Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.70s
Respondents Brief — California v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1981
Corp., / 411 U.S. 655 (1973) Fig 4 United States v. Republic Steel Corp., 33,35,70,75,80,90 362 U.S. 482 (1960) United States v. Rio Grande Dam & 80,81,85,86 Irrig. … Republic Steel Corp., 362 U.S. 482, 498-503 (1960). See also United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chem. Corp., 4l1 U.S. 655, 663-66 (1973); United States v.
451 U.S. 287Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Shepherdsville v. Rymer
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
re 5 = 1 1 GZ Supreme Court, U.S, FILED JAN 16 190¢ JOSEPH F. … Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 97 S. Ct. 598 46 L. Ed. 2d 561 (1976).
480 U.S. 916Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wood v. City Council of Manassas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 107 S. Ct. 2378, 96 L. Ed 2d 250 (1987). … Los Angels 482 U.S. 304, 107 S.Ct. 2378, 46 L.Ed 2d 250 (1987).
525 U.S. 869Brief in Support of Exceptions of the US — Arizona v. California
Supreme Court brief · Brief in Support of Exceptions of the US · 1962
Atkinson Co., 313 U.S. 508; Arizona v. Cali- . fornia, 283 U.S. 423; United States v. … ‘ California, 283 U.S. 423; Baltimore National Bank v. Tax Commission, 297 U.S. 209, 215.
370 U.S. 930Opposition Brief — Funderburg v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977) ............... 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 482 U.S. 270 (1987) ............. ~ Sones v. … Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 482 U.S. 270 (1987), is not to the contrary.
513 U.S. 1015Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Ford Motor Co. v. Polk
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1976
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938). … Battin, 413 U.S. 149 (1973); Arcieri v. Erie Lackawanna Railway Co., 484 F.2d 451 (6th Cir. 1973); Bernard v. Omaha Hotel, Inc., 482 F.2d 1222 (8th Cir. 1973); Winsby v.
426 U.S. 907Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mani Panoam Deng, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 22, 2024
New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62 n.2 (1975) (per curiam) (emphasis supplied). … Menna, 423 U.S. at 62. The Eighth Circuit applies a different standard, not true to Menna.
Opposition Brief — Teitelbaum v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1971
A. 2) and cases cited, certio- rari denied, 396 U.S. 879; see also Nolan v. United States, 423 F. 2d 1031, 1048-1045 (C. A. 10); Di- Piazza v. United States, 415 F. 2d 99, 101-103 (C. … 423
401 U.S. 924Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 9, 2019
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 152 L.Ed.2d 860, 1225 S.ct. 11781 (2002); Custis v. United Sates, 511 U.S. 485 (1994); Neifeld v. Steinberg, 438 F.2d 423 (3d. Cir. 1971); Albrech v. … Arkansas, 333.U.S. 196, 68 S.Ct. 514, 92 L.Ed. 644 (1948); Re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273, 68 S.Ct. 499, 507, 92 L.Ed 682 (1948); Neifeld v. Steinberg, 438 F.2d 423 (3d. Cir. 1971); Albrecht v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kinam Gold, Inc. v. Lettes
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
Fort Halifax, 482 U.S. at 7. … Fort Halifax, 482 U.S. at 11.
533 U.S. 929Petitioners Brief — Osborn v. Haley
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2007
(quoting Thermtron, 423 U.S. at 351). … Ct. at 2153 (quot- ing Thermtron, 423 U.S. at 351).
549 U.S. 225Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2003
Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. PCED 554.0554 4b ech e ees 6 Wisniewski v. … Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 344-45 (1976). Thermtron Products stands for the proposition that congestion in the court system will not warrant remanding cases.
Brief for the United States — Waite v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1931
, 36 Stat. 851 (U.S. … (U.S.
282 U.S. 508Amicus Curiae Brief — Rimini St., Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 783 (2019) (No. 17-1625)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437 (1987). … Crawford Fitting, 482 U.S. at 442, 444.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 12, 2026
Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987)................ 5, 12, 14, 18, 21, 23 Florida Rock Indus., Inc. v. United States, 18 F.3d 1560 (Fed. … Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987); Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255 (1980); Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979). See, e.g., Michael M.
Petition — Lustig v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Phillips, 482 F.2d 1355, 1357 (9 Cir. 1973); United States v. Hai- li, 448 F.2d 1295, 1299 (9 Cir. 1971). … Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1973).
434 U.S. 1045Petition — Chapman v. Dow Chemical Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Challoner, 423 U.S. 3 (1975). … Lowery, 482 F.2d 431 (2d Cir. 1971).
452 U.S. 958Reply Brief — Utah v. Ute Indian Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1986
Kneip, 423 U.S. 1047 CRTED vanicsnsssseessiesinscelaaeaiialaniabiianielin 1 Seymour v. Superintendent, 368 U.S. 351 (1962) 1 Solem v. Bartlett, 460 U.S. 1035 (1983) _ ............... 1 Solem v. … Bartlett, 460 U.S. 1035 (1983); Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 423 U.S. 1047 (1976); DeCouteau v. District County Court, 416 U.S. 966 (1974); Mattz v. Arnett, 409 U.S. 819 (1972); Seymour v.
479 U.S. 994Opposition Brief — Olkey v. Hyperion 1999 Term Trust, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) .... 12 Chapin v. Knight-Ridder, Inc., 993 F.2d 1087 COR Ge Bee 5 0c eka wns Ce eekeree 1] Decker v. … Litig., 89 F.3d 1399, 1405-06 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, __ U.S. ____, 117 S.Ct. 1105 (1997); Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, Ltd., 681 F.2d 111, 115-17 (2d Cir. 1982).
520 U.S. 1264Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Farsaci v. Bush
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
Bradford, 423 U.S 147 (1975) and Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. … Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975) and dicta from Richmond Newspapers Inc., v.
503 U.S. 939
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.