Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.28s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 11, 2024

    App.26a (cleaned up). … Dep’t of the Air Force, 527 F.3d 806, 819 (9th Cir. 2008)).

  • Transcript of Record — Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1963

    Is this veast-like thing’ something that can come through. the air, this candida albicans, if you know? A. Not so much the air as contamination. . , On the surface? … Neoanatter how clean we try to kecgoareclves, in ou hair. under our fingernails 7° A. Yes.) - ‘* —Q. And inthe airs too, right? A. Yes.sir. *().

    372 U.S. 108
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Powers v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973

    After the plane had moved at high speed over the water for takeoff and had barely become air- borne, the damage occurred. … The pilings were being cleaned and then re-strengthened by placing an additional thickness of cement around the steel reinforcement.

    414 U.S. 856
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Rose Mary Knick, Petitioner v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 4, 2017

    Both Williamson County and this case were brought under the Federal Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. … It is ample to lay out zones where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people.” (Village of Belle Terre v.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — John Pietsch, et al., Petitioners v. Ward County, North Dakota, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 12, 2021

    Enacted on April 6, 2010 by the Board of County Commissioners for Ward County (“County Commission”)—unanimously and with no opposition during the public comment period—the ordinance’s stated purpose largely … Dayton, 761 F.3d 873, 875 (8th Cir. 2014) (cleaned up).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

    Ohio 1993) 16 Clean Air Act, 4 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 00... 4 oy Land West, Inc., 526 P.2d 1110 (Idaho : § 113, 42 U.S.C. 7413 (Supp. … et seq., and the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., which also grant power to enforce statutory and regulatory requirements and to respond to imminent hazards.

    515 U.S. 1192
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — International Ass'n of Machinists v. Brady

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969

    Nothing in this Act shall prevent said carriers by air, or any class or classes of their employees, both acting through their repzesentatives se- lected in accordance with provisicns of this title, … It insists, however, that it ‘‘wiped the slate clean’’ on April 11 when it demanded only a reinstatement fee.

    393 U.S. 1048
  • Motion for divided argument — Environmental Protection Agency, Petitioner v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Motion for divided argument · Jan 17, 2025

    The Renewable Fuel Program (“RFP”) is a Clean Air Act program that mandates the amount of renewable fuel to be blended annually into the nation’s supply of gasoline and diesel fuel. … Section 307(b)(1) of the Act specifies that a petition for review of any “action” taken under the Act “may be filed only in” the D.C.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cramer v. Pena

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

    Section 29 of the International Air Transportation Com petition Act of 1979, Pub.L. … We received comments and reply comments from: Air Midwest, America West Airlines, Continental Air Lines, the Dallas/Fort Worth Parties, Delta Air Lines, the Department of Justice, the Regional Airline

    509 U.S. 904
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926). 15 During the same period that Congress was considering and enacting the bills that ultimately became the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act and other … Under Clean Water Act (33 US.C. 1344), Madrona Marsh, Torrance, Calif.

    531 U.S. 159
  • Reply Brief — United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007

    Asarco, Ine., 792 F.2d 887 eee ss] Ill Statutes and regulation: Page Act of Dee. 11, 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-510, 94 Stat. … limitation period for cost-recovery claims.

    551 U.S. 128
  • Reply Brief — Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff, et al., Petitioners v. Christopher Garnier, et ux.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 20, 2022

    Freed, 37 F.4th 1199, 1206 (6th Cir. 2022)) (cleaned up). … BIO 15 (cleaned up).

  • Opposition Brief — Rogers v. Liquid Air Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

    The RICO Act defines a pattern of racketeering activ- ity as at least two acts of racketeering activity committed within a ten-year period. 18 U.S.C. § 1961(5). In Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. … Imrex Co., Inc., 473 U.S. 479 (1985), this Court commented that a pattern requires continuity plus rela- tionship among those predicate acts. Jd. at 496 n. 14.

    492 U.S. 917
  • Petitioners Brief — Air and Liquid Systems Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Roberta G. DeVries, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John B. DeVries, Deceased, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jul 9, 2018

    Without this requirement, any affirmative act serving as a but-for cause of a later injury would subject the actor to liability. … App’x at 357–58 (6th Cir. 2009) (manufacturer of paint sprayer had no duty to warn about dangers of product foreseeably used to clean it); O’Neil v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    EPCRA's citizen suit provision is entirely different than the citizen suit provision in the Clean Water Act ("CWA"), 33 U.S.C. § 1365. … The court below exhaustively analyzed the differences between the language of EPCRA's citizen Suit provision and the language of the Clean Water Act's ("CWA's") citizen suit provision as construed by

    523 U.S. 83
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Mortier

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    Supp. 423 (N.D. 476 N.E.2d 585 (1985) 45 Ill. 1985), aff'd without opinion, 826 F.2d 1068 Statutes (7th Cir. 1987) 46 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … See, e.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Sections 7602(e), (£) (*municipality,"* “person"); Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.

    501 U.S. 597
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    3 suffer discharges of any type of pollutant whatsoever without any Clean Water Act permit. … Storm Water Management Plan, supra n.6, at Table 3.2-1. 16 be removed from Clean Water Act jurisdiction." Comments by EPA Region III (May 2003), at 26.

    546 U.S. 932
  • Petition — American Airlines, Inc. v. World Airways, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

    It is significant, therefore, that it was the Board’s policy for a period antedating the 1962 supple- mental air carrier legislation to preciude dual certification. … The Conference Report in its comments on ‘‘individually ticketed and waybilled serv- ices,’’ explained: ‘Under the House amendment, the term ‘‘supple- mental air transportation’’ did not include individ

    431 U.S. 915
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Ranieri v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1942

    Rice and Burton, No. 31, decided Nov. 9, 1942. 13 i (1) it iH ri i i} i [AIT AIR AOS AEA DI! … The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked under Section 3(b) of (1) 2 the Act of February 13, 1925, as amended by the Act of May 22, 1939. QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.

    317 U.S. 690
  • Record and brief — EPA v. National Resources Defense Council, Inc. (Nos. 83-1373, 83-1013)

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1984

    August 20, 1984 A-l CLEAN WATER ACT PROVISIONS 1. Section 208(bN2"C) of the Clean Water Act, as amended, MUS.C. … Section Olri) of the Clean Water Act, as amended. 151 5.0.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.