Transcript of Record — Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court brief1963
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
“LIBRARY "S
“IPREME COURT. UL &
VOLUME I
TRANSGRIPT OF RECORD
o-_
raaevones Ceiae of the United States
OCTOBER TERM, 1962
No. 16
a
JAMES GALLICK, PETITIONER, s
' v8.
THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO
RAILROAD COMPANY.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPFALS OF ‘THE
STATE OF OHI0, CUYAHOGA COUNTY
s
; , =
PETITION FOR CERTIORARI FILED MARCI 3, 1962
CERTIORARI GRANTED APRIL 16, 1962
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
. ‘OCTOBER TERM, 1962 2
,.
JAMES GALLICK. PRE TEEIONER,
is. A P
2s) THE BALTIMORE AND O10
; RAILROAD COMPANY, —
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARE TO CTHE- COURT OF APPLALS OF THE
STATE OF OHIO, CUYAHOGA COUNTY
a
. INDEX TO°VOLUME I
a ~ A Original Print
Record from the Court of Common Pleas, in and
for County of Cuyahoga, State of Ohiv
/ Amended petition : TESS ' A 1
Auswer to-amended ibis ; : b }
Reply —_. QP ices H 6
Journal entry of ‘sachonen nt for plaintiff on the
special verdict of ‘the jury by Judge Victor
Cohen eed Hi 6.
Exhibits ‘A thru W—sSpecial verdict J 7
dournal entry overruling motion by defendant
for. judgment on special vebdiet 2. Ss 14
Journal entry overruling motion, by defendant ~
for judgment notwithstanding the verdict T 14
Journal entry overrnling the motion by defen-
dant for a new trial . UC 15
Defendant's bill of exceptions Pie 1 45
“Appearances ° : ye 1 15
Bi stimony of William eT
es “direct by Mr. Dudnik ” 4. 4,
:
a a7 * - a . ~
Rrcoorp Press, PRintERS. New York, N.Y... September 21. 1962
.
ii
Record from the
INDEX
a:
thereon and objection overruled
Testimony of W illiam: Molnar—=---——_
cross by Mr. Dudnik
, Offers in evidence
Testimony of Walter Rady —
~ direct by Mr. Dudnik
eross by Mr. Dudnik
William Clason—
direct. by Mr. Dudnik
cross by Mer. Dudnik
Mrs. Mary Gallick—
direct by Mr. Dudnik
Offer in evidence
Testimony of Mrs. Mary Gallick—
eross by Mr. Hadden
James Gallick—
\
direct by Mr. Dudnik ~
cross by Mr. Hadden
Dr. Jacob R. Heller—
direct by Mr. Dudnik
cross by Mr. Leasure.
redirect by Mr. Dudnik
recross by Mr. Le “ASUTE
Helen Eberwein—
direct by Mr. Dudnik
Cyril W: Neff—
direct by Mr. Dudnik .
eross by Mr. Leasure
Offer in ev eldence
oa) ie
Testimony of Cyril W. Neff—.
eross by Mr. Leasure
redirect by Mr. Dudnik
reeross by Mr. Leasure
further redirect. by Mr
Dudni® ¢
Leasure
further: reeross by Mr
; : . Original
Court of Common Pleas, in ‘and for
County of Cuyahoga, State of (hio---Continued”
“ . Defendant's bill of exceptions-—Contintied?
Objection to calling Mr. Molnar fer cross-
examination by Mr. Dudnik and proceedings
198 |
213
213
130
2g
29
231
233
Print-
INDEX 28
Record from the Court of Common Pleats. an aud for
County of Cuyahowa. State ot Obiie Continued
Defendant's bilkof exesptions. Contimied
Testimony of dames Jo Gallick resumed 0-0
cross by Mr: Madde n a
Testimony of dames J. Galliek® 9° —— ---——
erat redirect by Me) Dudnik 4
OiTersain en bdegiece ae
Testimony of dames J. Gallick i
“ redireet be Mr. Durdnih hs
“Dr. Vietor Ippolite - a
; direet by Mr. Dudnik oie
OWors pf evidence . 256
Testimony of Der Victor Ippolite ‘
airect by Me. Dudnik—* 2a!
Offers incevidener a, SS
Testimony of Dr. Victor Tppolite «resumed
: direct by Mr. Drredntk tht
IN cross by Mr. Leisure . sae
Statement by the Coret Sh
Testimony af Dro Vietor Ippolito (restimed )——
eross by Mr. Leasure G2
redirect by Mr. Dudnik Wu
recross by Mr. Leasure 4
Dro Robin Andersen-
direet by Mr. Dndnik 416
ae, “CTOSS by Mr) Leasure $42
Offer in evidence ‘ Ww
. Testamony of Dr Robin Anderson ;
eross by Mr. Leasuré 0
redirect by Mr. Dondnik * $03
reeross by Mr Leasiure . 474
> Offers in-evidence : , 457
Plainti® re sts _ 459
Court's ruling on motion te strrke each of the
Specifications of newline *hheew . e 195,
Order overruling motion for a direeted Verdict S407!
Testimony af Panl D..1; aria -
direct by Mr Leasure fan
—eross by Mr Dudnik ~ > Age
Fs 2
lv tee INDEX
7 4 Original Print
Record from the Court of Common Pleas, in and for
County of Cuyahoga, State of Ohio—-Continued
Defendant's bill of exceptions—Continued ;
_ Testimony of William Clason— say
é direct by Mr. Lea: ure AT 310
i eee cross by Mr. Didnik 163 320,
Offers in. evidence 82 332
Testimony of ‘William Clason— ta ears. 7
redirect by. Mr. Leasure BY 332
Mr eee INDEX.TO VOLUME IT. °
Testimony of Joseph P. Corrigan— oo seed
el Oak eile _direct by Mr. Hadde ne 590-337
ae ~ eross by Mr. Dudnik 605 346
Offers: in evidence : 38 620 356
Testimony -of Joseph P. Cate . ve
redirect by Mr. Hadden 621. \ 356
recross by Mr. Dudnik 625 358
further redirect by Mr.
~ Hadden . —-, , 44: i
Dr .Louis A. Stearns—
_ direct by Mr. Hadden — 626. 359
cross by Mr. Dudnik - - 635 | 865
redirect by Mr. Hadden 662-381
Excell C. Richardson— ‘
direct by Mr. Leasure— - 665 385
~ eross by Mr. Dudnik . 674 R89
P redirect by Mr. Leasuse 679-392
4 recross by Mr. Dudnik 685. 396 sa fae
~ recross by Mr. Leasure 687 Pt
4% | further = eross by Mr ,
| » Dudnik . 688-398
st John H. Davis— , Tae
direct by Mr Leasure 690 399
eross by Mr. Dudnik 71 2412
redirect by Mr. Leasure 747 $29
recross by Mr. Dudnik) 754 4834 oe
further redirect’ by Mr .
_Leasure 764 440
>
a ’ 4 ° “.e
INDEX
Record from the Court of Common Pleas. in and for
County of Cuyahoga, State of Ohio —Coutinued
Defendant's bill of exeeptidns—-Continued
‘Testimony of Be nedict Brodzinski-- _,-
direct by Mr. Hadden
eross by Mr. Dudni
redirect by Mr. Hadden
further cross by Mr.
Dudnik :
Elmer: Giese—
direct by Mr. Hadden
, sane CTOSS by Mr. Dudnik
| redirect by Mr. Hadden
recross by Mr. Dudnik
-
Offers. in evidence
Defendant res}s
Rebuttal
Testimony of Leon. Plevin—
direct by Mr. Dudnik
eross by Mr. Leasure -
redirect by Mr. Dudnik
> PeCTOSS by Mr. Leasure
.
= . Dudnik -
James R.. Skelly— ;
‘ . direet by Mr. Dudnik
th ete = cross by Mr. Hadden -
James J. Gallick—
‘direct by Mr. Diidnik
mee L ) Surre! butt: al. : .
. : Te stimony of (ads Hecdiaiailts
direct by Mr. Leasureé
cross by. Mr. Dudnik
rn redirect by Mr. Leasure
Offer in evidence :
Plaintiff arid defendant rest :
Defendant renews its motion. for a) directed.
verdict and overrnling thereof
Court's ruling on motion to strike specifieations
of negligence
further. redirect by Mr. z
Te aes
SA7
vi see INDEX:
: : Original Print
Record from the Court of Common Pleas, in and for
County of Cuyahoga, State of Ohio—Continued
: Transcript of proceedings of ‘June 23, 1959 - . 913 o1y
Colloquy _ . aie Mita eeradee ~ 913 ALS
Statement by court re: : instpeietions _ 827 -: 516
Transcript of proceedings of June 24, 1959 - + WSR 522 |
Defendant's requests for submission of special * + | Ps
interrogatories to jury “ ...- r . 988 -. 522
Charge of the court —. » 1040 °. 534
Colloquy re: charge of the court. : . 1066 548
Transcript of proceedings of June 25, 1959 - 1072 551
| Question submitted to court by jury 1072 551
_ Transcript of proceedings of June 26, 1959 * “1076 553
-. Judgment for plaintiff = 9... - 1091-52
‘Judge’s certificate to bill of exceptions | ' "1103 568
Plaintiff's Exhibits:
~. No. 12—Blueprint of Survey of Adee—under’
and around the Columbus Road Bridge, June :
9, 1959, prepared by Neff.& Associates 1105a . 571
No. 13—-Marymount Hospital record of the ett
_ first’ admission .. ; 1105b 573
No. 14—Marymount Hospital record — ee, a ae
second admission a *1105f d77
No. 18—Highland View Sagahows County ig
- Hospital record - oe -1105m 5S4
- No. 20—Mary mount : Hospital bill (3 pages )-> .
June 4,1959 - 1106 588
No. 21—Cleveland Clinic bill (7 mages) 1107 591
No. 22—Highland View Hospital-bill (1 page) 1108. 598
No. 23-A,. B. & C—-Signed statement of wit-
ness, William Clason (3 pages) 1109 599
No. 24-A, & B—Signed statemént of witness,
Joseph P. Corrigan (2 pages) 1110 602.
Defendant's Exhibits A, B, C. D, E, F—The med-
ieal record of Dr. Heller (6 cards) 1111 ‘604
G-1 &G-2—The Baltimore &.Ohio Railroad
Company, Time return and delay report of
yard train employ ees, dated: August 10, 1954
and August 12, 1954 ; 1112 610
~
“4
INDEX
Re cord from the Court of C nmon Pleas, in aid for.
" OnDTY of Cuyahoga, Siave of Ohio -Continued
Defendant's exhibits—Continned ;
—AiL—The Baltimore a d Ohio Railroad Com
"pany, Report of Personal Injury, Form 790
L-f and 1-2—Signed statement: of plaintut,
James J. Gallick, dated August 10, 1454...
~ K—Map of City of! Cleveland showing Inter-
cepting’ Sewers in Cuvahéga Kiver Valley
N=Blueprint—Station Map—-Track, The -Bal-
‘timore and Ohio Railroad Company
Proceedings. in the Court of Appeals. Eighth Ju.”
dicial District, State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County.
Opinion, Hunsicker, J.
Journal entry of judgment |
Nofice of appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio
Motion of plaintitf-appellant to certify record filed
in the Supreme ourt of Ohio ~~
Notice «of éross- appeal” ‘to the Supreme Court of:
Ohio
Motion of defendant: iott~ to certify. rec cond filed
ein the Supreme Court of Ohio >
Assignments of error
Cross-assignments. of error
Statement of: questions prese nted
The Constitutional question :
The matter of public or great general interest
Proceedings in the Supreme Court of Ohio
» Journal entry of ‘order. overruling plaintiff- appel-
lant’s motion to certify’ record
Journsi entry of ¢ orde rr. ‘overruling defendant-
appellee's cross-motion to certify record
Journal entry of order sustaining motion by defen-
dant-appellee to, dismiss oippeal of — plaintiff-
appellant as of right :
Journal entry of order dismissin® appeal as of
right of plaintiff- appellant oS
“Applidation of defendant-appellee for re Svadiin of
its cross-motion to eertify
Site
1114
1115
T1i6. -
> 1117
1117
1131
1133.
1135
113s
1140
1142
1144
1145
1146
1147—
114s
“1148
114s
- 1148
114s
1150
612
G1...
615
617
G1s
618
629
* 631
632
633
63-4:
634
636
637
637
“638
639:
639
639
639
639
Miii ; _ INDEX | *
“ Original Print
Journal entry of order overruling the application
of defendant-appellee for rehearing ‘of its cross-
motion to certify Shite 1152 642
Notice of appeal to the Supreme Coy of the un
a RE eee On aN Pee aae 1153 642
Order allowing certiorari pakes ; : 1155 643 .
: ®
7%
P ie 1 :
Itol. \j
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS IN AND
FOR COUNTY OF ‘CUYAHOGA, %
STATE OF OHIO
No. GO7202,
wae
Jamis Ganiacn, Plaintul,
Vs. . - — ee cee
Tui. Bantimonre axp Oui Rawwoay Co Defendant,
AMENDED Piritiox--Fijed Septeniber S. LISS a
Now comes the plaintift and after having duly obtaimed ‘
leave of court files this his, gimended petition. Puaiiti’
for his cause of Action. save that at all tifnes he reimallered — s
the defendant was’and is a railrotid Corporation. orsanicd.
and existing under the iaws of the State ot Miury land, snd a”
Was at the time of the occurrenceshercim set forth and as”
now. ¢arrying on its SINCSS Us an interstate cendnen
[fol B| carrier ®t! pasgens YS and Preteh? within the juris
diction oF this court; (iat ajall times herein alleged. plain:
tiff was and is a resident of the City oot Paria, Counts os
of Cuyahoga and State of Ohio, emploved by the de remedant
as a-Yard Foreman, in whieh) expacity the plaintgt wit
engaged in the movetnent, switehing and ehussiiedton ot
freight cars on tracks ofthe defendant located in the
_ ¢inity of Lime Road and the Colmubus Road Bridgee un tie
City of Cleveland, Conny of Cis ahora, Brartecor Oe: Mos
He action of “plaintiff is brought under, aml IS coverneck by
the provisions .of the Federgl Employers’ Lisbility Aet,
oto USCA, Sections o1-59 ance Aime iétinents there ‘tos that,
fhe work Maties of the plaintiff at all thies herein ihe weal?
substantially affected tid were in furtherance of egnter-
state commerce, 5
* Plainti? further sav ‘that in theanonth of ANueust, 19542"
the exact date and thie bees nee rin, Khe Wars ener 0,
-
&
r
@&
in the performance of his duties involving the movement,’
switching and classification of railroad freight cars at de-
fendant’s tracks located.in vicinity of Line Runt and the
— Read Bridge in the: City of ‘land, County
{ Cuyahoga, State of Ohio; that -mclose. proximity: to
aiid “troite in August of 1954, and for a long time prior
thereto to the knowledge of. the defendant, there existed: a
pool of stagnant water on premises in the possession of and
Junder the control of defendant into which was aeccumu-
lated dead pigeons, rats and various forms of bugs, lice and
vermin; that plaintiff was required to perform his work
duties in close proximity to said area; that in the month-of ’
August, 104, while performing his usual and customary
work duties in and ‘about the Columbus Road Bridge and
‘Lime Road tracks of defendant, the plaintiff was bitten by
‘Tfol. C] an insect following which he developed serious,
painful and disabling injuries as will be deseribed herein-
after.
Plaintiff. further says that the deferidant was: neglige nt
in the following respects: . . @
1. In that it required plaintiff to ajetorw his work
duties in close proximity to an area which was known
by the defendant te be infested with de ad pigeons,
rats, bugs, lice and vermin.
” In that it failed to drain said stagnant pool of
water which would have eliminated the hazard te the
health of the employees compelled to work in the vi-
cinity of said area and more particularly, this plaintiff.
“>:
3. In that it failed by the use of chemic als or other-
Wise te eliminate’ from the said area where plaintiff
was required to work the accumulations of dead pig-
cons, Tats, bugs, lice and vermin, although it) knew
of said Condition which existed for many years prior to
the injury to plaintiff.
that it failed to provide plaintiff with a rea-
sonabhy safe place in°which to perform his work duties.
d. Tf that it failed to inspect and spray the empty
freight cars being moved, switched or classified in the
atl
t=
ee . ; bs 2 P ‘ 7 . LJ
Vieinityeon the track of the defendant near Lime Rezd
and the Coltumbus Read Bridge te pad thecsdimee of in
sects, bues, tree amd verniim.
© 6. In that it kmew that by permitting ail peel
stademant wither tecceerniaite dead: piweone, rats. bus,
nad Verh. Insects Wwaotiteh be gattraed: tes sid: dred,
und that its caploxees veuld have te works under un
Chhealthtad amd umeamitary condithons,
Plainti® further says that by reais of gad im conse
quence of the foreroine fre digent aets amd otussions of
fol Dy) the defendant. andeas the direct and proximate: re:
sult thereat, lie wits catised te be bitten by aan insect pehiel
caused his system to become poisoned and whieh resulted
In the fortuation of deep. meyite tleerations with craimine
“about lis extreniities and Hedy, Whieh condition has net
abated with thine.
Plaintity further saves that as ao result of dis injuries,
had been hecessary for hin te underce extemsive hos
afveorenerenaes nredical-care and attention, and surcery, for
al of whieh he has sustained ONE whee, the fall extent ani
qinount of whieh is, as veto aumieeertaingble tesmiudi as
plaintiff is recers ine tiedical eire and atte ation and hes:
jaitalization at the time ov tiline Wiis, his wnended: petition,
PlaintitY further sass iter his induries hae necesfitated
surgery for the amaprtation of hath bers, Uist ie is fon
fined to his hos pits bed and a wheel ehiar and will remain
sointo the indefinite fiture,
PlaintitY further says that lis amgarie. hace enused hime .
to suffer an extreme weieht dos. ; and neeessitated that he
constmne dare qutntities of hareoties Ioan attempt tore
lieve his pain, eas
Plaintiff further sas> thatas a result of his injuries: he
has suffered and will sutfer preriag inentis Prom pain. wrent
mental anemish, eXtreme nervousness. an inabylity te ob.
tain normal rest, wereht less. eosmetie disfigurement) an.
inability to eet oboutoand extreme Worrs. crief andamnxiety,
Plaintify further sats that his iniuries have rendered
him an invelidi end that be need= constant Gari anc at-
tention te livs person,
4
~-
rs
f
Plaintift further says that prior to the foregoing ocenr-
renee, hy was regularly employed, earning and eapable
[fol. ER] of earning substantial wages but that as a result
of his injuries, as aforesaid, he has been rendered totally
Incapacitated. from restuning his railroad -oceupation or any
other gainful occupation whieh condition will continue inte
the indefinite future,
By means of and in conseqtence: of which plaintitt has,
heen injured and damaged in the sum of Seven Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000.00), '
Wherefore, plaintiff? pravs judgment from the defendant
herein in the sum of Seven Llundred Fifty Thousand Dol.
lars ($750,000.00). .
A. H. Dudnik, Meyer A. Cook, Attorneys, for Plain-
tiff. Ns “4 .
® —a -
IN THE Covert of ComMoN PLEAS
~
Axswer to Amespvepn Petirios—Filed December 17, 1958
First’ Defense.
Now comes defendant and for its first separate defense’
to plaintiffs amended petition admits that it is a railroad
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Maryland, and maintains certain tracks in the vi-
cinity ef Lime Road and the Columbus Road ‘Bridge in the
City of Cleveland, Ohio; admits that during the month of
August, 14> plaintiff was employed by defendant: in the
capacities of yard foreman and yard helper, engaged in
the movement, switching, and classification of - cars
over certain tracks of defendant lecated in the City. of
Cleveland; adynits that plaintiff enuse of action is brought
[fol. PF] under the ote peers of the Federal Employers’
Liabilitwe Act, 45 UL S. Cl AL 6551-59) as amended: amd
adits that plaintiff's pe ax vard foreman and vard
‘helper were in furtherance of interstate commerce,
Not intending to deny that plaintiff may have been re.
quired in the course of gis duties as yard foreman or vard
helper to be. present from fime to time during tlie. month
of August, 1954, ator near the trac ‘ks of defendant which
: 5)
**
. ; .
are locate alin th 4 Vie nity of Line Reel sone thier ‘ohambus
Road Bridse. or that plsintiid bas satletye Nous series
vam pain’ al disability sebeegient te: Nagust, PMS phaintatl
does deny ferednek oi kro wiedso thet therm existed at
thitt time at peeled steenant water er ether unscmitery eon
dition fer whieh the chet ennctaunt Wats Pesponmstble un the vi
einity ef its treeks cat Loree Revel andthe Coluredus Rese
Brieless dlemies thaut pele’ at iiy’s ies. or abisertse: wits prend
mately extised or eontribeited: te by tho meulionenee af this
thefemelant. ifs saremts. servants. or enables, either im thee
respects alleged im the guncided petition or in ake ether
biainner, ane speej tient ly denies the existence of ame eon
nection Whatsoever between the condition of defendant’.
tracks and readbed and the inseet bite allewedly sistaimed
by plaintift while employed as ca vard foreman or vir
helper for defendant durin the month of Avert, DOL.
