Opinion

Lagel, Imad v. Elwood Staffing Services, LLC

  • 2018 TN WC 128
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Aug 16, 2018
Status
Published
On the bench
Joshua Davis Baker
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Aug 16, 2018

01:25 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE

IMAD LAGEL, ) Docket No. 2018-06-0130

)

Employee, )

v. )

)

ELWOOD STAFFING SERVICES, ) State File No. 54870-2016

LLC, )

Employer, )

And )

)

ZURICH AMERICAN INS. CO., ) Judge Joshua Davis Baker

Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING

MEDICAL BENEFITS

This case came before the Court on August 9, 2018, on Imad Lagel’s Request for

Expedited Hearing. The issue is whether Mr. Lagel would likely prevail at a hearing on

the merits in proving entitlement to additional medical treatment. The Court holds he

would not likely prevail at a hearing on the merits and denies his claim for medical

benefits.

History of Claim

Mr. Lagel worked as a temporary employee for Elwood Staffing. On July 19,

2016, he developed right foot pain and swelling while stacking boxes onto pallets.

Elwood authorized emergency treatment at Stonecrest Medical Center. After

examination and x-rays, the medical provider noted soft tissue swelling and osteoarthritic

changes, diagnosed a right foot sprain, and recommended follow-up with a primary care

physician.

Mr. Lagel chose U.S. Healthworks from a panel of physicians for his follow-up

care. Dr. Harold V. Nevels diagnosed a right foot sprain. He briefly restricted Mr.

Lagel’s work but discharged him to full duty three days later as his “pain was resolving.”

He placed Mr. Lagel at maximum medical improvement (MMI).

Mr. Lagel quit his job at Elwood about a week after his injury and began working

for another staffing company. About two weeks after starting his new job, Mr. Lagel

returned to Stonecrest with the same right foot complaint and was diagnosed with gout.

As before, his symptoms had developed gradually while walking and standing during his

shift. Mr. Lagel told the provider about his prior right foot injury but reported the “pain

resolved then returned today with ‘standing on foot all day’ – no injury.” Mr. Lagel

thought “it [was] caused by work with walking then standing still.” His symptoms

calmed somewhat after his second visit to Stonecrest.

Then, in 2017, Mr. Lagel’s right foot injury “came back.” He went on his own to

Vanderbilt University Medical Center and complained of the same symptoms, but he

attributed the onset of those symptoms to cold weather. Mr. Lagel filed a Petition for

Benefit Determination for medical benefits shortly after his treatment at Vanderbilt.

After this filing, Mr. Lagel testified that the adjuster agreed to authorize a follow-up visit

with Dr. Nevels.

At the follow-up, Dr. Nevels determined Mr. Lagel’s symptoms were unrelated to

his July 2016 foot sprain. Significantly, an x-ray showed “[f]irst metatarsal head erosions

which could indicate gout.” In providing his opinion, Dr. Nevels mentioned Mr. Lagel’s

“full discharge” from a “simple right ankle/foot sprain,” the “time interval” between Mr.

Lagel’s release and his return for more treatment, and the gout diagnosis. Dr. Nevels

wrote, “[T]he “preexisting condition more likely than not is causing the current

symptoms and findings.”

Dr. Nevels also could not align Mr. Lagel’s conflicting accounts of his injury with

those documented in the medical records. He wrote, “The findings on exam and

diagnosis are not consistent with the injury reported by patient.” He noted that Mr. Lagel

reported that Vanderbilt removed fluid from his right ankle. However, Dr. Nevel’s

review of those records indicated Mr. Lagel presented to Vanderbilt with “LEFT ankle

pain and edema—atraumatic” and underwent “an arthrocentesis of the LEFT ankle.”

(Emphasis in original.) Dr. Nevels specifically referenced the Vanderbilt-physician’s

notation that “the most likely etiology of the patient’s pain is osteoarthritic given that he

is on his feet the majority of the day” with a “labor-intensive job.”

Legal Principles and Analysis

At the hearing, Mr. Lagel requested treatment for his right foot and claimed the

symptoms from the July 19, 2016 work injury remained and/or repeatedly recurred after

2

his release by the doctor. To receive relief at this expedited hearing, Mr. Lagel must

provide sufficient evidence to show he would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits in

proving entitlement to further medical treatment. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1)

(2017). The Court finds that Mr. Lagel failed to present sufficient evidence.

To be compensable, an injury must arise primarily out of the course and scope of

employment. An injury arises primarily out of the course and scope employment if the

employment “contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the injury,

considering all causes.” Further, an injury causes the need for medical treatment only if it

has been shown “to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that it contributed more than

fifty percent (50%) in causing the . . . need for medical treatment, considering all causes.”

A “reasonable degree of medical certainty” means a physician believes it is “more likely

than not considering all causes, as opposed to speculation or possibility.” See Tenn.

Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14).

