Case law

Urrutia-Diaz

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 19, 2025

The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) later upheld this new policy in the case of In re Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. Dec. 216 (BIA 2025). … Patsy v. Board of Regents of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 (1982)); See also Herr v. U.S.

Grose v. City of Bartlett, Tennessee Government

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 27, 2023

See Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. 2011). Courts “have no obligation to act as counsel or paralegal to pro se litigants.” … V.

Maher

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 14, 2026

In Monell v. … Allman v. Reed, 703 F.3d 887, 903 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)).

Jones v. Bway Corporation

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 16, 2024

Koshani v. Barton, 3:17-cv-0265, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202203 at *11 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 6, 2012); Mitchell v. Alexander, No. 09-2496, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63974 (W.D. Tenn. June 25, 2010). See also Goldman v. … Johnson v. Watkins, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77863, *14 (S.D. Miss., June 30, 2010); Elston v. UPMC- Presbyterian-Shadyside, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17831, *6-7 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2008); Bryce v. Trace, Inc., 2008 U.S.

Feild v. GRAFFAGNINO

514 F. Supp. 2d 1036 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 11, 2007

Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 72 (Tenn.2001); Spurlock v. … See, e.g., Levine v. Wiss & Co., 97 N.J. 242 , 478 A.2d 397 (1984); Mwrphy v. Mathews, 841 S.W.2d 671 (Mo.1992); Dalton v. Miller, 984 P.2d 666 (Colo.App.Ct.1999).

Hudson v. United States

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 19, 2023

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … V.

Abdullah

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 21, 2026

While courts are properly charged with protecting the rights of all who come before it, that responsibility does not encompass advising litigants as to what legal theories they should pursue.”); Brown v. … Kubik v. Brown, 979 F. Supp. 539, 548 (W.D. Mich. 1997).

Tigrett v. Cooper

855 F. Supp. 2d 733 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 2, 2012

Voinovich v. … See Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 11 , 87 S.Ct. 1817 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1967); Harper v. Va. Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 672 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966). . See Brown v. Entm’t Merchs.

Ladwig

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 18, 2025

The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) later upheld this new policy in the case of In re Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. Dec. 216 (BIA 2025). … Patsy v. Board of Regents of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 (1982)); See also Herr v. U.S.

Thomas v. Schroer

248 F. Supp. 3d 868 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 31, 2017

Wagner v. … App. 2016) (finding Texas Highway Beautification Act regulations content based and unconstitutional); Thayer v. City of Worcester, 144 F.Supp.3d 218, 233 (D. Mass. 2015); Browne v.

Owen of Georgia, Inc v. Shelby County

442 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 2, 1977

Wood Preserving Co. v. Sundmaker, 186 F. 678 (6th Cir. 1911). See also Rugo, Inc. v. Henson, 148 Conn. 430 , 171 A.2d 409 (1961); Fetters v. … As was stated by an Arizona court in Brown v.

Sigma Corporation v. Island Industries, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 28, 2023

Brown v. City of Memphis, 440 F. Supp. 2d 868, 872 (W.D. Tenn. 2006). … Brown, 440 F. Supp. 2d at 872. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is therefore GRANTED. E.

Humana Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.

133 F. Supp. 3d 1068 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 25, 2015

Corp. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 208 F.3d 579, 581 (7th Cir.2000); Blue Cross & Blue Shield of N.J., Inc. v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 344 F.3d 211, 218 (2d Cir.2003)); see also U.S. Airways, Inc. v. … Page v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Supreme Staffing LLC, Better Placements Personnel LLC, and Inspire Hotel Staffing LLC

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 13, 2026

Fusion Elite All Stars v. Varsity Brands, LLC, 340 F.R.D. 255, 261 (W.D. Tenn. 2022) (quoting Mid Am. Sols. LLC v. Vantiv, Inc., No. 1:16–mc–2, 2016 WL 1611381, at *5 (S.D. … Zakora v. Chrisman, 44 F.4th 452, 479 (6th Cir. 2022) (citation modified).

Cole-Grice v. Nationstar Mortgage

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 27, 2022

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249 (1986); see also Bobo v. … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (“[A] court cannot create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.”

Benoist v. Titan Medical Manufacturing, LLC.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 29, 2021

See Miller v. Davis, 267 F. Supp. 3d 961, 996–97 (E.D. Ky. 2017), aff’d sub nom. Miller v. … See Fegley v.

Atkins v. CoreCivic, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 17, 2022

Griffith V. Franklin Cty., Ky., 975 F.3d 554, 582-83 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Winkler v. … Ford v. Cty. of Grand Traverse, 535 F.3d 483, 497 (6th Cir. 2008) (quoting Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)).

Hamlet v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 7, 2025

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989) A pro se complaint must still “contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Barnett v. Luttrell, 414 Fed. … Rodney Dotson v. Fayette Cty. Sheriff Dep’t., 2024 WL 493924, at *3 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2024) (citing Johnes v. Union City, Tennessee, 296 F.3d 417, 421 (6th Cir. 2002); Matthews v.

Smith v. H & H Samuels Properties, LLC

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 6, 2021

See Brown v. City of Memphis, 440 F. Supp. 2d 868, 872 (W.D. Tenn. 2006). … Moore v.

Kemper v. City of Jackson, TN

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 24, 2025

Aug. 9, 2023); Brown v. United States, 545 F. App’x 435, 437–38 (6th Cir. 2013)). … Brown v. VHS of Mich. Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013). However, such a failure does not automatically entitle the movant to judgment.