall on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Agency decision · Agency decision
The license for Project No. 82 was issued for a period ending July 31, 2007. … The license for Project No. 2146 was issued for a period ending July 31, 2007.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionsroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES (2006)
Agency decision · Agency decision
ACTION: Notice; reopening of comment period. … Further provisions are made to allow a public comment period. However, the Administrator may extend the comment period, if additional time for comment is requested.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 71, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 31, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
That Notice did not explicitly provide for a 30–day period in which the public may comment, in accordance with section 6(f)(1)(B) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as … Under FIFRA section 6(f)(1)(B), EPA must ‘‘provide for a 30–day period in which the public may comment’’ before acting on any request to cancel or amend a pesticide registration submitted under section
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. … On August 10, 2006, Southwestern published notice in the Federal Register (71 FR 45820), of a 60day comment period, together with a combined Public Information and Comment Forum, to provide an opportunity
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 70, No. 212 / Thursday, November 3, 2005 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
ACTION: Notice of extension of public comment period. … EPA is extending the public comment period to December 12, 2005, in response to requests for extension of the comment period.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.