Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.39s

  • Opposition Brief — Eastern Shoshone Tribe, Petitioner v. Wyoming, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 18, 2018

    When, in the context of the Clean Air Act, the Tenth Circuit was presented with the issue of whether the 1905 agreement and ratifying act truly diminished the reservation, it properly applied the three-step … Course of proceedings In December 2008, the Tribes applied to EPA for treatment as a state under the Clean Air Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 7601(d).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — George v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

    The National Environmental Policy Act 3 of 1969 P.L. 91-190 and E.O. 11514 Clean Air Act 2 U.S.C. §7401 3 Clean Water Act OF 1977 33 U.S.C. 3 1251-1387 P.L. 95-217 National Historic Preservation Act … with the approved State management program developed under the CZMA, conformance with the Clean Air Act 2 U.S.C. §7401 and Clean Water Act OF 1977 33 U.S.C. 1251-1387 P.L. 95-217, National Historic

    549 U.S. 1096
  • Reply Brief — Apache Corp. v. Moore

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

    A clean, visual and drift inspection involves cleaning the threads with a solvent, visually inspecting the threads to ensure that they have not been damaged di ~ 1g transit, and placing a cylinder through … More- over, the record reflects that, when the well blew out, the wellhead shot straight up into the air. Tr. 2373.

    517 U.S. 1217
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Luis Pina, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 8, 2021

    Ct. 2769 (2020) . ...................................... 3-4, 6, 11 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”) of 1996, § 309(c)(2), Pub. L.

  • Petition — Fox v. General Telephone Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

    Jackson uv Air Reduction Co., 6 Cir. 1968, 402 F. 2d, 521, 523. No benefit may inure to the company. Blum v. … REBUTTAL BY PLAINTIFFS Dale Kremsreiter recalled: I was an installer during the entire period covered by my wage claim and Mr. Gajewski was my foreman for the complete period in question.

    444 U.S. 829
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dura Corp. v. TWM Manufacturing Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986

    steel leaf spring acts as a positive retracting force lifting the axle from the ground automatically when the air is off * * *” Continuing to the next paragraph, “With the air spring inflated to operating … This gives the load an air ride.

    479 U.S. 852
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ryan Haygood, et al., Petitioners v. Camp Morrison, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 16, 2024

    Act 423 (H.B. 315). The two-year limitations period applies only to actions arising after July 1, 2024. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 566, 106 S.Ct 3088, 3098 (1986).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Courtney v. Smith

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

    In Investment Company Institute, we were unmoved by Justice Harlan’s comment in dissent that the Glass-Steagall Act was passed in spite of its positive effects on the competitive position of investment … or, in cases of bona fide urgency, two notices over a 30-day period.

    540 U.S. 814
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mark Mahon, Petitioner v. Apple Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 4, 2026

    Id. at 745 (cleaned up). … Plaintiff shall be provided an opportunity to comment on and/or approve the form of judgment.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Nebraska, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023

    Moreover, the Secretary has “claim[ed] to discover” in the HEROES Act an “unheralded power” to issue a mass cancellation of student loan debt. Util. Air, 573 U.S. at 324. … Air, 573 U.S. at 324). He cannot.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Weliver v. Board of Appeals, Maryland Department of Labor (No. 07-292)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

    Terrell Air Conditioning, 48 Md. App. 439, SE EF RE eiiisadeinctincneidulialnesnnlisueitasinedesaiaias 25 Weliver v. … Terrell Air Conditioning, 48 Md. App. 439, 442, 759 A.2d 1071, 1072-1073 (1981). To similar effect, in Beech Aircraft Corporation v.

  • Opposition Brief — Ditlow v. Pan American World Airways

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976

    STATEMENT OF THE CASE During the relevant period, the respondent air car- riers (hereinafter “the carriers”) were members of the International Air Transport Association ‘hereinafter “ITATA”).’ … The delay was due to the fact that the CAB directed the carriers to file economic justifications for the agree- ments and permitted interested parties to file comments.

    426 U.S. 949
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carl A. Robertson, Petitioner v. Interactive College of Technology, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 9, 2018

    Once Robertson said he "believed that he was decisively underpaid," Petitioner's comments made a valid claim under the "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act ("LLFPA"), which expands the statutory limitations periods … - (14) with Plaintiff's *annual reviews as written over a three-year period from 2009-2011 Plaintiff sincerely believed that due to the December 2011 comments to his annual review. and what he considered

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Lumber Co. v. Marbled Murrelet

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, A478 US. 5-40 (T9806). B. … Delaware Vallev Cittcens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 US. 5-46, Which, according to the Ninth Circuit, had “essentially over ruled” its own decision in Carson-lruckee. Pet. App. at Sa.

    528 U.S. 1115
  • Petition — King v. Public Service Employees Local Union 572

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

    Gemini provides cleaning services for the kitchen at Fort Monroe, Virginia, a federal enclave. … Air Terminal Services, 85 F.Supp. 545, 548 (E.D. Va. 1949); Air Terminal Services, Inc. v. Rentzet et. al., 81 F.Supp. 611 (E.D. Va. 1949); Note, Federal Assimilative Crimes Act, 70 Harv. L.

    434 U.S. 1065
  • Transcript of Record — Milanovich v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1961

    Tes all weren't wiping them clean, I'm sure? A. [ believe they had beer wiped-clean previously. Q). They had been wiped clean by who? : A. … Ido not remembe r distine tly who wiped them clean. - - Did vou wipé them clean? Let me put it that way. “ \. [believe assisted. — S And whom were vou assisting? A.

    365 U.S. 551
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines, Inc. v. Criales

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997

    Trans World Air- lines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 397, 102 S. … acts and fraud/corruption.

    522 U.S. 906
  • Appendix — S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

    While the latter acts do not, by their terms, apply to Puerto Rico, see 48 U.S.C. § 1301 (2), like the Clean Water Act they do give some indication that Congress has determined that it is desirable … The Clean Water Act Amendments of 1977 significantly expanded the scope of a vessel owner’s potential liability.

    450 U.S. 912
  • Opposition Brief — Michigan v. Dye

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

    Such a rule would necessarily require that the Act be invoked within a set time period which period could not be reasonable in every situation. … Had the witnesses been located within that period, it is likely required court proceedings under the Act would would not have been completed in time for trial.

    488 U.S. 985
  • Motion to Dismiss — Philadelphia v. New Jersey

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1977

    (Clean Air Act): Sec. 1857 NJAC. 7:142 - Rule 16(1)(b) — & No. 75-1150 —-— CITY OF PHILAD. … Bishop Processing recognized that the movement of air pollutants across state lines provided an adequate nal basis under the Commerce Clause for the enactment of the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1857

    430 U.S. 141

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.