Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.12s
Reply Brief — Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines Co.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1995
The 1961 Car- riage by Air Act, 9 & 10 Eliz. 2, ch. 27, §3, brings Warsaw Convention cases within the ambit of the Fatal Accidents Act.? … Because DOHSA and the Jones Act are incompatible with the Warsaw Convention, this Court is writing on a clean slate.
514 U.S. 1062Petition for Writ of Certiorari with Appendix — Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari with Appendix · 1961
The combined license-lease arrangement was therefore jot illegal nor a ‘ F re SON ‘ misuse of patents under the Clayton Act. Cf. Linde Air Products Co, v. Graver Tank & Mfg. … tions 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C.A. $1 and §2), and Section 3 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.A, $14).
366 U.S. 211Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Perkins v. United States (No. 07-999)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Progress On Performance Plan Elements Element 1-Element 7 (Needs significant Improvement) Comments *see specific comments on rear of form. … No complaints received during this rating period. 2. No complaints received during this rating period.
Reply Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000
During this same period, settling defendants who were parties to consent decrees in seventy-eight Clean Water Act citizen suits — and who faced or paid such penalties — agreed to fund at least $61 million … No. 228, 101st Cong., Ist Sess. 373 (1989), reprinted in 1990 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3386, 3756 (stating that, in citizen suits under the Clean Air Act, assessment of civil penalties for violations *** [is] necessary
528 U.S. 167Opposition Brief — Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. v. General Electric Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
GE then proceeded to clean up the site pursuant to the decree, beginning in October 1986. … period. 7d. at 801.
499 U.S. 937Amicus Curiae Brief — Enernoc, Inc. v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2049 (2015) (No. 14-841)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Max Zhang, Demand Response, Behind-the-Meter Generation and Air Quality, 49 Envtl. … Max Zhang, Demand Response, Behind- the-Meter Generation and Air Quality, 49 Envtl. Sci.
Respondents Brief — New York, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 19, 2018
. §§ 1251–1388 et seq.), are commonly known as the Clean Water Act (the “Act”). … After providing an extended comment period and reviewing thousands of comments, EPA issued its final Rule in 2008. 73 Fed. Reg. 33,697.
Transcript of Record — Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Sanders
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1947
Periodic cleaning and ad- “justing, ves. - Q. What is that operation ealled in the trade?’ A. . Just recleaning and adjusting of spark plugs. : Q. Is it ever called reconditioning? A. … of. such acts.
331 U.S. 125Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 6, 2024
Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677, 703 (1979) (holding that individuals have a private right of action to sue for gender discrimination under Title IX); 42 U.S.C. § 7604 (Clean Air Act citizen-suit provision … ); 33 U.S.C. § 1365 (Clean Water Act citizen-suit provision); 16 4 The Ninth Circuit’s opinion drops a footnote contending that Mr.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1886
wild” before drawing off into barrels and kegs, and also when the air -pump 1s used in forcing the beer from the cleaning-casks into smaller vessels, as the surplus air and gas will escape through … And those conditions are that the bung should be kept clean so as to act freely, are they not, and without stoppage ? A.
Appellees Brief — Lower Vein Coal Co. v. Industrial Bd. of Ind.
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1921
to the escape shaft crosses an air course, entry or other pass- ageway used as an air course, either as an intake or return, the air current shall be conducted by an overcast or under- cast, over … Air shall be forced and circulated around main ev.
255 U.S. 144Supreme Court brief · Motion for divided argument · Jan 10, 2024
And, because the challenged rule upended the system of cooperative-federalism that Congress enshrined in the Clean Air Act, the State Applicants seek a stay to prevent any further injury to the States’ … sovereign authority to regulate air quality within their borders. 1 The Industry Applicants include businesses in industries critical to the nation’s power generation, manufacturing, and defense.
Motion for divided argument — Ohio, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Motion for divided argument · Jan 10, 2024
And, because the challenged rule upended the system of cooperative-federalism that Congress enshrined in the Clean Air Act, the State Applicants seek a stay to prevent any further injury to the States’ … sovereign authority to regulate air quality within their borders. 1 The Industry Applicants include businesses in industries critical to the nation’s power generation, manufacturing, and defense.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 28, 2024
Dep’t of Agric., 779 F.3d 258, 267 (5th Cir. 2015) (cleaned up) (citations omitted); see also Nat’l Env’t Development Ass’n’s Clean Air Project v. EPA, 752 F.3d 999, 1008 (D.C. … Air. Regul. Grp. v.
Unknown title — Public Utilities Commission v. Pollak
Supreme Court brief · Unknown title · 1951
It has been our experience that a favorable comment freely offered is a rarity compared to the number of unfavorable ~ “comments. … It’s fall cleaning time! Send your draperies, slip covers and All accessories to the Rainbow Dyeing dnd Cleaning Company . . . their colers will come back fresh and glowing.
342 U.S. 848Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1892
Air valve. Cleaning crane. Convenience of apparatus.—The fs ov we) CO. VS. GORDON STROBEL ET AL., ETC. … beyond that period.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
E.g., Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387; Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300f-300j-26; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ( … “RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6992k; Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q.
535 U.S. 1121Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 29, 2025
Air Services, Ltd. … Id. at 449 (cleaned up).
Opposition — Exxon Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
The oil industry then submitted more than 1100 pages of comments on those regulations, and the Agency reconsidered them. Amended regulations were promulgated on May 20, 1975. 40 Fed. Reg. 21939. … Portland Cement was concerned with the Clean Air Act.
430 U.S. 922Respondents Brief — West Virginia Univ. Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1991
36 Clean Air Act, SS O.0.0. … § 585l1(e)(2); Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6305(d); Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 6972(e); Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 o.8.C.
499 U.S. 83
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.