Case law

Mitchell, Dwight v. Randstad North America

2016 TN WC App. 37 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 11, 2016

Vulcan Materials Co. v. Watson, No. M2003- 00975-WC-R3-CV, 2004 Tenn. LEXIS 451, at *7 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. … .”); Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct.

Neal, Wendy v. Moore Construction Co. Inc.

2019 TN WC 23 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 8, 2019

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *8. Similarly, the parties cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations to successfully support their arguments. Lurz v. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

McCaffery v. Cardinal Logistics

2015 TN WC App. 46 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 10, 2015

See Hood v. Jenkins, 432 S.W.3d 814, 822 (Tenn. 2013). … Hames v. State, 808 S.W.2d 41, 44 (Tenn. 1991) (quoting Butts v. City of South Fulton, 565 S.W.2d 879, 882 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1978)).

Emerson, Jeffrey v. City of Cookeville

2022 TN WC 68 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 7, 2022

.: 2021-04-0282 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 12856-2021 CITY OF COOKEVILLE, ) … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re the Estate of Browning

176 Misc. 308 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 24, 1941

(Donemar, Inc., v. Molloy, 252 N. Y. 360 ; emphasis supplied.) … (Donemar, Inc., v. Molloy, supra; Matter of Browning, 172 Misc. 647 , and authorities there cited; 3 Scott on Trusts, § 506; Restatement, Restitution, § 201, subd. 1.)

Legrand v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 12, 2007

Defendant's Exhibit 2: Rules and regulations of Utilization Review Board 8. … Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. N.C. Gen.

Wynn v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 13, 2006

. § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Stat. § 143-297 ; Register v. Administrative Office of the Courts, 70 N.C. App. 763 , 321 S.E.2d 24 (1984), Taylor v. Stonewall Jackson Manual Training Indus. School, 5 N.C. App. 188 , 167 S.E.2d 787 (1969), Ayscue v.

Douglas v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 16, 2005

Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. N.C. Gen. … . § 143-291 (a) confers the Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State.

City of Newark v. New Jersey Investment Co.

18 N.J. Misc. 182 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 19, 1940

Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1937), 119 N. J. L. 164; 194 Atl. Rep. 870 . The determination is one of fact in each ease. … See Hoboken v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment (Supreme Court, 1930), 107 N. J. L. 35; 151 Atl. Rep. 364 ; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1931), 108 N. J. L. 195; 156 Atl. Rep. 377 ; Hoboken v.

In re the Construction of the Will of Hinman

22 Misc. 2d 655 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 21, 1960

Y. 316 ; Crooke v. County of Kings, 97 N. Y. 421, 436 ; Real Property Law, § 96). … . *657 Under such facts, the statute creates a legal life estate with the same incidents of tenure as if the bequest had taken such form (Real Property Law, § 92; Matter of Reed v. Browne, 295 N. Y. 184 ; Rose v.

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2005

. ¶ 4 Your question relates to the portion of the Act governing funding by state agencies, departments, boards, councils and commissions, referred to collectively herein as governmental entities. … Brigance v. Velvet Dove Rest., 756 P.2d 1232 , 1235 (Okla. 1988). "[R]ules of statutory construction are not applied where the Legislature plainly expresses its intent." Id.

Opinion No. 70-115 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 11, 1970

When a policeman reaches the age of seventy (70) years he must retire, unless . . . the Board of Trustees or City Council grants him an extension. . . ." … State ex rel Williamson v. Evans, Okl. 319 P.2d 1112 (1957); In re Adoption of Lewis, Okl., 380 P.2d 697 (1963).

City of Uvalde v. Uvalde Electric & Ice Co.

250 S.W. 140 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 18, 1923

Ed. 679 ; Metropolitan Street Car Co. v. State Board of Tax Com’rs, 199 U. S. 1 , 25 Sup. Ct. 705, 50 L. Ed. 65 , 4 Ann. Cas. 381; Home Telephone Co. v. Los Angeles, supra. … City of Logansport v. Wright, 25 Ind. 512 . To the same effect are the holdings in Vason v. Augusta, 38 Ga. 542 ; Ottawa v. People, 48 Ill. 233 ; People v. Police Board, 75 N. Y. 38 ; City of N. Y. v. Furze, 3 Hill (N.

In re the Accounting of Hammer

184 Misc. 233 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 23, 1945

This did not amount to an allowance of the claim (Matter of Brown, 60 Misc. 35 ). … Y. 23, 33 , supra, quoted in Matter of Brown , 60. Misc. 35, 39, supra).

Barnes, Christopher v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

2021 TN WC 229 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 21, 2021

With that testimony, Vanderbilt’s expert proof is of limited use, especially when considering the Appeals Board’s decision in Hawes v. McLane Company, Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Bioskryb Genomics, Inc. v. Aclarity Genomics Inc.

2025 NCBC 56 · North Carolina Business Court · Sep 18, 2025

BioSkryb Genomics, Inc. v. AClarity Genomics Inc., 2025 NCBC 56. … All concern West’s work history with BioSkryb and his turbulent relationship with its board of directors, including, among other things, allegations that the board threatened to fire him multiple times, pressed him to

Love, Sarah v. Delta Faucet Company

2018 TN WC App. 16 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 30, 2018

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Sarah Love ) Docket No. 2015-07-0195 ) v. … Wright v. Wright, 337 S.W.3d 166, 176 (Tenn. 2011).

Opinion No. 80-222 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1980

State v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Okl. 118 P.2d 621 (1941). 84 O.S. 217 [ 84-217 ] — 84 O.S. 221 [ 84-221 ] (1971) provides as follows: "217. … degrees of relationship, the Attorney General's Office has since April 4, 1932 and in numerous opinions rendered thereafter, calculated the degrees of relationship in accordance with the civil law as expressed in Barton v.

Opinion No. 79-012 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1979

The Board of Regents for Higher Education (Regents) is a constitutional agency charged with responsibility to act as the "coordinating board of control for all state institutions of higher education." … See Gibson Product Co. v. Murphy, 186 Okl. 714 , 100 P.2d 453 , (1940); Potter v. State, Okl.

Satterfield, Kimberly v. Smoky Mountain Home Health and Hospice, Inc.

2023 TN WC App. 50 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 6, 2023

See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013). … Batey v. Deliver This, Inc., 568 S.W.3d 91, 99 (Tenn. 2019) (emphasis in original).