Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.49s
Transcript of Record — Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1936
Does it provide for clean air and matters of that kind? A. … We have a separate assembling unit, which is a little building itself, inside the big building with double and triple filtered air. Q. That is. where the clean air is necessary? A.
298 U.S. 448Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 4, 2020
Overview of the RFS In 2005, and then again in 2007, Congress amended the Clean Air Act to include the present-day RFS pro gram. See 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o). … On the contrary, Congress knows how to incorporate time limits when it creates exemptions and has done so in other amendments to the Clean Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferring B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. (No. 06-372)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
They apply the maxim requiring clean hands only where some unconscionable act of one coming for relief has immediate and necessary relation to the equity that he seeks in respect of the matter in litigation … Air Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB, 510 U.S. 317 (1993).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hodges v. Abraham
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
Army Corps of Engineers, 701 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir. 1983) (finding violations of NEPA and of APA through actions under Clean Water Act). … This contention was fully aired at the hearing, and the court finds that there is no support for Dr.
537 U.S. 1105Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
listed under section 1317(a) of Title 33, (E) any 70a Appendix C hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C.A. § 7412], and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical … Shine, 802 F.2d 583, 587 (Ist Cir. 1986) commenting on the Bankruptcy Reform Act; see also In re Mojica, 30 B.R. 925, 930 (Bankr.
Reply Brief — Environmental Protection Agency, et al., Petitioners v. Kentucky, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 9, 2025
PacifiCorp opposed the government’s motion to hold the briefing schedule in abeyance, arguing that the Court’s resolution of the venue issue could provide useful clarity for parties in future and present Clean … Air Act disputes.
Appendix — Hobbs v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1992
lawfully issued Clean Water Act permit. … law fully issued Clean Water Act permit.
504 U.S. 940Petitioners Brief — PDR Network, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jan 8, 2019
As interpreted by the Fourth Circuit, the Hobbs Act would also raise a serious question about whether 6 This Court has not considered the constitutionality of provisions in the Clean Air Act and other … Air Act].”).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 Se I ON virssticia cnn ceaedatcentionacceuctemetsiaiduces United States v. 1966 Beechcraft Aircraft Model King Air, 777 F.2d 947 (4th Cir. 1985) —............. … Kind of exchange In order to achieve the purpose of the Agreement a periodic exchange of experience shall take place.
489 U.S. 1016Record and brief — Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2008
Exxon Shipping pled guilty to one count each of violating the Clean Water Act, the Refuse Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. … Exxon Shipping pled guilty to one count each of violating the Clean Water Act, the Refuse Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
554 U.S. 471Petition — Soo Line Railroad v. Town of East Troy
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
American Air Transport, ne., 344 U.S. 4, 5 (1952); Western Pacific Railroad Case, 345 U.S. 247, 260 n. 20 (19538). … (11) The term “program period” means the period beginning January 1, 1975, and ending June 30, 1975, and the period covering each fiscal year thereafter.
450 U.S. 922Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Circuit decision to some stakeholders for comments. This policy acknowledges the impact of the D.C. … EPA regulations since 1985 have been based upon the interpretation that TMDLs may be expressed in periods longer than a twenty-four hour period. 50 Fed. Reg. 1779, 1776 (Jan. 11, 1985); 64 Fed.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 22, 2026
- On Thursday (1/31/2019), they cleaned the 3rd floor, where we live. 3. - Today Friday (2/1/2019), they are cleaning the second floor. … Mobile Air Estates, 125 Cal. App. 4th 578 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)).)
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Excel Auto Radiator Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1948
The Court denied the Petition for Rehearing without comment. … Claims 8 and 9—‘‘means for guiding air through the radiator in separate paths.’’
335 U.S. 823Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shannon Poe, Petitioner v. Idaho Conservation League
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 15, 2024
SMITH, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises questions of statutory interpretation concerning the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. § 1311(a). … This is a re-opened Clean Water Act case, first filed in 2011.”). 46a Consequently, an injunction will be issued barring Mr.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Comments of the Air Transport Association of America to the FAA, Docket No. 25148 (“ATA Comments’’).* ATA proposes that the 7In its questions concerning “minimum” EAPs, the FAA asks, “How far should … ATA Comments at 3.
486 U.S. 1014Petition — Andrulis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
EPA, 484 F.2d 1331 (1st Cir. 1973), that an award of attorney’s fees against the fed- eral government was authorized under § 304(d) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604. … EPA, 484 F.2d 1331 (1st Cir. 1973), the First Circuit held that Section 304(d) of the Clean Air Act, now codified at 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d) (Supp.
447 U.S. 922Amicus Curiae Brief — Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Air Act legislation and increasing competition from Western coal sources. … Pre-Coal Act History of Coal Industry Provided Rationale for Adoption of Coal Act A review of the history of the coal industry over the period of time from the 1940’s to the passage of the Coal Act
524 U.S. 498Opposition Brief — Loretto v. Group W Cable, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Counsel for Clean Air, _U.S._, ee 37 Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, Mw ce eee 22 Rose v. … Delaware Valley Citizens' Counsel for Clean Air., U.S. __., 107 S.Ct. 3078, 3086 (1987); Blum y.
488 U.S. 827Opposition Brief — Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Grefer (No. 07-1055)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
were transported in and around the yard, were off-loaded by crane or forklift, and were cleaned by both portable and stationary air rattling machines. … Exxon confuses “dissimi- lar acts” with “dissimilar harm.”
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.