Purther an-wertne, defendant sav< that of it) be trie
that the Wness or disen-¢ from whieh olamtdt now soffer-
Was enused or contributed te bw am insert bite sustained
Oby him on defendant’. premises or elsewhere, the likeli
hood of dari and comsequemces te plaintiffl therefrens:
fol. G] were bevond? the reali of reasonable probsabilite
or foreseenbilitvy with the result that me ghaty aroege reer”
ing the exercise of eare by defendant to peresteet olasmtilt
from anv sueh risk: and defendagpt further sas~ that if it
should be found that sneh risk sheld have been foreseen by
this defendant. né renseniahle method or meen. was avail
able te it whieh could have eliminsted. controlled. erenap
preciably reduced the niniters OM thts Of insert~ im and
about its pretises.: . * (
Further answering, dete nelant denies entch inde every ab
lew ation contained in plaintifl’s amended petition save and
Nee} it these hereinabove « Npires=Ts stebinittead ter Doe trite.
Second Defense. - @
Por its second senate defense te pelsvinat eft ’s sennvetnededd
petition, defendant iIneerpebates hereint bw reference and
makes ao part hereet the preecding portions of this ifs
answer and sav~ that if it sheuhd be found that plaintitls
disability Wes enused) im whole or im part ben thie merceicce mess
6 -
Of this defendant, which defendant specifically denies, then
neither said disability nor the insect bite which is claiiued
to have oceasioned it constitutes an “injury” within the
meaning of the Federal Einplovers’ Liability Act, and that
plaintiff may not recover in this action. * °
Wherefore, having fully answered, defendant prays that
plaintiff's amended petition, be dismissed and that it may
go henee with its costs without, day. :
Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Attorneys for Defen-
dant.
[fol. H] - poy Sete
Ix THe Court or ComMon PLEAS
Rerry—Filed June 16, 1959
For his Reply te the Answer of the defendant to plain-
tiffs: Amended Petition, plaintiff denies each and every
fact, statement and allegation contained therein save and
except such as are an admission of a fact, statement. or
allegation contained in the Amended Petition of Plaintiff.
For his further Reply plaintiff re-alleges and = re-avers
the facts, statements and allegations ‘contained in- his
Amended) Pétition, and) prays for’ judgment as in’ his
Amended Petition he has prayed.
A. H. Dudnik, Attorney for Plaintiff.
In THE Courr oF ComMMoeN PLEAS
Journal Extry of Jtpgement—July 20, 1959
The Court finds that the jury in the within eause was
duly impanelled and sworn; that praper request: wits nade
to the Court ‘by the defendant for a special vetdict as: pro-
Vided by law; and that a-special verdict was returned by.”
the jury. .
The Court-further finds that..the photographic copies
annexed hereto as Exhibits “A, B,C. D, E. PY G. EL I J,
K, LM. NL O.P.Q, ROS. TSU. VW" are an exact repro-
(fol. 1] duction of the original special verdict returned by
«
Vie jury amd anade a partoet the record at the within eats:
mel that sali Fixhibitsanmesed herete as” bexhiabits A
tired Wodenstitite the verdiet af the jury, 4 =
The Court pee Pras sate-toed teat Daahabit. A throguch
Wate xed hereto com-ftithte thee verdiet of the wey the
Court Kerelis Gneopparites The aise Hy peferenen dis part
of thi Is pie al dents as r eauloeNobess hy rewritten herern.
Tee Coukt farth re findy that preter request wits minde
by the defendant fer the subsoisstom of ae separate timding
"of tact Ie the yours ete that dehabit oN game edd dreretes
Imanmesaet plotecumedie equ. ad the finding of fret cet the
jury. JPite Court therefore caecorpens ites fiaxhibit oN" as
annexed hereta as a part ofthis Journal & ntry as thouch
eXpresstv rewritten herein,
The Court being oftthe opinion that the special verdict
Of the ary gs roterred te guid operated \ithin this
Journal Mntey and annexed herete ws Rixtubits Ao throweh
W is sittieient in faw te Peeuipe de iduaent for the glam
tits amd the jury by std special verde having fonnd that
plaimiths diaiceres ae Sin Hmndred Pacenty Bice Thon
sumed Dellars O86 0000): gad the Coot decarr of the
opinien that the finding of faet oof the darv. as referred te
andcineerperated vathin this Pearnad Entry gad ammexed?
hereto as Exhibit (Nis coms stent with the verdiet of ile
Jury itis hereby ordered that leantit reeover of the de
fondant the said semi of Sin Tiindred Paeenty Rive Phen
same Phollars (860500000000 for whietl: sar, with the east.
of this aetion. iudement is hemeha oremdered: da favor of
pheimtitY sad aeccnest the dete meant,
lfeol. Fi Serer Vi noe H
.
bextibat
We, thes gris. decane tret daly itipnedled: cand sweern
ened betme three fereth sr nea ot the whole snraeber
thereo!, de Moved bey the hg ii hes etal t af 1} da gry ude TGs. Tie
followin dheeTermitmatige tssites im this eanuse:
1. Wied se teal ot stan: int Water exist under te Colin
Pes Rested Bridee durin the ontureseariy port or Naweust,
54° Yrs, (
(Names of twelve Jurers otittedh )
-
*
. Exhibit B.
We, tHe jury, being first duly impanelled amd sworn,
and sito three-fourths or more of thes wholes muniber
thereof,do tind by the greater weight of the evidence the
following dete rmiimatiye issues in this ease,
2. Was the pool of stagnant water on the preinise: ~ of
the defendant B.& O.? Yes,
(Names of twelve jurors omitted.)
' Exhibit ¢
We, thee jury, being first duly cimpanelled and) sworn,
and being three fourths or more of the whole number
thereof, de find by the greater weight of the evidence the
following determinative issues in this cause:
3. Uf the answer to 2s ves, was the defendant Bo & ©),
In possession of the pretnises under the Columbus Read
Bridge whereon the nuedad Water stood?) Yes.
(Names ol twelve jurors omitted.)
(fol KJ | Exhibit D é,
We, the jury, bejne first duly impanelled amd sworn,
and being three fourths or more of «the Whole niunnber
thereof, de fine hy the greater weicht of the « Vidence the
following determinative issues in this eause :
4, Did the defendant B. & O: have under its «control
the premises under the Columbus -Road Bridge wherein
the stagnant water stood?) Yes. of
(Names of twelve jurors omitted.) ee :
Exhibit E |
We, the jury. being first duly umpanelied and. sworn,
and being three feurths or qore’ of the whole miniber
thereat, do find by the greater weight of the evidence the
following determinative issues in this canse
” ; % . °
. : TP the aw. Mee spttesttente Noe 2 pn Sess did ches
Petes see t taaliate: under ties. bericdoes in Thos staeerngmt Witter
: Vos, . ' — ae 4
® .
————: ~ Names offen.
€
; ee Bxhutie pe ; 4
_ 7 Wi, Voy Pe wee
oo mel Beier th pee neat
hie Reape eopayr??, de i
treipcette Td copped ~Weern,
~ eu ' ethae ? ’
he ay owed reriner bee
?} Peg, odes “rial cs ae eet ecm yee 4:2 oo ies tvdede Phere “| és
, PeTWites aleterp ope, 5 5 2 Us Ser eat fee :
. OF. the: newer tu NX Py
He Nes MI chested pent see Tr
litte: Utider tive ber gede-
SUM the stain avate ge y
‘s-
(Namie Of tite Witenes omiitte da ,
mies i eat 4 ; ‘
1 Be hikiis _; ar
. ~*~ : / i
a* «4 ‘ We, ties” yie’s i
. . Sta
Sc | ae FT es idiots Peed med erp,
i WMD bet thee RSTO MET) me TPT Ly ph
} +] fe j ‘ - iff f .
| - : = ee Philtsghoeey 4
thiespernsy, thes ‘ hed brs Tite i 8 CY oe «Wee foo Tyser @ bebe Spaces Pye.
? . “e | ‘ wy . Pa
Paria eT Ome i Pere
or
Pedlow ie eternity.
"ae AD the answer %, Ni, 2 is Germ, abieh Vern seein
latte under the bridue un the “Malnitat water! Yow
PE ie ot Narain YOO tWetve jiareps RIT PP
. “ + - - \ . .
cane - . ‘ a iy * kixhibis II. oh Sad
. P 5 e . ; 2
We, the Vian. Pern teed drity rset sted med sweorp,
1, ? ; , ° , ‘ '
o“ bg ane Tr ite To: f% . Deserts: or bifeter Pani Pegs Va bree }e® Nitiesheeg.
--° thereat ape Smell des thes sete ees BES, ofthe any jbo mere the
: eo felbow sree detertiimatices imate This cance: :
F P P , Pre . p
ae 2 6S OP tht answer te Ste \we ss died Inne. Meeting liats
7 ineder the Iwisdes iy erh, “Eni water! Yes
. - - . .
— (Names of twolye JUTOrS cnnitted 2
; > aoe . e
bos tiitee L. —
‘ : i ae .
ns ~ me the Pa Ce Te odigts Mitemgthed ame ~WOrn,
umd beams tipe. Peutths or tire of Dees WM beodes ppeapsabes
a : 3 ; P
a bad °
10...
thereof, do find by the gréater weight of the evidence the-
following determinative issues: in this eause ;
9 Was plaintiff required: to perform. his work duties.
in close proximity to the area referred to In question No.
uM Yes..
(Names of twelve jurors ‘omitted. )
[fol My. Exhibit J ol eee
We, the jury, being first duly impanelied and sworn,
and being three fourths or more of the wholes number
thereof, do find by the Qeater*weight of the-evidence the
following determinative. issues in this cause:
10. On a proximately: August 10, 1954, was plaintiff
bitten by an insect? Y on. | «.
(Natwes of twelve Jurors omitted. ) : th
f
iwhibit K
We, théyury, being first duly impanelled) and) sworn,
and being three fourths or more of the ywhoele number
thereof, do find by the greater weight of the evidence the
following determinative issues in this cause:” — *
11. Tf the answer te Question No. 100 is ves. was. he
bitten while performing his usual and customary work
duti®? Yes. tae eae
(Names of twelve jurors omitted.) -
Exhibit &
We. the jury, being first duly cimipanelled and) sworn,
and being three fourths or mere of the whole number
@thereot, do tind by the greater welglit of the evidence the
following determinative issues in this cause: ae
‘Tf the answer to No. Ors ves, Was he bitten’ Mear
or yea the Cohunbuas Road. Bridee? Yo: s,
(Names of twelve jurors omitted.)
>
| SOR —
fe Bi \ Eshibit Mo. *
We. the jury, being first duly impaneiled and sworn,
und Voevinnse three Nourths or qnore ef the Whole nuniber.
thereat, do find. by the orenater weight of the evidenee the
following determinative dsstles im this enuse: %
Io: Did the defendant Boo& Of provide the plaimtiff,
Mr. Gullick, a reasonibly sate place to work under the
facts and cireuinstances existing ak the time?
sury cant deeide on this question.
/
Mixhibit Nv ‘ .
— AWE, thee quires. bere first duly dipanelled and> sworn,
and beige three’ fourths or iore of the whole number
thereat, de find by the ereaferowermht of the evidence the
following determinative issues in this’ cause :
14. Uf the answer te question ] is Ves, did) the defen-
dawt Bo QO. Knew that by permitting the accumulatiop off
sud pool of strenant water, dead pigeons, dead rats, bugs
and vertnin would be attracted ta said areal Yes. >
(Names of ten jurors omitted. >
exhibit O “-
: We, the jury, being first daly iinpanelled and) sworn,
Sand cbeine three fontths or more of the whole number
thereal, do fine hy the ereater wereht of the evidence’ the
following determinative issues in this eause: |
In. Te the answer to T4#is ves, did the defendant BoA O.,
“know that itscemployees would have te work in thisdirea?
Yes.
(Names Of ten pirors omitted.)
fol | Exhibit P
We, the jury. being first nly impanelled and sworn,
and being three fourths or quer of the whole mumber
thereof, de fm be the eprenter wereht of the. evidence the
following: determinative dssiies im this eause:
-% ™ :
. ; } ®
. ‘ ; od
.
16. Was +the defendant negligent in one or more of
the particulars alleged in the petition? Yes. 3
?
(Names of twelve jurors s omitted. )- ;
Exhibit Q.
— We, the jury, being first duly impanelled and sworn,
‘and, being three fourths ag more of the ‘whole number
thereof, do find by the greater weight of the evidence the
following determinative issues in this cause:
.
17. If the answer to Question 16 is yes, indicate ‘in
the words of the petition the acts or omissions which con-
stitute defendant's negligence.
There, existed a pool of stagnant water on premises in,
~ the possession of and under the control of defendant into
Which was accumulated dead pigeons, rats and various
forms of bugs and vermin. on
(Names of ten jurors omitted.)
| Exhibit R
We, the jury, ‘being first duly impanelled and «sworn,
and being three fourths or more of the whole number
thereof, do find by the greater weight of the evidence the
following determinative issues in this cause:
18. Was the illness or disease from whieh Mr. Gal-
lick now suffers caused in whole or in part by an insect
[fol. P] bite sustained by him on defendant: B. & O.'s prem-
‘ses? Yes.
«
(Names of twelve jurors omitted.)
Exhibit S. \
We, the jury, being first duly impanelled and sworn,
and being three fourths or more of the whole number
thereof, do find by the greater weight of the evidence the
' following determinative issues in this cause:
19. Were the injuries to the plaintiff proximately caused
in any part, even the slightest, by any one or more of the
acts or omissions of the defendant? Yes. .
(Names of twelve j juvors omitted.) ~
»
—_
o
Exhibit: T.
We, the jury, being first duly impanelled and -sworn,
and being three fourths or more of the whole) mumber
thereof, do thal by the greater weight of the evidence the
following determinative issues In this cause:
LO, Tf the answers to any ene of the questions num,
hered 1.9, 6) 7. and Mie is Ves, Was there any reason for the
defendant Bo & OL, to anticipate that such would or might
probably a result ina npr ie or an injury?) No.
(Names of ten jurors omitted. )
Exhibit U.
We, the jury, being first duly impanelled and “sworn,
and*being three fourths or more of the whole) number
-thereot, do find*by the greater weight of the evidence the
Yollowing determinative: issues in this cause:
[fol.Q] 21. Was there a preximate causal relationship
to the stagnant water, the dead rats, the dead pigeons, the
insect bite and the present phy — condition of the plain-
tiff? Yes, !
(Names of twelve jurors omitted.)
Exhibit -V.
We, the jury, hein ‘first duly impanelled and sworn,
and being three fourths or more of the whole number
thereo!, do find by theereater weight of the evidence the
following de ‘terminative issues in this causes
22. If the answer to Question 21 is ‘ves, was it within
the realm of reasonable probability or foreseeability of the
defendant B & O to appreciate this proximate causal rela-
tionship between the stagnant water, the dead rats, the -—
dead pigeons, the insect bite and the present plivsieal con-
dition of the plaintiff’ No.
(Names of twelve jurors omitted. ),
‘Exhibit W.
We, the jury, being first duly impanelled. and) sworn,
and being three fourths or more of the whole number
14 aa . ? 1 - .
there of, do find by the greater weight of the evidence the
followi ing determinativ e issues in this cause:
23. What amount of money will ‘compensate ‘ie plain-
tiff, James T. Gallick, for his injuries and damages, if any,
resulting proximately from this accident? |
$625,000.00.
(Names of twelve jurors omitted. )
Exhibit X.
Interrogatories.
ad(a) W here on plaintiff's body was his first ade in-
fection? .
Answer: Back of left le& approximately 4” above knee—-
more to the outside. ‘ ,
(Names of twelve jurors omitted. )
‘ 2 ey _ ¢
[fol. S] | ;
‘ IN THE.CotrRT oF Common PLEAS
“D7 No. 697202
[Title omitted] ° Rees ‘
he RNAL Entry July 16, 1959
Detonlinnte motion for _ judgment on <preial verdict.
Overruled. 7
Victor Cohen, Judge.
[fol. T] , ‘
In THE CourRT oF Common PLEAS
No. 697202.
[Title omitted]
, JournaL Extry—September 29, 1959
Motion for judgment’ notwithstanding the verdict. Over-.
ruled. ; to
Victor Cohen, Judge.
‘. ;
o “«
: ba
ah ~
ffol UY]. : ; : ; ; 2,
: [Nothin Cocerror ComMon Prieas Ge
awe, O97 202
; L
ITithe omitted |) .-
’ Journan Eyxrry September 20, (a9
¢ ’ > .
Defendant. Baltimore and Olio Raitroaud motion for a
new trial is hereby overruled. Novreeord,
Victor Cohen, Judue.
j ; : ° .
{fol. 1] oar
The State of Ohio, ) §
- County of Cuyahoga) |
IN THE Covert or ComMon Phas
No. 697 202
James T. Gantick, Plaintiff,
—
DaLrimork & Ode Rarmeoap Co., Defendant. .
‘DEFENDANT'S BILL OF EXCEPTIONS :
APPEARANCES:
On behalf of the Plaintiff: ALTE. Dudnik, Esq. Marshall
I. Nurenherg, Esq. bie ee Sek |
On behalf of the. Defendant:: Baker, Tostetler &. Patier
son by Thussell Ie. Leasures sq. dnd Alexander PL. Hadden,
Esq. . P
é ,
Nlfonso Romito? Official Court) Reporter, Cuyahoua
County, Ohio. Ge Pie,
oe _ e ; * / *- *
216 :
[fol. 22] ° Thursday morning session, 0:15 A.M... Juné 11,7
1959. fen ce
. ‘Plaintiff's Case
The Court: The Plaintiff may call his first witness.
Mr. Dudnik: Will you cali William Molnar?) If vour
Honor please, the’ Plaintiff calls Mr. Molnar for cross-
examination under the statute.
Mr. Leasure: [f-yvour Honor please, the Defendant should
like at this time to interposesan objection to any éross-
examination until it has been-established, until the founda-
tion has been laid under,the statute which we have discussed.
The Court: Lass une that counsel for the Plaintiff: will
establish the foundation.
Yow may proceed.
‘
[ fol. 23) Thereupork the Piaintiff, to maintain the issues
_vndiis part to be maintained, ealled as a witness Winns
Mounxar, who, being first duly sworn, Was examined and
testified as follow s:
Direct Ctieaaiaret William Molnar.
By Mr. Dudnik:
/(Q. Mr. Molnar, | want you to speak loudly and clearly
enough so that all of thesé folks can hear you. Will you
state vour name, please? fia”
A. William Molnar. .
Q. And where do vou live, Mr. Molnar?
A. 7102 E}ton.
Q).. F-l-t-o-n?-
A. Yes.
Q). Are voua family man, sir r
AL Y¥ CS, sir. s
2 Where do vou work?
. B&O Railroad.
3 Low long have von worked for the B & O Railroad?
A. It willbe 14 vears in August.
Q. And in what capac ity do you work there?
A. Asabrakeman. - 4
a
17
-
*
Is that also sometimes known as switehman?
NX: Yes, sir.
}fol. 24) Q. Mr. Molnar, in August. of 1954 were you work,
ing Yor tle Bb & O Railroad :
A. Yow. sir,
().- As a switehman?
A Yes, '
Q. In the month of August of 1954 what job were you
Working? | |
Av Twas working 250 Seneca Street job.
(). 230 Semen ca Street job?
x Yes, '
Q. How long had vou worked upeto that time!
A. Thad ween on and off it for several vears, |
Q. On and off the job for several years. Now. will vou
explain to this jury and the Court what the 250) Senéea
Street job ix?
AL. Well, vouare switching the freight house and all the
firms on the west side of the river,
Q). How is that done, briefly, Mr. Meinar?
A. Well, when, the freight house is elosed at night. vou
take the loads and empties out. Dake the loads out, classify’
them. and then put the empties in for the next morning
shift to load them up.
Q. Now. this particular Seneea job, this 230 Seneca joh,
does that invelve the area aronnd the flats and around the
Cuyahoga River?
A. Alt the wav down. |
[fol 2 | (). Bee pardon ’
A, All the way down,
(). Are von familiar with thee ‘ohunbus Road bridge?
A. We co under itevers day.
Q). You go under it every day on the 280 Seneca job?
A, 1OR, 4, ;
Q. Mr. Molnar.owlien von say ven geounder it’ de you
sometimes ride under it? | ! :
A. Well. von are always riding on the engine,
Q). And have vor ever walked tinder it?
A. Oh. ves, Phave walked under it.
Q). And is that many times?
18
A. Well, when they tie the train up you have to walk
under it.
Q. In other words, is it fair to state that in the course
of your work, and in the course of doing your work on the
230 Sencen Jeb, you have occasion often to ride and waik
under the Columbus Road ’br idge?
A. Yes.
Q. Do you know Jim Gallick, Mr. Molnar?
A. Yes, sir.
(). How long have you known him?
A. Well, from the time. from 1945 when T hired out.-
(). And had you worked the Seneca job with him?
A. Yes, sir.
[fol. 26] Q. On many oveasions?
A. Well, he was on the job just prior to this accident.
Q). Were vou working that job prior, to the agcident, too?
A. Yes, sir.
Q). By the way, can you tell us whether there are any men
doing the type of work you are doing for the Baltimore and
Ohio Raroad that are seventy years old or older:
A. Yessir. PE don't know just exactly their ay. I know
‘they are up there quite a bit.
