Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

2.69s

  • Cramer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 4, 2024

    Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521–22 (Fed. Cir. 1993); see also Hines v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 22 Cl. Ct. 750, 753 (1991). … This amount also includes expert services performed by Naveed Mayer Natanzi, DO, board certified in pain management, and physical medicine and rehabilitation, at $520.00 per hour for 17.5 hours totaling $9,100.00.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Caesar v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 2, 2018

    Co. v. United States, 27 Fed. … See Prestidge v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Dominguez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 19, 2018

    Moran * v. … Shoenfeld, $350 per hour); Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 99-537V, 2008 WL 2066611, at *4 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 22, 2008) (awarding another board-certified immunologist, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Swope v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 10, 2015

    In Holmes v. … In Cunningham v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Carraggio v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services

    38 Fed. Cl. 211 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 21, 1997

    Pet. for V. Comp. Ex. 7. According to Ms. … Donlan, Jason’s pediatrician, who is board certified in medical genetics, testified. Dr.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Enstrom v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 29, 2023

    Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 6 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Edwards v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 23, 2024

    See Rochester v. United States, 18 Cl. … Although an hourly rate of $500.00 is considered high in the Vaccine Program, the undersigned will allow that rate in this case based on his qualifications as a board-certified neurologist. II.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rucker v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 23, 2020

    United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 216-17 (1983) (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 400 (1976)). … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1631). The court has already addressed the first element, finding that it lacks jurisdiction.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Perekotiy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 2020

    He is not board certified in dermatology. In his report, Dr. … Though he is not board certified in dermatology, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sparton Corp. v. United States

    68 Fed. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 28, 2005

    Id. at 1314 (citing Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1352 (Fed.Cir.2001)). It is by applying this reformulated standard that the Court must construe the claims in this case. … However, as articulated by the Federal Circuit in Sage Prod., Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Red River Computer Co., Inc. v. United States

    120 Fed. Cl. 227 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 27, 2015

    Local 1482 v. United States, 258 F.3d 1294, 1302 (Fed. … Assocs., Inc. v. United States, 369 F.3d 1324, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (citing E.W. Bliss Co. v. United States, 77 F.3d 445, 449 (Fed. Cir. 1996)).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Thornton v. Secretary of Dept. of Health & Human Services

    35 Fed. Cl. 432 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 1996

    Udom specializes in family medicine and is board eligible in emergency medicine. She, however, has very limited experience with polio. … In Hines v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2025

    In November 2017, a Physical Evaluation Board (“PEB”) found him physically unfit for service and recommended him for medical retirement. Id. at 18, 22. … See Barnard v. United States, 620 F. App’x 961, 962 (Fed. Cir. 2015); Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 37, 41 (2006); Mark Smith Const. Co. v. United States, 10 Cl.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Chally v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 18, 2018

    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … Gruber v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 91 Fed. Cl. 773, 791 (2010).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rolle v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 5, 2018

    Meeks v. United States, 2007 WL 5172431, at *3 (Fed. Cl. Aug. 6, 2007); see also Emerson v. United States, 123 Fed. Cl. 126, 129 (Fed. … See Stacey v. Warden, Apalachee Corr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Piper v. United States

    90 Fed. Cl. 498 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 17, 2009

    Merit Systems Protection Board, an SF-50 “is merely an administrative record of the accomplished action.” 13 F.3d 1571, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1994). … Corp. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Sepehry-Fard v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 9, 2019

    Rzcft's Mushroom Serv., Inc. v. … See United States v. Connolly,i16F.2dgg}, 887 (Fed. Cir. 1983) ("the [F]irst [A]mendment, standing alone, cannot be so interpreted to command the payment of money"); Brown v. Uniled States, 1 05 F.3d 621, 624 (F ed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • I3 Cable & Harness LLC v. United States

    132 Fed. Cl. 495 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2017

    (capitalization and emphasis in original). 6 According to the initial Price Evaluation Report, prepared by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and issued … .” *** Nothing in Brown’s affidavit [whereby Am-Pro attempted to show bad faith], moreover, suggests that the government “had a specific intent to

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baylin v. United States

    30 Fed. Cl. 248 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 1993

    McKeague v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 671, 675 (1987) (quoting Keller Street Dev. Co. v. Commissioner, 688 F.2d 675, 681 (9th Cir. 1982); United States v. Gilmore, 372 U.S. 39 , 83 S.Ct. 623 , 9 L.Ed.2d 570 (1963)). … Chanticleer Skyline Room, Inc. v. Greer, 271 Md. 693, 700-701 , 319 A.2d 802 (1974) (citations and footnote omitted) Board of Educ. of Washington County v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Trafalgar House Construction, Inc. v. United States

    73 Fed. Cl. 675 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2006

    Co. v. … Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.