Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.53s
Application — Louisiana, et al., Applicants v. American Rivers, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Application · Mar 21, 2022
The rule at issue here is the 2020 Clean Water Act (“CWA”) Section 401 Certification Rule (the “Rule”), a landmark and complicated rule the prior Administration adopted after a lengthy notice-and-comment … received during the period for public comment.”
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Murco Wall Products, Inc., Petitioner v. Michael D. Galier
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 16, 2017
or failures to act were: 1. … He testified there was dust in the air, and he was present while drywallers sanded the dried compound.
Reply Brief — University of South Carolina v. University of Southern California
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2010
Clean Air Eng’g, Inc., 267 F.3d 660 (7th Cir. 2001) Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Fluid-Quip Inc., 94 F-:3d 376 (7th Cir. 1996) Gen. Motors Corp. v. Keystone Auto. … Clean Air Eng’g, Inc., 267 F.3d 660, 683 (7th Cir. 2001) (observing that the Seventh Circuit has “recognized that the Lanham Act’s protections also extend to post-sale confusion of potential customers
562 U.S. 829Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Simmons v. Washington ex rel. Carroll
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1963
Pounovieh commented that Steele had ‘ta lot of union paper in the back of [his] car’ (PLA. 65; N76). … (PLA. 68; 167, 168), Morton remained on clean-up work for about three months and during much of that period worked alone, though previously several men had assisted the elean- up man in handling spilled
374 U.S. 808Amicus Curiae Brief — Borden Ranch Partnership v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
7 (iv) United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Department of the Army, Memorandum for the Field, “Clean Water Act Section 404 Regulatory Program and Agricultural Activitios … Legislative History of the Clean Water Act of 1977, A Continuation of the Legislative History of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1978) (“1977 Leg.
536 U.S. 981Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
Air Line Pilots Ass'n Pi Intern. v. … The use of High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filtered vacuums is recommended for cleaning up dust and fibers.
559 U.S. 1049Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 13, 2024
Id. at 2384 (cleaned up); See also NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958). … Id. at 2371 (cleaned up). “By compelling individuals to speak a particular message,” this requirement “alter[ed] the content of their speech.” Id. (cleaned up).
Reply Brief — Garco Construction, Inc., Petitioner v. Robert M. Speer, Acting Secretary of the Army
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 19, 2017
Air Force Instruction 10-245, Space Command Supp. 1, § 2.17.3 (June 2, 2003) (emphasis added). … Lee is alleged to have violated the Atomic Energy Act ... and the Espionage Act ... neither of which involves crimes of violence or narcotic drugs.”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to improve water quality. … The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to protect and_ restore vital wetlands and SAV areas.
546 U.S. 932Petition for Writ of Certiorari — English v. General Elec. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
During the period of March 5-9, 1984, plaintiff spent considerable work time cleaning up radiation contamina- tion at and around her work station, apparently left there by workers on preceding shifts … Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1367 (b); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622(b)(2)(A).
496 U.S. 72Reply Brief — New Jersey v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1931
I cleaned a good, many tons of it off | ' (326). That is a good many years ago. … The only thing on which we wish to comment is-the statement on page 66: of the brief ‘relating: to defendants !
283 U.S. 473Transcript of Record — Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1916
Detailed comment in respect to anticipation is little necessary save to Froment,. … I have been continuously acting in a professional capacity for Minerals Separation, Limited, since the beginning of 1905, and T so acted, with about six months’ interregnum, for a period before that
242 U.S. 261Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Production Plated Plastics, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1992
Likewise, the Clean Air Act notes that for certain limited subsections, “operator” includes “any person who is a senior management personnel or a corporate officer.” 42 U.S.C. § 7413(h). … Water Act and 20 Clean Air Act is redundant and the standards for such joint liability contained therein, including the restrictions to particular officers in particular instances are nullified.
506 U.S. 820Appendix — Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
Over a period of time, however, . … AP-73 of the National Air Pollution Control U.S.
422 U.S. 289Opposition Brief — Sprenger, Olson & Shutes, P. A. v. Burlington Northern Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 106 S.Ct. 3088 (1986) .................. 13 Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, No. 85-5 (U.S. … Delaware Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 106 S.Ct. 3088 (1986) and Blum v.
484 U.S. 821Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
Specifically, the Court stated: The injunction surely obliged Kovacs to clean up the site. … The cooling-off period was to end on February 26. Intense negotiation continued during the cooling-off period. In the final days of the period.
Petitioners Brief — Wilson v. Seiter
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1991
Scnitation ints Petitioner’s Allegations Urine accumulates around the toilets and urinals and is inade- quately cleaned, resulting in offensive odor; floors are filthy because of a lack of proper cleaning … Respondents’ Allegations The restrooms are completely cleaned twice a day, and throughout the day as necessary. The kitchen area and dining room are cleaned after every meal and kept very clean.
501 U.S. 294Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 11, 2022
The court of appeals concluded that even if federal common law governed respondents’ claims, the claims did not “arise under” federal law because the Clean Air Act displaced federal common law, and the … To the extent that federal common law would ordinarily apply, the court reasoned, the Clean Air Act displaced it—but did not displace or completely preempt respondents’ state-law claims. Pet.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 16, 2018
Air & Liquid Sys. Corp., 129 A.3d 984 (Md. 2015) ............................................................ 15 McIndoe v. … During these periods the trusts pay no money to claimants.
Appendix E — Kelly v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix E · 1994
(C) Actions arising out of any other act or failure to act by any person or public agency. … The public shall be consulted during the environ- mental impact statement process and views shall be solicited during a public comment period not to be less than 60 days.
510 U.S. 1041
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.