Q). And do vou know that they are in their niudient
A. T imagine he is, beeause | have heard it, it is just
rumor. |.wouldn’t swear to, his birthday.
Mr. Hadden: Your Honor, objection. .
The Court: Sustained. “Just rumors” will go out,
Q. What you imagine and what is rumor we can't talk
about. Now, do you know wh ‘ther there are men working
on that job that are about’ seventy years old?
A. LTimagine he is about seventy.
The Court: The last answer will go out, and the jury
will disregard it.
Q. You say you imagine, that isn’t proper, but that is
all right.” Now, what kind lof a worker was Jim Gallick
before he had his accident !
A. Well, he was a hustler.
{fol. 27] Q. What do vou mean by a hustlet?
“AL Well, hurry up and get our work done. Not KO real
slow.
(
Nae ~\
oa q
i
(). Was hea good worker!
A. Cicnnd worke "To °
Q. Was he a steady worker as tar ax vou know?
A. Yes. sir.
Mr. Molnar, this saitehing job oon the Seneen Street
io the switeling crew coniesed of four men?
As Well. ar tiat time TP think there was only three, .
Q). What world the Whe ail brakemen or switehmen?
ea Well. there was one cotiduetor and two brakemen,
(). Who gets the tithe of ao :
As The foreman. In the frd therg they are known as
seg: on the road ther are kneown@s a conductor.
And is the oldest switehman on that job. does he get
a lah of conductor, or tdre mun ?
A. Tf he bids it in.
Q. Tf he bids it in, if he asks for it?
“A. But if there is no one else. then the éldest man gets ip.
Q. And besides the three brakemen that wou had*at thet
time, was there an engineer and a fireman wife were part
of it? *
AJ Yes. standard erew. .
(). So the standard trew was eitper five: or siX men, is
that correet, sir?
A. Yes, sir. t
(fol. 28) Mr. Dudnik: Your Honor. at this tiene leall Mr.
~ Molnar for eross-examination under the statute.
Mr. Hadden: Your Lloner. DT should still like te register
the same objection.
The Court: Objection overrals d. ‘
Mr. Hadden: Your Honor may [be heard on that point?
The Court: Yes, vou may. : u
Onsretion to Canmixe Me. ie vn rer Cross Exawrsation
BY Mr. Depxik axp Proctrotxes Thrnrox axp
. OstreTioN OVERRULED P
(Therenpon the following proceedings ocenrped at. the
Court's honeh. ontside the heariig of the jury. as follows :)
Mr. Hadden: Under the statute whieh von so kindly
found for tee this morning, Section 2317.52. as | read that _
9 0 . . & s ; : ; . a
statute it pernits the calling of an employee’ witness upon
‘Cross-examination ouly when it pagum adimitted
that the Defendant acted in whole orlin’ part through the
agent or clmployvee Im connection with the transaction on
-Which he is called to testify.
Now, | do not.think that has been established here. It
has merely been shown that be is a company employee.
This man is going to be cross-examined [ presume on the
conditions under the bridge.
He had no responsibility on that whatsoever, Hs was
{fol. 29} merely a train enmplovee. - a ,
If Mr. Dudnik wants to call him on some other sini ct
matter, he certainly may. 3
The Court: Weil, as I understand it, he oe testified
that-a good part or some of his work’at least takes him in
that. area under the Columbus Road bridge, andsthat he is
a brakeman, and that he worked in the crew that Mr. Gallick
worked ‘in, and I think all that counsel for plaintiff, will
\
have to show is that this witness in the scope of JhisSem-
‘plovinent did a similar type of work that the plaintiff did.
That is the way T read it, but T may he wrong—
Mr. Dudnik: There isn’t any question about. i. vour
Honor. He is part of the entire transaction. Hle.is part
of the operation of the railroad. He is part ef ‘the ease.
Mr. Hadden: He has nothing to do with the ‘aceident.
Mr. Le easure : In ‘onr opinion, Judge, the statute T-think
very clearly contemplates that the employee or agent shall
he cross-examined only where he has played a part in the
accident or other event that is the subject of a lawsuit.
That has not been established here at all, and T don't
[fol. 30] think will be established in the case of this witness,
The typical example being a tftuck driver who is engaged
in an accident which leads to a lawsuit. He can be called
for cgoss-examination because the emplover aeted through
him in the transaction that led to the lawsuit.
The Court: I don't read it that way, but let's read the
Section:
“When the action or proceeding relates to a transaction
or occurrence in Which it has beem shown or it is admitted
that the adverse party acted either in whole or in part
"vy
through an agentoremplosen” DP think there is mo question
a “a 2 ‘
about that. is there: :
' @ Pe 7 a . .
Mr. Leasure: He is an eniplovee. but it relates to an
OCCUPTenee, 2 Paruieilar eel rence. ¢ “
Mer. Dudnilc: Tt cleres mote
The Court: Tain geing te get te that ‘Sueh agent on
einployvee of the adverse party qiay be ealled’™ he is ah
aventol the adverse parts
Mr. Leasure: But hie is mot stele agent. te: is not such
agent. ;
..°
fol. Ob] Mr. Tadden:' Tle me not ar agent through whom
the [I & Ohacted in comes tien wit inthis transaction, , Fi
Mr. Leasure: Or occurrence, .
The Court: | haven't eet: tothat part Vet.
Mr. Leasure: Go ahead’ Pdidmt want te inte rrupt.
The Court: To will start reading from the beginning
‘again:
“When the action or proceeding relates to a transaction
or oeenrrence in Which it has been shown or it is admitted
that the adverse party acted either in Whole or in part
through. an agent or emploxec, ~~ aventior empioves of
the adverse party may bn vealed as a withess and examined
as if under eross-exany nation Upen any matters at issue
between the parties Which: are ~HewneorGiudmitted: te have
been Within the scape ar oe ayent’s or emplovee’s author-
ity oremplovinent, : ae
“The party calling for gel examination shall not thereby
he conelided bat qaay rebut such daent’s vor ied es Si
testimony hy counter-testiniony,
“The party Whose deentorenmplover ise aalled as a Withess
by the dverse party. and whose agent or emplovee is
a ay , es | . are A. a
(foloO2) examined as if nnider eress oxamiunation= shall net
thereby de eonelnded bat diay redint sel aren ts or ene
Hover ~ te stimony hy CO’ tes *imony,
}
Now, vou may relit this testrerony,
re Leasure: We are net arguing about thedatter part
of this sections but it isthe Urst paragraph. .
The Courts DP don’t thimk there is any atestion in miv
mind that he may testify. ’
Mr. Leasure: On cross examination?
gG
. ¢
The Court: Yes. ‘
Mr. Leasure: Koen though there is no showing that the
gmplover acted through this tian in the oceurrence that is
the subject Of this lawsuit?
The Court: Ldon't think it says that here, a
Mr. Leasure: Then much of the languace is me aningle =¥,
Mr. Dudnik: There asit any question but what this ian
ean testify. Heads an employee. Theis a part of this entire
transaction. He lp a part of the whale Operwhron,
The Court: That is the way “TPoread it, gentlemen, “Thre
‘objection will be overruled, 3
tThereupon precee “lings Were rested within the hearing
[fol 83) of the jury, as follows :)
The Court: The objection will he ove crruled,.
Mr. Dudnik : Oije e ton overruled, our Honor?
The Court: Yes.
Cross examination of William Molnar.
Ds Mr. Dudnik :
Q. You reeail, do vou met. that Mr Galliek had an ae-
cident undernéath the Coliunbus Road bridge seme time in
August of 14? .
A. Well. that's when TP tirst heard athout it.
Q. You did hear about it, did you not?
A. I just heard about it. <1
Q. Now, de vou reeall a swampoor ia ditel whieh ran
alongside of the ratlunder the Cohitnibus Road: bridue ?
A. Yes, sir. %
Q. Ts it neta ~_ that the aWinp Was there as long as
vouean remeniber? ‘
* Yes, =:
Is it not a fact that oon cecasions: before August of
1b: _ ver sawdead pigeons and rats in that swamp!
A. Yes.
Q). Is it not afaet that vou saw theme eonsts imtly,
A. Shale . -
fol 4) Is it net a facet that vou saw thei im goed
we ath v ne had? | pe
-
on
AL Yes, - “
Is it net a faet That althonch vou never counted the
Piseon® in that swaltup. there were several im there all the
time? wipe f°
As: Fea! . . -
Qo. Ane dead rats. sir? : |
A. Yeu, : ; .
Mr. Dudnil:: Mark this. ;
“WMammtiti’s Pixkdat Dou iri SU @tecraple was marked
Por pdentigieation bys the reperter) ;
Mr. Prirdans : Mark Hits mest. aePthes next. | .
Plains EX il ound do beine darge photographs,
Were fharked fer a ea HN the: pepeorter)
Q). Pe itanet a faet Wiro Molnar that when these pats amd
pireons, the dened rats cmd poe ons. were Exner am that diteh,
the Te Were bios ameddm-cet. areumed themi is that meta faet,
a : ;
; 1 here is always bugs where the stiemant water wits,
a re ce ex there when the ratsawere there diudthe derQd
pireots were there. Mal Meloaras that meta tae!
A. tts : =
Q). Now. Miro Melnar, : — ve en ae vee A esaaty
fer telemtifiegtion ct Pls - Esiahit 1, ated b>: yeu te
Yad ty foek at thats Phe ven i mtify this Sew Newsir?
A. That ois ander (Columbus Read bradee:
w () Thateis the ditch weodre talhim® abeuts isn't it. sie?
A. Yes.
Vhart Inv Peat ven pefegpecd ter wher von answered tis
Septet ienns, ds at det, :
A. Yes, Eos
L | (hetrern Evie sed ‘ ;
Mr..Dirdnik: Tooffer this ins Viddemew,. vour: Moner, This
Wits trlsen oon Nopeust th. pT 7 toe
T hee Court . WW i thasnt ae io *heoPh. it \ it! Jaye re evived,”
; 2 J L
Now, Mr, Molnar TDohiand wen Plaintits diyhibit’
Number 2. 3 Nhetouraphetaken im Amcusr af 1957: de vou
idemtif'y this seein. sir!
Q
ca
- | - . , . | . - \
A. ‘ : :
That's under the Columbus Road bridge.
Mr. Dudnik: Potter this in evidence, if the Comet please,
The Const: Without objection if withhe received:
Mr. Leasure: Was that taken dn the same diate? ,
Mr. Dudmk: Yes. Nugust 6, 1 7.
Q. Now. sir. EP hand your atone upd liken on August H.
7, narked for identification as (Maigtitfs baxhibit
—— »
{fol 860 Number 8. and ask voulif vou ean identify. this
scene, sir? |
That's under the Columbus Road bridge.
The same diteh, is itnot.sir?
Al Yes, sire
“Mr. Dudnik: Dotfer this in evidences! the Court please,
Thiet ‘ourt:. Witheut objection. it willbe recerved,
pee
Now, Mr. Molnar. PE hand vou what has been marked |
for identification. as Pteintifts fixhibit Number 4. a phote-
graph taker \usust6, Jo and ask vou whether vou recouw-
nize this seeme? Se i : : : ie
A. That®s under ‘the Columbus Road bridlee there. The
High Level bridge. ,
Mr. Leasure:) Maw weosee that We haverm't seen that,
Mr. Dudnics Pam sorry.
QQ Mr. Molnar. we are looking throneh and under -the
bricdoces ny at northerly dire@tiomy, are weemotl ?:
A. Yes, sir |
(). So that this dite! n that We =p nuk of Was on the easterty,
alongs the easterly ral?» aie s .
AL Yes. : es
(). Isn't it a fact thist Why a th, se Deans would die in
that ditei. thes would lay thefe and remain there ter weeks
ftolov | at atime, sir? é
AL Yes, sir. ae Aas
Q. Agdethe men would work around there, sir.
\ Yes, sir. ' ; '
(). Is it net ‘a faet. Mer. er that vou Vourself dado an
experience with abu under that bridge within a couple of
weeks after Jim Gallek’s aeeidl mt? -
A. Yes, sir. 7 ee
ee het,
20
[fol 46) AL Yes,
Q. Ts it net a fact. sir. that re cooing under the bridge
vou felt something ev: es on your meek and you brushed |
it.isthata fact? ‘
= Yes, sir. . , eee
Just brushed at ‘trom vour neck off thie deft side, sir,
ix 4 ae nota tact? ss
“AL Yes, sir.
(J. A coup a of ininutes i iter Vou fe W hon your right side,
id ‘
C face, - :
Q). And vou putevour hand there andwou felt something
grab vour thaunb, didn't vou, sir? r
A, Y Us, sir.
(). And it yvats unde ravutl the ( ‘ohiabus Avenue bridge,
Was Is not, sir? | ee
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And thon vou stepped te look for it. did you not. sia
< Ae a RCA pA
Q. Because vou knew .of Galliek’s condition, isn’t that a.
[fol dl} taetesir? ee aka ee
AL Well To wanted te find ont what was éerawling on my
neck. TP didn't a What it was phat grabbed ay) thumb,
and | wantedete make sure what it vw ils. ae
Q. Butyoudidm't tind it?
A. We couldn't tind i it. We diinted for about ten minutes,
Now, handing you Plaintiffs Exhibit, th sir de von
a this wood nopiline? .
A. Yes, SIP.
Q. Underneath the bridge? 4,
Av Yes. : * Sate
And it fowms sort of a dium, four-sided dain, does it
not, sir? ‘
A. Yes, a
Q.. And when the water gets in thére, it cannot seep ont,
can it? o
A. No, sir.
\
4
v
¢ Q.. And it remains there?
AL Yes, sir. oe ;
Mr. Sidaik: Srturthe ‘reattestions. Thank von, Ma Mol-
nar. You may step down ind would: Vou have thes man
sti ip Vour sUbpoe hay sir.
Call Mr: Rady. : See
Mr. Leasure: So there is no mistnderstanding, is it the \
[fol. 42] Court's ruling that we gnnot ask this Witness any
questions at this time, that Wwe cannot cross-eXamine him,
or ask him any other questions. on any ‘basis at this time?
The Court: Just a minute. Are vou making a request
now to ask— . a a. |
Mr. Leasure: Tam asking the Court for information as
to what the procedure ise We raised our objection. te
procedure so far. The witness has just “been sumiuarily
excused, and | am as <king the Court what the procedure is
from here on.
Mr. Dudnik: If Tmay Zier vour bor!
The Court: Surely. .
Mr. Dudnik: f do no wish to give the Court advice, but
the procedure as I understand it is that they may call the
Witness as part of their case, as their w itness, any time they
put their ease on. That is the progedure.
The Court: There is no question about that. Counsel for
the defense has a right to recall this Witness as his witness.
(Therenpon counsel and the Court cofferred at the bench:
outside the hes aring of the jury.)
The C ourt: Any request to cross-exang$he this witness on *
(fol. 43] the part of the defense will be denied.
Mr. Dudnik: Mr. Molnar, vou may leave, sir.
———
.
[fol. 44] Thereupon, the Plaintiff, further to maintain the
issues, on his part te be maintained, called as a witness
“Warter Rapy, who, having been first duly sworn, was
examined and téstified as follows: > y
Direct examination of Walter Rady.
By Mr. Dudnik:
Q. Will vou state your mame in full, sir
A. Walter Rady. . :
Q. R-a-d-y? ° | Q
A. R-a-d-y. ee = i
Q
op
wd
Mr. Rady. may To impose on vou te speak loudly
enough =) thy bal folks eon hieuur Vou.
The ( ‘ourt » Reed V y
«):
a
().
A.
Road i. aad
Who rede won live. Mr Rady?
illo Grlembora.
Wehiatedeo | tho, \Ir. Riedy. - ee |
Pin yard brakeman and foreman for the Baltimore
aed Ohio Ralrosad.
Me
().
yok?
(he
How lone have vou been with them, sir. r
Pdicave, been thltre SU veers.
2 N ' . NB oly
of vears. Did von ever work the downtown Senees
_
On relief. Saturday and/Sundav, ves.
().- And dhal vor work tit: downtown Seneed joboin Tod?
ta $i A. Yes, sir. . .
4
. dm August of Iho:
Ves, -
> = ‘
That is the job that services the Mat- and Cuyahoga
° a ares
p, Yous. *% ol
— Qo In what e:paeity did vou work, sic?
? Awe b was the sard eee ; ; *
Q. Yard foreman? : :
ne Yard foreman. +
QA foreman is aes ananiber ot th. switching crew, iy he
not! ‘ i
A: That's right:
. Q. Also Known asa brakeman?
"AL Vat’. tight. . °
(). Does theanam with the seqiierity get the for deni’: job!
AL Well, not necessarily. ft all depends whethe * he hid
tin. But Pjusthapge med te bid itim |
‘Q. Do sit pay adittl: more, higher rate? | e\
A. Tt pays more. ves. ; ; er
Q. Mer. Rad. tho vou know .Lim Gallick? :
* AL Yes. Pde. \
Q. You have known him for a Jom tine! ne
‘ A. Yes. Pa
Q. You have wotked with him, hi ive you not
A. Yes, ~
28
[fol. 46] Q: Good workman, wasn't he?
AL That's right.
Q. Hard worker? : aes
A. Yes.
Q. As far as you know, did he worn steadily?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Mr. Rady, in connertion with your work on the Seneca
Job, did you have oveasion on the days that vou worked the
Seneca job to be unde ‘rneath _ Columbus Road bridge? .
A. Yes.
Q. And thatas a daily occurrence, ix it not, w hen you are
working that Job?
A. That's right, .
Q. Is it not a fact, Mr. Rady, that you knew that there .
existed & pool of stagnant water underneath the Columbus
-Road bridge, Ix that not a fact?
+ Mr. Hadden: Your Honor— ot
A. Yes.
Mr. Hadden: May I preserye our objection?
The Court: The same objection.
Mr.-Hadden: Inthe future?
The Court: Yes. The objection is overruled and the
Witness may answer, —
i A. Yes.
[fol. 47) Mr.*Dudnik: May the record show Tam calling
him for cross-examination; your Honor.
Cross examination of Walter Rady.
: By Mr. Dudnik.:
(), That is a fact, is it not? \
A. Yes, sir. °
Q. fs it notacfact that this peolof water ran near to-the
railroad as it) passed under the bridge, and there was_
always a lot of pigeons that drank of this pool, and-a lot
of dead ones laving about, is that not a fact, sir?
A. Yes. -
Q. Is it not a fact. sir, that this. condition which I de.
seribed in my jast.question existed in’ August of Ot, ‘and -
before that? _ i 4
AL Yes. -
d. Nind roma long tine before that?
A. Yes,
do Tsattsthata tact. Mf. Rady:
AL Yes. .
Q). Andoin that rae essed area there wars aeenmotated
dead birds, pige ie tae and other vermin, is that note a
fact, sir! . .
AL There were, ves. A
Q. And is this not a fact, Virw Rady. that mest of the
.uectimmlation Was prevalent haean rothat bridae. teat thatea
fact, sir?
[fol 4sj) AN. Well, may | say something art th:
Q. You certainty may, ir. |
“A. DT ewould see pigeons at the bridge. om the Cartes
— bridge, ie oa het
That is the bridge which the B& Ooruns under a litth
Pe up the read?
= Yes, ‘
; Now, my question issds it neta facet thet the comeditian
a thee Columbus: Road bridge was most prevalent!
“~
«
The Court: Do vou understand the question, Mar. Rady!
A. To understand the question, “Lhe only thing here: I
ee express tiyself better ininy own way.
a . Ewilllet vendo tt, Mr. Rady.
is (" ourt: You are advised toanswer
QQ. Can vou answer the question that Pasked sou. andl
am going to have it read back to vou,
A. Adib right.
(Following question Was rend hy the repartersy) 2 oe
, “NOW, my question is.is it net a faet that the condition
¢: | under the ( ‘ohumbus Road bride Wats Most prevalent
A. Well, as far as pigeons nine Vermin, er whatever von
have, vou would. see them in, under the Columbus Rewae
[fol Any, bridge and under the Carter Road bride
Q). Ts that the two plies vou sew therm the most!
x Yes, that's where Po saw them the most.
30 ah
Mr. Dudnik: No further questions. You may go and
have the gentleman stamp your subpoena.
Mr. Leasure: May we liave the same ruling on this wit-
ness as thte previous one, your Honor?
The Court: Yopare making the same 1 ‘equest?
Mr. Leasure: Let's make it-clear for the record. We wish
to retain our objection to permission for the plaintiff to
cross-examine these witnesses without establishing the
proper foundation under’ the statute. Weare objecting to
our inabuity to cross-examine these witnesses,
Mr. Dudnik? J ask that the jury be instructed ta, disregard °
that statement, your Honor, because this was discissed in
your presence and was ruled on by you, and he made” the
same statement in your presence, your Honor, and | ask’
that the jury be requested to disregard that statement of
counsel,
Mr. Lease: Hf your Rene please, that j is the only way
I can keep the record clear as to this witness,
[fol. 50] The Court:) The jury is entitled to hear what
Mr. Leasure said, and the objection raised by Mr. Leasure,
or the. request made by Mr. Leasure, however, is denied.
