Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.68s

  • Motion Amicus Curiae Brief — Pipefitters v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Motion Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

    Pent isy wania, 38 382 US. 399 (1966) Oe ona a 3 +) ; af os nt EN rae » rae ‘. we eee: vi “¢ L O., 30% U. S. 496 (1939) vane ; 10 : - -“Hertidon v. … Smith, - - 390 U.S. 17, 24 (1968) ; Elfbrandt v.

    407 U.S. 385
  • Opinion — Lemon v. Kurtzman

    Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1973

    Kolodziejski, 399 U. S. 204 (1970) ; or to the validity of elections for local officials held under possibly discriminatory voting laws, Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U. S. 544 (1969). … Kolodziejski, 399 U. S. 204, 213-215. _ Retroactivity of the decision in Lemon I goes to the very core of the integrity of the judicial process.

    411 U.S. 192
  • Respondents Brief — Madeirense do Brasil, S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1945

    Div. 399: Aetna Life Insurance Co. Vv. National Drydock and Repair Co.. Tnc., 230 App. Div. 486, Plaut v. Plaut, 255 App. … Y. 19, 24.

    325 U.S. 861
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Zaryl G. Bush, Petitioner v. Ohio

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 26, 2020

    Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 399, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1019 (2013)... 11, 12, 13, 14 Moonv. Robinson, N.D. Ohio 1:12CV1396, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108799....... 8 Murray v. … Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 399, 133 S. Ct. 1924, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1019 (2013) (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327, llSS.Ct. 851, 130 L. Ed. 2d 808 (1995)). Cradic v. Hutchinson, 2019 U.S. App.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lonnie Kade Welsh, Petitioner v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 23, 2020

    S. 399, 405 (emphasis added) The founders understood that punishment is deserved by a wrong doer only when his acts was a conscious choice unimpaired and unlabored free-will. … (a madman is punished by his madness alone). 2 William Blackstone commentary of the laws of England 24. (1803).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Paul Andrew Leitner-Wise, Petitioner v. LWRC International, LLC, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 28, 2018

    Church Dwight Co., Inc., 399 F.3d 13810, 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Intellectual Property Dev. v. TCI Cablevision, 248 F.3d 1333, 13846 (Fed. Cir. 2001). … Nye Tool & Machine Works, 261 U.S. 24, 40-41 (1923). 11 IT. Leitner-Wise conferred rights to his patent but only in consideration a royalty agreement.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eric Brown, et al., Petitioners v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 5, AFL-CIO, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 24, 2022

    McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 413 (1997); Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158, 169 (1992); Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., Inc., 457 U.S. 922, 942 n.23 (1982). … Suite 300 Golden Valley, Minnesota 55426 612-428-7000 Doug.Seaton@UMWLC.org October 24, 2022 Jeffrey M. Schwab Counsel of Record Liberty Justice Center 440 N.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Narkis Aliza Golan, Petitioner v. Isacco Jacky Saada

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 26, 2022

    Saks, 470 U.S. 392, 399 (1985); see also Lozano v. … In re D (a child), [2006] UKHL 51, ¶ 24.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Laura Cozza, Petitioner v. PNC Bank, National Association

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 4, 2022

    Ed. 2d 399 (2008) ............................................................... 15 Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 130 S. Ct. 2549, 177 L. … New Living translation, Matthew 6:24.

  • Respondents Brief Opposing Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Oregon

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief Opposing Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1961

    Or.) 67 F. 399; Graham v. Allen, 116 Or. 01,2 P. 1007. The presumption of contract arising under t! … Fox, 94 U.S..315, 320, 24 L. ed. 192. See ° | | 12 also United States v. Security-First National Bank of Lo Angeles, 130 F. Supp. 521.

    366 U.S. 643
  • Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Rule v. Sears

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1946

    Ct. 399, 56 L. Ed. 680. 14 Sears v. Rule, 45 Cal. App. (2d) 374. 5 STATUTES. California Code of Civil Procedure, Sec. 1699.0... ccccceceeeeee 15 California Constitution, Art. … (Br. p. 24.) SRR Se aR Ne It is also pertinent to add that the foregoing quotation is taken from a section of the brief which is headed: “C. There Was No Collateral Agreement or Trust.”

