Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.69s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerald E. Groff, Petitioner v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 28, 2023
A ready example is some airlines’ requirement that all pilots be clean shaven. … Indeed, Air Canada historically required that pilots be clean shaven for this exact reason. The company argued that because their pi7 See Brief for Islamic Law Scholars as Amici Curiae at 2, Holt v.
Appendix — United States v. Park
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
Records should be retained for a period of time that exceeds the shelf life of the product, except that they need not be retained more than 2 years. … (3) Remove all insecure jewelry and, during periods where food is manipulated by hand, remove from hands any jewelry that cannot be adequately sanitized.
421 U.S. 658Appendix — City of Chicago v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1969
Air fares are higher than rail or bus. … Some evidence was presented to show the carrier’s car- cleaning program and the problems involved.
396 U.S. 162Amicus Curiae Brief — Deaton v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Needham and Rice arose under the Oil Pollution Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2720, rather than under the Clean Water Act. … These definitions do not apply to other Clean Water Act programs.
541 U.S. 972Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Starzenski v. City of Elkhart
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
This case is replete with a litany of efforts by the City of Elkhart, over a period of approximately thirteen (13) years to force the Plaintiffs in this cause to clean up property determined to be substandard … As added by Acts 198], P.L. 309, SEC. 28.
519 U.S. 1028Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 3, 2019
comment period. … Air Act to challenge the EPA’s inaction.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 16, 2026
Armed Groups Subject Communities to Sweeping and Indiscriminate Daily Acts of Violence. ................................................... 6 2. … MSF defines gender-based violence “any harmful act that is perpetrated against a person’s will, threats of such acts, coercion, and other deprivations of freedom based on socially ascribed gender differences
Opposition Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
in the emission of any air pollutant not previously emitted.” … . ” The NSPS provisions were “designed to prevent new air pollution problems.”
549 U.S. 561Jurisdictional Statement — Nick M. Egleson v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1969
He did not counsel anyone to commit an illegal act, and did not intend to create a disturbance or interfere with the cleaning. … If the defendant could 1‘*An Act relating to trespass upon real estate.
395 U.S. 336Appendix — Sun Country Airlines, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1995
Four of the commenters, including ATA, Delta Air Lines, and RAA, commented on whether reserve status should be considered part of a duty period. … Aviation Act.
516 U.S. 1008Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — U. S. Dairies Sales Corp. v. Mojonnier Dawson Co. (No. 962)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1957
In this connection the district judge commented that ‘‘both sides did what human beings usually do under those cir- 5 cumstances, nothing more.’’ … The chamber does not maittain a constant hydrostatic head and it uses a variable head backed up by air pressure. It is not made for the filling of free-flowing fluids.
Appendices — Mayco Oil & Chemical Co. v. Transtech Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 1994
Section 107(b) lists only the following defenses: “(1) an act of God; “(2) an act of war; “(3) an act or omission of a third party other than an employee or agent of the defendant, or than one whose … The defenses under section (b) are: acts of God, acts of war, or unforeseeable acts or omissions of third parties. 32a contemplated ordinary tort principles of contribution, which require a finding
512 U.S. 1213Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
For that reason, the Second Circuit held that such claims are “clearly barred by the Clean Air Act.” City of New York, 993 F.3d at 96. … The Hawaii Supreme Court’s circumvention of the Clean Air Act warrants this Court’s review. See Shell Pet.29-31.
Reply Brief — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. San Mateo County, California, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 14, 2023
Respondents further argue (Opp. 20) that removal is improper because “Congress displaced the federal common law of interstate pollution” with the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act’s displacement of a remedy under federal common law did not revive otherwise inoperable state law. See Illinois v.
Appendix — Gilbert v. City of Little Rock
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 107 S.Ct. 3078 (1987) (Delaware Valley II). … As an example, section 307(f) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7607(f) (1982), provides: In any judicial proceeding under this section, the court may award costs of litigation (including reasonable
493 U.S. 812Prologue — Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 1949
Ex. 29 is itemization, consisting of several pages, of ~ dry cleaning prites for the army, cadets, ; eS ee and air corps uniforms, suits, and civilian — Q. … It is just a comment. Jt is pretty hard to separate that which is comment and proper. Overruled. Let it stand. Q. Was it the biggest laundry in Omaha? A.
338 U.S. 1Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Goodspeed v. Whitman County
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
During the fifteen day comment period, comments were received that were treated as appeals and were heard by the Board on February 26, 1992. … The 15 day comment period ended on May 15, 1992, before which several comments were received from the public.
526 U.S. 1159Appendix — General Radio Co. v. Superior Electric Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1964
With long periods of continuous use, . … “So, the first thing we thought was ito keep air away, from the area around ihe brush. and the track.
376 U.S. 938Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Texas Water Conservation Ass'n v. Department of the Interior
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
Autuority: NEPA, the Environmental Quality Improve- ment Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.), sec. 309 of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 86a 7609), and Executive Order 11514 … Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7609).
506 U.S. 823Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) .. s Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 98-100 (1983).
522 U.S. 192
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.