You may step down.
Mr. Dudnik: This gentleman wilk stamp your subpoena.
{fol. 51) Ther renpon, the Plaintiff, further to maintam the
issues on his part, to be maintained, called as a witness
WiLtiam Clason, who, being first duly sworn, Was exam.
ined and testified as follows:
Bineet vpssinintlon of William Clason.
By Mr. Dudnik | :
Q. Mr. Clason, will you give us your name in full, please?
A. William Clason.
Q. Will yeu spell your last name?
AL C-l-a-s-o-n.’ ’
Q. Where do you live?
\. 10918 St. Mark Avenue.
Q. What do you do, Mr. Clason?
31
A. To oam ovard foreman for the Baltimore and = Ohio
Railroad. . | of
Are you here pursuant.te a subpoena?
Yes, bam. |
. How long have vou been with the Baltimore and Ohio?
» Fourteen years, the Ysth of next month,
Mr. Clason, do you know any men who work son the:
I} ; Qhon the same jobs that vou de that are seventy vears
-ofage? or Pes oe
AL Well, really don't know their age. leonky know one
man that may be seveuty. > . .
. . . . °- . .
[fol o2] Q. You only know what le
A. [only know one man that may be seventy. bE don't
“know his age. . rhea
The Courts. The dast part of the afswer may go out, and
the jury will disregard the last part of the auswer,
Do vou know Mi, Muglish, Pat Minis hh?
\. Oh, Pat Knglis hh? Oh. ves,
Q. How oldics Pat Englis h?
»Mr. Hadden: Yout Honor, lets establish who Pat lengiish
is.
) What does Pat lMnelish dos
AJ He is retired right wow. The was ancengineer,
Q. Didhe work on th Seneca Street job!
\. Oh, Ves,
(). Low old was he When he retire “d ;
Q. Had you worked with Jim Gallick in the past?
A. (hi, Ves,
(). On the Ne necg job! ie e
[fol o8 fA Yes. ,
Q. Did you “know him thin? , : .
AL Oh, es. , ,
Q. Was hea ood worker
A. Yes,
Q. Mr. Clason, are you farrliar with the bridwe. the:
Columns Road bridge? \
32 .°
A. Yes.
Q. Have you walked under it many times during your
work? ; ; ,
a 7
Q. And is it practically a daily routine?
. . o . . . .
[ fol. 54] _ Cross examination of Williaa Clason.
By Mr. Dudnik:
Q. Is it net a fact, Mr. Clason, that vou first learned of
Jim Gallick’s accident within a couple weeks after it hap:
pened, and vou learned it from a claim agent of the B& O
Railroad?
‘AL Yes, | learned it from a claim agent of the B & O
Railroad, but Tam not certain about the couple of weeks
afterwards. It may have been, it seems,.it may have been
longer than that.
Q. What is your best judgment as to when it was that
you learned of Jim Gallick’s accide mt?
A. Well, TE would say possibly within a couple months.
Q. Within a couple months, But you can't tell us whether
it wis: within two weeks, or within two months, or how
close? .
A. No, Lean’t remember.
Q). Your outside guess is two months?
AV. [thas been too long age. Pdon't reeall.
Q. Is it fair to state, then, that you dearned of Jim
Gallick’s accident within two months after it Happened, and
you Je ‘armed of it from a claim agent of the B&O Railroad?
ND Yes. °
Q. Is it nota fact, sir. that back in August of 1954 you
[fol. 55) were working what is called the downtown area
job? \
A. Yes, \ aa
Y. To refresh your recollection, sir, did you not tell te
or somebody from my office that after Jim was gone for
about two weeks ac laim agent for the railroad came over—:
ane a : 33
a
[fol O6) QQ). “Ro refresh veur reeellection, Mr. Clason. did).
yeu net tell sonieene Prem my efiee in writing that after
lim Galltek was heme for ahbent twe wie ke. a elaine gent
fer the rothvoued eaaue ever tated scuted bees woertead at statennienet
from vou? ;
— oa. NL Yes. Paave that stateneent,
Qh Is it meta faet that alemg the east rail umder the
Columbus’ Réad bridge Chere is a db pressed amd: lowered
grea as a result of whieh the re isa Swamp theres is that net
afact?
7, Yes, ? . “.
Q. Us citemet a faét that there always was ahent a feet et
Water or more there. even tn goed weather. cad duro the
rainy Weather it was much wersd is that neta taet!
AL Well, a foot may be pretty deep but there has always
heen water there. ;
(). Give me Sour best jndement of a foot is pretty deep?
a 8 Well, 1 would sy an average of twe or three ineher
all the time. :
Y. Would vou sav that rather than the Fone Whieh von
stated inthe statement? 4°
A. Yes, DP woulch
(). 1s it not a fiiet that it wa- ahe reduring goml weather
ame baud?
oo it was, °
J As it neta feet that Pail Deluria. the section foreman,
an ‘made ~ Veral attcinpts te clear this -wainp up but was
never successful. is that net a fact
A. Yes. hie did work on it te drain it.
QQ. Sir, please? Read the question. Yoit ean answer that.
[fol Os, af DT have stated a fact te vou vou say yes, and if
Lhaven't stated a fact to vou soi <a) ne.
. 4 . ° fo . .
(Following question was Tread by the reporters)
“Ts it neta faet that Paul Delaria. the section foreman:
hind tise several attemmpt= te clear this swipe ape beat
Was never sucesssful. is that mot a faet!”
A. ‘Yes:
,
3+
(fol. 59] Q. Is this not a fact, that as a result of the con.
dition that existed there, there were quite a bit of bugs, rats,
Insects, and dead rotty pigeons there, is that not a faet?
AL Yes. :
Q. Is this not a fact, that the condition was bad several
years avo, and was still bad in August of “o4, sir?
A. Yes.
Mr. Dudnik: Thank vou, sir. You may step down and
have your subpoena stamped. |
— The Court: Do vou want the record to show that you are
making the same request?) |
Mr. Leasure: Yes. if your Honor please,
The Court: The request is denied., You may step down,
sir. :
(fol. Go]. Thereupon, the Plaintitt, further to dialitain the:
issues on his part to be maintained, called as a witness
Magy Gannick, who, being, first duly “Worn, Wis examined
and te stific “das follows:
Direct examinationof Mary Gallick.
By Mr. Dudnik:
“Q.sMrs. Gallick, Lam going to as ea you to try and keep
your voice up So thateeverybody can hear vou. Ts that fair
enough? ‘
A. Yes sir. ;
Q. You are Mary Gallick?
A. Right. ‘
” Spelf your name, Mrs. Gallick.
. G-a-l-l-i-e-k.
n Where do you live, Mrs. Gallick?
A. 4403 Dawns hire Drive, Parma.
The Court: What is the street?
A. 4403 Dawnshire- Road.
The Court: Dawnshire?
The Witness: Dawnshire, D-a-w-n-s-h-i-r-e.
, 9
‘
(). How olde are vou, Vrs Gatlliok?
"A. Dwar Son the sth day of June.
GO, a2 ae tes
Al Yous. sit
Q). Ynd yon are the: wife of Him Galliek
fal Gt) AL Ves. sit me
(). How long have ven beet macnn: vad! J
P Since Lon.
Q). oh vears, Approximate ly:
A: Vex, sir,
(). What lo vou de, Irs. Galle iS,
A. Waitress. ji
Q. Where slo von work?
A. Downtown in Gazelle’s, 4
-@ Mrs. Gallick, Tam geome te ask yeu
ears prior te Amonat of Tad vou have g ver
3
*
if for several”
ctihess veal muy
pent oroskin blemishes of aus kind om veur diasband!
A
\).
A.
().
“A
A.
Ns ‘Ver,
Onamy part of tis body?
Never.
cs
te
Do vou kecall when i: ee forthe bA GH?
Ooh, Ves,
What che Lhe ales before thiat? -
He was. foreman fort Hunkin (no
Company, labors foreman,
How long idl he de that, Mrs. Gi
12.15.14 years perhaps.
Q. Was heea steady worker or net
Thaiekin-4 seri
A. he ves, he was,
62 | Was he a stendy worker up oumtib Aueust of
Ith grins Worked tor the Baltimore and Ohio Raaroaed !
fol,
-
rh sses did slim have ?
=
Vos, str.
As furias yon can reenth, prior ‘to A
Not any,
nike le
(onstruetion
ilhiek?
When
Wits
e
hie Wats Wath
of 154 what
Do vou recall any gee idowts of any kine while lies Wats
i ge anther: uilrosd before that?
AL Well fb believe one tinte he pulled: a Tigame nt jumping
omor off a car, something like thate Haw QV hapuened Pdon't
know.
At work. it happened at work,
+---- j . >
+
36
Q. Do vou recall Whether he lost any time !
AL Yes, at one tane che did. But at wasn't stated as an
accident.
QQ. Tedidin’t heer vou, :
OAL Bt was net stated as an accident. .
& Do vewknow What Uae reason for that was?
AL That Peouldiet.. nesd wontdn’t know,
2. How long before Nugust of Sd was that?)
A. Pean't he sure of the time’
Q. Was it within two or three years before?
Vo Tt could have beon areund two wears. Loam net toe
4). Was Fim laid np alone time with that?!
: A. Nay not too honey.
Q. Do veureeall what his ti jue Vwas!
Hol 63) A. Inst oa puted ligament PE believe: the doctor
sata. ,
(),, Mrs. Gallick, before that.cor aside from) those: two
incidents which ven remembers do vou reeall any other
injuries Whaeh slim may dave hiaed on his past? '
AL One time D believe he jumped, during work, - a
off of a working ear and he step peel inte a hole or sone
thong ane wet hort.
4 Was he scrionsly injurediin that accident!
. He hort his ankle. ;
4 Poidit kee }? hin out ot work long?’
Nat toe Jeore sty The.
y Was itamatter of days!
Thar beam t answer thatocdt his been so lone.
: Mrs. Galliek, Dam foing teask vou whether von reeal!
au eortain dayoin August Pd when dim came home and
-usked Vou te foveok at ih oper of his loudly, dle Neu recall that?
A. Yes, blo: =
Q). And was itin August of 1954? nal
A. Vesssire
Q. ¢ ‘an ven give np adi ite or not? :
JA. No, | ean’t. ? ‘
Y. Can vou tell us what time, of the day oor night that
hay pened? : er
A. That is when he came home at night. Tle came hote
from work.
C9. WW diets veern sony cat ne acdats cabana Wihuat tite?
a | AL Tt wae atter DD ene. ;
(0. Were ven heme .
AL Ves, sir. pas
Cd New. wheat elel fe aR ven tes teak at Ma Cistliek !
A. Phe tedden TO a CR CW ES TC Te
the: bavk of lbs barot was? traritaars ce terae tartans states. camel tee
Wartitectine te leek get i . :
(0 Nndd hel vent book art it)
Vo Vessdaba
Cd. Coser weet titted rape cemied poco teaepes pees ret came Neenep se Te co beange
Where be ge ke al Veet Sen deceed Whar? parti oeet dire fenue
NT ware bate on hiere* A |
() New Morar peotina. vie have et sear hated em the
rich! bo QVas at the caght on ter, .
’
MN DD wate conthe dent. Ven ecombed ott there. «
(9. Vootscisre sure of that’
© Men aie *
09. Nal did ven ro) . :
Ne Ves. Debi ° :
¢
() Wil! Meets f. SL thee neat sy ceteed Slee © cotaet oe Nine? 4 whist Sen
<aw?
AN. Weoedb. thats: acs ce We ats pes-t like when Soo ceed ia dete
| W bast eeoieor wane at?
No Ut wise pork.
( Wohicat wane the ee et at! -
NAN. Ndnenat the sc 70 eat catreotgt hast . . est PON Basalt in.
| tin moridee tiicet, ‘
Bs
Fe WO TC RY EA ca ites pean.
AN, Ves. tr. ‘ : .
?. Dyed ot (satis ‘ Ced TEN Cette PE hety Serik caw it
rae, Wee x “_ ee
Cd Wore tr elief veer pe Nt see at, Mes. Giailiek ’
AL Vibe ent proown cts.
C0. Dered vevsn leveeks cat at geacsnany
AL Yes. bdiak > .
Co Wisat did sence the nent merging f+
j NA. Well. it ts re By ten cte’ abe epee boah cohen aden peor in eller.
A). Woiicet komet ot a eden! :
a
t.
Pink Dt wire ade por pe nk,
Picdat give vou ams eygmermm! 60? ,
.
.
().
t-
No
os
a
. No,
| Did Jim ge ts work?
/ Yost he did.
When chi vou next look ut it?
At night when he came home,
he keptadgterige. Tt heat burning lim, 2
tell th? Court”
41 eontinued to
. What did it look like that? ar Ase:
A. Well, it was getung a little redder. Litth: pinker. Tf -
key p getting pinker, _ 8 .
| Did it give vouany “Coneern?
t Not tao moteh. . -
4). Did there come atime when vou saa it and you were
fol. 66 concerned about it!
AL Vest sir,
How loneatter the first time that you saw it!
A. About the titth daw.
Q. And when von sawoitlon the fifth day,
wih jnry what it looked tike.
AL Well, it be say) towetdarger and real pink, real dee per
pink around. ane it began-to rape.
Q. Did indo anvthing about it thi day?
A. Well, he would always wash it with soap and water,
Q. Didhe de anything after von saweit as vou deseribed !
A. DT snid to we see a deetor, a od
(). OT a oe oe tor! 4s
A. TL gustelom’t remember how soon atte’
(). Tsay did he voto see aaloetor? .
AL Yes he did. e
QQ). And who was the deetor
AL De. bneob Helber. P
Q). Did von continue te abserve it after that?
No Yes. sar,
» 8G. And did itehamge tvsize amd color as yi
eoolbserve dt? ;
A. Tt kept getting larger amd oat kept burning. Phat’= wha
. QQ. Mis. Galhek. did there comecg time that your husband
fol? went to another doctor? ,
A. You. We “eee catammed then because
Dr. Heller. die
had ewenme to Dr Pfeffer ama Dr. Theiler was going te put him
tie the: hespoataal.
go to the hospital.
/ s
/
/
/
Jim had never beer sek. so he was afraid te
@ és ‘ f
«
re)
Q). Sewlat did youde?
ON. Soothe frend oYoours snewested@ in fet | repired
IP tie Nave w cacletar that Hee taeda? recotmmiona, beeguse: Fim
didnt witht Towge fo thé hospital Phe wanted andther,
ge et “sop aen, Seobe wenttte Dr Vietor Tpopeolites.
Dadbveha we Wath hi i!
= 6 Yew. Ladiel. se . iin 1 >
"New, Gn the day that ven wont te Dr. Dpoolite. were
~ ven The peo tien Dvd) piel t elooked a this!
A. Yous, =ar, “sf .
Q) Willson tedbos what took dlike qhem? oo,
A.B y that time twas abentt the <zecof a bait a dellag
amd atthad raised amd at had been dracuing an the. side.
and at dowked vers muds
QQ). Did Dr. ia we, “
- Yoss he did, ‘
Ded hes Hpem took ine atoatethe test times amd enamiiminy
it, Nara st ay Piste! ; ee
af Iretiecdians IN. OD Te poite said Pate the hesgital for
Von, :
QM. thee pardon? : ;
“falas No dhe sis He Mme ed rte ly ge sev es dae bowke ef gat it,
eNamined ity die saody bom, Jouare goimg te the Thos portal.”
CQ) Nn bth te ee! :
AL Wellothe re wits ne te al Ufo was going to prt hom in the
hespitad that da@v.but there was ne bed at Vetrvnieunt. Su
he had te Wart out! Saturd: iva that Were Ik. .
Q). Nudd did tie pat Lar in the n! ; ;
A ¥P% a ‘ 4 °
(ho Mrs. Gallick de vorknoaw whetlyg ot net Tin received
abs surwery While he Was ait the diospatad?
AL Oh, VES, ‘ :
(). Twillaek vein, Vr~ Galhedk. how done after he ente —
Marymount Hospital did fe reecive dis first SUPSery
Ao DP bGheve that very week, the first week,
(). Were vou thers when became ontof surgery!
AL OW, Ves,
eWas hea surges mere than onee?
2 “Oh, te. @ % :
How often did vou Visit dain? : sd
: Every day.
o:
ce
°
_ ee ; a
(). “And did vou know whe ty he went to surgery?
\. Yes, sir. v
(). How would.you know! ee
OAL The doctor informed me that he would besgoing to
surgery, and Twas there before he left. and when he got
out of stirgery, ;
[ fot, 69) Q. Did vou‘see Jim after all of these surgeries ?
A@ Yes, sir. : ae
Q). Deseribe to the jury how he looked,
A. Sick, very sick,
Q).. Were vou able to talk to bim?
A. No, becuse he was under medication.
Q. Now, do vou kitow how Jong he was in’ Marymeunt
i ae the first time
L don't remember it it Was three months or two nets
some Bah iat along in there, .
Q). Well, the record will show that it was trom Septe ea
fsth to January Mh. Us that about right?!
A. Yes.
Q. Now af aboutthe tinie or close to January 4th, shortly
before he was sent home, were you able’ to Ghsgrve Jim's
legs and body? : ;
A. Yes, sir. ; .
Q). Will vou describe to the jarv what you saw?
A. Well, they had operated on. the deft leg that was.
injured, and it was deep, and it was about this much in size
(indieating), open, ‘and then the donor--the woused the right
leg to take the skimeotf. - °
‘
N.
Mr. Dudnik: Can von folks hear?
es
A. They took the skin off the right leg /to cover up the
en a thre beac Jeu that they diced (pe trated On: And it looked
[fol 70] like it was) going’ to heal, but it hadn't. It whda.
ance da sear tissyé as the doctors called it, is what it was.
Besides thatmark that you described, were there any
a marks at that time, in January of Hoot
7
A. No.
(). Just thesight leg where they took the skin?
A. Yes, sir. The lett leg was injured.
Q. From the time that vou first saw that litthe mark on
Jim on the first day until the time he went into Marymount °
os ee
‘41
Hospital or until the time rather when he went te) Pr.
Tpoprolite, Wits There ame or miore thiam Oise eruption o
” Qhues just thiit ome.
. How long was lg heme aie odie tett the Thespatal?
A. Tt seamed te me like abeut three tieuths, mote than
like “that. ;
(). Now. Togave vou seme wren eatay and would Like*
doe olttect tat. we nthe THOT, ; .
“Khe records will show thiut he was in Mi; usanount Ebesputal
from Se plenihe r Tsth te December Sthi sanieh Posceied ebeareuas ry
dh. dt is December Sthi oF ed. Mrs. Vialliek.
AL Yes,
QQ). Now, Wlien be We Mt hotnie heewats hotnie abet a neenthy,
Was he note. " "
7 Yes, sir.
Will vou describe his condition dining that month?
el TEL OAL dhe was vers sick.
QQ. In what way, Mrs. Galliek? °
AZ Well, he had those he lad thie open wound thiit Aad
tobe dressed, [tf was vers a ry painful.
GQ) Whodressed them?
I dlressed them.
(). How did vou dress it!
A. The doctor gave die instructions as-to how to dress
ai .
. How often did vou dress them!
: Mortiing and night, and pout theromyvacin on, and. it
mpeg? changed. > : ks
Did vou take enare of him const: intly 2 Ta a ec
a ( ‘onstantly.
. Were vou working then ? os
. Lwas. a
r Whe took eareot bins bs vou were at work?
The neighbors leookes | ion hin.
Stale. Mere. Gallick, lie went back to Marvinount Hos
pits : as T said. he was home about it month. on January 4
of JOA, did le not? ’
A. Yes, sir.
Q). How lone did he st: iw in the ——— the second time?
Fs A vear anda half or better.
¢ 7 Z
42 oi! ; ‘ . we i ete
Q. To refresh vour recollection, it Was about a vear and
(fol. 72] a quarter, about 15 months, \Mrs. Gallick.
Did vou-see him at the hospital? \
* E very day. x
. How long did you stay there?
: ] would stay with him about until quarter i ax,
because T was due at work at four o'clock. \
QQ. And did youwabserve hin every day? ©
A. Every day.
Q. During. that ign how did he progress, was he xet-
ni better or worse
» He had very satel pains, horrible awful some
Q. How did vou know that? F
A. Berause he cried most of the time. He kept grabbing
for something to hold onto, with the pains. He couldn't
pass his bed unless die would ieee oF of horrible pains.
Q. As time went on during the second stay, were there
any mere eraptions on his body? z ,
A. Yes. Tt went wild. ,It just broke out in different
place es, . ;
Q. Tell us axhioge it wenf?
A..His ankle went, which took the entire heel in pratc-
tically.
Then the plac “«—then the donor, the right leg, had gone,
which had been the donor, that had gone,
Then Fhehéve there was a place on his side or underneath
his arm, Lam not too sure of that, because they went so
rapidly thatven couldn't keep up with them.
[fol. 73] Q. Were they tting larger?
A. Oh, ves.
Mr. Dudnik: Mark these.
(Plaintiff's Exhibits 4, 6) 7, 8.9 and’ TO. being phato-
eraphs, were marked for ide ‘ntification hy the reporter.)
