Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.82s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025
For example, the court noted that Loper Bright pointed to provisions of the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act that not only used broad language but also explicitly empowered agencies to regulate based … During construction periods between 2021 and 2030, use of stationary lift vessels in the lease areas and cranes at port locations would further increase navigational complexity in areas immediately around
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025
For example, the court noted that Loper Bright pointed to provisions of the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act that not only used broad language but also explicitly empowered agencies to regulate based … During construction periods between 2021 and 2030, use of stationary lift vessels in the lease areas and cranes at port locations would further increase navigational complexity in areas immediately around
Appendix — Salvador v. Lake George Park Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2011
It would review the comments and make a determination. Q. I think I missed a step. … (8) A boat cleaning area that is designed, operated and maintained in such a manner to prevent contamination of the waters of the park shall be provided, or boat cleaning shall be prohibited.
562 U.S. 1272Opposition Brief — Lord Manufacturing Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1950
Bs S Cc BREEBB I EE a ah cdc kce Amepiseviecceen ape Royalty Adjustment Act (Act of October 31, 1942, 56 Se Se ee es ss Sree ee eae eae Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (Act of Sep- … In August 1942, after a short period of letting contracts without requiring estimates of costs or profits, the Air Force adopted the common business practice of requiring contractors in fixed price
339 U.S. 956Opposition Brief — Ditlow v. Pan American World Airways
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976
STATEMENT OF THE CASE During the relevant period, the respondent air car- riers (hereinafter “the carriers”) were members of the International Air Transport Association ‘hereinafter “ITATA”).’ … The delay was due to the fact that the CAB directed the carriers to file economic justifications for the agree- ments and permitted interested parties to file comments.
426 U.S. 949Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Middleton v. Ball-Foster Glass Container Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
American Air- lines, Inc., 132 F.3d 1112, 1119 (5th Cir. 1998). The ADA defines disability as follows: (A) a physical or mental impairment? … United Air Lines, Inc., 119 S.Ct. 2139, 2145 (1999). It was undisputed that Middleton has a physical impairment to his back.
536 U.S. 924Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gerardo Farias-Contreras, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 27, 2024
(cleaned up)); United States v. … (cleaned up)); United States v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
whatsoever without any Clean Water Act permit. … Storm Water Management Plan, supra n.6, at Table 3.2-1. 16 be removed from Clean Water Act jurisdiction." Comments by EPA Region II (May 2003), at 26.
547 U.S. 715Amicus Curiae Brief — Printz v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
J. 1193 (1992) ....... 25 David Salmon, The Federalist Principle: Interaction of the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment in the Clean Air Act, 2 Col. J. Environ. … David Salmon, The Federalist Principle: Interaction of the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment in the Clean Air Act, 2 Col. J. Environ. L. 290, 326-27 (1976).
518 U.S. 1003Transcript of Record — Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936
In the case of tobacco, the base period shall be the postwar period, August 1919-July 1929. … period.
297 U.S. 110Transcript of Record — Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1946
The question now is did he make any comment? A. … a house - with.an air gun, was developed.
328 U.S. 680Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Nor does the brief comment on how the Clean Air Act should be construed. … The most startling finding about voters’ political knowledge also comes from this period.
Opposition Brief — Hester v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
quality standard for any air quality control region designated pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended. … issued pursuant to these acts.
516 U.S. 1093Amicus Curiae Brief — Chong Yim, et al., Petitioners v. City of Seattle, Washington
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 10, 2020
The landlord is stuck with whoever accepts the listing offer within the 48hour first-refusal period. … Causby, the Court held that the state’s interference with an air easement (through noisy flight paths) could alone effect a taking even though the “[owner] does not occupy [the air above his property]
Petition — Metro Truck Body, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
AIR CONTROL PRODS. of ST. PERTERSBURG, INC., 335 F.2d 245, 249, (C.A. 5, 1964).” … IDEAL LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING CO., 330 F.2d 712, NLRB v. JOCLIN MFG. CO., 134 F.2d 627, and NLRB v.
447 U.S. 905Opposition — Brain v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984
This Court’s decision did not mark a radical departure from settled case law or a clean break from a long line of prece- dent. … Ct. 2281, 2285 (June 8, 1983), wherein this Court held that the six-month federal limita- tions period set forth in Section 10(b) of the National 14 Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (b), “should
465 U.S. 1027Appendix — Raytheon Aerospace, Inc. v. Greenwell
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1998
When ques- tioned on her use of NEK cleaning solvent, she took a defensive attitude instead of a helpful one. … “If someone makes a comment about that, you get rid of it,” she says.
524 U.S. 904Brief for Respondent — Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1973
“But this is how the sequence was shown over the air: Mr. … A theater may advertise a motion picture that por- trays sex and violence, but the Legion of Decency has no right to post a message calling for clean films.
412 U.S. 94Opposition Brief — Leslie Salt Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
The 1972 Clean Water Act, The Callaway Deci- sion, And The 1975 Interim Final Regulations .. 15 2. … * As with the 1976 Oversight Hearings, the comments of numerous senators indicate their understanding that absent an amendment reduc- ing the scope of Corps jurisdiction under the Act, the Act’s jurisdiction
498 U.S. 1126Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 27, 2022
Ct. 361, 370 (2018)) (cleaned up). 23 Id. (citing Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831-32 (1985)). 24 Heckler, 470 U.S. at 832-33. 25 Id. at 833. 26 2018 Appropriations Act, 132 Stat. at 1009-10. … (quoting Chaney, 470 U.S. at 832) (cleaned up)).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.