Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
2.99s
Nardi v. Town of Kennebunkport
Superior Court of Maine · May 16, 2007
This Court deferentially reviews a board's factual findings to detennine whether the evidence before the board justified the decision. Lewis v. Maine Coast Artists, 2001 ME 75, «JI 14, 770 A.2d 644, 650. … The Court may not overturn a board's decision "because the record is inconsistent" or it is possible to reach a "different conclusion" than the board did. Twigg v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished586 A.2d 1267 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 28, 1991
The perpetrator entered through boards in the back of the store and broke into the safe. Money bags containing $2685.00 of United States and Canadian currency were taken or emptied. … See United States v. Silvestri, 787 F.2d 736, 740 (1st Cir.1986); Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 443 , 104 S.Ct. 2501, 2508 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984); United States v. Galante, 547 F.2d 733, 740 (2nd Cir.1976).
Cited 13 timesPublished513 A.2d 269 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 23, 1986
In Smith v. Allstate Ins. … (quoting Brown v. City of Laconia, 118 N.H. 376 , 386 A.2d 1276, 1277 (1978)).
Cited 33 timesPublished260 A.2d 437 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 24, 1969
To the same effect is Leighton v. Leighton, 58 Me. 63 . In Strout v. … Thompson v. Pew, 214 Mass. 520 , 102 N.E. 122 ; Daniel v.
Cited 2 timesPublished7 F. Cas. 1085 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1828
The 2 Browne, Civ. & Adm. Law, 96, is referred to as confirming this doctrine. That the courts of common law in England will grant a prohibition in such a case, is admitted. … It is so recognized in Christie v. Lewis, 2 Brod. & B. 410, and in Faith v. East India Co., 4 Barn. & Ald. 630.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Feb 7, 2007
White v. Hollis, 589 A.2d 46, 48 (Me. 1991). … "The municipal officers and the planning board, agency or office responsible for enforcing the zoning ordinance are in their official capacities parties to all proceedings before the board of appeals." Crosby v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Apr 30, 2004
See Mastriano v. Blyer, 2001 ME 134, 9 11, 779 A.2d 951, 954; Stanton v. Univ. of Maine Sys., 2001 ME 96, 1 7, 773 A.2d 1045, 1049. … AND JULIET BROWNE, ESQ.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEllsworth Commons v. City of Ellsworth
Superior Court of Maine · Jul 28, 2008
Thus, the resulting question is Whether, as a matter of law, the record compels the conclusion that Board's proceeding was affected by bias. Magnetic Resonance Technologies of Maine v. … Gensheimer v. Town of Phippsburg, 2005 ME 22, , 18,868 A.2d 161, 166.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished24 F. Cas. 504 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 15, 1836
What may be a reasonable amount of goods to be allowed to a vessel as sea stores, must depend on circumstances, as the number of persons on board, and the facility with which supplies may be obtained in the business in which … S. v. Lyman [Case No. 15,647]; U. S. v. Goodwin [Id. 15.229].
Cited 0 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Oct 9, 2015
In Vogt v. … However, in Jacques v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Nov 6, 2018
See Brown v. Thaler, 2005 ME 75, 5, 880 A.2d 1113. In this case Doyle attempted service by certified mail, but did not obtain acknowledgments of service. … Brown v. Thaler, 2005 ME 75 ,r,r 8-13. A dismissal under Rule 12(b)(5) is without prejudice. Fries v. Carpenter, 567 A.2d 437, 439 (Me. 1989).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHarrison v. Town of Cranberry Isles
Superior Court of Maine · Mar 10, 2009
Camp v. Town of Shapleigh, 2008 ME 53, ~ 9, 943 A.2d 595, 598 (quoting McGhie v. Town of Cutler, 2002 ME 62, ~ 5, 793 A.2d 504, 505). … Toomey v. Town of Frye Island, 2008 ME 44, ~ 12, 943 A.2d 563, 566 (quoting Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2000 ME 30, ~ 8, 746 A.2d 368, 372).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished376 A.2d 465 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1977
In State v. … Kobylanski v. Chicago Board of Education, 63 Ill.2d 165 , 347 N.E.2d 705, 709 (1976). For cases adopting this same rationale, see Eastern Scrap Services, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished252 F. 267 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 15, 1918
Wolf v. Cook (C. C.) 40 Fed. 432, 438 ; The Sabine, 101 U. S. 384, 391 , 25 L. Ed. 982 . … Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U. S. 113 , 16 Sup. Ct. 139, 40 L. Ed. 95 .
Cited 8 timesPublished64 Me. 86 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874
The *89 corporate powers of the company were to be exercised by a board of trustees and such officers and agents as they might appoint. … Brouwer v. Appleby, 1 Sandf., 158 ; House v. Allen, Ib., 171; Brouwer v. Hill, Ib., 629; Howland v. Myers, 3 Comst., 290.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHarvey v. MacHigonne Benefits Administrators
128 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 19, 2001
Neither Franchise Tax Board nor Drinkwater address this particular issue, which was raised by Gulf Life Insurance Company v. Arnold, 809 F.2d 1520 (11th Cir.1987). … Co. v. DiGregorio, 811 F.2d 1249, 1253 (9th Cir.1987); Reynolds v. Stahr, 758 F.Supp. 1276, 1281 (W.D.Wis.1991).
Cited 1 timesPublishedGrande v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
460 F. Supp. 2d 163 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 27, 2006
In Robinson v. … Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished121 Me. 22 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 14, 1921
Hunt v. Bailey, 39 Mo., 257 ; Higgins v. Halligan, 46 Ill., 173 ; Griffin v. Knisely, 75 Ill., 411 ; Reithman v. Brandenburg, 7 Colo., 480 ; Despard v. Walbridge, 15 N. Y., 374 ; Stees v. … Thus, in case of a lodger occupying rooms in a boarding-house with his family; White v. Maynard, 111 Mass., 250 ; Peaks v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMaine Auto. Dealers Ass'n Ins. Trust v. Superintendent of Ins.
Superior Court of Maine · Aug 31, 2009
Centamore v. Dep't of Human Servs., 664 A.2d 369,370 (Me. 1995). … Competitive Energy Servs., LLC v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 2003 ME 12, <[ 15, 818 A.2d 1039, 1046. If the statute is unambiguous, it is interpreted according to its plain language. Arsenault v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · May 4, 2018
AP-2018-15 CHARLES MCINTYRE, Plaintiff V. … The Board conducted the hearing as scheduled and the Plaintiff attended and testified.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna