Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines Group Inc., Petitioner v. United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 27, 2025

A slot is authorization from the FAA to land or take off during a particular period of time. Slot control enables the FAA to regulate air traffic in certain congested, high-demand areas. … The Clean Team did not run that alternative through American’s proprietary tool.

Appendix — Christopher v. North Carolina State University (No. 08-834)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2008

CAMPUS VISIT AND TOUR Interview Comments Mission. … When she returned with her father, he opened the air conditioning unit and attempted to clean the green growth inside.

Opposition Brief — Asta v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

The plant air quality was very poor. … (R. 987) Most of the employees who worked cleaning up the enamel spills were not provided any protective equipment either, (R. 988) although they were compelled to clean up the enamel spills with a

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shell Oil Products Co., L.L.C., et al., Petitioners v. Rhode Island

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 2, 2022

In relevant part, the court concluded that “we cannot rule that any federal common law controls Rhode Island’s claims” because the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act “‘have statutorily displaced any … By contrast, the First Circuit held that, because the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act “have statutorily displaced any federal common law that previously existed,” state law governs claims in this

Opposition Brief — Sierra Club v. Shell Oil Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987

(Continued on following page) 17 Further indications of Congress’ intent in Section 505 of the CWA can be found in the legislative history of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. … Monterey Coal, supra, 743 F.2d at 598. 3(j) The Clean Air Act Conference Committee Report states: “The conference agreement authorizes citizen suits against pol- luters to abate violations. . .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2024

Air Act cases. … The Clean Air Act divides judicial review of EPA actions into one of two general categories: Actions that are either nationally applicable or of nationwide effect go to the D.C.

Motion — Exxon Corp. v. Hunt

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1986

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2890 (1983)....12, 16 Youakim v. … News at 6139 (comments of Representative Gore); 126 Cong.

Opposition Brief — American Lung Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

ey SE es FE IED ceccrerscnnsensssecinencenincsenmrerenecin 5, 6, 9, 10 Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.: MED GREINER, TID cxiessstenerssescnensesvinencsonesevemnenente 2 § 109(d)(1), … (1) STATEMENT Section 307(f) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) provides that, in any proceeding for judicial review under the Act, a court “may award costs of litigation (including reasonable attorney

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — World Champ Tech, LLC, Petitioner v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 17, 2025

(cleaned up). … (cleaned up).

Petition for Rehearing — Christina Alessio, Petitioner v. United Airlines, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Dec 7, 2023

e 100% Safe and Transparent Aircraft Cabin Products for Cleaning, Disinfecting, Sanitizing and Air-Freshening “The Flying Living Room” (The Petitioner’s Reference Name for the “Aircraft Cabin” shared … Code 5124, Approving Chemical Cleaning, Disinfecting, Sanitizing and Air-Freshening Substance Products, used inside the Aircraft Cabin?

Reply Brief — INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, AIRLINE DIVISION v. TRANS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC. (Nos. 80-478, 80-470, 80-480)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1980

Acme Tank Cleaning Process Corp., 86 F.2d 727 (2d Cir. 1936) (“[t]o let the Ta 7. … changes have been fully processed under the Act’s mandatory procedures through the thirty day “cool- ing-off” period?

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pizzaco of Nebraska, Inc. v. Bradley

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

The evidence did show that respondent Bradley could and did present a clean shaven appearance for an extended period without aggravating his condi- tion. … United Air Lines, 851 F.2d 1249, 1258 (10th Cir. 1988).

Opposition Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Minnesota

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 23, 2023

Moreover, “the Clean Air Act has displaced any relevant federal common law in this area.” Id. … emissions,” namely the Clean Air Act.

Prologue — Burks v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 1993

The prosecution’s case was solely based upon a theory of a blunt force mecha- nism caused by the petitioner acting alone. Dr. … The janitor who cleaned the floor testified that his cleaning would have picked up the earring if it was there when he cleaned. (R. 1018).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ali Bahreman, Petitioner v. Allegiant Air, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 21, 2025

Street, 367 U.S. at 767-68 (cleaned up). … Co., 424 U.S. 747, 768 (1976)) (cleaned up).

Opposition — West Penn Power Co. v. Train

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976

STATEMENT On September 13, 1973, pursuant to Section 113 (a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1857c-8(a)(1), the Administrator of the Environ- mental Protection Agency sent petitioner … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857¢-5(a) (3).

Reply Brief — Pilgrim Equipment Co. v. Texas

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1972

Acts 1969, 61st Leg., p. 133 ch. 45, emerg. eff. April 2, 1969.” … The business was dis- : rupted during this period, and to some extent thereafter.

Reply Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2017

So too in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427 (2014). There, the Court construed the Clean Air Act, which required major emitters of “air pollutants” to acquire certain permits. … The Act defined “air pollutant” as “any air pollution agent or combination of such agents, including any * * * substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air.” 42 U.S.C

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — RDFS, LLC, Petitioner v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 6, 2025

Air Regul. Grp. v. … When compressor facilities are proposed, the analysis must also describe how the proposed action will be made to comply with applicable State Implementation Plans developed under the Clean Air Act.

Reply Brief — Maine v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989

First, the Federal Respondents dispute the peti- tioners’ assertion that EPA has made the Clean Air Act’s interstate air pollution provisions effectively meaning- less, suggesting instead that those … The Government responds to the central legal asser- tion of the Petition — that EPA’s construction of the Clean Air Act leaves the Act’s interstate pollution control provi- sions virtually meaningless