    328 U.S. 843
  • Respondents Brief — Wallace v. Foster

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1950

    Illinois, 399 U. S. 178 Delaney v. United States, 268 U. 8, 586, 589 District of Columbia v. Pace, 320 U. 8. Eagles v. Samuels, 309 U. S. 304 Feldman v. United States, 382 U. … E. 24 396... 2 Wallace v. The State, 205 Ga. 751, 55 S. E. 24145. 2, 10 Williams Mfg. Co. v. U. S. Shoe Machinery Corp, 816 U. S. 364, 3 San Woolsey v. Best, 299 U.

    340 U.S. 815
  • Opposition Brief — United Food & Commercial Workers Local 951 v. Mulder

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995

    Casey, 956 F.2d 399 (3rd Cir. 1992) ........ . 10 Litton Financial Printing v. NLRB, __ U.S. ery eee 5 Tierney v. … P. 24(b) for permissive intervention. Intervening defendant NLRB is granted 60 days in which to file its answer or other responsive pleading.

    513 U.S. 1148
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ronald R. Myles, Jr., Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 18, 2021

    Sheldon v Kettering Health Net- work, 816 F3d 399, 415 (6th Cir 2016)(quoting Hapwood v City of Warren, 127 F3d 490, 493 (6th Cir 1997)). § 1738. … ■u'$ IM> ‘S'* 4 fr£l&AM^dM^ si J ouM act ust n& * t-L [n~K fytCuJi Cju*t &i <4$^ U2t~ Qti />tV. 0&&- j2M>, 24 /UwraMc (e& CJccdiC^ u/__ ..

  • Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Albert & Harrison, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1947

    Wil- son Co., 133 F. (2d) 399 (App. D. C.), and is inconsistent with the court below’s earlier deci- sion in Massman Construction Co. v. United States, 102 C. … It could not acquire such a right by purporting to ‘reserve’ it” (133 F. (2d) at 399, 400).

    331 U.S. 810
  • Motion — United States v. Midwest Video Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1972

    *Tex., 1968), aff. 399 U.S. 383, — 90 8. Ct. 2018 (1970). Streets, sidewalks and.other simiJar’ places. … Collier, 24 F.C.C. 251, 16 R.R. 1005 (1958). But.

    406 U.S. 649
  • Appendix — Moore v. East Cleveland

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1977

    Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1972). … Ed. 2d at 399.

    431 U.S. 494
  • Supplemental Brief — In re Ainsworth

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1991

    FILED MAR 20 399) 4 j bn } No. 90-1397 OFFICE OF THE CLERK | SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1990 IN RE JONATHAN B. AINSWORTH, Petitioner Vv. … This was in clear violation of the United States Supreme Court's holding in Schiavone v Fortune 477 U.S. 21. 24 Pi ee maa 7 a een Pee ao = ae a = 7 — of 7 > Se Pe _ 4 7 : gh - == 2 .

    500 U.S. 903
  • Opposition Brief — Mattei v. Laborers Combined Funds of Western Pennsylvania

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

    Super. 399, 518 A.2d 1296 bo PE eee Tee POE ETT LCC TC TAT OeT OEE 4 Laborers Combined Funds of Western Pennsylva- nia v. Mattei, 402 Pa. … Super. 399, 518 A.2d 1296 (1986) (Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Appen- dix, pp. Al6-A27).

    502 U.S. 968
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Phoenix-El Paso Express, Inc. v. National Carloading Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1944

    A.) 260 Fed. 70...... 24 Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio Rr. Co., 294 U. 8. 240, SO Sup. Ce. 407, 79 L.. Bid. GOB... 2... ice ee 31 Pacific Mail Steamship Co. v. Joliffe, 69 U. … Heth, 3 Cranch 399, 2 L. Ed. 479; U. S. vs. Burr, 159 U. S. 78, 15 S. Ct. 1002, 40 L. Ed. 82; Shwab vs. Doyle, 258 U. S. 529, 42 8. Ct. 391, 66 L.

    322 U.S. 747

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.