Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.42s
Rohrman v. TIPPECANOE COUNTY ASSESSOR
901 N.E.2d 95 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 10, 2009
Robert V. Rohrman (Rohrman) appeals the final determination of the Indiana Board of Tax Review (Indiana Board) valuing his real property as of the March 1, 2004 and 2005 assessment dates. … See K.S. v. State, 849 N.E.2d 538, 541-42 (Ind.2006) (stating that to characterize procedural defects or errors as "jurisdictional" misapprehends that concept) (citation omitted); Packard v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrancoeur, Bibiane v. Amerimed Medical Solutions, LLC
2024 TN WC App. 36 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Oct 21, 2024
Id. at 639; see also Curtis v. G.E. … Pool v. Metric Constructors, Inc., 681 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tenn. 1984); see also Smith v. Royal Globe Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1999
The primary responsibility lies with the State Board of Agriculture. … A statute is not unconstitutionally vague when it (a) sets forth the legislative policy and the standards for administrative action, Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. Estep, 652 P.2d 271 , 277 n. 23 (Okla. 1982), State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2019 TN WC App. 55 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 20, 2019
Madden v. Holland Grp. of Tenn., Inc., 277 S.W.3d 896, 898 (Tenn. 2009). However, “[n]o similar deference need be afforded the trial court’s findings based upon documentary evidence.” Goodman v. Schwarz Paper Co., No. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCavanaugh v. Lexington Furniture
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 16, 1998
Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44 , 283 S.E.2d 101 (1981). 2. … Booker v. Duke Medical Center , 297 N.C. 458 , 256 S.E.2d 189 (1979). 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPhiladelphia Underwriters' Agency of Fire Ass'n v. Moore
229 S.W. 490 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 23, 1921
Bills v. Hibernia Insurance Co., 87 Tex. 547 , 29 S. W. 1063 , 29 L. R. A. 706, 47 Am. St. Rep. 121 ; Brown v. Palatine Insurance Co., 89 Tex. 590 , 35 S. W. 1060 ; Dumphy v. … W. 814 ; Insurance Co. of North America v. O’ Bannon, supra. The extent to which the rule should be applied may be gathered from the following language in Brown v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHunter, Dale v. Doug's Automotive
2019 TN WC 128 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 23, 2019
Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2018); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To prove a compensable injury, Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcMillan, Lanell v. ULG Companies, LLC
2024 TN WC 26 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 28, 2024
Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2023); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 488 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If ULG does either or both, Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRockefeller Foundation v. State
144 Misc. 460 · New York Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1932
(Smith v. Browning, 225 N. Y. 358 ; People v. Duffy-McInnerney, 122 App. Div. 336 ; Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151 .) The certificates of .stock are in themselves only evidence of the *462 transfer of title. … (Phelps-Stokes Estates v. Nixon, 222 N. Y. 93 , and cases therein cited; White v. Huber Drug Co., 190 Mich. 212 ; 157 N. W. 60 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedNyack Rural Cemetery, Inc. v. State
32 Misc. 2d 828 · New York Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1962
In the Catskill case, the court cited Matter of Board of St. Opening ( 133 N. … Neither the Catskill case nor Matter of Board of St.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 30, 1986
See also, Hannan v. Board of Education of City of Lawton , 107 P. 646 (Okla. 1909). The precise question presented has been addressed in several other states, using the statutes of those jurisdictions. … McGinnis Equipment Co. v. Riggs , 422 P.2d 187 (Ariz.App. 1967); Douthit v. Allen , 426 S.W.2d 812 (Ark. 1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLagel, Imad v. Elwood Staffing Services, LLC
2018 TN WC 128 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 16, 2018
Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN. Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *27 (Nov. 9, 2015). Lay testimony is insufficient to establish causation in the absence of medical evidence. Ariga v. AtWork Pers. Servs., TN Wrk. Comp. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished2024 OK AG 3 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 22, 2024
Board of Pharmacy on the Physician Assistant Drug Formulary. 59 O.S.2021, § 519.6(E)(1). … 2000 OK AG 34 , Question Submitted by: Lyle Kelsey, Executive Director, Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision Cited Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 1939 OK 467 , 97 P.2d 58 , 186 Okla. 217 , CASE v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1963
OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS FOR ANY ONE YEAR " AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 1 OF HOUSE BILL NO. 823, SAID BOARD MUST COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SAID BILL. … CITE: 59 O.S. 1961 427 [59-427] ARTICLE V, SECTION 55 (FRED HANSEN)
Cited 0 timesPublishedJackson, Rodnecia A. v. Federal Express Corporation
2020 TN WC 113 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 23, 2020
To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedColonial Life Insurance v. City of Jersey City
18 N.J. Misc. 60 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 9, 1940
City of Garfield v. Forstmann Woolen Co. (State Board), filed September 12th, 1939. … Gibbs v. State Board (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1925), 101 N. J. L. 371; 129 Atl. Rep. 189 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1969
These statutory provisions were interpreted by the case of Duncan v. … Provided, that children who have not reached such age of six (6) years may be admitted to nursery and kindergarten classes approved by the State Board of Education at public expense.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFilcrest Realty, Inc. v. Township of Edison
2 N.J. Tax 77 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 24, 1980
Passaic v. … Passaic v. Gera Mills, supra; In re Appeal of East Orange, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublishedHan v. Clackamas County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Dec 18, 2012
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2 was an appraisal report (Brown appraisal) prepared by an MAI (member of the Appraisal Institute) appraiser, Aaron Brown (Brown). … Woods v. Dept. of Rev., 16 OTR 56, 59 (2002); Reed v. Dept. of Rev. (Reed), 310 Or 260, 265, 798 P2d 235 (1990).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedStandard Oil Co. v. City of Atlantic City
18 N.J. Misc. 582 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 24, 1940
Its appeal to the Atlantic County Board of Taxation for a reduction in the assessment was dismissed. … Those decisions by this board held that gas retorts and oil tanks were part of the apparatus and equipment of a public utility, under Pamph.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna