Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.94s
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2023
BROWN, : : CIVIL ACTION v. … See Brown v. Mercadante, 687 F. App’x 220, 223–24 (3d Cir. 2017).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2023
v. … Brown v. Phillips, No. CV 16-3887, 2020 WL 6158230, at *3-*4 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2020), aff’d sub nom. Brown v. Moore, No. 20-3600, 2022 WL 1772992 (3d Cir. June 1, 2022); Brown v. Phillips, No.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2023
Castleberry v. STI Group, 863 F.3d 259, 263 (3d Cir. 2017) (quotation marks omitted). Because Brown is proceeding pro se, the Court liberally construes the allegations in his Complaint. Higgs v. … Partridge v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 9, 2023
As Brown is proceeding pro se, the Court construes his allegations liberally. Vogt v. Wetzel, 8 F.4th 182, 185 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Mala v. … Brown also fails to allege that these specific Defendants had actual December 21, 2022); see also Commonwealth v. Brown, CP-06-CR-0002299-2022 (C.P.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2023
See Weber v. … .”); Baker v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2023
See id.; Teamsters Local 177, 966 F.3d at 251-52; PG Publ’g, Inc. v. … LLC v. Commc’ns Workers of Am., 216 F. Supp. 3d 530, 531, 534 (E.D. Pa. 2016).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 2023
See Brown v. Berks Cnty. Jail, No. 23-0780, 2023 WL 3324676, at *7 (E.D. Pa. May 9, 2023). … As Brown is proceeding pro se, the Court construes his allegations liberally. Vogt v. Wetzel, 8 F.4th 182, 185 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Mala v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2023
Early in the SAC, Brown asserts that Defendants commenced a case against him at CP-51- CR-0006768-2022. (SAC at 2.) The publicly available docket in Commonwealth v. Brown, CP- 51-CR-6768-2022 (C.P. … Accordingly, Brown’s 1983 claims against Yellen must be dismissed. As to Brown’s claims against the United States, they are barred by sovereign immunity. See Mierzwa v. United States, 282 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 2023
Brown’s willfulness in submitting the forged chiropractic care receipt summary. Our facts our distinguishable from those in Simmons v. Gilmore, where Mr. … As Chief Judge Brann explained in Stafford v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 2022
See, e.g., Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147 (2007). … In Gonzalez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2023
See id.; Teamsters Local 177, 966 F.3d at 251-52; PG Publ’g, Inc. v. … LLC v. Commc’ns Workers of Am., 216 F. Supp. 3d 530, 531, 534 (E.D. Pa. 2016).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 2023
Paladino v. Newsome, 885 F.3d 203, 211 (3d Cir. 2018). … Brown v. Phillips, No. CV 16-3887, 2020 WL 6158230, at *3-*4 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2020), aff’d sub nom. Brown v. Moore, No. 20-3600, 2022 WL 1772992 (3d Cir. June 1, 2022); Brown v. Phillips, No.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLee v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
467 F. Supp. 1043 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1979
Scott v. Plante, 532 F.2d 939 (3d Cir. 1976). The actions of the Parole Board are subject to certain due process constraints. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). … Certainly in Morrissey v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2022
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NASIR BROWN : … Sleets v. Pennsylvania, No. CV 16-930, 2017 WL 8683557, at *5 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 21, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, No. CV 16-930, 2018 WL 1570814 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2018) (quoting Moore v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2022
BROWN, : Petitioner, : v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-CV-3068 JOHN KERESTES, et al., Respondents. … Brown’s Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (ECF No. 53), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to reopen this case for purposes of considering the Motion. 2.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2022
[the test in] Strickland [v. … In Gonzalez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. Brown
6 F. Supp. 582 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1933
In Ithaca Trust Company v. United States, 279 U. S. 151 , 49 S. Ct. 291 , 73 L. … These considerations make plain the necessity of adhering closely to the policy of Humes v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 2022
Thomas v. … Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987); see also Fed R. Civ.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 2022
KENNETH BROWN, : Petitioner, : : v … No Certificate of Appealability shall issue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) because no reasonable jurists would disagree with this Court’s procedural rulings or its disposition of Brown's claims. See Slack v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 25, 2022
Brown boarded an overnight Greyhound bus from New York to Pittsburgh. (Doc. No. 32 at 5.) Mr. White drove the bus for the entirety of the trip, including at the time of the accident. (Doc. No. 32-2 ¶ 8.) Ms. … Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48 (1986).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna