Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Damien Guedes, et al., Petitioners v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 3, 2019

Kesler & Clint Rossiter, eds., 2 Chevron addressed the interpretation of the term “stationary source” in the Clean Air Act. 467 U.S. at 840 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 7502(a)(1), (b)(6) (1982)). … The court below noted that another provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(c)(1), imposed criminal penalties, Pet.App.

Supplemental Appendix — Graziani v. New Jersey (No. 951)

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1959

James Graziani supervised the purchasing of used cars. ~ He directed the cleaning up of the vehicles, which, beside removal of dents, or tt and replacement of slip-covers, included steam cleaning of … Clippinger then looked under the engine hood and testified that “‘the engine _ was beautifully clean, with two exceptions; the air-cleaner and the oil filter.

Reply Brief of Petitioner — Killian v. Allied Latex Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief of Petitioner · 1951

The art would not have made its persistent and unsuccessful efforts for more than a decade to improve on the objectionable air inflation test that alone was avail- able prior to Youngs’ invention, were … Indeed, by disregarding the clean-cut admission as to the temporary condenser by respondent’s highly quali- fied expert, and by disregarding the equally clean-cut finding of the Trial Court as to the

Petitioners Brief — Printz v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1996

United I a a a 27 David Salmon, The Federalist Principle: Interaction of the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment in the Clean Air Act , 2 Col. J. Environ. … Indeed, David Salmon, The Federalist Principle: Interaction of the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment in the Clean Air Act, 2 Col. J. Environ. L. 290, 326-27 (1976).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Washington v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

He also hauled trash, painted, and cleaned duck droppings from rocks at the base duck pond.” 42 M.J. at 555. … We defer to the military judge’s findings that Colonel Rust’s “spit in your face” and “black Jew” comments were not threats.

Appendix — Collins v. LaFleur

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989

Act or Louisiana Worker's Compensation Act. … Who cleaned that? A-23 A. The skipper, as far as I know, he would wash it. I mean I don't know. I never did clean it. Q. All right.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2019

[15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.], the Safe Drinking Water Act [42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.], the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.], the Clean Water Act [33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.], the Marine Protection, Research … quality criteria established under section 304 or 303 of the Clean Water Act [33 U.S.C. 1314, 1313], where such goals or criteria are relevant and appropriate under the circumstances of the release or

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Asia Johnson, Petitioner v. Rothschild

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 20, 2018

As relief, Johnson requested "clean air better control on our climate." (Id., ¶TV Relief.)' … With respect to the relief sought, Plaintiff writes: Clean air better control on our climate. Id.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Delaware Riverkeeper Network, et al., Petitioners v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 9, 2019

The Department places a notice in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, beginning a 30-day comment period. Id. … Clean Water Act.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Sheaffer v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1963

. : = 2 <- 2" air 2 - « . S es . … can ever be cleaned for the lies*and deceit used to deprove the peti-_ tioner of his position of employment with the respondent.

Appendix — California v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1978

Except for the reference to service charges, § 313 is virtually identical to § 118 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1857f. … Similarly, the Clean Air Act and the Water Pollution Control Act amendments give effect to state law and require compliance with it by federal installations.

Appendix — Town of Largo v. Richmond

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1940

Florida, described as follows, to-wit: Begin at the northeast corner of Section 34, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; thence west on the north line of said Section 34 to the east line of the Seaboard Air … Florida, described as follows, to-wit: Begin at the northeast corner of Section 34, Town- ship 29 south, Range 15 east; thence west on the north line of said Section 34 to the east line of the Seaboard Air

Joint Appendix — Oakland Housing Authority v. Rucker

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2001

The Americans With Disabilities Act (42 USC. … Tenant’s written comments shall be taken into consideration by Management before the pro- posed changes become effective.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Westfarm Associates Ltd. Partnership

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

In response, in 1978, Con- gress amended the Clean Water Act to regulate toxic pollutants (including PCE) discharged into sewer systems. … In 1979, WSSC hired environmental consultants to develop a pretreatment program to respond to the amendments to the Clean Water Act.

Amicus Brief — Milwaukee v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

It has an interest in this case because the decision below interprets the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, PL 92-500, the Clean Water Act of 1977, PL 95-217 which amends the 1972 Act, and … og - RESET ARSR ARC ie conape ew NG 2 FRE 9 Statutes: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Rie I ahi iaihirdcalonck sitet scaled iabetabtacaeunis 2, 8, 10 Clean Water Act of 1977, P.

Reply Brief — Phillips Manufacturing & Tower Company, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 3, 2022

Air Reg. Grp. v. … time of a full comment period, it would have known these particularized consequences of the Mandate.

Reply Brief — Key Tronic Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1994

In 1986, Congress enacted the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (“SARA”) to amend the 1980 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. … responsible parties liable for the costs of these clean-ups.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Treasury as penalties, in strict accordance with the Clean Water Act. Even though the Act only authorizes penalties to the U.S. … CLEAN WATER ACT AT THE CITY'S WASTEWATER TREATMEN PLANT AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1996-97 co-owner and operator of the Waters Qua--ty at 195 Belle Air Road, which is sus tect to tion System

Joint Appendix — Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1997

219 They had -- they were required by the Clean Air Act to produce a health effects criteria document looking at what the hazards were from, in this case, asbestos. … I am sorry, | thought you were talking about -- Personal air test? -- personal air test. Cancel that last comment.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Honeywell International Inc. v. Interfaith Community Organization

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

After various comments, NJDEP approved the IRMs in July 1987 (CAJA6069; CAJA6083). … In the ordinary course, each step involves study, drafting, comment, and revision, and that process occurred here.