°
Q). Mrs. Gallick. Tam going to hand vou a photog rraph
that has been marked for identification as Plaintiffs Ex-
hibit 10. and Task vou who is theanan in this picture?
A. That is Jim end his nephess, his brother's son.
Q. Is that Jin Galliek? _ “s
A. Yes, it is. €
.
a . \
(). Plow tong bette Td was it taken?
OAL About a vear before,
Mr. Duddik: yD sheula dike te pats. thos areund th the
Jurseat this time. ver MToner.
Vhe Court: You mis.
Oyriasan heaving i | ss
Mr. Dudnik: Wraith “farehatl reniiided nie. wear Phenmer,
that Phavetootferit ine sees mee tl rst.
Mav fotfer dit imes idence? ;
The Court: Wilt oftectign ait will dve preeeroed an
evidence “ee, a : Ace
Ladies and se nt fer hen of the jury. at this tune there will
beabriel recess. 7
[fol 74) You may cretupm te the dies oreem ote mer
With the admonttion do not talkeabent thos cnse wath ances
not even amongst yourselves,
I
(Thereupon a recess was taken.)
‘ : a
e y, e «
By Mr. Dadnik+
Qo Mes. Galhek, DP believe seu teld us he was in Mars
nount Hospital for some Lo months? .
A. Approximately. vs! ‘
Q. Andadter that hie came horney. did bee mot!
“A. Yes, he did. :
Q. And he was homehow bone do vor reed?
Mee can't he too streed the dates leemtuse
Q). Would this be riadt. according te the fosputay ree:
wei hada home Prot Mareh sth: ay pan iintil Vials ot di
of POD? ite .
That is alanost three and a half months.
About feuror five qmonths. abeut five qenths. i that
Ptr right? | re
AL Yes: ‘Chit woul Phe about ridit. bateT am tot toe sure
on the time. cade
Q. Could vou deserthe te the jury where fie spent hae
time during that five months?
A. In bed.
Q). Could he go te the bathroom? -
és
440
A! Xo, not at. lust, no, not when he « came home that time,
no. °
(). How many openings did he have that were sore?
[fol. 75] A. At that time. the left leg and the one that
they used for thé donor, his ankle—
\ (Interruptions) =
.
(). Will vou hold up HY little bit, ple axe, Just hold up.
Sow keep your voice up. nies
There were se any vou just can't reme anber.
* What was tlie appearance of the original one?) What
“was the size of it at that time?
- The Court: | am sorry, Mr. Dudnik. I was distracted
myself. [think the question Was— eats
Mr. Dudnik: How many openings were sore, and tliere
-Were sO many you just can’t remember,
Q. My next question iss-Could vou deseribe the size of
the-original one on the back of his left leg?
‘AL Well. Peouldn't shaw you, only if ! stood up.
P All right.”
. bE will have to:show vou on iy sit ioe It extended
ae here to here’ and. it covered all this in here. The
» doctors— A i
Q. Hlow did jetook?
Oh, it: looked wvieious. dt was a big hole where you
Could see the ter dons, as 4e had to-clevate his foot, what-
ever way they could put it foy him. i
_ The tendons and the flesh would be just hanging through
there. " : '
Then when T would drow them the duotee inabeucted mie
[for 76] to wake the 2 cauze and the medication and T would |
pack that in folding the. gauze and pac king: that. in thie Te,
4 Into the opening? ;
. Into the openings. “They were draining.
@ Were they draining? |
| Draining awful Kad with i-tétrible odor.” ¢.."
a How often did fof pack them?
A. Well, twiee a day jand sometimes if they dr ained more
| had to dress them Again, because they drained more,
Q. What happened When yeu took the packing off?
“-
0
45
He wonld just seream with pain, And often times
he Neue erabomy arm inorder to keep from hurting, he
Wold ask me to stepr its side fora ditthe bit until he could
vet his breath beeausedt Was so paininl,
Was that everytime vou dressed him?
Affithe tintes all the time. ;
a Who took careso! him during ‘these months that he
Wats home? eae
The neighbors looked inven hin. We hind ao murse
that lived iu the back of us. She dooked in-on him maybe
by the hours, came on. are
Q. Who tock care of him when vou were net working,
during the day when vou werent working wha took care of
him? .
oe I took care of him always,
Now, he then entered the’ ( Teveland Clinie on duly
Pa 6
ifol. 77) A. Yes, sir. a
Y Do vou remember that? .
A. L sure do re mye nbor it,
Q. And according te the Cleveland Chi nie gttords he was
there from July SO, M56. to December 21156?
A. That's right.
Q. How often did you see him?
> Every day.
~Q. How was dim doing!
A. Very bad. ane ‘a
Q). Te deft the Clintecon December 21, 196. dnd he was
home until February 5. ats a period of about five weeks
or six Weeks, © | ‘
_ you Te ammembe | that La Tied?
I sure do.
= What did-vou do for him? .
A. Dkeptdressjng tim the way thateD was instracted.
And was that daily?
A. Bveryday.every morning and night... md
“GL. Were they still were = runaing?
Pa
OAD Rouning. sunning sers. Running. It was green and
xray aund allditierent abe colors on it. And they were
deep.’ -
Q. Was-there an sodden toit?
«
46 FE
A. Unbearable odor, but PE didn't mind it.
QW. Now, he went cack to the Clinic on Fe ‘bruary oth, ioe.
[fel 7S) and he stayed. until April bth or “a?
Oe
Q. About two and a half months. Why did he go baek.
-do you know? :
A. He got very bad. Tle was very bad.
Q. Now, during the first stay at the Clinie was he op
eratedom? 9 5 ots
A. On the first day?) Deean’t remember af he didi on the
lirst day.
(). Stay. net day. During the first entrance te the: (lini
“ = they operate on him’?
AL Oh, ves. they operated on him, ;
(). How muainy times, de Cou know?
A. TP don't know how many operations he tad before the
amputations. fb don't reniember. There were so many |
can't remember, ,
QQ. Were you there all the time? ,
A. Always there. .
Q). How dicdthe look during that tinie!
A. Horrible after each operation he looked worse,
Q. Then during the second stay at the Clinie between |
I hruary Sthot OT and April Pith of oe, was he operated .
ont 4
A. Yes, he was,
° 0). Now, then. he went back te the Clinie om Apri 25th,
or, ane staved until Pune 22nd of Toe. about two months,
did-he not!
As Yes, ;
(fol 7) Qo Laan going to hand You five photographs, they
are Plaintit’s Exhibits 5.6. 7 and s. end ask yor te look
at them and tell the jury whether Jans bedy appeared or
they correetly represent how Jim's body = atpy reared while
“ he was at the Cleveland Clinie! ,
AL Oh, Ves, i e
. Logk at ell of them, os :
\. They g6t alot worse than these.
The Court: Mr. Dudnik, | notices that von handed the
Withess five of the am. You only me ut ioned four, You men
tioned Plaimtitt’: Exhibits « oh 6, 7 and 8"
“Mr. Dalck: Yes.
©. Phreets aseet weer se theine th.) .
*i ‘| hi s weet “ I~~ et, 7 af e
vA Ne Mage LE veer se 8) se tore Ofer d cee? oe leet Waeetnen”
Mer. Deregdse oe Peete Beit SO TLS med te Whack
Sesi, Nerur Dheotieer’.
Vester Dieotiony cat thee totee ota le Dadeany ®t .oeste tee pecans thee =
tee Mheee jays Powered ik tee deeded thee tne tape cated ive then
SOD © Oh Aree,
"Phir Ceonst: Newey efit See tune abce sa.
Mir. Poaednikes Misa tae peered shies DP cotter the nm ane ous
ones. youn Phemer. Dothialk Peverteckedd atl Mia tte:
Tel sth teeerd slew that tex are ottened! .
Th (ast » MW Thaegat wrlajens tiem th ‘ tise bee* tee ergetead it
as tebetion -~»©
(). Wise Vicspepe teebeon Mens 2b. 257 thee Nevta rewcadl !
No Dobe Thee cbied bse dnere th tint dee waa catnepeataateed. the
Nett be mies camp itaate ol.
The Comet: Mas. Galle hk. wall we takes wear tum. |
. Kaew Pow ccstit fb tee tee der weet @ ecalel wena pratense dae can thea?
bach there!
O0 Mare Gill ko speak ste uated lestebls) . Five tweet bise~
Yeo taecar What sed sank. New bcm ce ctr tee ech the jue tion
teeth. Woicat fies be? obo May Be Htksa * "
ALD bechiews “haat, > owh h thes iattapeatiatoed? thie fina? few,
thes bent Bae, es
C0. Th v camp atanteed the str tbe!
A. Ve.-. sirethe left i a ae
C2. Dee serie Low oom wes bie te baes ercatnee: eotat eat sea rage rh.
after de eet ovr tie ether er wipete ver Mees gave ham!
A. Ate Wits Vers tial.” ~ : .
Cp. Whaert wore hire sperrate *
“OM. Wello nactirectts lie wars Hooke mtiearterdl, beemuse at went
see Paast, Navel rt ts reek sce De aetensetie tee take Neote be ge,
Q. What hap need en ute ba nay:
oe AL Danse miiniat) just ae minute.
, felos1 (0. “Take Noo tittee,
No Deantt be nett the ad tes The dates are confusing,
Precaemise: they were all dike ce teat tinaine, ;
> iS a
-48
. Do you remember that as being thie day “that they took
Pas ~ other leg off? ,
AL As | sitidl, Iam not sure on the date. What date was
thrat?
Q. June 12th of 157, is that about when they took Jim's
— leg off? an
I ean’tebe sure of the dates, because it has all been
a hse nightmare.
They did, however JWithin three weeks take Jims other”
ne didn't they? foo
A. Yes. : ’
(). Were you there?
A. Lsure was there.
Q. Can you telt.us a little about him when he got out of
surgery, the next day, the next week? o>
_ is Well, he was very bad. He was very weak trem it
all, and then after when he had r alized that his both lees
were gone, TL ean't desertbe it. It was horrible.
Q. Now, Mrs. Gallick, he was atthe Cleveland Clinic,
follawing those amputations until uly 21, 157. Ts that
about right if the record: shows it?
A. | beg your aamigr
[iol 82, -Q. July 2107957, is that about right. that he was
dismiss dor that he : ft the Cleveland. ‘Tinie?
Ay Ye 7
Q. Did he go home from there?
A. O07 did vou sar. :
= Yes, or did he go straight to Highland View Hospital!
He went to Highland View Hospital. He never 3
ah again. <
Mr. Leasure: Isn't that the wrong di Ate?
Mr. Dudnik: No. July: vi; Bas.
~Q. Ts that the-date ”
3
Mr. Leasure: That Was “OS,
“OAL OS, |} am not—
Mr. Dudnik: Well, let’s make sure, What is the discharge
‘date there?
Mt. Leasure: July 21, 195s.
oo; j | ee 49)
() Then heovide Tiere abet aver alter they amputated. |
hie tee sad ;
A, Yue ~o hie Wills. : *
(). Tami sorry,
The Court: Te thatat the Clevetamd (time until dats 20st
of as! : ,
Dielick: last Gotmemient, seme Ploner Tami a little
“ womtiisedd bepes
Q) Was the surgers ints) Was the surgery ins!
‘Yolosoe NL Tas,
Q). Lami sorry. ;
"
:
A. The date < dire all -o confusing.
(). Vhes care confis inst Too Brier, fava,
ay Becunse we lost traci of the time. . o>
Vir. Dudatk: Dios. vonr Toner,
The Court: Doth of them in os ThAbesras, of course,
Will speak for thempsedy
Mr. Dudnik: The AN i ~penk for themselveag, vour Honer.
The Court: But lets get it efeared np for the record.
) Do vou remember what year?
A. Dncos, ves, ; thon
Q). thow one gltogeth rn was heat the Cleveland Clinie ?
AS Mer. Didnuk. Poeautt be sure af the dates. . DP cannot
Pe ~ of the dates. ®
>» Howaeve ay Pr niefhe Cleveland Cline
The dectors’ records wilbhawe it all.
: P-cit Yair te tate mow that fe was in the Che celand
Clinie Tor about two veaes With the exception of the two
Snenths or se that he came homey
Vhat’s eopreet. .
Q). Tam sorry Leonfused von, and myselt, Mrs. Gathiek,
by 4) Where didi lie go from the Cleveland Clinte.
| Pe went te Tel Haid, View Hompoitaal canal hie dias re.
miatined there ste. ~
(0. Phas tie been Thome since? %
ON. Neches not heen treme Tb lis bein very: bird.
4). Mis Galbek. where is Pahtand View Hos paithl
A. Out on Richmond Rose.
¢
0
a a. -
® Tow often do you sce dim?
A. Every day. 4
x ;
Mr. Dudnik: 1 have dio more questions, © «
. | a
Cross examination of Macy Gallick.
By Mr. Hadden :
Q. Mrs. Gallick, T want vou te understand F dont want
tomake thos any more diffientt for vou tham necessary. it
You would [ike to’stop, please tell me. Toonly have one or
two questions, ane they relate to the time baek in August
Yd when Jim test came bagk to the house and deserihed
‘hat he had been bitten, according to What your testimony
has been,
AL Yes, . ; x aa S
Q. To wonder if vou could desciihe im somewhat more
detail exactly what the appearatice of the place he com
plained about Wits ; ; |
NJ Wi DE will have: to show you on my right tee again,
I will savy
[fol so) Q. Peden't care where it was. To just want. te
know what it looked like. °
AL OW hat it looked like?
“Q. Yes.
A. Tt was baek in ‘. rey It: Was about half the sizeof mis
maid. Amd it was a welthke like vou Would see a dite
andit was pink.
-) Ttwas all pink? ;
A. Around, vou could see. Then there was a little red thing
no there. You could seecit was a bite, vou could see it owas
asting, ;
rs There Wasa litth redawhat in it? Abo
. it was a welt with: a little red thing. You eould see
th: ; it Was a sting. ‘
The Court: Little Jed thing.
Q Little red thing?
AL Yes. It leoked like it might have been. but as “vou
pit vour thumb on it, he asked me to toneh it beeaus: it belt,
«
ad
o
.
; L. “ F
ay aD |
| o
% - oat tall trance enied loget in that wfiy, As TD oypont ny thitannids on it,
twas waren te mav third,
(). N opr thie thar tat. Can you desertbe the thing that vou,
sawoinit?
: AL Plow cold Dodeseritee a ditthe pea Speck ft there?
OQ) AN reed speek? > oe
A. Vent was. .
rig i Ped se () dethat thee da ot venwean der abinit deseripy neit?
AL Ves. You fies Ser MOU Knew i Was a we Jit Wats
cbites You eouild s “at becuase Ut Wits — from: the
‘other the~Tp.
Q). One or two more greet iofts, Mus. Galtiek. Sines August
Lot Ts When thes teat staprteal. Sen hivsbamed as voutestitied
bits been in consider ‘able ye Mois that right! ,
AL The worst pach thes BUS tan ever dived through.
OQ). Mt venw Hi jt answers WMestion we will be through ,
; ae dittle quick. yr 23
AL Yes. .
Q. fmt fur te say. Mae. Gatlick that the bain has varied,
sommet mies dt fas becom wore and they it hits gotten better
Por tame cand phen perhaps if has wotten Worse, is thats?
A. Now iteautinuedan. Deon ied 7 ne mona horrible putin. «
) (0. Pau met asin that it stopp dat any times Pimerely
a he Novit never stepheadein as Ver stoppn al.
. vit Wis u) Wats dss tine than atoothe I's vs
thin keV ean! dame wer that better fr iimse
|
i: -
(). Vau don't feel wou CITE tacit, Wu < nite all
A
'
}
Ac Nosd can’t enswer for him,
Mar. Hadden: (hats ail Thank seus You mity step
the RR ta . : zi -
Mr. Dindnisk : Weowillbenu!! th Biiaint Sin
4
ry
Uy.0 e245 | Phares open, Doone Gragg K, piaititf hepesn,
Hepes Ves sascrspsonnog s bar se cote Tins guint t tes bee hieaiutisine ad,
o> 06 6b Dectes.-0 OF oe ‘, alae tte dit oon ny boebacal ld, “ heh, bein
he shisks |. ary) th 4 tniitie a ned ee Viltend co. hollows:
“Deas. he by Tete teeel erence a riy ; J (rirdlieh.
Ley Bhs Wa Paden ‘ =
1t,. © cessed | hh Vertes Verteletuene hy? :
ee LT) ee | TB © Cwatt 40 hin Whether all
APA I acrhag ts af Rina: woes Hees ts EiMeulty scene him, ean
Vobe yl i Tvengy ” ;
‘) grees wetine Obaeang: Navn have wal (yo de for Mie’, linn.
. 7 . .
eee O2s “S444 * {xs ] afk ie tded
e
\ ! he ‘
1." t a tts ’ AS oe we
.
4 ‘2 = , e
s \\ “ ‘ ‘ \ \ 4:
\ " : \ ‘
.* . ‘ ‘ ‘ 7
. J °
\ \ /
kN 4 . ‘ co) :
. e .
\
’ z all
os ‘ be
° A ’ .
“ he '
\ \ ;
me %
TT .
[ .
AL Witness. neds) pe ee
Q). Dhow tear clea Vertb tes tii Paeseol Dane
NOSth erode ~ 2 ° e
Q). Where? = 8 ;
Ao? Mitinestpol i ,
(). \\ lncatclied scott der whe Hho eett sof astet oof eTyereed ’ ‘
NL OM. viernes gobs Pedros hoo
(9. (aan Sou hy beret tape tee thate inital thee Pbeaeed in 4 sete «
jer ap
NAN. OD worked at roe ny glad La hoch Dodie’
trash. Po assslsccnede-ed cote thee Cone ot “veep tMee oe :
fol so oS ae ted Mfoerns ‘Jient ’
a. Then | “ortel, pape’ ‘| Yer © pyre caces,y :
(). Haid 9, Dates, vis basse geal. os Et thi re Ce
CPrtergsapt ens »
° is gi ,
Yur ai oft) FE56s el te, € Baer sr seg
-
‘
.
-
~
54 es
Q. Office work?
A. No.
2 Always with your hands and few 43
. Hands‘and feet
- Jim, when vou fe ft the Hunkin- Conkey whe ‘re did vou
go to work?
A. Baltimore and Ohio Saitioud:
Q. Approximately what year?
A. 1944. ‘s°
Q. So that in 54 you had bee nthe re 10 soles? eae
“A. 10 years.
YQ. W hat did you start as?
JA. As a brakeman. 4
Q). And did vou continue to be ; a brakeman up until 1954?
A. No. Ll was promoted to yard foreman shortly after 1
started. Cagayan leak
Q). And were voua vard foreman in es
JA. Twas not. | worked as both up until "5
Q. You worked both?
A. Yes.
Q. Jim, what disenses of any kind or sicknesses dia you
have in your early childhood and your cart vouth?
A. None. All LP remember, | had one, smallpox,
Q. Suiniipex?
[fol 91] A. Yes.
Q. How old were vou then?
A. Well— r
Q. When you were a baby? ”
A. No, when I was 10,12 years old.
Q. Did you get overit? > Co -
A. Oh, Ves.
—Q. Did you ever have any Find of a skin condition?
A. Lneveras much had a pimple on me.
- @ Did you ever have sugar diabetes?
AL Oh, no.
sf
a~
\
(). Did you ever suffer from colitis?
A. Tdon't know what it is.
Q. vier youever suffer from Buerger's Disease?
A, ! ' don't’know what that is. ;
Q. Did you ever have an allergy of any kind?
A. No. .
s
wo
P :
Q. | take it then up until Tod vou Were aman of good
health? ‘3
AL Grood licalth.
Q. What didvou. Weish in Ay asus stot aod?
AL 20 pounds.
Q. What do-vou weigh now?
AL SO) Ge she ld’
(Q). Can we goon, dim? :
A. sedageslyae:
[fol G21 Q. Did vou ever have any serious accidents be
fore August of TH54?
A. Sprained ankle. :
Q. On the railroad? ; .
“AL On the raddroad. and Peuess a pulled ligament,
(). Aig youever have a spraine «Lhack .
“AL Ve a ¥OS. :
(). We reany of those serious ee ‘ide utsyedim:?
OAL None. no, :
Q. Were any of then loss of time aceide Mts:
A. No. 7 ,
Q). Your wife was saying somethitig. Would you explain
What your wife said - <a |
“AL ¥e st ves, there Wis one time an aceident when DP wis
working for the DuPonts. Tcot off a tank car and it was
in-kind of a hole that [stepped in. and d spritine ‘damy ankle
and Tbroke aconple of toes,
\.
x.
().
A.
().
When was that, jm? eee er gee
Oh. that musi have been ahqut 1, 2 semewhere,
Did you getover thet ttall right “ae
Ves. :
Now, your wile ; sad something about accidents and
no acejdents. P-think you can — What the railrosaed
terms dre for lost time vecidents and no lost time accidents.
he
_ fol.
We se ee nvon dent dose no time, that is no lost time,
0 | Are there times when vou can't work ‘fora
Ley w days ran aceidé nt they can let vou mark in and off
sa nae tomake it Are ports thle gueide mt 2
z
-”
+
They did me for thdavs. an certs
“- hat js the reason for those things?
Walk TP think mostly —
.
