Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.31s
Murphy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2017
Grice v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 36 Fed. … I will accordingly pay her a flat rate of $300 across the board, including time testifying, rather than differentiating by task as her invoice does. Fees App. Ex. 2 at 2. Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished43 Fed. Cl. 97 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 25, 1999
Moehizuki v. U.S. (Case No. 97-294C), in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. 2. I appreciate the opportunity to tell the Court my story. … The windows of the plane were boarded up and we were not told where we were being taken.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAttig v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 16, 2019
V. … Shapiro v. HHS, 101 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPaluck ex rel. Paluck v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
104 Fed. Cl. 457 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2012
Frye is board-certified in general pediatrics and in neurology with special competence in child neurology. … Snodgrass is board-certified in neurology, with special competence in child neurology.
Cited 90 timesPublishedBrennan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 10, 2025
Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 9 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNorthrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
63 Fed. Cl. 38 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 5, 2004
We agree with the Board that Urban is entitled to reimbursement of a quantum valebant basis for the reasonable value in the marketplace of the supplies and concomitant services. Urban Data Sys., Inc. v. … Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedQuest Diagnostics, Inc. v. United States
110 Fed. Cl. 716 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 1, 2013
Fed’n of Gov’t Emps. v. United States, 258 F.3d 1294, 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2001). … V. United States, 39 Fed. Cl. 231 (1997). All that is required of an agency is that it has a reasonable basis for its decision. See Honeywell, Inc. V. United States, 570 F.2d 644, 684 (Fed. Cir. 1989).
Cited 2 timesPublishedDie Casters International, Inc. v. United States
73 Fed. Cl. 174 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 28, 2006
See Todd v. … Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished104 Fed. Cl. 699 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2012
See Deutsche Bank AG v. United States, 95 Fed.Cl. 423 , 427 n. 3 (2010) (citing Brown & Williamson, Ltd. v. … FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (quoting Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFisher v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 28, 2024
He is board certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology. Id. Dr. … Davis v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 94 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedVoith Hydro, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 8, 2019
See Voith Hydro, Inc. v. United States, 142 Fed. Cl. 233 (2019); Voith Hydro, Inc. v. United States, 141 Fed. … Corp. v. Dalton, 88 F.3d 990, 1000 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2015
United States v. … Instead, if the Department of Veterans' Affairs denies a veteran's application for benefits, the veteran may appeal the denial to the Board of Veterans' Appeals ("BVA").
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 6, 2018
This court does not possess jurisdiction over claims seeking- damages based on the Fourth Amendment. see Brown v. … Cir. 1993) (quoting bobula v. U.S. Dep't ofJustice,970 F.2d 854, 859 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKennedy ex rel. Kennedy v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
99 Fed. Cl. 535 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 16, 2011
Corp. v. … See, e.g., United States v. One Toshiba Color Television, 213 F.3d 147, 157 (3d Cir.2000) (en banc); N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Brown, 84 F.3d 137, 142-43 (5th Cir.1996); Hertz Corp. v.
Cited 60 timesPublishedMarkarian v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 24, 2023
He is board certified in psychiatry and neurology. Id. Dr. Leist specializes in the field of neuroimmunology and directs a clinical program in that neurologic subspecialty. Resp. Ex. A at 1. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWeiss v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 21, 2025
Moriarty v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 844 F.3d 1322, 1328 (Fed. … Ojeda Colon v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 18-1065V, 2021 WL 2809582 (Fed. Cl. June 3, 2021), review den’d, decision aff’d sub nom. Colon v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 156 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHolveck v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 4, 2025
Accordingly, I will reduce the sum to be awarded for entitlement damages briefing (a total of 36.1 hours, or $15,390.00) but only by twenty percent.9 Such an across-the- board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)10 fairly … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTully v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 3, 2025
Accordingly, I will reduce the sum to be awarded for entitlement damages briefing (a total of 33.7 hours, or $12,164.50) by twenty percent.9 Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)10 fairly captures … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSouthern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United States
77 Fed. Cl. 396 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 9, 2007
Co. v. … Appeals are to the DOE Board of Contract Appeals. Id. . The unavoidable delays clause was addressed in briefing in Northern States. Br. for Def.Appel-lee, Northern States Power v.
Vacated in part, on other grounds by Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United States, 637 F.3d 1297 (2011)Cited 42 timesPublishedBoddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
36 Fed. Cl. 722 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 4, 1996
Sartin v. United States, at 177 (citing Burnet v. … Q you could meet the Code Requirements that you refer to for smooth, cleanable surface by having a wall board ceiling and just painting it with glossy paint, couldn’t you?
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna