Case law

Heiken v. Southwestern Energy

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2021

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Buck v. Stankovic

485 F. Supp. 2d 576 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 1, 2007

McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District, 187, Cahokia, Ill., 373 U.S. 668, 674 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963). … See Theck v.

Edison Light & Power Co. v. Driscoll

21 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1937

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners (D.C) 276 F. 979, 984 . … In DesMoines Gas Co. v.

Bender v. Norfolk Southern Corp.

31 F. Supp. 3d 659 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 2014

See Walter v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 985 F.2d 1232, 1238 (3d Cir.1993) (citing Patzig v. O’Neil, 577 F.2d 841, 846 (3d Cir.1978)). B. … While business necessity focuses on the pertinent qualification standard and assesses whether it can be justified by an *670 across-the-board requirement pertaining to all employees, direct threat focuses on the individual

708-710 MARKET ST, LLC v. BOROUGH OF BERWICK and NICOLL OLIVER

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2025

Following the landmark decisions of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly3 and Ashcroft v. … See Bruzga v. County of Boulder by and through Board of County Commissioners, 795 F. App’x 599, 603 (10th Cir. 2020); Kessler v. City of Key West, No. 21- 11069, 2022 WL 590892, at *9-10 (11th Cir. 2022).

Emmanuel

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2026

Petitioner has appealed that decision the Board of Immigration Appeals. (Doc. 6-9, Resp. Ex. 8). He is not subject to an administratively final order of removal. … See Ceus, 2026 WL 907587 at *3 (balancing Mathews v.

Ankney v. Paradise Township

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 (1997).

Pell v. Weinstein

759 F. Supp. 1107 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1991

V. … Browning-Ferris Industries, 590 F.Supp. 1528, 1542-42 (W.D.Pa.1984) (a corporation and its agents are not capable of conspiracy together because they are legally the same person.)

Muldoon

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 2026

MEMORANDUM Before the Court is the motion for leave to file an amicus brief filed by Defendants Penn State Health, the Board of Directors of Penn State Health, and the Penn State … Liberty Res., Inc. v. Philadelphia Hous. Auth., 395 F. Supp. 2d 206, 209 (E.D. Pa. 2005) (citing Sciotto v. Marple Newtown Sch. Dist., 70 F. Supp. 2d 553, 555 (E.D. Pa. 1999)); see Dobson Mills Apartments, L.P. v.

United States v. Jansen

218 F. Supp. 2d 659 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 2002

United States v. Williams, 247 F.3d 353, 355 (2d Cir.2001); United States v. Fraser, 243 F.3d 473, 475 (8th Cir.2001); United States v. Wyss, 147 F.3d 631, 632 (7th Cir.1998); United States v. … .”); United States v. Brown, 3 F.3d 673 , 681 n. 8 (3d Cir.1993) (suggesting in dicta that prior instances of drug distribution may be admissible under Rule 404(b) to prove a subsequent intent to distribute drugs).

Betz v. Satteson

259 F. Supp. 3d 132 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 2017

Dist. v. … Renk v. City of Pittsburgh, 537 Pa. 68 , 641 A.2d 289 , 293 (1994) [citations omitted). . Id. (internal citation omitted), See also Bright v. Westmoreland Cty., 443 F.3d 276 , 287 (3d Cir. 2006); Brown v.

Reid-Douglas v. Deparlos

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2019

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986) (emphasis in original); Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1111 (3d Cir. 1990). … Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1856 (2016); see Nyhuis v.

Quarles v. PALAKOVICH

736 F. Supp. 2d 941 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2010

Beers-Capitol v. Whetzel, 256 F.3d 120, 125 (3d Cir.2001). Beers-Capitol v. … Chinchello v. Fenton, 805 F.2d 126, 133 (3d Cir.1986). As the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit observed in Brown v.

Massaquoi v. Oddo

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 2023

Mollett v. Leicth, 511 F. App'x 172 (3d Cir. 2013); Carroll v. Prothonotary, No. 08-1683, 2008 WL 5429622, at *2 (W.D. Pa. … s/ Karoline Mehalchick KAROLINE MEHALCHICK Chief United States Magistrate Judge September 9, 2022, to the Board

Urrutia v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 2020

Merlini v. Gallitzin 5 See Guidotti v. … Feeser, Inc v.

Ficca v. Astrue

901 F. Supp. 2d 533 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2012

Id.; Mason v. Shalala, 994 F.2d 1058, 1064 (3d Cir.1993); Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir.1988). Factual findings which are supported by substantial evidence must be upheld. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Fargnoli v. … Smith v. Califano, 637 F.2d 968, 970 (3d Cir.1981); Dobrowolsky v. Califano, 606 F.2d 403, 407 (3d Cir.1979).

Ernst v. Union County Conservation District

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2024

Diaz v. … V.

Hoffman

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2026

See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Higgs v. Att’y Gen., 655 F.3d 333, 339 (3d. Cir. 2011). … Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir. 2005) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1118 (3d Cir. 1989)).

Hoffman

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2026

See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Higgs v. Att’y Gen., 655 F.3d 333, 339 (3d. Cir. 2011). … Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir. 2005) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1118 (3d Cir. 1989)). Nothing alleged in the second amended complaint triggers liability under Carter.

BGN Development Corporation v. Moosic Borough

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2024

filed this lawsuit on September 7, 2023, against Defendants Moosic Borough (“the Borough”), Moosic Borough Council (“the Council”), Moosic Borough Planning Commission (“the Commission”), Moosic Borough Zoning Board … of Adjustments (“the Board”) (collectively, “Moosic Defendants”), Vesper Northeast LP (“Vesper Northeast”), Vesper Management, Vesper Management, LLC, Vesper Property Group, Ltd., (collectively, “Vesper Defendants