Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFD

10,000+ results

1.01s

  • Solis v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 10, 2024

    ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION ATTORNEY VICTOR MANUEL BROWN … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Mitchell

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Nov 13, 2024

    P. 12(b)(6); Gibson v. City of Chicago, 910 F.2d 1510, 1520 (7th Cir. 1990). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Laddner

    District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 27, 2025

    See Hodak v. City of St. … Brown also sued Deputies Laddner and Igleheart in their official capacities. Mr. Brown’s official capacity claims are the equivalent of claims against Craighead County. Veatch v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Coleman v. Casey County Board of Education

    510 F. Supp. 301 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Mar 26, 1980

    The Board of Education refused to rehire him. … See United States v. Georgia Public Service Commission, 371 U.S. 285 , 83 S.Ct. 397 , 9 L.Ed.2d 317 (1963); McDermott v. Wisconsin, 228 U.S. 115 , 33 S.Ct. 431 , 57 L.Ed. 754 (1912).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ezekwo v. American Board of Internal Medicine

    18 F. Supp. 2d 271 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 12, 1998

    See Bryan v. James E. Holmes Reg’l Med. Ctr., 33 F.3d 1318, 1333 (11th Cir.1994); Austin v. McNamara, 979 F.2d 728, 734-35 (9th Cir.1992). … Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Servs., Inc., 504 U.S. 451, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 2072 , 119 L.Ed.2d 265 (1992). See also, Irvin Indus. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Short

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 6, 2023

    United States v. Reyes, 307 F.3d 451, 458 (6th Cir. 2002). … Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471–72 (9th Cir. 1986); Shepard Claims Serv., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Durrani, MD

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 20, 2022

    However, as this Court explained in ruling on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment filed in a related case (Doc. 40, Case No. 1:18-cv-785, Tara Brown v. … See Stidham v. Durrani, No. 1:18-CV-810, 2021 WL 2013024, at *4 (S.D. Ohio May 19, 2021) (citing Landrum, 2020 WL 3512808 at *5); Levandofsky v. Durrani, No. 1:18-CV-809, 2020 WL 5535872, at *5 (S.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Gray

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 18, 2023

    As to the first category, evidence about Plaintiff's interaction with Captain Howell is certainly relevant as the Sixth Circuit stated that Captain Howell’s decisions may have been “set[] in motion,” Brown v. … Brown v. Gray, No. 21-3386, 2022 WL 961246, at *5 (6th Cir.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Lee

    District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 23, 2024

    Hamilton v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 331 F. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Matthews v. United States, 682 F.3d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Burton

    District Court, D. South Carolina · Sep 17, 2021

    App’x 164, 165 (4th Cir. 2001); see also Hummer v. … See Wojcicki v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Woods

    District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Feb 3, 2025

    PLAINTIFF V. … Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993) (explaining that it is the prisoner’s responsibility to provide a proper service address for each defendant).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sifferman v. BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTHEAST MISSOURI

    250 F. Supp. 2d 1139 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 11, 2003

    250 F.Supp.2d 1139 (2003) James SIFFERMAN, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:01CV162 CDP. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division. … Ultimately, as in all major decisions, it is action by the Board of Regents which is legally binding.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cook

    District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 26, 2024

    See Graham v. Costello, 299 F.3d 129, 133 (2d Cir. 2002). Because Petitioner’s previous application for relief under § 2254, challenging the same conviction, was adjudicated on the merits, see Brown v. … § 1631; see also Liriano v. United States, 95 F.3d 119, 122-23 (2d Cir. 1996) (per curiam). This order closes this case.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. Dallas County Board of Education

    480 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Dec 10, 1979

    Sims v. Etowah County Board of Education, 337 So.2d 1310, 1315 (Ala.1976) (quoting Turk v. County Board of Education of Monroe County, 222 Ala. 177 , 131 So. 436 (1930)). … While the Court recognizes that discriminatory intent need not be shown under ESAA, Board of Educ. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Giles

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 3, 2023

    Under § 1983, Brown must show that any violation “occurred because of a municipal policy or custom.” Burgess v. Fischer, 735 F.3d 462, 478 (6th Cir. 2013) (citing Monell v. Dept. of Soc. … But again Brown makes no assertions beyond “a bare recitation of the legal standards.” Brown v. Cuyahoga Cnty., 517 F. App’x 431, 436 (6th Cir. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Barroner

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2022

    Anderson v. … Rode v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Waldron v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 26, 2023

    Brown $500,000.00 by wire transfer, which represented one-half of Mr. Brown’s fee to appear and to perform at the Event. (Id. at ⁋ 8.) … Brown did not appear or perform at the Event. (Id. at ⁋ 9.) Despite Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pruett v. Harris County Bail Bond Board

    593 F. Supp. 2d 944 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 3, 2008

    Migis v. Pearle Vision, Inc., 135 F.3d 1041, 1047 (5th Cir.1998). … The Court likewise rejects the challenges of the defendant for time expended by Furlow, Kelley, Brown, Pernell, Brady and Parks for the years 2005 and 2006.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cool

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 1, 2023

    Although discovery is ongoing, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, which reads: “[n]ow comes Michael Brown, plaintiff in the above captioned case. … See Heard v. Caruso, 351 Fed. Appx. 1, 15–16 (6th Cir. 2009); Stitts v. Staples, 1998 WL 466569 at *2 (6th Cir. 1998); Shepard Claims Serv., Inc. v. William Darrah & Assoc., 796 F.2d 190, 193 (6th Cir. 1986).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Romano v. Brown

    District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 25, 2024

    Brown and Set. Bower remain as defendants. See Dkt. 23. 71. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), This Court carefully reviewed the R&R, the objections briefing, and the relevant record.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.