Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.48s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 18, 2022

    Cir. 2006) ........................ 9, 26 Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. … Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 113 (1948)).

  • Petition — Western Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Alaska

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

    Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857h- 7. … The Secretary’s duty to consider the alternative of delay is underlined by the EPA/CEQ determinations, made pursuant to § 809 of the Clean Air Act, that the sale was “environmen- tally unsatisfactory

    439 U.S. 922
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Alabama Department of Environmental Management v. National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    Air Act, § 110(a), 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a) _....... 8-9 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, Pub. … § 271.21(a) (emphasis added).* EPA explained the dis- 2 This arrangement contrasts with State Implementation Plans under the Clean Air Act, for example, where state revisions to the plans are not

    501 U.S. 1206
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rizzi v. Underwater Construction Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

    While the Longshore Act does not define “Navigable Waters,” the United States Code Annotated (herein “USCA”), in Chapter 26 of its section on Navigation and Navigable Waters and the Clean Water Act, … A permanent disability is one which has continued for a lengthy period and is of lasting or indefinite duration, as distinguished from one in which recovery merely awaits a normal healing period.

    519 U.S. 931
  • Petition for ReHearing — Green v. Cleary Water, Sewer & Fire District

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for ReHearing · 2010

    (e) “Air-cleaning device” means any method, process or equipment, the primary function of which is to remove, reduce or render less noxious air contami- nants discharged into the atmosphere ({) “Area … App. 26 (g) “Federal Clean Air Act” means the Federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., as amended.

    559 U.S. 971
  • Amicus Brief — Transportation Union v. Long Island R. Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1982

    Carey, 552 F.2d 25 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 902 (1977) (Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970). These decisions involve fundamentally different federal statutes and state policies. … Air Act Amendments of 1970.“ 552 F.2d at 38 (emphasis added).

    455 U.S. 678
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jones v. Rockdale County

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

    Jones’ lake without her consent, without any Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq. (“CWA”) permits, and without a Resource Conservation Recovery Act 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq. … Air Act [42 U.S.C.A

    544 U.S. 962
  • Record and brief — Thermofil Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982

    Air Surrey Corp. v NLRB 601 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1979)."! 620 F2d at 125. … ''In Air Surrey, supra, the Court stated: It hes long been the law in our circuit that an employer cannot be held in violation of section 8(a)(1) of the Act when it discharges an employee for activity

    455 U.S. 1016
  • Transcript of Record — Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1952

    Paradise: I would not comment on the facts. The Court: Then I would not comment on it in any way. Mr. Paradise: I see. … As an example, our air compressor was to be serviced at periodic times, and that at various times I would inspect that air compressor and make sure that it was serviced.

    343 U.S. 922
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2019

    Hartley, The Go-Between (1953). 18 passed a series of regulatory environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. … Air Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, to name just a few.

  • Opposition Brief — Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Black Grievance Committee

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987

    Delaware Valley Citizens Counsel for Clean Air? (i) 3. … Delaware Valley Citizens Counsel for Clean Air, October Term, 1985, No. 85-5, on "the question whether attorney's fees chargeable to a losing defendant under the Clean Water Act and the comparable

    483 U.S. 1015
  • Jurisdictional Statement — Kubo v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

    Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1976

    (Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources Bad. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 801, 808 [114 Cal. Rptr. 577, 523 P.2d 617], quoting from County of Sacramento v. … Rptr. 1, 524 P.2d 97]; Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources Bd, (1974) supra, 11 Cal.3d 801, 817-818.)

    429 U.S. 802
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

    The provisions of the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act that addressed hazardous air pollutants, 42 U.S.C. § 7412, significantly changed the regulation of those pollutants. … Air Act amendments, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7651-765lo.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. LTV Corp., 113 S. Ct. 661 (1992) (No. 92-732)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

    Air Act, because it failed to meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”). 45 Fed. … Means: Pursuant to Section 113(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. §7413(a)(1), you are hereby notified that based upon information obtained by the United States Environmental Protection

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Center for Biological Diversity, et al., Petitioners v. Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 5, 2020

    Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq., the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq., the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 7401, the Archeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470 … , 42 U.S.C.A. § 6901, Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 7401, and the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300f.

  • Transcript of Record — Coryell v. Phipps

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1943

    That, pressure should -’ a aveided if. at all’ possible, because it will act on ‘the © be joints . of the air pipe, and. may cause gasoline vapors — to. … How long «was the five pounds of air riaomnees ap- - plied?. A: About ten minutes. | Q. And while the air pressure of five pounds was on the tanks for that period, what did you obsery e?

    317 U.S. 406
  • Reply Brief — Roberts v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2000

    Sunstein, /s the Clean Air Act Uncon- stitutional?, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 303 (1999)......0.....c 2 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States No. 99-1174 HOLLIS EARL ROBERTS, Petitioner, Vv. … | In addition to the commentators cited in the petition, see Cass Sunstein, /s the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 Mich. L.

    529 U.S. 1108
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

    Federal statutes enacted in the 1960s and 1970s imposed obligations on the federal government to develop and maintain certain minimum standards for clean air, see “Clean Air Act” of 1963, Pub.L. … . §§ 1251-1376 (the “Clean Water Act” of 1972). In 1970, Congress enacted the National Environmental Policy Act, Pub.L.

    535 U.S. 1095
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Stern v. Gillman

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1941

    ee Lame ey i 6 (4) The District Court did not comment upon the prior art patents. … after it had to be admitted that HAAS was known in the trade to have been using air pressure, and an air stream, and a needle, for forcing thread into a pocket

    311 U.S. 718
  • Petitioners Brief — Territory of Guam, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Feb 22, 2021

    . 6901 et seq.]has been suspended by Act of Congress), (D) any toxic pollutant listed under section 307(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1317(a)], (E) any hazardous air pollutant … listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7412], and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to which the Administrator has taken action pursuant to section

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.