Documents

Opposition Brief — Voters Education Education Committee v. Washington State Public Disclosure Commission (No. 07-1153)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007

During this period, the Committee ran a second advertisement regarding Ms. Senn entitled “New.” … According to the Court, the “justifications for the regulation of express advocacy apply equally to ads aired during those periods if the ads are intended to influence the voters’ decisions and have

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gary Perez, et al., Petitioners v. City of San Antonio, Texas

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 31, 2026

Protecting Native sacred sites benefits those who live near them by protecting the plants, air, birds, insects, and all living things that make up an ecosystem. … May I not wash in them, and be clean?” Id. 5:12. By any objective measure, the rivers of Damascus were better—cleaner, closer to home, more impressive, and more familiar.

Appendix Vol I — Poly-Tech Industries, Inc. v. InstyBit, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix Vol I · 1997

CLEANING. Parts must be cleaned of metalworking fluids prior to blackening. … During this period Mr.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Honeywell International International Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp. (No. 08-262)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

control the amount of air that is drawn through the compressor. … The Court thereafter denied the petition without comment. Honeywell Intl Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., 545 U.S. 1127 (2005). D.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mill v. Colorado Department of Health

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

Fifth, it’s also been proven, to the satisfaction of this Court, that the federal program, the UMTRA Act, will clean this up at no cost to the Plaintiff, either by purchasing the property or by cleaning … However, the Court believes that once UMTRA gets to this land, even if they clean it up and return it to the owners on site, that they will compensate for a period of time, at least the period of time

Petition — National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Discussion We have decided to solicit comments from all parties with respect to the proper course of action for the Board to follow in light of the court’s remand.* In order to focus the comments, … Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al. v. (C.A.B.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Paul S. Morrissey, et al., Petitioners v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 9, 2022

Cir. 2021) (cleaned up). … Cir. 2004) (cleaned up).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Enright v. Solar Turbines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

In addition, there is no indication of what time periods Mr. Remas was analyzing. … Air, Inc., 228 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2000); see also 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(0)(3).

Appendix — Northern Helex Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976

\ 1-207 (comment 2). … The official comment to § 2-703 says that the article ‘‘re- jects any doctrine of election of remedy as a fundamental poliey’’, and the comment to § 2-704 explains that ‘‘the seller is given express

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carol V. Clendening, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gary J. Clendening, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 29, 2022

Sec. of Air Force, 944 F.2d 1477 (9th Cir. 1991). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 viii Major v. … The Sixth Circuit has also commented on the expansion of the doctrine: “in recent years the [Supreme] Court has embarked on a course dedicated to broadening the 19 Feres doctrine to encompass, at a minimum

Amicus Curiae Brief — Deaton v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Reg. 1991 (Jan. 15, 2003)............. 10, 13-14 LEGAL PERIODICALS Albrecht and Nickelsburg, Could SWANCC Be Right? A New Look At The Legislative History Of The Clean Water Act, on Ravel. L.. … THE SCOPE OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT IS AN ISSUE OF GREAT NATIONAL IMPORTANCE. A. The Fourth Circuit’s Decision Will Have Broad Effects On The Implementation Of The Clean Water Act.

Opposition Brief — California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, et al., Petitioners v. Adam Nickels, Acting Regional Director, United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 22, 2026

(1) 2 STATEMENT The Clean Water Act (CWA or Act), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., generally prohibits the unauthorized discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States. 33 U.S.C. 1311(a). … Congress amended the CWA’s definition of the term “point source” to exclude “ ‘return flows from irrigated agriculture.’ ” Clean Water Act of 1977, Pub. L.

Joint Appendix — Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Comm. v. Federal Election Comm'n

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1996

Defendant’s deny that “Wirth Facts #1” was aired dur- ing the period between April 2, 1986 and August 12, 1986. “Wirth Facts #1” was aired between April 4, 1986 and April 13, 1986. … Again, comments were sought on time periods ranging from 14 days to 6 months prior to an election, or any other time period considered reasonable.

Transcript of Record — Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1922

GREASY AND BOILIN CLEAN ini i. … Tt depends next upon the proper adjustment of the burners. the proper mixing of the ga with air, and the keeping of the pipes. air mixers and burners clean All this is to be done by the patron.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — The School of the Ozarks, Inc., dba College of the Ozarks, Petitioner v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 27, 2023

Cir. 2012), the Sierra Club filed an APA challenge against the EPA, which had declared that the agency satisfied certain obligations imposed on it by the Clean Air Act. … EPA, 699 F.3d 530 (D.C. 2012), the Club filed an APA challenge alleging that the EPA failed to engage in the notice-andcomment process before declaring that the agency had met certain Clean Air Act obligations

Appendix — Jones v. Georgia Pacific Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998

overt act in furtherance of its conspiracy with Raymark. … REVIEW OF MEMBER COMPANY MINERAL FIBER TESTING EXPERIENCE Industry representatives commented briefly on their company’s programs to test air quality relative to mineral concentrations within their

Appendix — Newak v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1990

There is some evidence in the investigation that wrongful acts occurred prior to the amended period recommended by the investigating officer. … The following matters do, however, deserve comment.

Respondents Brief — APC Investment Co., et al., Petitioners v. Howmet Aerospace Inc., fka Arconic, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 13, 2021

Nor does it remotely capture what the court of appeals decided here. 13 The dispute in Guam concerns whether, in a settlement between the United States and Guam under the Clean Water Act, Guam accrued … Water Act).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Applicant v. New York, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 9, 2025

Id. at 247 (cleaned up). … (cleaned up).

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Healy v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1951

Section 1 of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (Act of April 22, 1908, Chapter 149, as amended by the Act of August 11, 1939; 45 U. S. C. … Throughout that period during which the engine headlight was on and its bell constantly ringing, Argument il the train was moving at 5 miles per hour, a rate of aaane which many people can walk.