Case law

McConnell v. Canadian Pacific Realty Co.

280 F.R.D. 188 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2011

See, e.g., Gregory v. Melrose Group, LLC, No. Civ. A. 03-2414, 2003 WL 22928805 , at *3-4 (E.D.La. Dec. 8, 2003); Access Now, Inc. v. South Florida Stadium Corp., 161 F.Supp.2d 1357 (S.D.Fla.2001); Brown v. … See Frame v.

McCain v. Schwab

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 2021

See, Jones v. Brown, 461 F.3d 353, 358-359 (3d Cir. 2006). McCain’s claim against Reeher was therefore dismissed with prejudice. … Oliver v. Wetzel, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 18837, at *13 (3d Cir. June 24, 2021) (citing Booth v. Churner, 206 F.3d 289, 292, n.2 (3d Cir. 2000) (outlining process in detail)); Brown v. Sprenkle, 827 F.

Kloch v. Smith

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2019

See Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155 (3d Cir. 1982); Zicarelli v. Gray, 543 F.2d 466 (3d Cir. 1976). Both the legal theory and the facts on which a federal claim rests must have been presented to the state courts. … Picard, 404 U.S. at 277; Brown, 669 F.2d at 158–61.

BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Shepherd

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2022

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

United States v. Kistler

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 2023

Local Rule 72.3; Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). … EEOC v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 99-100 (3d Cir. 2017). The de novo standard applies only to objections which are specific. Goney v. Clark, 749 F.2d 5, 6-7 (3d Cir. 1984).

Tolentino v. Xue

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 2019

Alpizar-Fallas v. Favero, 908 F.3d 910, 914 (3d Cir. 2018). … Brown v. Mace-Liebson, No. 18- 2205, 2019 WL 2950015, at *3 (3d Cir. July 9, 2019) (quoting Spruill v. Gillis, 372 F.3d 218, 236 (3d Cir. 2004)).

Cooper v. Ransom

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2023

Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587-89 (1986). 26 Daniels v. Sch. … Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 85 (2006). 31 Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 218 (2007); see also Woodford, 548 U.S. at 90-91. 32 See Booth v.

Brockway v. Shepherd

942 F. Supp. 1012 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1996

Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. 224, 228-229 , 112 S.Ct. 534, 536-537 , 116 L.Ed.2d 589 (1991). See also Illinois v. … Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, 410 U.S. 667 , 93 S.Ct. 1197 , 35 L.Ed.2d 618 (1973) (word, combined with “mother,” in headline of student newspaper not obscene); Cohen v.

Fidelity National Title Insurance Corporation v. CRH Americas

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Roland

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 2025

Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir. 2000). 16 Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974); see Nami v. … v. White Consol. Indus., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993)). 19 Connelly v. Lane Const.

Bolduc

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 2026

Inst., Walpole v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985). In other words, “[t]his standard is met if there was some evidence from which the conclusion of the [disciplinary board] could be deduced[.]” See id. … See Denny v.

Perlstein v. United States

57 F. Supp. 123 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1944

On September 26, 1942, Petitioner visited George Lindsey on board another ship in the harbor at Massawa before leaving, and it was at this time that the crimes of which he was later convicted were alleged to have taken place … In Hammond v.

Locke v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021

or even being prepared by the D.O.C. to see the Parole Board. … See Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 81-82 (2005). It also applies to parole board decisions. See Williams v. Consovoy, 453 F.3d 173, 177 (3d Cir. 2006).

Nieves v. Griffits

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2025

Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)). … Rahman v. Gartley, No. CV 3:23-363, 2024 WL 555894, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2024) (citing United v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)). II.

Groff v. Southland Corp.

956 F. Supp. 560 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1997

Hershey v. Ninety-Five Associates, 413 Pa.Super. 158, 161 , 604 A.2d 1068, 1069 (1992) (brackets added) (quoting Brooks v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 10 Pa.Commw. 247, 309 A.2d 842 (1973); McBride v.

Payne v. Wyatt

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2023

Brown v. Lowe, No. 15-CV-02373, 2016 WL 4429956, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2016), aff'd sub nom. Brown v. Warden Pike Cty. Corr. Facility, 693 F. App'x 176 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Reid v. … See Brown, 2016 WL 4429956, at *1; Hudson, 468 U.S. at 517. The complaint does not allege any other constitutional violations other than the ones addressed in this order.

Evanitus v. Saul

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2021

In Denicola v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 2021 WL 735853 (M.D. Pa. … See also Brown v. Saul, 2020 WL 6566221, at *4 (W.D. Pa.

Wright v. Gelb

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 2020

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing U.S. v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Dagne v. Lowe

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2023

See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3); Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490 (1989). … See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 699 (2001); Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). lll. Discussion Dagne contends that his continued immigration detention violates due process. (Doc. 1).

Fairley v. Ferronti

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 2025

See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Higgs v. Att’y Gen., 655 F.3d 333, 339 (3d. Cir. 2011). … Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir. 2005) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1118 (3d Cir. 1989)).