Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.49s

  • Transcript of Record — Union Pacific R. Co. v. Hadley

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1918

    How did he discover that the air-line was broken? What was it that indicated to the engineer of 510 that the air-line was broken’ A. The air-guage on his engine. Q. … During the period that you were on duty? A. Yes, sir. Q.

    246 U.S. 330
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022

    The Clean Water Act Protects the Chemical, Physical, and Biological Integrity of the Nation’s Waters The text, structure, and history of the Clean Water Act—as well as this Court’s decisions—all confirm … Indeed, Congress itself referred to wetlands as waters or water bodies repeatedly in the Clean Water Act.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for DC

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    COP Ta cecevcncrsceevnsnscscsccsnsersenessnssesesssessunnssssesseces 12 INTERNET SOURCES Clean Air Task Force, Scraping the “Bottom of the Barrel” for Power: A Rebuttal to the National Coal Council’ … org/Documents/May200 | report-revised.pdf with Clean Air Task Force, Scraping the “Bottom of the Barrel” for Power: A Rebuttal to the National Coal Council’s Electricity Availability Report (November

    542 U.S. 367
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (2019) (No. 17-1104)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

    Id., comment c. … Restatement (Second) of Torts §4, comment a (1965).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Trevor Murray, Petitioner v. UBS Securities, LLC, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 4, 2025

    Murray, 601 U.S. at 37 (cleaned up). … New York City Bd. of Educ., 232 F.3d 111, 118 (2d Cir. 2000) (cleaned up); see also Renz v.

  • Appendix Vol I — Musslewhite v. State Bar of Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix Vol I · 1989

    period of suspension. 3. … Army over its comments about solicitation of clients after last December's crash of an Arrow Air DC-8.

    493 U.S. 960
  • Supplemental Appendix — General Motors Corp. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1990

    This action comes on to be heard on defendant General us is the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) enforcement authority under the Clean Air Act (the “Act’’), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. … Hamisch, the Chief of the State Air Branch of EPA Region I, on May 30, 1986 Region I was prepared to of the revised SIP to EPA SA-5 it sf Ht ar Hae i AGRE FP Hie af 41 +7 itis! Hi!

    496 U.S. 530
  • Appendix — UMCO Energy, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (No. 08-418)

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008

    'S The discussion and comments to the preamble state: The [Pa. … (“Mine Subsidence Act”), the Clean Streams Law, 35 P.S. § 691.1 et seq.

  • Petitioners Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Aug 21, 2019

    Bringing the smelter into compliance with federal and state clean-air standards would cost an estimated $400 million. Lydia Chavez, When ARCO Left Town, N.Y. 9 Times (July 25, 1982). … Moreover, § 122(e)(6) already spells out a time period during which PRPs are barred from acting unilaterally, i.e., as soon as EPA’s remedial investigation begins.

  • Petition — Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. Sheehan

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982

    Appointments are considered probationary for the periods specified below and these periods may not be extended. … be made following expiration of the authorized reply period. 83.

    456 U.S. 728
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019

    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Ct. at 1207-08 (distinguishing the act of interpreting a regulation from the act of amending it).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Machipongo Land & Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

    I, § 10 provides that: ave a right to clean air, pure water, f the natural, scenic, the environment. … Barnes & Tucker I, 319 A.2d at 880 (quoting section 3 of The Clean Streams Law, Act of June 22, 1937, P.L. 1987, as amended, 35 P.S. § 691.3).

    537 U.S. 1002
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sun Country Airlines, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

    by the FAA in 1 Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (the “1958 Act’), Pub. … Numerous parties submitted comments in support of the petition, including the AFA, union members of JCFA, individual flight attendants, the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”), the Air Line

    516 U.S. 1008
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jessie Hoffman, Petitioner v. Gary Westcott, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 16, 2025

    Rees, 553 U.S. 35, 48 (2008)) (cleaned up). … Acts 2024, 52nd Ex. Sess., No. 5, §1 (eff. July 1, 2024).

  • Reply Brief — Exxon Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1976

    be distinguished on this basis since the court of appeals in Union Electric also considered economic and technological factors in the same hollow sense of ruling them legally irrelevant under the Clean … Air Act. (515 F.2d at 216-19.)° Actually, if certiorari were denied in this case, incon- sistent and anomalous results might follow depending upon how this Court decides Union Electric.

    427 U.S. 651
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — American Bankers Association, Petitioner v. National Credit Union Administration

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 10, 2020

    U.S.C. § 457 (granting appellate jurisdiction over decisions made by the Food & Drug Administration); 33 U.S.C. § 1365 (granting concurrent jurisdiction over Clean Water Act cases); 42 U.S.C. §§ 7411, … 7412, 7413, 7419, 7420, 7521, 7545, 7571, 7607 (granting exclusive jurisdiction to hear certain Clean Air Act petitions); Eric M.

  • Amicus Brief — Mission Insurance v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983

    The Federal Water Quality Im- provement Act of 1970 amended and was incorporated within the Federal Water Pollution Act of 1948, 33 U.S.C. 51161 (1970). … See also Pan American World Air ways, Inc. v. C. A. B., 380 F.2d 770 (2d Cir. 1967), where, in considering a statute which also resulted from conference, the Court stated: We do not agree.

    462 U.S. 1132
  • Transcript of Record — Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1949

    Mo te ae e ammo ; . ari R Z te . sae 4 : = ; In:spité of this cleans Indication that wo retroactive rate. … Act the language used in, the Railway *-Mail Pay Aet and the Air Mail Act.

    336 U.S. 601
  • Appendix — Milwaukee v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981

    °The court noted that early cases recognized a public right to clean, unpolluted air, but that the notion of ‘‘pure’’ air has come to mean clean air consistent with the locality and circumstances. … The federal common law nuisance action existed in the face of the then existing Clean Air Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857 et seq., a statute whose structure and administrative scheme served as the basis

    451 U.S. 304
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gupton v. Virginia

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

    After plaintiff had left active employment, defendant further restricted smoking in the building, in part, to comply with the Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act (defendant’s Exhibits 7-10). … to bring outside air into the building during the winter period, and only during the winter period, because you would basically be running it through to the diffusers without any heat in the perimeter

    513 U.S. 810

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.