Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.43s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Education, et al., Petitioners v. Myra Brown, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023
Moreover, the Secretary has “claim[ed] to discover” in the HEROES Act an “unheralded power” to issue a mass cancellation of student loan debt. Util. Air, 573 U.S. at 324. … Air, 573 U.S. at 324). He cannot.
Opposition Brief — Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
OE .b.0.bicud cus tancesdeeeeeceeal nd «ind ob buds eonee ee “I bo TABLE OF CITATIONS—(Continued ) STATUTES Page Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(b)\(3), 1321(f)(2) ...... 4 Clean Water Act, 33 … See, Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, 7604, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251, 7 1365, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 3251, 6967.
491 U.S. 1Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Goodman v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
Goodman has “suffered ‘long periods of deprivation of basic amenities,’ such as ‘showers, baths, adequate venti- lation or heating, recreation, work, medical and MH/MR care, laundry service, cleaning … /MR care, laundry service, cleaning service, and phone service.”
544 U.S. 1031Appellants Brief — Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1997
See Act § 2(a)(1), (17) & (19). … To assist subscribers in obtaining off-air access to network programming during this period, TCI distributed 40,000 A/B switches to subscribers in early October 1993. J.A. 1240.
520 U.S. 180Amicus Brief — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981
But the Clean Air Act does not mandate the use of coal; it merely establishes standards for the emission of sulfur dioxide when coal is used. … Indeed, when it amended the Act in 1977 (see Pub. L. No. 95-190, Section 14(a) (7)-(9), 91 Stat. 1399, amending Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. (Supp.
453 U.S. 609Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Avecor, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
This difficulty is exacerbated where only a few witnesses of much larger group who heard the comments testify on the subject, and most of these cannot be regarded as unbiased. … Armstrong conceded that it was the function of the operator of the machine to periodically clean off the excess plastic, either using re- lief machine operators or, when necessary, shutting down the
502 U.S. 1048Amicus Curiae Brief — American Gas Association, et al., Petitioners v. Department of Energy, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 23, 2026
Pet.App.16a (cleaned up). … After all, gas and electric furnaces both heat air.
Petition — Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. NLRB
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
This cafeteria is air-conditioned and seats between 400 and 500 persons. It is open for breakfast between 5 a.m. and 8 a.m., and also during lunch periods. … The five coke cribs, which are air-conditioned and enclosed, are scattered throughout the plant and are open during all meal and rest periods.
441 U.S. 488Appellees Brief — Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1984
-ecccceceees , 20 42 US.C. § 2236 22 42 U.S.C. § 2271 22 : PAGE | ees 22 4 ES Serene 22 |) ee 22 ictiicicsinnerienttenenppeenescontipenpestnnien 22 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C … For example, Congress has specifically authorized the states to regulate radioactive air pollutants from nuclear plants in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C. § 7422, and to impose certain
464 U.S. 238Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2026
Over the course of a 90-day public comment period, the island, with a population of just 166,000, submitted more than 10,000 comments and testimonies raising substantive concerns about the build-up’s impacts … Concerns about the speed and scale of the build-up raised during the comment period by both the local public and other federal actors also led DoD to substantially revise its plan, reducing the total number
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Allen v. Texaco Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1996). _ B. … All requirements of Section 114 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857) and Section 308 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251), relating to inspection, monitoring, entry, reports,
537 U.S. 973Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
VI, el. 22222 3, 23 STATUTES : Federal Power Act, § 27, 16 U.S.C. 8811 passim Flood Control Act, §1, 33 U.S.C. § 701-1 (1952 eT 4 Clean Water Act § 101 (g), 88 U.S.C. § 12851 (c)) 4 § 301(b)(1 … (Army Corps of Engineers may deny Clean Water Act Section 404 permit to FERC licensee), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 816 (1987) ; Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Ass'n v. FERC, 785 F.2d 269 (10th Cir.)
493 U.S. 1068Transcript of Record — Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1946
They have got a steam and a hot-air. The hot-air ‘mangles has 67, 68 shelves in, on a continuous chain, and the jigger head runs with the mapgle. … Arid, oh, clean out the jigger hae a little bit, mavhe clean off the tools most of the time, clean off the ring, clean the bench out. After we got done, by that time— Q.
328 U.S. 680Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2021
(1950), the Clean Air Act (1970), the Clean Water Act (1972), and CERCLA (1980). … Circuit within 90 days of any regulation promulgated, but not specifying that relief should extend to nonparties); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b) (providing complex provisions for review of covered rules
Opposition Brief — Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al., Petitioners v. Wyoming, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 18, 2018
When, in the context of the Clean Air Act, the Tenth Circuit was presented with the issue of whether the 1905 agreement and ratifying act truly diminished the reservation, it properly applied the three-step … Course of proceedings In December 2008, the Tribes applied to EPA for treatment as a state under the Clean Air Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 7601(d).
Petition — Transocean Contractors, Inc. v. Reed
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
He occasionally did some cleaning of the boat. … In affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeals, this Court made the following comments concerning the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act: This Act, as we have seen, was to provide
464 U.S. 1043Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 29, 2022
Watson, 551 U.S. at 143 (cleaned up). … Shock Trauma Air Rescue v. State Comp. Ins.
Joint Appendix — United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al., Petitioners v. Sierra Club, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · May 21, 2020
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (hereinafter, the “316(b) Rule”). … Measures established by the Director may reflect recommendations made by the Services during either the 60-day review or the public comment period.
Supplemental Brief — Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1982
or” on the ground that a separate German-American air transport agreement was in- tended to cover in detail all questions relating to air transport. … No Clean Drafts were given for the Protocol and enclosed letters. Four copies of the Clean Draft Treaty are being transmitted to the Department under cover of a despatch.
457 U.S. 176Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mark Murphy and Jennifer Murphy, Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 15, 2025
Further percolation is no longer useful: the arguments have been fully aired, and there is no probability this conflict will resolve on its own. United States v. … “Thus, the government cannot prove a § 846 violation unless it proves that the conspirators in the agreement knew they were acting—or intended to act— without a legitimate medical purpose in the usual
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.