é
06 e
Mr. Leasure: [ think we will object, your Honor. The
jury doe ‘sn't a for suite. He has indie ated that he thinks, }
and I don’t think itis relevant here anyway, ,
The Court: Obje ction sustained. -
Q. At any rate, none of the accidents you had were —
serious ? . .
A. No oO. J x
— QQ. Jim, when did you start to work on the Seheea down-
‘town job?
A. Oh, | would say around 1950.
r Now, from 1950 to 1954 was that your regalak job!
» That was my regular job.
5 And what trick did you work most ? ?
A. The second trick. |
Q. -And what is the time of the second trick?
A. 3:00 to 11:00, a
ra Jim, just us # little bit about that Seneca Stre et
job. * : »
~The Court: Is that 3:00 p.m. to 11 :00 nin f
, [fol. 94] | Mr. Dudnik: 3:00 p.m, to 11:00 p.m.
Q. Just tell us a little bit about the downtown Seneca
~ job, sometimes ealled the dow ntown job?
A. Downtown.
(. Sometimes the Seneea job, same thing? .
A. Yes,
YQ. What is the downtown Seneca job?
A. It refers to the freight house, to switeh, you take—
Mr. Didnik: Can all you folks lear? Thank: you.
A. You take empties in and out of the freight, out of the
firms, and you would place, vou would pull the freight house
and take the loads that were loaded cars out of the freight
house. classify them, and take them to Clark eg
(). In other words, | take it there were cars along the
industry, what do they eall them, platform —
A. Yes, and we have a yard there,
q. Ana you af out the empties and pull in the full
ea uxt on ix a sWitching operation, isn't tt?
That's ie gi
4
“
oF
Q. And ‘that job i is mostly in What se rritery, a what part
of town? >
4 Well, it re Te thi: Hats.
ingen ‘
fel 95] JA. The flats.
Q.:- That is around the river, ism'tit? +
A. Yes. night alongside the river,
Q. Now, how many men work on oni.of those jobs or
crews, one of-those jobs?) Twill withdraw that:
That was a very: very-—not for a railroader—that must
have been a.silly question. ’ {.
Yow have crews working towether ne amet a me
A. Yes. » 5
Q. [flow many men ina crew? i
A. Well, there would be i yar oon and this par-
ticular job had three helpers.
Q. A yard forémanand three helpers ?
A. And an engineer and a fireman.
(). Now, we know the engineer runs the engine,
4
N. Right. . ay
Q. The fireman sits next to him? :
"A. Yes, ; 9
Q). He stokes the fire?
A. Right.
i Now? the foremanyis he a switchman, too?
. Yes,ves, o<o@
6 W hat ix the difference ites ona he iper and a fore-
man?
A. Well, the foreman has the re aeantanty of the job, tw
run the job.
ifol. 96). Q. Now, three helpers, and they are — ‘n? :
A. They are switehmen, ° 5
@. Dao* they sometimes work with the engine? loam 1 tale :
‘ing about the four—.
AL Yes.
Q. And do they sometimes work away from the engine
A. AWay.
QW. Are there times When the men ride the e hgine }
A. Right, ods | as
(). Are there tines that the men walk and the engin)
follows them” oh j
.
58
A. Yes.
Q. Does that all “ve nd on the kind of ‘work you have
to dg? .
A Thats right.
‘Qe Now, in August of 1954 on the day that you had your
accident, what were you then, the he per or the foreman?
I was the Vard foreman.
You were the yard foreman? .
Yess te
Did you bid in that job? o _
No. The regular foreman was off.
So you got it? |
\ vs,
Does the forefman's job pay more. than—does the
foreman get more than the brakeman?
[fol. 97] A. Itdoes. ¥ -
Q). In 54 how mu¢h was a brakeman ge tting aday?
A. I think it was $17.54.
Q. And how much was the foreman getting!
A. $18 something.
_ Q. Have there been any increases in that rate since, do
you know?
_ “A. Oh, | think there has. | think there has been two
mereases.
Q. Since then?
A. Since ther. '
Q. Now, when you wiliod that triek, second trick, what
time did you normally get down te work?
A. Around 2:00.
Q. And where did you go?
A. Well, you park your ear, go to the yard office.
Q. And what is the operation from there ?. :
A. You get to the yard office about quarter to 3:00,-you_
would eall Clark Avenue, get your orders as to consist vf,
your work, and then proceed to the engine and go to work.
* |. Now, was this a daily routine? ;
A. That & daily.
Q. .And the foreman called ana got the orders!
A. Yes. -
Q. Jim, of course you are familiar with the Columbus
Road bridge!
erererer:
i>
‘4
/
- ; . : , a
ag
Te os | A. Right. ¢
(). Before 14 on ovonr Seneca Street job that vou
worked for four ve val how often diel you get to. Ke, oe
that bridge every dk iv! 2 “é :
AL Every day.
Q). More than once a day?
OAL Sometime mere than onee a day,
@ (. Did vou sometimes walk undernesth?
A. Yes. wewould walk.
Q. And did vou sometimes ride underneath ?
A. And sometime = rides ,
(). Now, how many tracks de they have under that
bridge? . a
a\. One track. ‘It is two rafls.,
Q. One track Which is two rails?
(x. Yeu. *
, f Q. And what was that track known as!
A/ The River Track. .
Y. lim, that track runs tp which direction?
A. North and south.
Q. Railroaders eall that ditferent.
A. East and west. “> :
Q. In other words, railroad directions it is east and west?
A. East and west. ‘
(. But the way we folks look at it it issterth and south?
i North and south.
‘Tfol, 99 | Q. Jim, ean yen=deseribe the condition under-
neath the bridge, partie aularly itlons x the east rail as it was
in August of Tod?
A. Welle there was stagnant waters dead rats, pigeons,
with inseets tying above and in the water,
‘Q. Were those rats and pigcons in the water?
\. Inthe water and along the rail.
Q. How long, if you know, had that condition which you
now deseribe existed before August of To4? _
A. As long as bremember. aie :
Q. Well, how long do you reamember. Jim {
A. Well, the dength of tinte that | worked for the B & O
Railroad, 10 vears.
Q. Was it ever cleaned up?
A. [have never seen it cleaned up.
~
r
60 Led as a aes
The Court: Ididn't hear that. | |
Mr. Dudnik: “I have never seen it cleaned up.” _-
Q. Had you ever complained about it to anyone?
A. Yes, to Paul Delaria, the track foreman.
~Q. To Paul Delaria,and he is what? 9 >
As He is the track foreman. ; ' .
-Q. Had you complained about that before August. of
1954?
A. Yes, a long time before,
Q. Had you complained about ‘it once. or more than once?
A. More than onve. _
{fol. 100] Q. Jim, [ am going to hand you a photograph
“which has been marked Plaintiff's fxhibit No. 3, taken two
years after your. accident, and ask you if it correetly rep-
resents the appearance of the condition you described unde T-¢
neath the Columbus bridge on the day that you had tour *
accident? a...
A. Exeept for the dead rats and pigepns. I. don't see no
insects. ' .
Q. You say exeept for the dead rats and the pigeons and |
‘insects? :
A. And insects. .
Q. Except for that, is that the way it looked?
A. That way and much worse.
Q. That is Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 2. Do you say the
same or not for Plaintiffs Exhibit No. 1 taken in. August
of 1957? K ohne
A. I would say the same.
Q. By the way, this Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1, Jim, i is this
Ba rail the east or west rail?
That is the east rail.
In other words, is ‘north in- this direction, north in
this direction? ,
“A. North would be along going ieee ts track.
~Q.. Tsee. But that is the east rajl?
A. Yes.
Q). Perhaps you can teli me betine ahout Plaintiff's Ex-
hibit No. 4 which is a. picture taken in August of (1990,
‘[{ fol. 101] three years after your aecident.
“~
*
ae Pat te Se |
Now, in this picture which W: Ly are vou looking as you
logk into the pieture? +
"A North.
Q. That makes the east rau the oneoon the right, isn't it?
A. That's right, ; i
Q. Now. do you remember the day you had your accident ?
A. Tdo.
: Can you tell us the date now, the exact date?
: No, l ¢: ant say the date.;
§ n On that dfy, fim, when id you leat ave home?
Ascusnal,at 2:00,
m) How did you fel that day?
JA felt good that day.
ny What was you? state of health?
‘AL Very good,
-Q. When you got to work—did you drive to y work? eh
A. Tdrove to work.
©@. You parked your car? ee we
A. Parked my car.
(). Do you reenll about what time you got into the vard
offi is that what you call it?
» A. Around 2:00.
Q. That gave yo
A. An re ;
(fol. 102) Q. Why-did von get there so early? .
I, it was nothing unusual for me. | always got’a *
job ahogd of time. cn Ss
Qn did yeu call fororders? —¢ ; ’
“A. Nbout a quarter to 3:00 Lealled tor orders.
- And did you get them?
. Lgot my orders.
; What is the first thing you did, Jim?
A. The first thing, we pi¢ked up ony linehes and lanterns,
went to the Diesel, put them on the Diesel, and went over
to the spur vard, .
Q. All right. Now, where was the Diesel with relation to.
the office? :
A. Directly neross from the yard office.
Q. And you say you put your things in the Diesel ‘and
went to the spur track! ,
di. Spur yard.
iow much time before vou started?
~
es
ov .
&
j oC .
62
Q. Spur yard? .-
A. Yard.
Q. Was that at another tench 7 :
A. Yes? that was another track.
Q. Did vou walk there or ride the engine there?
. AL No, 1 walked there..
(). What did the other men do, if you re call?
AL. The head man took the engine up to the awite ly threw |
[fol. 108, the switch for the Diesel to,back down into the’
spur yard in track 7, . a .
Q. ‘Now, Jim, do you remember the engineer on that day?
A. Pat English. ° .
Q. Dovouw knew heow-old Pat is or sas then, if you know :
If you don’t know, it is all right.
A. He was over 60.
Q.. Who was the fireman?
A. That I don't ‘know, beeause he was ealled, | think he
was called onthe earlier shift, on the morning shift.
Q. Now, can you not tell us the name? :
A. No, Ll ean't.
Q. Can-you tell us thea other three members of your
switching crew?
A. No, I don't remember vither, for the simple reason
we were—they Was men that was ealled for the Jocals,
which left me the foreman, and that’s the reason I don't
_ remember.
Q. In other words, you cannot recall who was with you
that day?” ard ‘ ; Piakd -
A. No, | don't. ‘
Q. Now, after you went to the spur yard what did you |
do then?
A. Well; there was a couple of cars on the head_end of
track 7, and we coupled onto them and shoved them to the
rear of track 7.
Q. Jim, | am-not going to bother ‘you with that airplane
, (fol. 104] picture. Where was this operation, with -relatien
"to the Columbus Road bridge? ,
A. Well, it was underneath it.
‘ Q. Underneath it? - ———
A. Underneath it. sie
al
a
63
—Q. You did some switehing underneath, To mean, move-
ments underneath the bridge?
- Ves, ,
. Then didthere come a tune when you left your engine
a started to walk under the bride .
Yes, s ee Cae
And this mishap etl p von are geong te tellus about,
on accident that vets are gemyg te tell us about, did ate
~~ spenoon Veur first walk througit under that bridge?
The tirst walk. -.)
”
Mr. Duthlt : Your Henor, one is as good a time as any
to recess,
The’ Cour t: Ladies sane} poy wen af the jury, we will
recess now for the luncheon heur, and beeause of some
duties th Court has te perform we will reeess until 2:00,
You will have your inch and return fer action at 2:00,
You may retire to the jury room ones more with the
admonition that vou do net talk to anyone wheut this case,
ffol. 10. 7 hot even amongst yours: Ives.
(Thereupon un adjournment was oe nto 2-08 a'elock,
pam, Pune 11, 19a at W hic ‘h tims the following proceedings
were hid :) ° .
[fol. 106 }.
Thursday afternoon session, 2:00 yam ie June HW, 1959
Thereupon the Plaintit. dames T. Gauriek. resumed the
Witness stand anid was further examined dnd testified as
follows:
e 4 °
Direet examination of James T. Gallick, resumed.
Iv Mr. Ducdnik:
Mr.-Dudnik: Mr. Romito, will you read the last two
questions and answers !
(Last two questions and answers were read by” the
reporter.) ,
‘ : .* :
Q. Jim, | want te straight none thing out. You told the
jury yew had smakpox when you were a child, and P asked
64
oa |
you- about that during the luncheon intermission ; Was ‘it
smallpox ?
A. Chicken pox. 8
Q. Chicken pox! | “MS
A. Yes.
© Q. Are you Sure of that?
A. Yes. © :
(). Jim, when you started for the bridge where had you
~— from?
The spur yard over Lime Road. |
- Over Lime Road? ) ree of
A. Yes. ay
Q). Onto where? .
[fol. 107] A. Onto the iver Track. _
Q. Onto the River Track, that is the track that you told
us that leads under the bridge?
A. Under the bridge.
*Q. And did you start from that point for the bridge?
A. Yes,
Q. How far were you when vou got off of Lime Road and
__onte the River Track, how far were you from the entrance
* to the bridge? :
A. About 20 or 30 feet. - si
(. 20 or 30 feet, and would you. then be going in which,
‘direction as you go toward the br idge?
“A. North. =
Q. Would you then be going in the direction that you
see looking at Plaintiff's Exhibit 4?
A. Yes.
Q). And at that time | take it you Were on the River
~ :
The River Track.
- Did you then start for the bridge?
A. Yes.
Q. Did you stop at any point under that bridge or did
‘you go all the w ay tiirough without stopping?
A. No, 1 stopped under the bridge.
Q. What was the purpose of your stopping?
A. To see where the engine was, “wie re the Diesel Was
, coming down.
gr*
60.
[fol.os! QQ. When von went tn first. as vou enter the
brides didilt vou know where the Diesel was?)
AL Now. : ‘ ;
©. Did vou know where it was geing to be dater?
Bs Well db knew. Dhad an idea where it was going,
. Now, Ria, You say tho you stopped to see where it -
wan! ’
x Where it was, yes,
J Where were vou im that bridge or ander that bridge
Re nh vou stopped, in other words, were vou closer to the
entrance, closer to the other side, or closer to the middle?
= I would say Closer to the mids Ile.
To the middle? , Fae
§ To the middle. |
Q. When yon stopped where’ were you sent with
reference to that diteh?)\~
A. Alongside the track, trat would ™ the ext taGete of
the River Track. :
(. You. Were not alongside. the rail closest to the ditch,
were vou! ny
- NO. %
You were on the othe YT side? —
4 On the other side, oe e. .~ .
Q. And when vou stopped. as you stopped which way
were vou headed?
[ ful. 109 | A. Repeat that.
“Qo As you stopped which way were you headed ?
Bd South.
~ Well, before vou die aalined south were vouhe aded north?
: Yes. When T stopped underneath the bridge T looked
to see Where the Diese! was coming.
(. Before you looked which way we re you i aded ?
A. North.
Qe And what did vou do in order r pe Hook?
. Well, had to turn around.”
And when vou turned around then were you headed |
e
>
ee
AL Yes. then Pwas. loadin south.
Q. How lone did vou stand there before you ‘de ‘termined
the position ef your Diesel?
N Oh, about30, 45 seconds maybe.
— Q. Is that your best judgment?
~ A. That's my best judgment.
. Then after you determined where it was what did Fou
_ A. Then I proceeded, | started to walk. stg
. Now, when you started to walk, tell the Court and j jusy -
what happened?
A, I was bitten after I took a few, a couple of steps.
Q. You were bitten?
A. I was bitten.
Q. Where were you bitten? |
{fol. 110] A. On ‘the left leg abov e the knee.
Q. How do you know you were bitten?
A. Well, | know I was Bit. beeause 1 slappe cd my pants leg
and crushed it.
Q. What.do you think you out
“A, Well, it was something, some insect,
Q. Have you any. idea—
The Court: What was that r
Mr. Dudnik: It was some insect.
Q.: Have vou any idea as to the size of that insect?
A. Well, it was the width of them three _— s, over-
lapped, these three fingers.
Q. These three fingers?
A. These three fingers:and my thumb. I crushed it with
my thumb and my three fingers. ‘ 7
Q. And did you feel it crush?
A. I felt it crush. .
Q. What happened after you er pide it?
A. I straightened out my leg to make sure, I felt some. |
thing going down my. leg, you know, it would go down. ‘
Q. And did you fe el. it go down? me.
A. | felt it roll down the back of my leg. 7
Q. Did you see it? ~
_ A. No, I didn't. p
Q. Have you ever seen. it? i kao Mo, ?
[fol. 111] A. No, [haven't. :
Q. Why didn’t you see. it after it went down your pant
leg? - | .
«
ee : a 67
“Because the Diesel was too clos to me and I didn't
ln time to pick it up. es
Q. What did vou do then when the Diesel eamy at you?
A. Welk the Diesel come, LT got on the Diesel, and I
showed the manon the footboard, lasked him to look. I told
chim Lhada dite. | és . ° oa
Q. Did you feel any pain? |
A. Yes, I felt it.
Q. Was it severe or slight? ait
\. Well, it was severe from the beginning and it case sed
* ee ?,
— Q. You say you re ae it to the man on the. foothoard?
A. On the footboard. Pals
Q. Who was that man? . 4
A. Idon't know who thataman was
Q. Did you at one time think yo
didi you never know w ho it. Was? 4.
A. No, IT didn't think | knew who it Wats,
Q. Do you remember now who it was?
A. No.
(). Did he look at it?
A. Helookedatit. |) ,*
Q. Was that while you were Jn the Diesel!
(fol. 112] A. On the Diesel.
Q). Then.where did the Ditsel go?
A. We went to West Street.
Q. What did vou do? .
A. [got off the Diesel and went and looked the cars over.
Q. Did you continue your tour of duty?
~ oak. I did.
Q: During the timé that you continued your tour of duty,
did you feel any sensation at the place where you had. the
bite?’ |
A. Yes, I did.
Q. And where, again, was the place?
A. Above the knee on the hack of my thigh.
Q. When did you next do anything about that particular
‘bite?
AL Well, when we got to Clark Avenue T have a locker
there and I went in and washed it off with soap, washrag
and water.
knew who it Was, or
/
&
Q. Could you see it ?>
A. No. :
Q.. When was it that’s you did that? ? as
A. That was about 7:00 pm. a: ‘%
Q. When did you eat, before or after?
A. After.
Q. And when did you eat that day?.
A. About 7:15. - . .
Q. Was that at your supper hour then? ; 6
A. Yes, it was lunch hour. ate ,
- [fol. 113] Q. After you ‘washed .it and had your dinner,
did you continue to w ork?
A. Yes, [ continued to work.
Q. Did you finish your tour of duty that day?
a. I did.
Q. When did you finish?
A. At 11:00 p.m. that night.
Q: From the time you’ washed it -until 11:00 ae were
you conscious ‘of any sensation in back of your leg
A. Yes, I was.
- Q. Were you conscious of the sensation when you weint
home”.
A. I was..
.Q. What did you de then when’ you went home?
A. Well, 1 asked my wife to look at it She says that |
was bit. .
Q. Did vou tell her what happened?
A. And I told her what happened. —
Q. Did she describe it to you?
A. Yes, she described it.
Q. Were you alarmed about it?
A. No, I wasn't alarmed about it.
Q. What did you do.that night?
ALT got in the bathtub, took a bath, and went to. bed.
; share after that.
' Q. What did you do about it the next night, the next day?
[fol. 114] AL. Nothing. os ;
Q. Did it tkeep j you from w orking?.
A. No, it didn't.
Q. Were you conscious of a sensation ! 4
.. A. Yes, 1 was,
¢
/
. Dil it ever leave yout , a ¥
rs ‘No. .
Q. Did vou do anything about it: the following day, and:
the following dlav, say, forthe next Tour or five days ?_
ASWell, for the next three or four days fhere was’
nothing done ‘about it. | =v
Q. Were you ‘alarme dabout it?
A. No.
Q. When did von first become -athrene dabout it?
A When she told me it was forming like a boil.
Q. Like a boil? wee
aA. Like a boil, and it. was going to bust. on
Q. Didit bust? — Ve
A. 1 got in the bathtub. 1 got " the bathtub and when
LT got ott she told me that it busted.
Q. What did you do then?
A. Then, the onty-thing | had was carbolic salve. T put -
carboli¢ salve on it.
Q. Did you see a doctor?
A. Yes, the first off day [| had, that was on a- Thursday,
[folc117] lL wenttoa doctor: Ae
Q. How-many days after that, do you’ know, after the
bust? :
A. No, it wasn't but a couple ot dayed.
4 W ho did you see? .
_DreHeller. :
Q. What did Dr. Heller do fer vou?
A. Well, the first thing he gave me was a shot of peni-
-eillin.
Y. By the way, had Dr. Heller treated you before?
. He was my family doctor, ;
@ And do you recall some of the things he treated you
for? .
A. Yes, he treated me for my hack, and that's x about all 1 -
guess. Se
QQ. Do you ‘recall ever secing him about your. chest?
A. Yes.
What was the imei nt that sent vou, that got you to.
Dr. Heller with regard to your chest?
