Documents

Opposition Brief — Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1971

A/S Det Forende Dampskibsselskab (4th Cir. 1968) 399 F. 2d 347 Waldron v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. (1967) 386 U. S. 724, 87 S. … Raymond Concrete Pile Co., 356 U.S. 252, 255, 78 S.Ct. 687 (1958) 34 Judge Moore, supra, n.24 35 Stewart, J., dissenting, in Calbeck v.

Memorandum — Fidelity Assurance Assn. v. Sims

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1943

Rev. 399, 402; | ” Finketter, Law of Bankruptcy Reorganisation (1939) a . … Manufacturers Trust Co., No. 24, October Term, 1942, certiorari “granted, 315 U. S..794."

Emergency Application — Andrew Richard Lukehart, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · May 29, 2026

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 424 (1986) (Powell, J., concurring in part and in the judgment). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (citing Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U.S. 447, 456 (1984)).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kathy R. Allen, et al., Petitioners v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 22, 2024

Referencing: [24] Judgment Order, [23] unpublished per curiam Opinion. Originating case number: 5:21-cv-00174-D. … Mailed to: Kathy Allen. [1001449331] [22-1528] CH [Entered: 10/03/2023 09:24 AM] Page 16 of 17 Appendix A .

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Stokes v. University of Tennessee at Martin

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988

Bass, (CA5 ALA) 616 F 2d 1259, cert. denied 449 US. 983, 66 L.Ed. 2d 245, 101 S.Ct. 399 (1980). . V. L. Nicholson Co. v. … Bass (1980 CAS ALA), 616 F2d 1259, Cert. denied 449 U.S. 983, 66 LEd 2d 245, 101T S.Ct. 399. ; Since Respondent's rules limited termination under the “discharge” category to be only for “cause”, Petitioner

Brief for The Respondents in Opposition — Schy v. Susquehanna Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for The Respondents in Opposition · 1970

op IN THE: JUL 24 1970 abt SEAVER, CLERK ——— os | Supreme Court of the ited sSeeab | ae | _ OCTOBER TERM, 1970 s _No. 320 . Mavnice H. Sony, v. … C. 20006 ‘ _ * Attorneys for: Respondénts July 24, 1970. | ae

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hines v. California

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

(Appendix A at 24-27; 15 Cal.4th at 1030- 1032.) me Vil. REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT 1. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 428, 91 L.Ed.2d 335, 358, 106 S.Ct. 2595 (1986) (conc. opinion of O'Connor, J.).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sandchase Cody, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 24, 2021

Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ............................... 5 Collins v. Miller, 252 U.S. 364 (1920) ............... 8 Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. … Ave., S.E. #560 Washington, D.C. 20005 Washington, D.C. 20003 Counsel for Amici Curiae November 24, 2021 * Counsel of Record

Opposition Brief — Aero Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1966

Stat. 136, 73 Stat. 519, 29 USC. 151, et fh Re a eR TSE ye cep RG RS ih capa a aac 24 ~. … | 268-269, 24-25; R. 262, 141; 269, 98-99).

Opposition Brief — Town of Rye v. Skinner

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

Like petitioners here (Pet. 24-25), some of the respondents in that case relied on Bow- man Transp., Inc. v. … Campbell, 399 F. Supp. 208 (D. Mass. 1975), aff’d, 536 F.2d 956 (1st Cir. 1976).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Arthrex, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 2, 2020

Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012).................................................... 11 Eli Lilly & Co. v. … See Petition for a Writ of Certiorari 24-25, 25 n.2, United States v. Image Processing Techs.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Timothy Rosin, Petitioner v. Kimberly Hill

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 29, 2025

Supp. 2d 399, 435-36 (D. Md. 2006). … Supp. 2d 399, 435-36 (D. Md. 2006).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

Jd. at 399. … Jd. at 399-400.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tanco v. Haslam, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-562)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

See id. at 399. … DeBoer, 772 F.3d at 399.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Delo v. Lashley

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

Jd. at 399. … Dugger, 481 U.S. at 398-399.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Davena v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1952

Tr. p. 81, line 24 to p. 82, line 3). … United States, 174 F. (2d) 397, 399 (C.A. 8th).”’

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Eric Drake, Petitioner v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 10, 2025

Eric Von Drake, Cause Numbers: F-22-76307 & F-24- 76901, 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), this case holds that a court lacking authority cannot deprive liberty. Wengerd v. Rinehart, 114 Wis. 2d 575, 338N.W.2d861 (Wis. Ct.

Opposition Brief for the United States — Webster v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief for the United States · 1971

most of these cars, inserting prices in the applications and bills of sale based on the retail value, although the actual ‘prices were often several thousand dollars below re- tail (Tr. 220-255, 399 … This is the limit established by Rule 24(b),, F.R.Crim.P., and the exercise of the court’s ° discretion in refusing to grant additional peremptory challenges was proper. United States v.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pfeifer v. Bell & Howell Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974

(m September 24. 19TS. Pfeifer filed a notice of appeal of the District Judge's Getober 29, 1973 order [sice!] with the Tta Cireuit Court of Appeals (page following 399, Petition).

Opposition Brief — Naim v. Naim

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1955

(See Opinion below, Statement as to Jurisdiction, Page 24.) ca 4 trary or without a reasonable relation to the purpose of the statute. … Meyer y, Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399. The appellee’s reasoning pre- supposes the validity of the purpose of the statute. Oyama v. California, 332 U. S. 633, 646.