Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.07s

  • Opinion — Rounds v. Cloverport Foundry & MacHine Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1915

    Stat., § 563; Judicial Code, § 24. . As the last point is plainly well taken, it is unnecessary to go further. … Elevator Co., 119 U. 8. 388, 398, 399; Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffrey, 177 U. 8. 638, 646, 648. In the case of Leon v.

    237 U.S. 303
  • Memorandum — Sigal v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1974

    He looked inside the airplane and noted that four of the six seats had been removed and approximately twenty flattened cardboard boxes and two sealed boxes occupied the seating space (Tr. 24-25). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42: Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132; United States v. Pollard, 466 F. 2d 1 (C.A. 10), certiorari denied, 409 U.S. 1127.

    419 U.S. 954
  • Opinion — Baker v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1978

    Tr. 23- 24, 393). One of the agents removed the keys from the ignition and handed them to Officer Bergman, who opened the trunk. Inside he saw a briefcase and a locked footiocker (S. Tr. 27-30). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52. This power to execute an immediate search on probable cause extends to items, such as the footlocker, found inside the vehicle. See United States v.

    439 U.S. 818
  • Opposition Brief — Magafan v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1971

    Im- migration and Naturalization Service, 419 F. 24 1355 (C.A. 2), certiorari denied, 399 US, 941; Tua- zon v. Immigration and Naturalization somyice 389 F. 2d 863 (CA. 7).

    403 U.S. 931
  • Opposition — International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

    conflict between the Fifth and Ninth Cir- cuit law on the subject of protectable trademarks IV This case does not merit a fact review by this court V Conclusion ; Soe faa . et, ¥ yd fT, 24 … Commonwealth of Virginia (1821) 19 U.S. 264; 399-400; 6 Wheat 264; 5 L.Ed 257, 290.

    452 U.S. 941
  • Petitioners Brief — James v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1990

    A. 24-53) 523, 528 N.E.2d 723. The opinion t of Illinois, First District, (J.A. shot in the head and died as a result of this wound. … gave descriptions of the offend- ers to the police immediately after the shooting, none of the witnesses said anything about the hair color or style of the person who fired the shots, (R. 329, 365, 399

    493 U.S. 307
  • Opinion — Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Edmisson

    Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1908

    —-Decided February 24, 1908, production before the notary taking the deposition of the witness who the not sufficient, and copies made by the notary cannot used where the objecting party gives notice … Par. 4277, § 399, is as follows: “Entries in books of account may be admitted in evidence when it is made to appear by the oath of the person who made the entries, that such entries are correct, and

    208 U.S. 534
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lynn S. King, Petitioner v. New York, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 5, 2022

    Farradino dated April 24, 1999, A-59-A60]. … Redhail, 434 US 374, 398-399 (1978).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Saldajeno v. Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

    United States, 24 Ct. Cl. 399 (1889)................ 18 Murray v. The Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) GE CDE) .aicenssrssiccvcsactneineioiabeidaranmeien lokam 24 Prosecutor v. Tadic, Int’1-Crim. … United States, 24 Ct.

    540 U.S. 821
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Gibson v. Harris

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1964

    425 (May 24, 1963); Davis ¥. … Cailander, 25H FF. 24 410 45th Cir. 1958) ; Warner Bros, v. Gittone, 0 Fi 2d 202 (3d Cir, 1940): and United States v. Adler's Creamery, 107 V.2d 987 (24 Cire 1939).

    376 U.S. 908
  • Record and brief — Kimberlin v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982

    Greene, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) 26 Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 1K T— 6, 7, 8 Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 (1967) 25 In re Nielson, 131 U.S. 176 (1889) . 15 Manson v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970), this court con- sidered the applicability of the confrontation clause to the admissibility of prior inconsistent statements and noted: “the main danger in substituting subsequent

    455 U.S. 1002
  • Amicus Brief — International Longshoremen's Association v. Allied International, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1982

    Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 969 (1972) ............ 23 Local 399, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 235 NLRB 555 (1978) .................... 19, 23, 24 Local 418, Sheet Metal … Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 840, reh. denied, 382 U.S. 988 (1965) 16, 24 National Maritime Union of America (Shippers Stevedoring Company), 245 NLRB 149 (1979).. 18, 14, 24 National Maritime

    456 U.S. 212
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hetzner v. Michigan

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

    Calico fornia v Green, 399 US 149, 158 (1970). … as those made in his testimony; and the rule is the same whether the previous statements were made verbally or in writing, and applies equally to statements under oath and unsworn state- ments.' 24

    507 U.S. 1005
  • Opposition Brief — At&t Family Federal Credit Union v. First National Bank & Trust Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

    . §§ 24 (Seventh), 378(a). … Jd. at 399-400. The Fourth Circuit has not cited Branch Bank since Clarke was decided, nor has it had occasion to con- sider whether in light of Clarke it would now follow or reject the D.C.

    510 U.S. 907
  • Motion — National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc. v. South Carolina ex rel. Daniel

    Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1985

    University Committee, 399 U.S. 383, 390 (1970). No jurisdiction exists under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c, either. … Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 24 36 (1950), the case upon which they principally rely.

    469 U.S. 1101
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michigan v. Johnson

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986

    California v Green, 399 US 149, 157; 90 S Ct 1930; 26 L Ed 2d 489 (1970). … BAUGHMAN Chief of Criminal Division R rch, » pro) SZ Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 1204 Frank Murphy Hall of Justice Detroit, Michigan 48226 Phone: (313) 224-5846 Dated: June 3, 1986 JC/ag - 24

    479 U.S. 823
  • Opposition Brief — Pennzoil Co. v. United States, 24 Cl. Ct. 167 (1991) (No. 91-34)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

    See Re- funds Resulting From Btu Measurement Adjust- ments, FERC Order No. 399, 49 Fed. Reg. 37,735 (1984). 3. … gress enacted in Section 1339(a), the Comptroller General’s opinion interpreting a statute that did not contain such a bar is of no relevance here.* 8 Petitioners also err in relying (91-1 Pet. 23-24

  • Opposition — Schafer v. Penn Central Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

    Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., BO 02 NO LEOE i. bok sea eaes ck kde ews New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1970) . Peckham v. … Robin Key, are nine of approximately 150,000 former stock- holders of Respondent, Penn Central Company (PCC), which, prior to the consummation on October 24, 1978 of the PCTC Plan under section 77

    444 U.S. 835
  • Reply Brief — Stevens v. Marks

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1966

    Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 ........ 12 Conlon v. Murphy, 263 N.Y.S. 2d 360 .............. 13 Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 ............ 8 Daniman v. … Brief, p. 24. Such is not the case.

    383 U.S. 234
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dora L. Adkins, Petitioner v. HBL, LLC

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 5, 2018

    Pinkley, 191 F.3d at 399. … A week later, on July 24, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.