Documents

Respondents Brief — National Postal Policy Council, et al., Petitioners v. Postal Regulatory Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 18, 2022

I, § 1 ............................................................ 17 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ................................... 16 42 U.S.C. 7411 ...................................... … West Virginia involves a provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., that addresses the measures that the Environmental Protection Agency may consider in developing emission guidelines, 42

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. Crowley

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1955

Criche used kerosene and oil to clean 7 his hands, but he never washed himself at work. … Criche used kerosene and oil to clean his hands, but he never washed himself at work.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA Inc., Petitioner v. Armand Fontaine, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara Ellen Fontaine

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2026

Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 485 (1996) (cleaned up). … Meat Inspection Act, ERISA, and numerous other statutes.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Etihad Airways P.J.S.C., Petitioner v. Jane Doe, et vir

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 4, 2018

Aug. 18, 2003) (No. 02-9462) (summarizing delegate’s comments). … , such carriage by another mode of transport is deemed to be within the period of carriage by air.

Appendices — Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2002

Federal statutes enacted in the 1960s and 1970s imposed obligations on the federal government to develop and maintain certain minimum standards for clean air, see “Clean Air Act” of 1963, Pub.L. … The Act establishes an account to be known as the Uranium Enrichment Decon- tamination and Decommissioning Fund (Fund), which, over a 15-year period, would accumulate the monies required to clean up

Appendix — Hoy v. Mentor Township Township, Michigan (No. 09-121)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2009

The letter states residents can finance the hookup fee over a 30-year period, if they make a down payment. … For the trench in the oid drainfielad area, excavate 48" to clean sand. Backfill with new clean coarse sand to 24" to 30 " below original grade. Both trenches shall be at the same level. 8.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bencel v. Frost

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1965

Naval vessels and air- craft in the area also assisted in the search which covered 20,000 square- miles per day, and a total of 78,000 square miles were searched in the 10 day period. … Gasoline fumes mixed with air form an explosive mixture. These fumes being heavier than air, find their way to the bottom of the bilge.

Opposition Brief — Tidewater Marine Service, Inc. v. Aubry

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

Clean II and Mr. Clean III alleging failure of their employer, CLEAN SEAS”, to pay premium wages for hours in excess of eight in a workday or forty in a workweek. … Typically, TIDEWATER employees, like those of CLEAN SEAS, work 7-day hitches of 12-hour days alternating with 7-day rest periods onshore.

Petition for aWrit of Certiorari — Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for aWrit of Certiorari · 1971

The “clean hands” provision of Norris-LaGuardia (29 U.S.C. §108) rarely arises in this context. … REA reduced its forces 38% in the Gulf District and 32% nationally in the period be- tween 1965-1970.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (No. 08-937)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

They apply the maxim requiring clean hands only where some unconscionable act of one coming for relief has immediate and necessary relation to the equity that he seeks in respect of the matter in litigation … Air Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB, 510 U.S. 317 (1993).

Petition — Peat v. National Transportation Safety Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

A-4 dent establishing the appropriateness of a 60-day suspen- sion, and (¢) the potential for disaster caused by the in- tentional acts of respondent. … A-10 safety problems with respect to his control of other air- craft.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act regulation” for protection. … The Court applied this class-of- activity analysis to the Clean Water Act in United States v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — PMC, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999

The plan requires that the proposed clean-up method in which the costs will be incurred be submitted for public comment before it is implemented. Jd. at 1514; 40 C.F.R. § 300.700(c)(6). … of availability of the adminis- trative record file or provide for a public comment period.

Motion to Affirm — United States v. City of Chicago

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1970

The ' equipment is seryiced | and receives interior cleaning prior to departure from Atlanta and St. … A number also expressed concern over poor lighting on occasions. and lack of clean wash- rooms.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

Review Bd., 423 F.3d 483, 489 n.11 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal whistleblowing protected under Clean Air Act based on Congressional ratification theory). … Ambassador Fuel Oil Co., Inc., No. 86-CAA-1 (Apr. 27, 1987) (D&O of Sec’y Brock) (internal protected under Clean Air Act); Flor v. U.S.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — GenCorp, Inc. v. Olin Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

On September 8, 1983, after a notice-and-comment period, it placed both the Big D and Fields Brook sites on the National Priority List for clean-up. … In July the US EPA gave public notice of a plan for proposed clean- up of the Big D Site in a draft Record of Decision (hereinafter “ROD”), which provided a 30 day period for public comment thereon

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 11, 2022

The court of appeals concluded that even if federal common law governed respondents’ claims, the claims did not “arise under” federal law because the Clean Air Act displaced federal common law, and the … To the extent that federal common law would ordinarily apply, the court reasoned, the Clean Air Act displaced it—but did not displace or completely preempt respondents’ state-law claims. Pet.

Opposition Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

Under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 ef seg., no “major emitting facility” may be constructed or modified 4, «wy “clean air” area unless the facility is subject to the “bes’ available … In Alaska—-as in most States— the “permitting authority” under the Act is the State.

Supplemental Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Jan 5, 2024

And “even assuming federal common law could provide a basis for removal under the artful pleading doctrine,” the defendants’ removal theory failed because the Clean Air Act has displaced the body of federal … Air Act, not on the preemptive effect of federal common law.”

Appendix — Technograph, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1985

Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605, 608 (1950). 2. … This case is thus distinguishable from Sealed Air Corp. v. U.S.