A. Well, ] was working at DuPont Chemical at.the time-
when an a cuaaieaaly ares, and as I was eating: a a
70 - ‘
S
[just happened to get into this argument, and { made a
swallow iind it seemed to have stuck in my chest.
Q. And that is what yeu went to see hint about?
A. That's what 1 went to see him about.
Q. Was that cleared up?
A. That cleared up. :
(fol. 116] Q. Now, Dr. Heller gave you a shot of pent-
cillfin the first. time you saw him with relation to this bite.
and did you see him again?
A. Yes.
Q. How long after that?
A. Aday, the next day.
Q). Did you continue to work?
A. Yes.
Q Hlow many times did you se® him altogether, de you
reeall ? . :
~ AS Shout half a dozen times.
Q. Now, on the last time that you saw him what did:hé -
tell vou? —
A. He told me, fhe says, “1 will have to put you in the
hospital” @ :
Y. What did you do?
A. Well, | went to another doetor.
. Who did you go to?
Ippolito.
Dr. Ippolito?
Ippolito.
How long after the last visit to Dr. Heller?
It was right after the visit.
Did Dr. Ippolito examine vou?
He examined me.
. Was vour wife with you?
ifol. 117] A. She was.
(Q). What did Dr. Ippolito say to you ‘alter he examined
you?
A. He says, “You are going to the hospital.”
(). This time did you agree to go!
A. I went. '
QQ. How long after he said that to you did you get into a
hospital? :
A. The next day or two.
Oreorerere:
71
Q. And what hospital? .
NO Maryvineunt, : ’
Q. By this time were you able to see any part of the sore,
on vour leg? ; :
i em
Q. What did Dr. [Ippolito do for you in the hospital?,
Mr. Dudnik: ml in your way, sir?
Juror No.7: No. > SN re,
Mr. Dudnik: Thank vou...’ °
A. They took cultures and examinations.
_Q. What did he do by way of treatment other than the
examination and cultures?
A: Le operateds Skin—
*Q. How long—lLam sorry,Jim?
A. Skin graft. © :
Q. Now, before fhe skin graft didn't he do something
else? ca . ;
ffol. 118) A. TP don’t remember.
YQ. bo vou remember?
A. I] don't remember.
Q. Before the skin graft, Jim, may | oask you avhether
you recall that he didia debridement operation, which was
cutting away of the flesh, dowou re veal] that?
A. Yes, L recall that.
Y: Was that the first operation?
A. That Was the first Operation. 2
Q. How long after your first entrance to-Marymount did
you have that debridement, if you reeall? ve P
A. That was only acouple of days after:
Q). Did he put you to tin
A, Yes.
Q. And how did you fe fF afterwards?
A. Sickly.
” a
— Q. Now, after you got over the effects or whatever it
was that put you to sleep, did you begin to feel anything
about vour leg?
A. Yes
YQ. W hat did.you feel?
A: Pain.
Q). What kind of pain was.it ?.
A. It was a sharp burning pain,
~~
72 os
-
Q. Following that did you have a skin graft operation!
(fol. 119} A. Skin graft. .
Q. Now, ean you tell me bow long between the debride-
_ ment and the skin graft?
&. Xe \
Q. You can't?
A. BO
Q: What did hy ilo by 1 way of a skin graft.can vou tell us?
A. No, 1 ean't.tell vou. The ‘y Just took skin off my right
thigh and that’s all Lean say about it.
Q. Were you able to see the area that the skin was taken
from? ; mee
A. Yes. , .
Q. Will you describe that?
~d# It was raw.
Y. Vas it sore?
A. It was sore.
*'*a2. Could y ou tolerate it?
A> What? -
Q. You had no trouble ‘tolerating that pain, did you?
A. Well, yes, to a certain extent, it pained enongh that
=
Q. That you knew it was there?
A. a Cs,
Q). tlow about the area that the graft Was made on, was
that sore?
A. That was painful.
[fol. 120] Q. How long did you have that graft before any
other surgery was done on you!
A. [don't remember. I can't, L don't remember.
Q. All right. Jim. You were in Marymount the first time
- about four months, were you not?
A. Right. é
Q. During those four months did you have more than
the debrideme ‘nt and the one skin graft!
A. Yes. ;
-Q. What did you have?
A. Well, they were cutting away, and skin grafts.
Q. Were there several of those .
A. Yes. (
Q. Were they painful?
A. They were, ; :
Q. Was your legs the site of the trouble, getting more
painful, less painful or did’it. stay at the same level of
pain? ; Na
A. That was always painful? severe pain.
Q. Did they give vou anything for pain? :
A. Twas takingdemeroi at the time.
Q Demerol? *
AL Yes,
Qe: At the end of fonr tenths vor se. or te be precise, on
December sthoof LO von went heme. and veu were home
}fol. 121) for about, oh. four days less than a month, were
you not? — -
A. Yes.
Q. What did you de when von were home!
A. Nothing. TP tried erutehes once, and then Lstayed in
bed from then on. : Saks
Could you get along with erutehes!
No.
Could you go to the bathroom ’
No.
Who took erie of you! ‘
My wife. ,
During thi t period did she dies yor every day? -
She did. ; :
. IT mean the wound. |
A. Yes,
. Tell me, what did you experience when the bandage
was taken off?
A. Well, pain. °
Q). Was it ifitensely painful !
A. Intensely painful. (
Q. And was that every day 2 .
A. Every day.
Q. What happened to the area that the doctors treated
during that month, did it get better, stay the same or get
worse? —_ -
‘A. It just kept getting worse. s
[fol. 122] Q. Were you able to see it yet?
A. No, not yet.
Preoreverc
74 : ro
Q. How do you say it was getting worse, I mean, can you
explain what you mean by it’was getting worse, Jim?
A. Well, one thing, the bandage, i came off, you could
see the size, it was getting bigger in are:
@. What was getting bigger?
A. This—
Q. This sore? |
A. This sore, and there was more pain to it.
@). Did you finally go" back to the. hospital, Marymount?
A. Yes.
Q. How long were you ties the second time?
~A. (No response.) /
Q.. ly about 15 months correct?
A. I was going to say about 14 months.
Q. Tell me about that 15-month stay in the hospital, Jim.
A. What is theretosay? — .: As
Q. Will you keap your voice up? Are you getting tired?
A. Lam getting tired. |
Q. Would you like a little rest, Jim?
A. Yes. a
The Court: We will have a very brief recess. You won't
retire to the. jury room. You may. go out and ee a drink *
of water and smoke a cigarette.
(fol. 123] “Be ready to come back in a few minutes. Will
you all assemble there. Are all 14 of you there? [just
want to make sure that vou are admonished. not to talk
to anyon? while you are‘out in the hall there regarding this
case.
(Thereupon a recess was had.) °
The Court: Before you get started again, Mr. Dudnik,
may I say to the ladies and gentlemen of the jury, as you
have noticed I have cautioned you every time you leave
the room whether it is for recess or the termination of
the case at the end of each day, and every noon hour.
I want to further caution you, and | have cautioned you,
and vou have been cautioned during the impaneling of the
jury. to be careful in reading newspapers and listening to —
comments on the radio or television or any other medium
as it has to do with this case.
I caution you onee more not to fornt any’ opinions from
anything vou read or see comer ring this case.
¥ ott may proces “aly
ve 124), By Mr. Dndnik:' son
Jim, | asked you to tellus about the Tiamonths in the
itl ut Marymount, und vou said “Whit is there te
say?” R .
We Ho detame putt te vou this was. temake it brief. did
You have many surgical procedures there?
A. Y (Ss, po Sel ‘*
Q. Did this infection spread!
A. Yes, - ~
Q). Can you tell us te what parts of vour bedy it spread?
A. Under my arm, my right side hereon the back, and
my ankle.
Q. Are you pointing to Sour left or right ankle?
A. Lett ankie, |
. Were vou banelaged every day!
A. Bandaged CVers day.
Q. Were these areas running?
A. Running. . -
Q). Were they running with pus?
A. That's right.
Q. And how did the bandage, how did vou feel when
they bandaged vou?
That was painful.
Q). How many operations‘did you have at Marymount?
\e Ddon't remember, : |
Q. Yowhaven't any idea?
[fol. 125] A. No.
Q. Were vou given narcotics for the relief of pain?
A. Twas, 07 .
Q). Following the 15 months’ stay at Marymount — by the
way, during that time at Marymount was there an odor
from those areas?
A. Yes,
° When did the odor begin?
. Oh. som time after Pwent hack to the hospital.
. ‘ And did that odor continue !
A. It did.
a4
76
Q. Through the balance of the stay at the hospital?
A. It did.’
Q. What kind of an odor was it!
A. Terrible.
Q. And was it 2fll the time ?
A. All the time.
Q. Now, then, on March Sth of 1956 you went home, did
younot? — ‘i
A. Yes. ‘¢ ss
Q. And you stayed home about four. or ive months, “did
you not! .
A. Yes.
Q. How did you feel during those four or five months,
Jim?
A. The same. Just painful. | was taking nareotic pills
(fol. 126} for the pain.
Q. ¢ ‘ould you sleep?
A. Off and on, I couldn't sleep. .
Q. Was the pain getting more severe or lid it stay at the
same level?
A. lL would say it Was more severe, _
Q. What was happening to those areas that. were op-
erated on during the time that you were at Marymount
‘the second time? a !
A. They were getting larger.
Q. What was happening to those operated areas. when
‘vyourwere. home during those four or five months?
. They were gettingdarger.
Did the skin grafts take?
None. .
They did not take? “ie Nat
No. ;
And did the sores ope nup again?
They opened up.
Were there some that vou could see,.lim! .
There was, after, | could sev it, yess i
Could you describe it? ,
Well. [don't know how to deseribe it.
Would you keep your voice up for me? -
It was stringy, various color, running. .
Was it running from more than one area!
CFE rere rere rer
[fol 127} AL Vos, ie-was.
Q. Now, then, on stuly 30th you centered: the Cleveland
Clinie? : .
A. Yes,
Q. And vou were there
The Caurt:: What year is this!
A. Of 1956. “Ae:
Q. Now. P hope Tam’ right, Yeu Were a patient at Chee
land Clinic trein July oe 108. te Huly 21 TMS. isnt thet
right?
A. That's fight. - | 6
Q. A period of about two Years!
A. That's right. | : *
(). However, there were sate periods durtug that. time
that vou were drome. : Breer”
A. Two or three f think. Mt ome tome Pthink @ was home
forfour days. - ; ,
Q. Four days andbyvon went batek !
A. Then Thad te ge back. | |
| Q. What was the longest peried that vou were home
away Arom the hospital during the twe dears at the Cleve-
land Chinie !
A, Four days. - ;
Q. Thatis your recollection ?
A. Ves, °
YQ. Now, then, when ven got inte the Clinie the first time
What shape were vou in, Jim?
[fol P28) AL Physically | was in good shape:
Q). Good shape! - *
A. Good shiajs physically.
Q. What was the condition of OUP area, sore areas?
A. That was undescribiable,
~ Q. Were vou in pain!
AL All the times P
(. What is the first thing they did fort yon by way of
treatment at the Clinie? :
A. Pdont know what they done.
(2 You don't remenmber?
A. Pdon't remember.
Q. Did you have any surgery there?
A * Yes. .
78° e
oe
Q: How many times were vou in-surge rv during the some
two years or-texs that you were at the ¢ ‘leve ‘land ( ‘hinie
A. | couldn't count them.
Q. Were there many?
A. Many.
Q. How did you feel ae ‘reach of those surgical opera-
tions? .
A. Well. sick, miserable.
Q. And were you getting better? °
A. No.” e
—Q. ‘Or were you getting worse?
A. I think worse.
[fol. 129] Q. Did you have many skin grafts?
A. Yes. , a
Q. Did-you have daily dressings ?
A. Daily dressings, onee or twice a day. -
Q). Once or twice a day. | want you to tell me how you
felt when they took the bandages off?
A. It was painful, and I screamed. [used to seream.
Q. What is that?
A. Lused to scream, holler.
.Q. Did they ever have to take you in surgery and give
you a general anesthetic to take: your bandages off?
A. They did:
Q. How mahy times?
A. Oh, many times.
- Many times?
Many times.
¢ Under a ge ‘peral anesthetic? °
Yes.
ot Why was that? |
A. Because it was so painful. © a
4 Was there an odor about those areas at the Clinic?
. There was. ,
a “Was it constant?
Constant.
a Jim, what happened i in May of 1958?
| fol. 180 | A. [lost my first leg. ~
Q. What happened three weeks later, Jim?
A. LT lost my second leg.
(. How did-you feel, Jim?
ee e ‘
;
4
‘79
Are vou ready to continue?
me Yes. . >
»* é ‘ .
. Do vou want to live, Jim?
"4
_ I want to live. ~ yee
Q. You were .: harged from the Clinic or rather you left
the ¢ ‘Tinie oi, July 2115s, did you not, Jim?
AL COS, that’s right. |
Q. Where did vou go from there?
A. Highland View. ?
Q. Arevou still there?
“A. Dam stillthere, ©. . ;
Q. What are they doing for vou, Jim?
A. Therapy. Whirlpool, That's all.
(). Jim, are vour nese be healed?
A. One is. The other isn't.
Q. isit-Sllrunning? | ye
A. There is a drainage.
The Court: W hat? ;
© Mr. Dudnik: There isa drain lee, your Honor.
(). Jim, are you a narcotic addict. 4
“ffoh W1] oA. No.
Q. Were you? : ‘
A.. Yes.
. Q. Do vou still take things for your pain?
A. Ido. — : ‘ , 5
*Q. Do vou have to takeat every day?
A. Every day.
QJ. Jim. do you have an ope nN wound“any Where now?
A. Onmy arm. .
Q. Tam going to ask veur wife to take. the dressing off,
and T want you to exhibit it to the Court and jury. Will
you help him, Mrs. Gallick?
Is it safe to do it?
Mrs. Gallick: Yes, it is safe to do it.
Q. Jim, Tam going to turn this around. I want the jury
to see this.
Can all of you foiks see that?
Now, Jim, bam not going to ask vou to show vour stumps.
But is that skirt upasdar as it can go?
A. As far as it can go. eee
»
fae.
80
Mr. Dudnik : Can all you folks see that?
Q. Jim, were ydu visited by any claim agents of the
Baltimore and Ohio Railroad?
A: I was...) ~ ae
[fo]. 132] - Q. When was the first time you were seen by a
claim agent?
A. I don't. re «member when, but it was at Marymount
Hospital.
Q. Marymount?
A. Yes. ; 7
Q. Will you keep your voice up. Was it during your
first stay or your second stay? . ‘
A. My first stay.
Q. Your first stay?
A. First stay.
_ @. Did you at that time give ‘them a statement of some
kind?
Yes, I did.
. Which you signed?
A. I signed. .
- Who was there when you signed ‘it?
Spinelli and Robinson. :
. Spinelli and Robinson. Were they both claim agents
of the railroad? ie,
A. They were. | inh
. Was there any body there representing you?
. No.
. When did you retain.a lawyer in this case, Jim?
Q
A
Q
A. In’56.
Q
A
Q
ore! ere
. Some two years later!
. Yes.
. And that was Mr. Cook—
{fol. 133] A. Cook.
Q. —who in turn was kind enough to retain me?
A. Right.
Q. Jim, did you keep a time book of ev ery day that you
worked? a |
A. I did. .
Q. And does that show the shift you worked and the days
you worked and the hours you worked !
A. Yes.
7
. ? -
Mr. Dudnik: You have copies of this.
Q. Lam going to hand you this book--mark it.
(Plaintiff's Exhibit 11 was marked for identification by
the reporter.) .
Q. If'is marked Plaintitl's Exhibit 11; aki ix this, Jim?
A. It is the time book.
The Court: What?
Mr. Dudnik: Time book.
Q. I believe it has records ‘starting in 19 what, Jim?
A. This is from April 16th.
Q. April 16th?
-A. To the dist.
Q. Of what year? W hat I inean is this, Jim, about how
many years does this cov er?
Aw "51.
Q. ‘or? -
[fol 184] A. °51.
Q. Thropgh the time you worked until you left work as a
result of your accident? |
A. Right.
Q. Jim, | am going to turn to the month of August of
1954. You have a word written there after the date August
~ 10th, and what does that word say?
-A. That says “Bug.”
Q. When did you put that in there, Jim?
A. It was after when I was visited by Spinelli and
Robinson.
Q). Was there any particular reason that you did it?
A. No, Just to give me an idea of about the date..
Q. And you still cannot tell the jury with any certainty
as to— :
_ A. No.
_Q. —as to thee ‘xact date?
- No. .
. It has been called to my attention that 1 may have
“over Pothag asking you g question, Jim.
I want you to tell me whether or not on the day that yeu
had the accident’ the diteh contained the things you de-
- scribed that were in it most of the time?
Co i.
3 “ai ° =
‘A. Yes.
Mr. Dudnik: You may cross-examine.
The Court: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, in order
[fol. 135] to give the plaintiff a little rest period, there will
be another short recess. © |
Once more, when you go out of here and have a smoke
and drink of water,remember the admonition not to talk
about this case with anyone, not even amongst yoursely es.
(Thereu pon a recess was taken. )
- Cross examination of James T. Gallick.
¥ o
‘By Mr. Hadden:
Q. Jim, before I-start out I just want to make it clear to
you that 1 have no intention to make it any more uncom-
fortable for you than it already is, and if it becomes that
way please let me know. .
Jim, you say in 1954 you were living in Parma; .how long
had you been in Parma?
A. A year and a half.
Q. Year and a half?
A. Year and a half.
Q. Was this a new house for you?
A. This was a new house..
Q). You were doing some work around your ohnee, weren t
you?
AL W Al, yes. .. P
Q. You did some work on your garage?
(fol. 136] <A. I painted it.
Q. And did you have a garden. in | the vicinity of . your
house?
A. No, no. \
-Q. But you did have a yard! ?
- A. Yes.
Q. With a lawn?
A. Witha lawn.
Q. During the summer of 1954 while you. were doing the
work of which-you speak, did vou ever have occasion to ‘de
out in your back y ard with shorts on? -
<
a AL No. L never wore shorts.
Q. You néver wore shorts?
A. No. fae
Q. Do you remember the date that you moved into your
hotise i in Parma? —
A. No, L don't. ;
Q. It was in the vear 1953, was Tt?
A. Maybe. . mas
ae You can't be sure?
A. No.
QQ. What can vou tell me, i about the Weather in the
m onth of August, Wot? .. - °
A. Well. it was nice aaa
” ee Q. Ittwas nice Wweatlhitr
: A. Nice weather.
(fol. 1I3t}) Q. Can you reveall at the present time ever hav-
ing seen or heard any thunde ‘Ystorins or any ‘had storms:
during that.month?
A. No,
(Q). Would it be fair te say that perhaps for three weeks
or a month before your insect bite there had bee ‘mono real:
heavy rains?
A. No, there was no heavy y rains.
Q. Now, while-von were on the Number 2 vard sx or
Seneca Street, job, duri ing the month, of Anenust,.lim, | would
like to get it-ca litthe more clear in my mind exactly what’
- are : it was that vou had to work ini.
\s | understood it, you came to work every day at the
ene “a Street vard office, is that right ?
A._Yes.
-Q. “And that is loc: ited mavbe a couple of hundre db vards
from the ¢ ‘olamMus Road bridge?
A. Yes, '
Q. Now, during the course of vour anvdina ry working day
on that job, via far to, the north along the B & O tracks
w ould you go? 3
A. To W hiskey Island. .
Q. That is.an island on ‘the short: of Lake Evie, isn’t it?
A. Yes. ; F = en 5
Q. Right Up.as far nerth ax vou can go? |
A. Yes,
[fol 188] .Q. How far south would you gett
A. Te Clark Avenue.
—Q. To Clark Avenue?
A. Not during the. afternoons, though.
Q. Well,;sometime ev ery day you would get down to
Clark Avenue?
A. Yes. :
Q. And would that be at the south end of the Clark
Avenue yards?
A. Yes, south.
Q. In other words, you would work in and around the
yards alse? ;
A. Where?
Q. Well, your work took 4 you through the y yards not just
up to them?
A. We would take our cars to Clark Avenue, disconnect
the engine and come back to the yard, switchman’s shanty
there, and go to lunch. ;
(). In any event, your: work did take you down to the
Clark Avenue 5 vards, that is right, isn't it?
A. Yes. = :
Y. Now, in the course of traveling back and forth along
the B & O tracks between the: limits that you have men-
_ tioned, you had to pass niany industries on both sides?
A. Yes:
‘{fol. 139] Q. And you had to travel, if would be fair to say.
wouldn't if, ‘throughout the flats area?
A. Yes.
Q: What was your habit, Jim, so far as the clothes that
you wore on the job i in the summertime ?
A. Like\any other man. A shirt, trousers, and T always
wore a 10-inch, that is 10 inches high, Chippewa shoe.
Q. 10-inch high C hippew wa shoe?
A. Yes.
Q. That would come up above your ankle, is : that tight? :
A. Yes.
(). What can you say about your pants, were they the
regular khaki pants that most people Wear in the summer-.
time!
A. Yes.
—,
7
83,
Q. And Hey came down tothe top of vour shoe, did they?
os No, the y came down to the ankle. lig.
To the ankle, Do vou remember whether it was that
Be a clothing you were wearing on the datte that this insect
bite took place? .