An employee must present expert medical proof that the alleged injury is causally

related to the employment when the case is not “obvious, simple [or] routine.” Willis v.

All Staff, 2015 TN. Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *27 (Nov. 9, 2015). Lay

testimony is insufficient to establish causation in the absence of medical evidence. Ariga

v. AtWork Pers. Servs., TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at*7 (Aug. 18, 2015).

Further, the opinion of the physician selected from a panel is afforded a presumption of

correctness on causation, although that presumption can be overcome by a preponderance

of the evidence standard. Tenn. Code Ann § 50-6-102(14)(E).

Here, Mr. Lagel chose Dr. Nevels from a panel of physicians. Dr. Nevels could

not state that Mr. Lagel’s right foot condition arose primarily from his employment with

Elwood. Conversely, he found that Mr. Lagel’s pre-existing arthritis and gout were

“more likely than not” causing Mr. Lagel’s flare-ups when walking and standing during

his shifts. The Court must afford Dr. Nevels’ opinion a presumption of correctness, and

Mr. Lagel’s lay testimony alone does not overcome that presumption. Accordingly, the

Court holds he is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits and denies his request for

additional medical benefits.

It is ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Lagel’s request for additional medical benefits is denied at this time.

2. The parties shall appear for a status conference on October 1, 2018, at 10:30

a.m. (CDT). The Court will convene the status conference via telephone. The

parties must call the Court’s conference line at (615) 741-2113 or (855) 874-

0474 to participate.

3

ENTERED ON AUGUST 16, 2018.

______________________________________

Judge Joshua Davis Baker

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

4

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Medical Records

2. Mr. Lagel’s Affidavit

3. Wage Statement

4. First Report of Injury

5. Choice of Physician

Technical Record:

1. Request for Expedited Hearing

2. Dispute Certification Notice

3. Petition for Benefit Determination

4. Employer’s Pre-hearing Brief

5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of this Expedited Hearing Order was sent to

the following recipients by the following methods of service on August ___,16th 2018

Name Certified Fax Email Service sent to:

Mail

Imad Lagel, X X 5756 Mount View Rd.

Self-represented Antioch, TN 37013

Employee Lg_imad@hotmail.com

David Deming, X ddeming@manierherod.com

Employer’s Attorney

______________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

6

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the

form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven

business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice

of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of the appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of

the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file

it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of

Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both

parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of

the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’

Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof

concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be

a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten

business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The

party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business

days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a

statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the

expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of

the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an

argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

Filed Date Stamp Here EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Division of Workers' Compensation

Docket#: - - - -- -- - --

www.tn.go v/labor-wfd/wcomp.shtm l

State File #/YR: - - -- - - --

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov

1-800-332-2667 RFA#: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _

Date of Injury: - - - -- - - - -

SSN: _______ _ ______ __

Employee

Employer and Carrier

Notice

Noticeisg~enthat _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~--~~~~---~~~--------~

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]

appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers' Compensation Claims at _ __

-~~~-----~~~~~~~~-to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board .

[List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk's office]

Judge___________________________________________

Statement of the Issues

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

Additional Information

Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]

D Temporary disability benefits

D Medical benefits for current injury

D Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court

List of Parties

Appellant (Requesting Party): _____________ .A t Hearing: DEmployer DEmployee

Address:. _______________________ ______________ ___________

Party's Phone:.____________________________ Email: _________________________

Attorney's Name:________________________________ ___ BPR#: - - - - - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:. _ _ _ _ _~~-~~~~----~~---- Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: _____________________ ___________ _ _ _ __ _

Attorney's Email :_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

*Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant*

LB-1099 rev.4/15 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: - - - -- - - -- - - - SF#: _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ DO l: _ __ _ __

Aopellee(s)

Appellee (Opposing Party): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.At Hearing: OEmployer DEmployee

Appellee's Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Appellee's Phone:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.Email:_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __

Attorney's Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ BPR#: - - - - - - - -

Attorney's Address:._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Phone:

Attorney's City, State & Zip code: - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -

Attorney's Email:._ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, certify that I have forwarded a true and exact copy of this

Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties

and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules of

Board of Workers' Compensation Appeals on this the day of__, 20_ .

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev.4/1S Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

.

ll .I

Tennessee Bureau of Workers' Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, I am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 2. Address: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. Telephone Number: - - - - - - - - - 4. Date of Birth: - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Relationship: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. I am employed by: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , -

My employer's address is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

My employer's phone number is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

8. I receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

SSI $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Camp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are: ' ; !•

'

Rent/House Payment $ per month Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe:

10. Assets:

Automobile $ _ _ __ _

(FMV) - - - - - -- - - -

Checking/Savings Acct. $ _ _ _ __

House $ _ _ _ __

(FMV) - - -- - - -- - -

)

Other $ _ _ _ __ Describe:_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

_ _ _ dayof _____________ ,20____

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:_ _ _ _ _ __ _

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.