Documents

Petition — Bosco v. Beck

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Copies of the Negative Declaration were distributed among the public and comments were solicited. A fifteen-day comment period was provided, 40 C.F.R. $3 6.212(a). … Only one comment was rec- eived during that period. See A.R. # 34.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Braley

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

Throughout the period of Unocal’s leasehold, Unocal used its portion of the property for petroleum production, “operating a number of oil wells, pipelines, above-ground storage tanks, and production … CERCLA explicitly incorporates the definition of “disposal” from the Resource Conservation and Recovery , Act (“RCRA”). 42 U.S.C. § 9601(29).

Motion to Dismiss — Philadelphia v. New Jersey

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1978

Air Act, the Water Pollution Control Act, and other Federal and State laws respecting public health and the environment, greater aaa of solid waste (in the form of sludge and other pollution treatment … This point is underscored by the comments during deliberations on the bill on the floor of the Senate.

Opposition Brief — Britt v. San Diego Unified Port District

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1977

Miller, 425 U.S. 231 (1976) .....cceeececceces 2 STATUTES and REGULATIONS Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970 Sections 2-301(a), 49 U.S.C. §§1701-1742 .......00005 23,30 Clean Air Amendments … Petitioners also mention the Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §§1857 et seq.

Amicus Curiae Brief — CropLife America v. Baykeeper

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

The provisions of the Clean Water Act relied on by the court of appeals do not mention pesticides. The only reference in the Act to pesticides is at 33 U.S.C. … FIFRA sets out how that balance is to be struck; the Clean Water Act does not. 9 b.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mark Geraghty Wonders, Petitioner v. Office of the Army General Counsel

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 24, 2025

(cleaned up). … Air Florida, Inc., 750 F.2d 1077,1084 (D.C.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Etihad Airways P.J.S.C., Petitioner v. Jane Doe, et vir

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 4, 2018

Aug. 18, 2003) (No. 02-9462) (summarizing delegate’s comments). … , such carriage by another mode of transport is deemed to be within the period of carriage by air.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Old Republic Home Protection Company, Inc., Petitioner v. William B. Sparks, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 25, 2020

counsel’s failure to note this fact or comment on the effect of the repeal of the Oklahoma Service Warranty Insurance Act on the continued viability of the McMullan holding is a disservice to this Court … APPLIANCE COVERAGE Dishwasher All components that affect the cleaning operation of the unit including the pump, motor, gasket, tub, timer, fill valve, seal, door latch, air gap, control board and touch

Memorandum — Washington v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1971

Although we can find no statute with this number, the reference is apparently to general congressional findings and purposes of the Clean Air Act, which we discuss infra pp. 10-11. … Pankey, 441 F.2d 236 (10th Cir. 1971), deserves only brief comment.

Record and brief — James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior v. Holmes Limestone Co.

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982

. § 7607 (b) (1) (Clean Air Act). … Petitioner refers to the fact that centralized review is common, citing the Clean Air Act and Voting Rights Act. (Pe- tition, 13 n.15).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Nebraska, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 125 (2000) (cleaned up). … Air Regulatory Grp. V. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)).

Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

EPA, 810 F. 2d 493 (Sth Cir. 1987) STATUTES: Clean Air Act, 42 USCA § 7410 (a) (3) Page 2 INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE Mid-America Legal Foundation ("MALF") is a non-profit Illinois corporation. … Clean Air Act, 42 USCA § 7410 (a) (3) (A). This is the most logical result, in light of the Page 5 statutory scheme which requires swift action by all concerned.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (No. 08-937)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

They apply the maxim requiring clean hands only where some unconscionable act of one coming for relief has immediate and necessary relation to the equity that he seeks in respect of the matter in litigation … Air Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB, 510 U.S. 317 (1993).

Petition for Rehearing — Victoria Elia Kaldawi, Petitioner v. State of Kuwait, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Nov 8, 2018

(I comment add: who MISHANDLED my case, TO HIDE THEIR MISCONDUCT). … AIRES/61/177, U.N. Doc. A/HRCIRES/2006/I (Dec. 20, 2006) 11 D.

Jurisdictional Statement — Kubo v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1976

(Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources Bd. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 801, 808 [114 Cal.Rptr. 577, 523 P.2d 617], quoting from County of Sacramento v. … Swoap (1974) 11 Cal.3d 856, 863-865 [115 Cal.Rptr. 1, 524 P.2d 97]; Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources Bd. (1974) supra, 11 Cal.3d 801, 817-818.)

Respondents Brief — National Postal Policy Council, et al., Petitioners v. Postal Regulatory Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 18, 2022

I, § 1 ............................................................ 17 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ................................... 16 42 U.S.C. 7411 ...................................... … West Virginia involves a provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., that addresses the measures that the Environmental Protection Agency may consider in developing emission guidelines, 42

Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7410(a)(2)(D), yet the basis for the violations is an extra-statutory construct that conflicts with longstanding precedent. … EPA stands, EPA will be encouraged to ignore, where expedient, the plain meaning of the Clean Air Act and impose its own “short-cut” interpretation of the statute.

Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7410(a)(2)(D), yet the basis for the violations is an extra-statutory construct that conflicts with longstanding precedent. … EPA stands, EPA will be encouraged to ignore, where expedient, the plain meaning of the Clean Air Act and impose its own “short-cut” interpretation of the statute.

Motion to Affirm — United States v. American Bldg. Maint. Industries

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1975

The basic service provided is the labor necessary to perform the cleaning work. … The total expenditures during the eighteen-month period for all of those mail items would amount to only $22.33, assuming an 11¢ air- mail stamp was used for each of the 203 items.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Loper Bright Enterprises, et al., Petitioners v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 22, 2023

As part of that work, EDF advocates for effective and stable implementation of federal statutes such as the Clean Air Act, Food Safety Modernization Act, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management … Rev. 431, 446–49 (1989) (recounting the policy challenges that led Congress to delegate certain powers under the Clean Air Act); Matthew C.