A. It was.
Did vou have socks ou?
a Yes, -
. What sort of socks were they 2°
They were cotton socks.
a How high up your lew did they come:
(fol. 140] AL T would Pe) they were about 12 inches high.
So they overlapped the shoe about 2 inches,
Q. I see, were they turned down over the shoe top, or did
they stick up?
A. No, they had elastic.
Q. They had elastic tops?
A. Yes,
Q. On the day of this insect bite, Jim, T would like to get
a little more clear in my mind exactly what your movements
were, , - ee
Please, again, if yeu begin to get tired. please det me
know,
The Court: Are vot tired now?
A. No.
Q. You reported to work as vou said at the Seneca Street
vard office ?
As —. vara alle. :
Q. fain not sure exactly what time vou arrived on this
partic eae day? .
A. | would sav around 2:00, which was re ular for me,
Q). | understand voucto say that it was regular that vou
arrived at 2:00?
A. Around 2:00,
Q. Now, Jim, do von recall in August of 1957 while vou
were a patient in the Cline, that Mr. Diidnik and Mr. Nu-
[fol. 141] renberg and myself and a court reporter came to
see vou, and we took vour de lias
A. Yes, ;
Q. Do vou recall telling me on that oceasion that vour
usual time of arriving on the job was 2:30 in the afternoon?
86
A. No, I don’t.
Q. You deny that vou said that, sir?
A. 1 don’t remember saving it. But I still say it was >
2:00.
Q. It is your opinion that 2:00 was the time rathe ‘r than
2:30?
A. That's right.
Mr. Hadden: May l have a second or two, your Ilonor?
The Court: Surely.
Q. Jim, 1 am going to read to you a question and answer
or two from your deposition, merely for the purpose of:
finding out whether this refreshes’ | you on What Was said
back in August of 1957.
lL asked you—
Mr. Dudnik: Page and line?
Mr. Hadden: That is Page 62.
Q. The question: “You are not able to say then where
you have been or what you had done during the half hour
or so that vou had been working before vou were stung ?,
“A. Yes. | was in the'vard office a half an hour before
[ fol. 14: 3) talking on the tele ‘phone,
“Q. You had been in the vard office?
“A. Yeu.
“Q. And vou came to the vard office at 3:00?
“A. Before, before 3:00, We generally get there around
2:30.
"QQ. Areund 2:30?
“A. 2:30
“Q. And how long would vou ordinarily be there?
“AL Well, we would vet to work at 3:00. Get there at
2:30, get to‘the telephone, quarter to three or 3:00, and
stay at the telephone 15 or Inavbe 20 minutes, and then go
out and pick up the Diesel.”
Now, Jim, does that refresh vou on the questions and
answers that we had?
A. Yes.
Q. And do vou say it is true or not true that vou got there
at 3 :00—-exense me, at 2:30 0r at 2:00?
A. 2:00. | | 7
—
87
Q. You deny what you said at the deposition, then, ix that
right?
A. Yes.
Q. You were under wath atthattime?
A. Yes.
Q. In any event, vou get vour orders from (lark aveque
| tel. 14:5 | on the tele ‘phone, ix that right!
A. That's right.
Q). How long did that-take vou?
A. What?
(). To get the orders ove r the tele plone.
“A. Oh. 15 mintites, 20 minutes.
Q. Then dtd youproceed on to do vour work?!
A. Then we ae al out-te do our work. ;
Q. What did you de during the ather 40 or 45 minutes that:
you were in the Yard office
A. We liavt a locker there, sit inthe shanty, loaf, talk.
Q. You loafed for 45 minute-. then ven proceeded ont to
your engine, and E think von said that won left. your lanch
ine ket and your lantern theresis that right?
A. Yes. : °
Q). On the engine? _
A. On the engine.
2 And vou went to the spur vard?
A. Spur vard. Tract: 7.
Q. Track 7. If Lam correct, Track Twas a track whieh
lay between the river and tracks leading inte the freight
station, freight house, is.that right?
That's right.
(). And how iorg were vou there!
A. 10.15 minutes, .
[fol 144] Q. And after havin: done vour work there vou.
proceeded Ww here?
A. I waited until the Diesel was coming out. The Diese!
passed me. Then Tstarted toward~ the river track.
Q. Which way was the Diese! going?
A. The Diesel was going south.
(). That is, back in the direction of Sherwin-W illiams?
— AL Sherwin-Williams.
Q). What was its purpese in going back there?
A. To throw the switeh, so we co to West Street.
88
Q. Did you have anything to dé with the throwing of the
switch there?
A. ‘No, I wasn't at that point at all. ‘i
Q:-1 see. So you went directly from = the spur yard
towards the C olumbus Road bridge? ee
A. Yes. j zs «
-Q. Now, Jim, I think .whien you were answering Mr.
Dadnik’ s questions, you said when you got unde sans the
bridge you stopped?
A. I stopped. ,
Q. And how long is it that you say you ‘stopped?
A. Oh,a half a minute.
Q. Half a minute? , .
A. Wait a minute. | didn’t finish my question.
; . Excuse net beg your pardon,
[fol. 4 5) Ae Half a. minute, maybe 40 seconds.
ral | What was the pur pose of your stopping?" .
To see that the engine, the. Die sel, Was coming tow ards
{
me.
Q. From the positien that you boii and turnedscould
you see the Diesel?
‘ A Yes. . , {
Q. Could you see it as far as the switch point where it.
had to back up and then come back towards vou? .
‘A. That’s right. .
Q. You could see that far? lees
A. That's right.
Q. What did the Diesel engine dow hile vou watched it?
A. Threw the switch and he started back.
.Q. That is, the switch was thrown and: you saw him c¢om-
ing hack? :
A. Yes.
Q. Was it at that time that you felt thie insect bite?
A. No. -«
Q. When was it? :
A. When T seen the Diesel was coming back T turned
around, started walking north, and T took a couple of steps
when this insect bit me.
Q. It was shortiv then. df was right after vou had stopped —
and looked down the track, is that right?
A. (Witness nods.)
89
[fol M6] Q. Gan vou give me some estimate of how long
it was, between the time that vou turned back to continue
your walking and the time vou te lt the bite?
: A. | took about two ste Ps.
Q. A matter of one or tWo seconds then pe re,
A. Yes, :
Q). In other a at Te ast avery short tine,
A. Yes, ' Reece
Q). At that potut ie Diesel engine had just started to
move toward vou, is that right? ‘
A. No, he started to move towards me up un til P watched
him.
Q. Well— ee
A. And then TP turned around nnaael started walking north.
Q. The'point 1} was ‘wetting at was Whether vou turned
and started to walk as soon as vou saw hit begin to move
toward vou?
A. Yes,
_Q. Jim. showing vou Plaintiffs Eshibit 2. DP will ask vou
to say what that is, if vou can tell.
A. That is the diteh. ; ;
Q. Can vou identify, the track for me and what it showed
"atthe time? : :
A. That is the river track.
Q. In which direction | ix that looking, is that looking hack
[fol. 147] towards where vour Diesel was?
A. Yes. That is south, looking south.
‘Q. So if we give our atteation rh ato the right hand side
of this pieture, that shiws Inere or less the view that vou
had as vou stopped and von say ven turned around: ind
looked tow ards vour Die sel. is that right ”
A. Yes. ~
Q. Now. can vou tell me by lacking at this picture Whether
the: point of the switeh is shown?
By RO o
(). You can't see it? eet ’
A. No, Tean't see it, That was taken ona eirve angle,
QQ. dim, returning onée again, to the tinte two vears ago
When vour deposition was taken, do von reeall saving any-
thing at that time’ either to Mr Dudnik or to mvself when
“we questioned you with regard ‘to stopping and turning
3
90 eS >
around in the middle of the track for half or thre e-quarters
of & minute! ? | j
*
Mr. Dudnik: There is an objection, vour Honor, unless
there is something in there as to Whether he’ stated some-
thing differently. But whether he recalls if the question
wasn't asked there would be no question of récolleetion.
So there is an objection to'that question, —%
Mr. Hadden: Your Honor, it is a perfeetly proper «les:
tion on cross-examination.-
{fol. 148) Mr. Dudnik: Are vou. laying the foundation!
Mr. Hadden: Tam.
Mr. Dudnik: T withdraw the objection,
The Court: Proceed. a
(). Do you have the question in mind of would vou like to
hone it read, Jim? | :
A. Read it. sieram
Mr. Hadden: Read the question, please.
ee question was read by the reporter.) ,
» LEcan't remember saying it. :
- Jim, I want to read you a few questions and answers
here.
_ Mr. Dudnik: The page, please?
Mr. Hadden: Page. 24, towards the end, towards the bot-
tom.
Q. Mr. Dudnik was questioning vou at the time of these
questions and answers, and | will read them.
“Q. Now, describe this ing ident in your own words, Jim.
“A. Well, [started towards West Street, and Twas
over in the spur yard first. | crossed Lime’ Road, started
walking underneath the® Columbus Road bridge When [ got .
an awful biteon my left leg,”
Do vou remember those questions and answers?
[ fol. 149] - A. Ido.
Q. Do you remember saying, Jim, that while vou were
walking under the Columbus Road bridge you.got a sting?
A. Yes,
Q. Now, am interested in the date of this accident.
91
Mr. Dudnik: Just aometment. Lo veur Honor please. I
NOW Penew tis objection: te The Question an Whieh he said he
Wits laying a foundation. Tae question wasi’tasiked. “There
fore To renew my objection. The question wats never asked
Whether hy stoppedor didn't stop en his depesition, and then
Powitheltew tay Gbjeetion when Mr. Hadden said he wats
leaning the foundation, and | theturht
The Court: As cD reiaenioe® aed think Mr Hadden was
ae ; | i. s
reading from: the ch pesttion. amd ashed if the plamtail re.
tiehiberced say itis tae lanectiace taint Wits rene frei the depo- ;
sition, ?
Mr. Dudmik: Yes, but Dae talking about the objection:
before that. - Zn
The Court: TP odon't think weever get an answer toe it
, anyway.
we.
e>-@ Rare of
Mr. Dudu: QU recht. Pana serrs DP ssid anmvthing. Tt is
ab rizht, your Homer. Paves by tiat Daim net pressing the
point. , a ,
“The Court: TP dont thankethere was am answer te that
[fel 150) question. beenause "Mrs Pladdenm then went inte
the deposition said reatel frets: the depesttiam. - |
Mr. Dudnikt: Un other words. be asked him whether he
yetnetubers bere ashed any thm ahent <teppanmg umdep the
bridge: ; ays
» The Const: That’. right. and there wasenever an answer
to that.
Mr. Durbiik: Nm the witres. sand bo didn’t remenbier
The Courts There wits never an answer te that question,
Py " '} °
cas Preeatl
Mr.-Dudnik: Them he did not read amy quesfion with re.
lation te stompan. tinder the daidee. “There is ne such thing
In the deposition. as Psce it, cour Toner ‘Thattis why I
ann objecting tir the epttes* rena! boeecense: May Phinededeen snd he
Was laying a foundation apparently to stow that the witness
said something else om tis denmesitoon. As a matter of taet,
he did not, vour Efoner. .
Mr. Hadden: Wellothat is get tht poitt, cour Foner
The ‘omrts The last onestion amd omsqwer nay stand,
QO. Mr. Gallick, with respeet to the inseet whieh bit vou,
I fol, 15] fer Iyieehy Vou edevirn hit ven its | tineders tered it, vou
ae : x
92 9
_felt a stinging sensation behind vour left los inside your
~ pants, ix that right?
A. I felt the bite.
Q. You reached down with vour left hand and‘vou grabbed
an object inside your pants?
. Right.- 7 ‘
. With-the first three fingers . on
Three fingers.
Ofwhichhand?
. OF the left hand. -
Of the left hand? ‘
A. And the thumb.
(). And the-thumb!
A. Yes. a
@ And vou squeezed it?
. Psqueeged it. , °
> Now, vou said vou heard a—
A. A crack. .
» QQ. Did vou hear the crack or feel the crack? ,
++ A. Both. .
Q. Can vou ren with. somewhat greater accuracy
how big around it was?
&. Well, TP would say about as big dround as my little
finger. . .
()..As big around as vour little finger?
[fol 12] A. Yes,
Mr. Hadden: Mav we oe the record show that. is
mavbe half an ineh in diameter
M r. Dudnik: Call itiant | way you want.
Q. Would vou hold vour hand up again so T ean see what
Vour three fingers look like? ‘
An inch and a tialf tp two inches long?
A. Two inches. ie
Q. Two inches. So in your best judgment, whatever it
Was that was under vour pant leg was about two inches long
and perhaps half an inch in diametér?
A. (Witness nods.).
(). Perhaps the size of a peanut, w aia that he?
A. T think a peanut js 2 little bigger.
YQ. A little higger?
ne ee
—
‘
~
A. Yes, . ’ Nan Me
Q. You have never deseribed it in that way, have you?
A. No, ,
‘- And vou fe It itroll down your — lew?
. Pdid. ,
Hy When it rolled down vour pant leg, can vou give me
any estimate of how long that was after you had turned:
around and started to walk towards West Street!
Lounderstood you to say tavo to three secotyts, oF two
LYol. Load seconds, to be more éxact, between the time vou
started to turn— aoa y fa
A. Yes, | took ae ople of ste _
(). —-that vou lity ped vour ley
AL Yes,
Q. And then immediately the bug rolled down your pant. .
Jew? °. : oe
A. After TPslapped it. it rolled down my leg. -
~Q.
walk back in the direction that vou had started out, and the
thine this tnseet rolled down vour leg if that is what it was,
Was mabe five sevonds, is that a fair statement?
A. No. ttould be longer than that. +
Q). It would not-be ?
A. It would be.
(®% It would be. How lone*would it be?
A. From the time TE turied around and started walking
north, I would nay yt would he closer to between 30 and 45
seconds,
Q. T want to make sure “ton understand the question? and
that ix after vou had stopped and looked around, vou say
‘from the time that vou then turned to go back, took two
steps. slapped the inseet and it: fell dow n your pant leg,
that was 80 to 40 seconds : ry ;
A. Ae es, . ;
Q. What can von tell ine, Mr. an o about the condition
of this pool as you deserihed it, «the vears that vou
(fol T54) worked there? [ft 1 gét ee dircet testimony
correetiy, vo worked for tie B&& QO and had occasion to be
under that bridge for something like ten vears, is. that
right? ; ’ oe ak
A. Off and on, ves. .
~~!
»
93
So that the time lapse from the moment vou started to...
94 . a =
Q. Off and on? . : at.
A. Yee « « - :
Q. And for the last poe :
A. Four years. *. nal os
Q. —quite regularly? . .
A. Regularly. \
Q. Would it amount to more than once a day sometimes!
A. Yes. \
Q. If you went through one way, you hind to come ‘it
again, didn’t you? \
“A. Yes. € \
: 4 ° 4 8 \.»
Q. So it would be twice a day, at least twice a dav?
A. Yes.
Q. Now, during this period of ten vears that vou saw it |
occasionally, and four that you saw it regularly, was the
condition so far as insects, stagnant water, and the like,
the’same? : : .
. A. It was. ,
given time that vou had to be there?
A. It was always filthy.
[fol. 155] Q. Please answer. the question. It neither got
better nor worse during the time that vou had occasion to —
see it? - : : t
A. No, it got no better or no worse.
4 And that condition was filthy as vou described at?
Yes.
O. Exactly what do vou mean by the word filthy?
A. Filthy is part rotted Rides of dead pigeons, dead rats,
dead insects, flying in and around that area
~ Q. And by that area do'voyn mean the area diy rectly under
the bridge or some larger anf’ ?
. That area under the bridge and other.
And some other area, also?
Yes.
Whatarea was it in addition to the part of the bridge?
South of the bridge. _
South of the bridge? ran
And north of the bridge. ”
Both south and north of the bridge?
PeOP DEO? y
Q. That is to say, it got neither worse nor bétter in the |
\
95
A. Yes, sir.
Q). Taking the north part first. how far te the north of the
ge! did this condition prevail? .
/ Oh. would sav about 50, 75 feet
; Was it restneted In that area toe the east side of the
trac ‘ks?
A. Yes, inonite. ,
[fol M6) QQ. Well, there was no water en—
A. No. iis.
Q. —on the west side of the trae ‘ks, was there?
A. No, there wasn't.
Q. How about to the south of the bridge, how far—
ae
Mr. Dudnik: Didn't he say seuth—wasn't that south,
or north? ane
Mr. Hadden: North. sry ies
Mr. Dudnik: Lam sorry.
» Q: How about South of the bridge, how f ar did the ares 2
extend in that direction? s
A. That was covered with de ad crats and rotted hides.
Q. Maybe vou didn't understand the question, The ques-
tion was how far did that area extend?
- All the way to Sherwin-Williams.
» All the way to Sherwin-Williams. And how great a|
Pn ‘e would that be?
A. About 200 vards.
Q. When youosay Sherwin W iNiams | take it von mean
_ the first part of the She ‘TWH -Williains buildings, or did it
“go beyond that?
= The first part.
‘ The first part? | ’ Ps
“ 4 To their overhead awe !
Q. To their overhead bridge; that iS an overhead bridge
{fol 57} that crosses over ‘a river track and goes be. *
tween two parts of their plant?
A. That don't cross over the river track.
? Well, it does co between—
\. It crosses over the east and west—the main track
there, what we call the main track
Q: That is not the river track down there?
A. No. ‘
96 4
Q: When vou say that this area extended that far to the
south, what exactly do you refer to, do you refer toa wide
area orto a narrow area?
—/ A. The width of the tracks: | a
/ Q. The width of the tracks. Is that to say, then, ee
cine insects, rats and other things Were on the tracks, «
that it was just the width of it? |
A. What do vou mean on the tracks or thee width of it?
Q. You said the width of the area that extended down
to Sherwin-Williams was the width of the tracks. ¢ Now, I
am trving to find out whether veu mean to say that that
was the area, the tracks are the area that had the filth on?
A. Our right-of-way.
' Q. It was the w idth of the traéks, and the things that you
described were on the tracks themsclves, them?
A. Yes.
Q. Can vou give us anv estimate of how many dead
[fol. 158] pigeons you may have seen on any given-oceasion
right ‘under the Columbus Road br idge?
‘A. Under the Columbus Road bridge?
Q. Yes, the place where you say you were bitten?
Well, [ never counted them.
A.
Q. Well, was it one?.
A. Oh—
Q. Was it five thousand?
A. No. T would say twenty.
Q. Twenty? .
A. Or more.
. Twenty or more, and: when you say twenty do vou
mean that those were dead pigeons?
A. Dead pigeons or dying pigeons.
Q. Was there ever a time that vou can reme ‘mber when
there were fewer pigeons than that?
A. Yes.
Q. When-was that? I thought mor condition remained
~ pretty constant from what vou told me?
A. Well, T never, just like I say, I never counted them.
(Q. Am I-now to understand there were timey/when there
were fewer?
"A. Yes. i . , | ae f as
aa
“ . -
. we. BR VY
Q). Can vou give ine some estimate of how many dead
pigeons, dead or dying pleeons vou may have seen?
[Poh dae y AL Oh, saw twenty or thirty.
(). Is that the fewest you ever si aw!
A. Yes. » |
Q.- Are vou wetting tired?
A. Lam getting tired,
Q. Well, then let's suspend, may we, vour Honor?
(Counsel and the: Court conferred at. the heneh. )
The Court: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, thé heuili tt
Will adjourn Court for the dav in just a moment.
Before he does, vou will remembor there will he ne Contt
‘tomorrow, and you will feport back at 9:15 Monday morn.
ing, once more with the admonition that vou do not. talk
with anyone about this case, not even amongst vourselves.
(Thereupon an adjournment was taken ta 9:15) acum,
- Monday, June To, 159) at which time the folowing pro-
ceedings were had :) - ay
[fol 160] Monday morning sossion, @:15 am, Jane 1. 1959
The Court: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury. by agree-
ment of counsel on both sides, we are to take the testimony
of two witnesses out of order he fore wee omplete the cross.
examination of the | daintiff.
You will sane when we adjourned last Thursday the
piintiff. was being cross-examined Dy defense counsel,
At this time Dunderstand the pli aintiff is calling two other
Witnesses sis that right! ‘ :
Mr. Dudnik: Yes:
Mr. Leasure: Yes. a —
Mr. Dudnik: Dr. Heller. ia
er
98
Therkupon the plaintiff, further to maintain the issues
on his part to be maintained, called as a witness Dr. Jacon
R. Hevierswho, being first. duly sworn, Was examined and
testified as follows: ,
Direct examination of Dr. Jacob R. Heller.
z.
_ By Mr. Dudnik :
Q. Dr. Heller, will-veu on your name in full, please?
A. Jacob R. Heller, H-e- l-l-e-
{fol. 161] (). Where do you ie, sir?
“A. 3000 West Sulgrave Oval, Shaker Heights.
Q. Are vou a lic ensed practicing ‘physician in this com-
munity?
A. Tam.
Q. Where did vou take vour medical training Doctor?
A. Ohio’ State University. West Virginia University.
. When did you graduate?
1928.
Following that did: you “intern in any hospital, sir?
Tdid.
This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.